Circular Economy Policies for Decarbonization of US Commercial Building Stocks: Data Integration and System Dynamics Coflow Modeling Approach
Publication: Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 40, Issue 2
Abstract
Despite the recognition of the built environment as a sector with high potential for reducing embodied emissions, there is a lack of national-level data on embodied carbon emissions attributed to the US commercial building stocks. Hence, there is a need to benchmark the current state of embodied emissions attributed to the commercial built environment and the impact of circular economy (CE) policies for their decarbonization to facilitate well-informed decision-making. This paper fills this knowledge gap through providing policy makers with a framework that estimates the current and future projections of embodied carbon emissions attributable to the US commercial building stocks and highlighting the decarbonization potential of multiple CE policies. To this end, the following multistep research methodology was adopted: (1) collecting and integrating relevant data; (2) conceptualizing and initializing a system dynamics (SD) model; (3) developing subsystems and coflow structures within the SD model using aggregated stock data from the National Energy Modeling System; (4) verifying and testing the developed SD model; and finally (5) suggesting policies and conducting scenario analysis using CE policy precedents. Findings reveal that in the baseline scenario, cumulative emissions are projected to reach by 2050. As for the scenario analysis, the unit size reduction policy emerged as the most impactful single policy, achieving a remarkable 38.8% decarbonization. Whereas the comprehensive CE policy that optimizes floorspace demand and the carbon intensity of materials, exhibited a 52% decarbonization potential by midcentury. As such, this study contributes to the body of knowledge by benchmarking emissions projections, providing insights regarding CE decarbonization strategies, their associated primary stakeholders and implementation pathways. Ultimately, by embracing a holistic approach toward CE policies and harnessing accurate and standardized data on building embodied emissions, stakeholders can effectively attain decarbonization goals and promote a sustainable built environment.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by the Missouri University of Science and Technology’s Kummer Institute for Student Success, Research and Economic Development through the Kummer Innovation and Entrepreneurship Doctoral Fellowship.
References
Abotaleb, I. S., and I. H. El-adaway. 2018. “First attempt toward a holistic understanding of the interdependent rippled impacts associated with out-of-sequence work in construction projects: System dynamics modeling approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (9): 04018084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001539.
ARUP and Ellen McArthur Foundation. 2023. “Circular building toolkit.” Accessed November 17, 2022. https://ce-toolkit.dhub.arup.com/.
Benke, B., M. Lewis, S. Carlisle, M. Huang, and K. Simonen. 2022. “Developing an embodied carbon policy reduction calculator.” In Carbon leadership forum. Seattle: Univ. of Washington.
Berrill, P., E. J. Wilson, J. L. Reyna, A. D. Fontanini, and E. G. Hertwich. 2022. “Decarbonization pathways for the residential sector in the United States.” Nat. Clim. Change 12 (8): 712–718. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01429-y.
Blumberga, A., E. Cilinskis, A. Gravelsins, A. Svarckopfa, and D. Blumberga. 2018. “Analysis of regulatory instruments promoting building energy efficiency.” Energy Procedia 147 (Aug): 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.090.
Blumberga, A., G. Zogla, P. Davidsen, and E. Moxnes. 2011. “Residential energy efficiency policy in Latvia: A system dynamics approach.” In Proc., 29th Int. Conf. of the System Dynamics Society, 24–28. Littleton, MA: System Dynamics Society.
Bull, J., A. Gupta, D. Mumovic, and J. Kimpian. 2014. “Life cycle cost and carbon footprint of energy efficient refurbishments to 20th century UK school buildings.” Int. J. Sustainable Built Environ. 3 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.07.002.
C40 Cities. 2021. C40 cities clean construction declaration. New York: C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group.
California Legislative Information. 2022. “Assembly Bill 2446. Embodied carbon emissions: Construction materials (2021–2022).” Accessed September 19, 2022. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2446.
Caputo, P., G. Costa, and S. Ferrari. 2013. “A supporting method for defining energy strategies in the building sector at urban scale.” Energy Policy 55 (Apr): 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.006.
CBRE. 2022. “Office conversions: A second chance for underutilized space.” Accessed March 10, 2023. https://www.cbre.com/insights/viewpoints/office-conversions-a-second-chance-for-underutilized-space.
