Technical Papers
Apr 24, 2024

Weld-Quality Diagnosis of In-Service Natural Gas Pipelines Based on a Fusion Model

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 15, Issue 3

Abstract

Damage to pipeline welds during service can result in substantial human and economic losses. Hence, early and accurate quality diagnosis of in-service natural gas pipeline welds is of utmost importance. However, the current diagnostic methods are plagued by low accuracy and excessive resource consumption. Therefore, a fusion model for diagnosing the quality of in-service natural gas pipeline welds is constructed based on gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and random forest classifier (RFC). Initially, heterogeneous raw data sets undergo data cleaning and quality enhancement processes. Subsequently, the predictions from GBDT, KNN, and RFC are fused using voting as the fusion strategy. The processed data set is then utilized to train and test the fusion model (MIX). After verifying the reliability of the model through cross-validation, the performance of the model’s prediction results is assessed, and a comprehensive analysis of the model’s characteristics is conducted by combining theory and empirical evidence. By analyzing the experimental results, the fusion model performed better than the single model, with an accuracy rate of 96%. It can effectively diagnose the quality of natural gas pipeline welds in service, providing a new reference for existing diagnostic methods.

Practical Applications

The fusion modeling method proposed in this study can be applied to the diagnosis of welding quality of in-service natural gas pipelines in order to solve the problem of early quality diagnosis of natural gas pipelines and improve the diagnosis of welding quality. The method can effectively overcome the problem of small size and poor quality of engineering data sets. First, the original data set is cleaned and downscaled, and then the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) combined with edited nearest neighborhood (ENN) (i.e., SMOTEENN) is balanced to improve the quality of the data set. Then, the data set is predicted by three models, and the three predictions are fused using a voting fusion strategy to effectively improve the diagnostic ability of the models. Finally, the importance of the output features of the fused models is utilized for empirical and theoretical information mining. The experimental results show that the diagnostic accuracy of the method can reach 96% with high reliability and stability, which can provide technical support and theoretical basis for the diagnosis of the welding quality of in-service natural gas pipelines. Mining feature information can also provide more reference information for the pipeline welding construction stage, improve the initial welding quality, and reduce welding defects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions.

Acknowledgments

For the work described in this paper, the authors would like to express their gratitude to the support from the National Natural Science Foundation Youth Fund Project (No. 51904259) and the Research Innovation Foundation of Southwest Petroleum University (No. 2022KYCX051).

