Experimental and Numerical Studies on Thick Rubber Bearings under Uniaxial and Offset Tensile Loading
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 150, Issue 7
Abstract
Thick rubber bearings (TRBs) have been proven to be effective in mitigating horizontal shaking induced by earthquakes as well as railway-induced vertical vibration. During earthquake excitations, TRBs might be subjected to tension, which should be carefully assessed during design. This paper presents experimental and numerical studies on the behavior of TRBs under tensile loading. Four full-scale thick natural rubber bearing (TNRB) and lead thick rubber bearing (LTRB) specimens were designed and tested under tension, with and without lateral offset. The test results showed that increasing the applied lateral offset decreased the tensile stress and stiffness of the TNRBs, while the LTRBs did not exhibit any reduction. In addition, the test results were compared with design specifications in current codes for conventional rubber bearings. Finally, finite element (FE) models of TRBs were built and validated against the results of uniaxial and offset tensile experiments, and the cavitation of rubber was modeled via a two-phase model. To further estimate the damage due to previous tensile loading, damage variables under cyclic tensile loading were also taken into account. The experimental and numerical results showed that the lead core only slightly increased the initial tensile stiffness of the bearing under uniaxial testing, while it had a significant influence on the tensile properties of the LTRBs under offset displacement.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (Grant No. 52025083) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51878502). The authors also thank the China Scholarship Council for the financial support received during a visiting study at ETH Zürich (No. 202106260155).
References
Aiken, I. D., J. M. Kelly, and F. F. Tajirian. 1989. Mechanics of low shape factor elastomeric seismic isolation bearings. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
ASCE. 2022. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-22. Reston, VA: ASCE.
CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation). 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation). 2009. Anti-seismic devices. EN 15129. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chen, P., B. Wang, Z. Zhang, T. Li, and K. Dai. 2023. “A generalized model of lead rubber bearing considering large strain stiffening and degradation.” Eng. Struct. 275 (Jan): 115264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115264.
Code of China. 2021. Standard for seismic isolation design of building. GB/T 51408-2021. Beijing: China Planning Press.
Constantinou, M. C., A. S. Whittaker, Y. Kalpakidis, D. M. Fenz, and G. P. Warn. 2007. “Performance of seismic isolation hardware under service and seismic loading.”. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Reaserch.
Dassault Systèmes. 2014. Computer program ABAQUS/CAE version 6.14. Providence, RI: Dassault Systèmes.
Dorfmann, A., and S. L. Burtscher. 2000a. “Aspects of cavitation damage in seismic bearings.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (5): 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:5(573).
Dorfmann, A., and S. L. Burtscher. 2000b. “Experimental and computational aspects of cavitation in natural rubber.” Plast. Rubber Compos. 29 (2): 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1179/146580100101540815.
Doudoumis, I., F. Gravalas, and N. Doudoumis. 2005. “Analytical modeling of elastomeric lead-rubber bearings with the use of finite element micromodels.” In Proc., 5th GRACM Int. Congress on Computational Mechanics, 143. Nicosia, Cyprus: Kantzilaris Publications.
Fukasawa, T., S. Okamura, T. Yamamoto, N. Kawasaki, T. Somaki, Y. Sakurai, and N. Masaki. 2015. “Development on rubber bearings for sodium-cooled fast reactor: Part 2—Fundamental characteristics of half-scale rubber bearings based on static test.” In Proc., ASME 2015 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conf., V008T08A040. New York: ASME.
Gauron, O., A. Saidou, A. Busson, G. H. Siqueira, and P. Paultre. 2018. “Experimental determination of the lateral stability and shear failure limit states of bridge rubber bearings.” Eng. Struct. 174 (Mar): 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.039.
Gent, A., and D. Tompkins. 1969. “Nucleation and growth of gas bubbles in elastomers.” J. Appl. Phys. 40 (6): 2520–2525. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1658026.
Holzapfel, G. A., T. C. Gasser, and R. W. Ogden. 2000. “A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models.” J. Elast. 61 (1): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010835316564.
ISO. 2017. Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic–Determination of tensile stress-strain properties. ISO 37: 2017. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2018a. Elastomeric seismic-protection isolators—Part 1: Test methods. ISO 22762-1. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2018b. Elastomeric seismic-protection isolators—Part 3: Applications for buildings—Specifications. ISO 22762-3. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2019. Elastomeric seismic-protection isolators–Part 4: Guidance on the application of ISO 22762-3. ISO 22762-4. Geneva: ISO.
Iwabe, N., M. Takayama, N. Kani, and A. Wada. 2000. “Experimental study on the effect of tension for rubber bearings.” In Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Christchurch, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
JEA (Japan Electric Association). 2013. Technical guidelines on seismic base isolated system for structural safety and design of nuclear power plant. JEAG 4614-2013. Japan: JEA.
Kelly, J. M. 2003. “Tension buckling in multilayer elastomeric bearings.” J. Eng. Mech. 129 (12): 1363–1368. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:12(1363).
Kelly, J. M., and D. Konstantinidis. 2011. Mechanics of rubber bearings for seismic and vibration isolation. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Kelly, J. M., and M. R. Marsico. 2013. “Tension buckling in rubber bearings affected by cavitation.” Eng. struct. 56 (Mar): 656–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.051.
Kosuke I., S. Kensuke, and M. Shin. 2018. “Study on influence of stress softening of rubber material due to damage on earthquake response.” [In Japanese.] Trans. JSME 84 (Jun): 857. https://doi.org/10.1299/transjsme.17-00359.