Çetin, S., C. De Wolf, and N. Bocken. 2021. “Circular digital built environment: An emerging framework.” Sustainability 13 (11): 6348. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116348.
City and County of Denver. 2021. “Denver amendment proposal form for proposals to the 2019 Denver building code amendments and the 2021 international codes-2021 code.” Accessed May 15, 2023. https://www.denvergov.org/files/assets/public/community-planning-and-development/documents/ds/building-codes/code-adoption/amendment-proposals/ibc/ibc_2205.3.pdf.
City of Portland. 2022. “Notice of new requirements for concrete.” Accessed May 15, 2023. https://www.portland.gov/omf/brfs/procurement/sustainable-procurement-program/documents/city-portland-concrete-embodied/download.
City of Portland. 2023. “Portland City Ordinance No. 187876—Code 17.106 deconstruction of buildings Law.” Accessed May 15, 2023. https://www.portland.gov/code/17/106.
Congress.gov. 2022. “H.R. 5376—117th Congress (2021–2022): Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.” Accessed May 1, 2023. https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5376.
County of Marin. 2022. “Section II: Marin County Code Chapter 19.07 added to Marin County Code Title 10.” Accessed May 15, 2023. https://www.marincounty.org/-/media/files/departments/cd/planning/sustainability/low-carbon-concrete/12172019-update/low-carbon-concrete-code.pdf?la=en.
Deetman, S., S. Marinova, E. van der Voet, D. P. van Vuuren, O. Edelenbosch, and R. Heijungs. 2020. “Modelling global material stocks and flows for residential and service sector buildings towards 2050.” J. Cleaner Prod. 245 (Feb): 118658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118658.
Dong, J., Y. Schwartz, A. Mavrogianni, I. Korolija, and D. Mumovic. 2023. “A review of approaches and applications in building stock energy and indoor environment modelling.” Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 44 (3): 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/01436244231163084.
EHDD Architects. 2023. “Early phase integrated carbon assessment (EPIC) documentation.” Public Beta v2.0.1. Accessed May 6, 2023. https://www.epic-docs.dev/epic-web-application/readme.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. n.d. “Reimagining our buildings and spaces for a circular economy.” Accessed April 18, 2022. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/built-environment/overview.
Energy Information Administration. 2018. Commercial buildings energy consumption survey (CBECS). Washington, DC: US Energy Information Administration.
Energy Information Administration. 2022a. “Commercial demand module of the national energy modeling system: Model documentation.” Accessed December 18, 2022. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/nems/documentation/commercial/pdf/CDM_2022.pdf.
Energy Information Administration. 2022b. “NEMS macroeconomic activity module documentation report.” Accessed December 18, 2022. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/nems/documentation/macroeconomic/pdf/MAM_2022.pdf.
Energy Information Administration. 2023a. “Annual energy outlook 2023.” Accessed May 1, 2023. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/tables_ref.php.
Energy Information Administration. 2023b. “Annual energy outlook retrospective review.” Accessed May 1, 2023. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/retrospective/.
Energy Information Administration. 2023c. “The national energy modeling system (NEMS): An overview.” Accessed May 1, 2023. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/nems/overview/pdf/0581(2023).pdf.
Famuyibo, A. A., A. Duffy, and P. Strachan. 2013. “Achieving a holistic view of the life cycle performance of existing dwellings.” Build. Environ. 70 (Dec): 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.016.
Fazeli, R., and B. Davidsdottir. 2017. “Energy performance of dwelling stock in Iceland: System dynamics approach.” J. Cleaner Prod. 167 (Nov): 1345–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.009.
FEMA. 2010. “Debris estimating field guide.” Accessed September 1, 2020. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/fema_329_debris-estimating_field-guide_9-1-2010.pdf.
Gardner, H. M., V. Hasik, A. Banawi, M. Olinzock, and M. M. Bilec. 2020. “Whole building life cycle assessment of a living building.” J. Archit. Eng. 26 (4): 04020039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000436.