References

Ahmad, Z., and J. Zhang. 2005. “Combination of multiple neural networks using data fusion techniques for enhanced nonlinear process modelling.” Comput. Chem. Eng. 30 (Dec): 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2005.09.010.
Anand, V., S. Gupta, D. Koundal, and K. Singh. 2022. “Fusion of U-Net and CNN model for segmentation and classification of skin lesion from dermoscopy images.” Expert Syst. Appl. 213 (Mar): 119230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119230.
Breiman, L. 2001. “Random forests.” Mach. Learn. 45 (Oct): 532. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.
Brito, A. J., and A. T. de Almeida. 2009. “Multi-attribute risk assessment for risk ranking of natural gas pipelines.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94 (Mar): 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.02.014.
Chen, B., and X. L. Luo. 2021. “Incipient fault detection benefited from voting fusion strategy on analysis of process variation.” Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 215 (Mar): 104347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2021.104347.
Cover, T., and P. Hart. 1967. “Nearest neighbor pattern classification.” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 13 (1): 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964.
Dai, L., J. Guo, J. L. Wan, J. Wang, and X. Zan. 2022. “A reliability evaluation model of rolling bearings based on WKN-BiGRU and Wiener process.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 225 (Mar): 108646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108646.
Feng, J., D. Qin, Y. Liu, and Y. You. 2021. “Real-time estimation of road slope based on multiple models and multiple data fusion.” Measurement 181 (Aug): 109609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109609.
Friedman, J. H. 2002. “Stochastic gradient boosting.” Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 38 (4): 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2.
Guo, J., J. L. Wan, Y. Yang, L. Dai, A. Tang, B. Huang, F. Zhang, and H. Li. 2023b. “A deep feature learning method for remaining useful life prediction of drilling pumps.” Energy 282 (Mar): 128442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128442.
Guo, J., J. Wang, Z. Wang, Y. Gong, J. Qi, and G. Wang. 2023a. “A CNN-BiLSTM-Bootstrap integrated method for remaining useful life prediction of rolling bearings.” Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 39 (5): 1796–1813. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3314.
Jia, W., Z. Zong, and T. Lan. 2022. “Elastic impedance inversion incorporating fusion initial model and kernel Fisher discriminant analysis approach.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 220 (Mar): 111235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111235.
Kraidi, L., R. Shah, W. Matipa, and F. Borthwick. 2019. “Analyzing the critical risk factors associated with oil and gas pipeline projects in Iraq.” Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 24 (Feb): 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2018.10.010.
Kuncheva, L. I. 2002. “A theoretical study on six classifier fusion strategies.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24 (2): 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.982906.
Liang, X., W. Liang, and J. Xiong. 2020. “Intelligent diagnosis of natural gas pipeline defects using improved flower pollination algorithm and artificial neural network.” J. Cleaner Prod. 264 (Aug): 121655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121655.
Liang, X., W. Liang, L. Zhang, and X. Guo. 2019. “Risk assessment for long-distance gas pipelines in coal mine gobs based on structure entropy weight method and multi-step backward cloud transformation algorithm based on sampling with replacement.” J. Cleaner Prod. 227 (Aug): 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.133.
Lindh, D. V., and G. M. Peshak. 1969. Influence of weld defects on performance. Renton, WA: Boeing.
Ma, Y. W., J. L. Chen, W. H. Kuo, and Y. C. Chen. 2022. “AI@nti-Malware: An intelligent framework for defending against malware attacks.” J. Inf. Secur. Appl. 65 (Mar): 103092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2021.103092.
NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). 2020. “New NTSB leaders bring data-driven approach to improving safety.” Accessed December 30, 2020. https://www.ntsb.gov/Pages/.
Pan, F., D. Tang, X. Guo, and S. Pan. 2021. “Defect identification of pipeline ultrasonic inspection based on multi-feature fusion and multi-criteria feature evaluation.” Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell. 35 (11): 2150030. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218001421500300.
PHMSA (Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration). 2020. “About data & statistics.” Accessed June 5, 2022. http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline/library/data-stats/.
Roemer, M. J., G. J. Kacprzynski, and R. F. Orsagh. 2001. “Assessment of data and knowledge fusion strategies for prognostics and health management.” In Vol. 6 of Proc., 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conf. Proc. (Cat. No. 01TH8542), 2979–2988. New York: IEEE.
Sampath, S., K. L. Chaurasiya, P. Aryan, and B. Bhattacharya. 2021. “An innovative approach towards defect detection and localization in gas pipelines using integrated in-line inspection methods.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 90 (Jun): 103933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.103933.
Wan, Y., Y. Wang, Y. Yang, C. Liu, and Y. Dai. 2021. “Intelligent identification and classification methods of oil and gas pipeline defects by fluxgate magnetometry.” Harbin Gongcheng Daxue Xuebao 42 (9): 1321–1329. https://doi.org/10.11990/jheu.202005049.
Wang, J., L. Yu, S. Tian, W. Wu, and D. Zhang. 2022a. “AMFNet: An attention-guided generative adversarial network for multi-model image fusion.” Biomed Signal Process Control 78 (Sep): 103990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103990.
Wang, L., Z. Mao, H. Xuan, T. Ma, C. Hu, J. Chen, and X. You. 2022b. “Status diagnosis and feature tracing of the natural gas pipeline weld based on improved random forest model.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 200 (Dec): 104821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104821.
Wang, L., Y. Tang, T. Ma, J. Zhong, Z. Li, Y. Zhang, and H. Xuan. 2020. “Stress concentration analysis of butt welds with variable wall thickness of spanning pipelines caused by additional loads.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 182 (May): 104075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104075.
Wang, Z. Y., J. Guo, J. Wang, Y. Yang, L. Dai, C. G. Huang, and J. L. Wan. 2023. “A deep learning based health indicator construction and fault prognosis with uncertainty quantification for rolling bearings.” Meas. Sci. Technol. 34 (10): 105105. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ace072.
Wu, L., W. Liang, and D. Sha. 2022. “Cross-domain feature selection and diagnosis of oil and gas pipeline defects based on transfer learning.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 143 (Jan): 106876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106876.
Wu, Q., X. Qin, K. Dong, A. Shi, and Z. Hu. 2023. “A learning-based crack defect detection and 3D localization framework for automated fluorescent magnetic particle inspection.” Expert Syst. Appl. 214 (Mar): 118966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118966.
Xu, T., Z. Zeng, X. Huang, J. Li, and H. Feng. 2021. “Pipeline leak detection based on variational mode decomposition and support vector machine using an interior spherical detector.” Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 153 (Sep): 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.07.024.
Xu, Z., M. Bashir, W. Zhang, Y. Yang, X. Wang, and C. Li. 2022. “An intelligent fault diagnosis for machine maintenance using weighted soft-voting rule based multi-attention module with multi-scale information fusion.” Inf. Fusion 86 (Oct): 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.06.005.
Yao, J., W. Liang, and J. Xiong. 2022a. “Novel intelligent diagnosis method of oil and gas pipeline defects with transfer deep learning and feature fusion.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 200 (Dec): 104781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104781.
Yao, X. Y., G. Chen, L. Hu, and M. Pecht. 2022b. “A multi-model feature fusion model for lithium-ion battery state of health prediction.” J. Energy Storage 56 (Dec): 106051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.106051.
Zhang, C. M., and S. N. Peng. 2012. “Analysis of the market position of natural gas in China based on energy production and consumption elasticity.” Adv. Mater. Res. 343 (Jan): 212–215. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.343-344.212.
Zhang, Z., W. Huang, Y. Liao, Z. Song, J. Shi, X. Jiang, C. Shen, and Z. Zhu. 2022. “Bearing fault diagnosis via generalized logarithm sparse regularization.” Mech. Syst. Signal Process 167 (Mar): 108576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108576.
Zhao, Y. P., and Y. B. Chen. 2022. “Extreme learning machine based transfer learning for aero engine fault diagnosis.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 121 (Feb): 107311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.107311.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 15Issue 3August 2024

History

Received: Feb 23, 2023
Accepted: Jan 2, 2024
Published online: Apr 24, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Sep 24, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu 610500, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Graduate Student, School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu 610500, China. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu 610500, China. Email: [email protected]
Engineer, PipeChina Southwest Pipeline Company, 6 Yingbin Ave., Jinjuan St., Jinniu District, Chengdu 610213, China. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Student, School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu 610500, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share