Kumar, M., A. S. Whittaker, and M. C. Constantinou. 2014. “An advanced numerical model of elastomeric seismic isolation bearings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (13): 1955–1974. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2431.
Kumar, M., A. S. Whittaker, and M. C. Constantinou. 2015. “Experimental investigation of cavitation in elastomeric seismic isolation bearings.” Eng. Struct. 101 (Oct): 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.014.
Li, Y., Y. Ma, G. Zhao, and F. Zhou. 2020. “Experimental study on the effect of alternating ageing and sea corrosion on laminated natural rubber bearing’s tension-shear property.” J. Rubber Res. 23 (3): 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-020-00045-9.
Mano, T., and I. Mangerig. 2015. “Tensile load-carrying behaviour of elastomeric bearings.” Steel Constr. 8 (1): 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/stco.201510009.
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. 2018. Rubber isolation bearings for buildings. JG/T 118. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China.
Mori, T., M. Nakamura, N. Murota, H. Kitamura, and T. Sato. 2015. “Evaluation of tensile characteristics of rubber bearings to design seismically isolated structure by design limit value of tensile strain.” [In Japanese.] J. Struct. Constr. Eng. 80(718): 2021–2031. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.80.2021.
Mullins, L. 1969. “Softening of rubber by deformation.” Rubber Chem. Technol. 42 (1): 339–362. https://doi.org/10.5254/1.3539210.
Naeim, F., and J. M. Kelly. 1999. Design of seismic isolated structures: From theory to practice. New York: Wiley.
Nakamura, T., H. Okada, M. Seki, K. Sugiyama, and A. Teramura. 1991. “Development of base isolation system for earthquakes and micro-vibrations using laminated thick rubber bearings: Part 1—Characteristics tests for laminated thick rubber bearings.” [In Japanese.] Obayashi-Gumi Gijutsu Kenkyusho-Ho 42 (Feb): 15–22.
Ogden, R. W., and D. G. Roxburgh. 1999. “A pseudo–elastic model for the Mullins effect in filled rubber.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 455 (1988): 2861–2877. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1999.0431.
Okamura, S., Y. Kamishima, K. Negishi, Y. Sakamoto, S. Kitamura, and S. Kotake. 2011. “Seismic isolation design for JSFR.” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 48 (4): 688–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2011.9711750.
Pietra, D., and A. Park. 2017. “Behaviour and modelling of lead-rubber bearings subjected to tensile actions.” In Proc., 16th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Las Condes, Chile: Chilean Association of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering.
Ren, X., W. Lu, Y. Zhu, Y. He, and T. Li. 2020. “Compressive behavior of low shape factor lead-rubber bearings: Full-scale testing and numerical modeling.” Eng. Struct. 209 (Mar): 110030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110030.
Reyes, S. I., and J. L. Almazán. 2020. “A novel device for a vertical rocking isolation system with uplift allowed for industrial equipment and structures.” Eng. Struct. 214 (Jul): 110595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110595.
Reyes, S. I., M. F. Vassiliou, K. Agathos, and D. Konstantinidis. 2022. “Effects of two testing protocols on the material model parameter identification for rubber-like materials.” In Proc., 3rd European Conf. on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. Berlin: Springer.
Robinson, W. H. 1982. “Lead-rubber hysteretic bearings suitable for protecting structures during earthquakes.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 10 (4): 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290100408.
Shen, C., P. Tan, J. Cui, Y. Ma, and X. Huang. 2016. “Critical tension–Shear load of elastomeric seismic isolators: An experimental perspective.” Eng. Struct. 121 (Aug): 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.039.
Teramura, A., J. Yoshihara, M. Nakamura, R. Ishikawa, Y. Yasui, T. Suzuki, and H. Okada. 1991. “Development of base isolation system for earthquakes and micro-vibrations using laminated thick rubber bearings: Part 3—Application to a medical facility building subjected to railway-induced vibration.” [In Japanese.] Obayashi-Gumi Gijutsu Kenkyusho-Ho 43 (Feb): 7–14.
Toups, E., R. Seewald, B. Schaaf, H. Holthusen, U. Reisgen, M. Feldmann, S. Reese, and J. Simon. 2020. “Modeling of hyperelastic material accounting for the Mullins effect by defining a new stiffness reduction variable.” Technische Mechanik-European J. Eng. Mech. 40 (1): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.24352/UB.OVGU-2020-016.
Warn, G. P., and A. S. Whittaker. 2006. A study of the coupled horizontal-vertical behavior of elastomeric and lead-rubber seismic isolation bearings. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State Univ. of New York at Buffalo.
Zhou, Y., K. Ma, P. Chen, D. Lu, and H. Wu. 2022a. “Investigations on train-induced vibration and vibration control of an over-track building using thick-layer rubber bearings.” Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 31 (1): e1898. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1898.
Zhou, Y., and Z. Zhang. 2022. “Experimental and analytical investigations on compressive behavior of thick rubber bearings for mitigating subway-induced vibration.” Eng. Struct. 270 (Mar): 114879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114879.
Zhou, Y., Z. Zhang, and M. F. Vassiliou. 2022b. “Investigation on vertical stiffness reduction of thick rubber bearings under lateral displacement.” Constr. Build. Mater. 360 (Jun): 129563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129563.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 150 • Issue 7 • July 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 16, 2023
Accepted: Feb 7, 2024
Published online: Apr 30, 2024
Published in print: Jul 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Sep 30, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.