Ghosh, T., G. Avery, A. Bhatt, T. Uekert, J. Walzberg, and A. Carpenter. 2023. “Towards a circular economy for PET bottle resin using a system dynamics inspired material flow model.” J. Cleaner Prod. 383 (Jan): 135208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135208.
Guzzo, D., V. P. Rodrigues, and J. Mascarenhas. 2021. “A systems representation of the circular economy: Transition scenarios in the electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) industry.” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 163 (Feb): 120414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120414.
Haase, I., and H. Torio. 2021. “The impact of the climate action programme 2030 and federal state measures on the uptake of renewable heating systems in Lower Saxony’s building stock.” Energies 14 (9): 2533. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092533.
Hawkins, D., and D. Mumovic. 2017. “Evaluation of life cycle carbon impacts for higher education building redevelopment: A multiple case study approach.” Energy Build. 150 (Sep): 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.05.058.
Heeren, N., M. Jakob, G. Martius, N. Gross, and H. Wallbaum. 2013. “A component based bottom-up building stock model for comprehensive environmental impact assessment and target control.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 20 (Apr): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.064.
Kavgic, M., A. Mavrogianni, D. Mumovic, A. Summerfield, Z. Stevanovic, and M. Djurovic-Petrovic. 2010. “A review of bottom-up building stock models for energy consumption in the residential sector.” Build. Environ. 45 (7): 1683–1697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.021.
Kazancoglu, Y., E. Ekinci, S. K. Mangla, M. D. Sezer, and Y. Kayikci. 2021. “Performance evaluation of reverse logistics in food supply chains in a circular economy using system dynamics.” Bus. Strategy Environ. 30 (1): 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2610.
Kim, S., H. Kim, J. Lee, T. Hong, and K. Jeong. 2023. “An integrated assessment framework of economic, environmental, and human health impacts using scan-to-BIM and life-cycle assessment in existing buildings.” J. Manage. Eng. 39 (5): 04023034. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5600.
Kluyver, T., et al. 2016. “Jupyter Notebooks—A publishing format for reproducible computational workflows.” In Positioning and power in academic publishing: Players, agents and agendas, edited by F. Loizides and B. Schmidt, 87. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press. https://www.doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-87.
Levis, J. W. 2008. A life-cycle analysis of alternatives for the management of waste hot-mix asphalt, commercial food waste, and construction and demolition waste. Raleigh, NC: NC State University Libraries.
Minunno, R., T. O’Grady, G. M. Morrison, and R. L. Gruner. 2021. “Investigating the embodied energy and carbon of buildings: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of life cycle assessments.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 143 (Jun): 110935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110935.
Monteiro, P. J., S. A. Miller, and A. Horvath. 2017. “Towards sustainable concrete.” Nat. Mater. 16 (7): 698–699. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4930.
Müller, M. O., and S. Ulli-Beer. 2010. “Policy analysis for the transformation of Switzerland’s stock of buildings. A small model approach.” In Proc., 28th System Dynamics Conf. Seoul: System Dynamics Society.
National Park Service. 2022. “Historic preservation tax incentives.” Accessed December 10, 2022. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/taxincentives/about.htm.
Ness, D. A. 2023. “Technological efficiency limitations to climate mitigation: why sufficiency is necessary.” Build. Cities 4 (1): 139–157. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.297.
New York City. 2022. “Executive Order No. 23.” Accessed May 15, 2023. https://www.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/023-002/executive-order-23.
Nik, V. M., E. Mata, A. S. Kalagasidis, and J. L. Scartezzini. 2016. “Effective and robust energy retrofitting measures for future climatic conditions—Reduced heating demand of Swedish households.” Energy Build. 121 (Jun): 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.03.044.
Ojha, R., and A. Agarwal. 2023. “Implications of circular production and consumption of electric vehicle batteries on resource sustainability: A system dynamics perspective.” Environ. Dev. Sustainability 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03279-w.
Onat, N. C., G. Egilmez, and O. Tatari. 2014. “Towards greening the US residential building stock: A system dynamics approach.” Build. Environ. 78 (Aug): 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.030.
Parker, A., H. Horsey, M. Dahlhausen, M. Praprost, C. CaraDonna, A. LeBar, and L. Klun. 2023. ComStock reference documentation: Version 1 (No. NREL/TP-5500-83819). Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Lab.
Pauliuk, S., K. Sjöstrand, and D. B. Müller. 2013. “Transforming the Norwegian dwelling stock to reach the 2 degrees Celsius climate target: Combining material flow analysis and life cycle assessment techniques.” J. Ind. Ecol. 17 (4): 542–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00571.x.
Reinhart, C. F., and C. C. Davila. 2016. “Urban building energy modeling—A review of a nascent field.” Build. Environ. 97 (Feb): 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.12.001.
RMI (Rocky Mountain Institute). 2023. “Embodied carbon 101: Building materials.” Accessed April 27, 2023. https://rmi.org/embodied-carbon-101/.
Schiller, G., K. Gruhler, and R. Ortlepp. 2017. “Continuous material flow analysis approach for bulk nonmetallic mineral building materials applied to the German building sector.” J. Ind. Ecol. 21 (3): 673–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12595.
Schmidt, S., T. Jäger, and U. Karl. 2012. “The transition of the residential heat market in Germany: A system dynamics approach.” In Proc., 30th Int. Conf. of the System Dynamics Society, 22–26. Littleton, MA: System Dynamics Society.
SF Environment Department. 2023. San Francisco Ordinance No. 144-21. San Francisco: San Francisco Environment Department.
Sterman, J. D. 2000. “Business dynamics.” In System thinking and modelling for a complex world. New York: McGraw Hill.
Tuominen, P., R. Holopainen, L. Eskola, J. Jokisalo, and M. Airaksinen. 2014. “Calculation method and tool for assessing energy consumption in the building stock.” Build. Environ. 75 (May): 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.02.001.
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2022. 2022 global status report for buildings and construction. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP.
USEPA. 2020. Advancing sustainable materials management: 2018 fact sheet. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USGBC (US Green Building Council). 2023. “LEED credit library.” In USGBC homepage. Washington, DC: USGBC.
USGSA (US General Services Administration). 2021. GSA green building advisory committee advice letter: Policy recommendations for procurement of low embodied energy and carbon materials by federal agencies. Washington, DC: USGSA.
USGSA (US General Services Administration). 2022. GSA green building advisory committee advice letter from the federal building decarbonization task group. Washington, DC: USGSA.
Van Rossum, G., and F. L. Drake. 1995. Vol. 111 of Python reference manual, 1–52. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica.
Wang, Q., R. Laurenti, and S. Holmberg. 2015. “A novel hybrid methodology to evaluate sustainable retrofitting in existing Swedish residential buildings.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 16 (Aug): 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.02.002.
White House. 2021. Executive order on catalyzing clean energy industries and jobs through federal sustainability. Washington, DC: White House.
Zhong, X., M. Hu, S. Deetman, B. Steubing, H. X. Lin, G. A. Hernandez, C. Harpprecht, C. Zhang, A. Tukker, and P. Behrens. 2021. “Global greenhouse gas emissions from residential and commercial building materials and mitigation strategies to 2060.” Nat. Commun. 12 (1): 6126. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26212-z.
Zhou, W., A. Moncaster, D. M. Reiner, and P. Guthrie. 2020. “Developing a generic system dynamics model for building stock transformation towards energy efficiency and low-carbon development.” Energy Build. 224 (Oct): 110246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110246.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 40 • Issue 2 • March 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 24, 2023
Accepted: Oct 20, 2023
Published online: Jan 10, 2024
Published in print: Mar 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jun 10, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Air pollution
- Buildings
- Business management
- Commercial buildings
- Construction engineering
- Construction management
- Continuum mechanics
- Data analysis
- Dynamics (solid mechanics)
- Emissions
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering mechanics
- Environmental engineering
- Facilities (by type)
- Methodology (by type)
- Models (by type)
- Pollution
- Practice and Profession
- Project management
- Research methods (by type)
- Solid mechanics
- Structural dynamics
- Structural engineering
- Structural models
- Structures (by type)
- Sustainable development
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Radwa Eissa, Islam H. El-adaway, Accelerating the Circular Economy Transition: A Construction Value Chain-Structured Portfolio of Strategies and Implementation Insights, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-14550, 150, 8, (2024).