Abstract

Myriad palpable benefits are associated with building information modeling (BIM) usage in the construction industry, but its full integration has been impeded by the necessary culture change required to release its inherent latent potential. Therefore, fully comprehending and investigating cultural manifestations of BIM-enabled construction organizations is critical to drive such change. Yet curiously, research in this field is scant due to the phenomenon’s inherent complexity and subjective nature. Therefore, this study identifies and delineates underlying beliefs that are evident in BIM practices within a contractor construction organization by leveraging Schein’s three-layered organizational culture model as the theoretical framework to analyze and interpret the primary and secondary data sourced from a case study research design. A large-scale BIM-enabled contractor organization represented the case, and the organizational BIM environment constituted the unit of analysis. Data were collected through eight in-depth semistructured interviews, direct observations, and documentation. Underlying beliefs are identified, suggesting that the company uses a combination of autocratic and participative decision-making methods, prioritizing teamwork, cooperation, and groupism over individualistic and competitive orientations. Emergent findings also reveal that employees believe in the inherent goodness of human nature and the latent capacity of individuals to govern themselves, fostering trust and autonomy within the organization. Professional behavior and conduct take a pragmatic, risk-taking, and trial-and-error approach to derive truth and reality. The organization believes in dominating the external environment rather than being submissive and considers a balance between present and future the most appropriate unit of time. Accordingly, the study enables managers to understand the shared beliefs of the employees concerning BIM and make decisions accordingly to promote and augment a harmonious alignment between cultural aspects and BIM practices.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the University of South Australia’s financial support through the UniSA scholarship (USAIGR) for Ph.D. studies.

References

Alankarage, S., N. Chileshe, R. Rameezdeen, D. J. Edwards, and A. Samaraweera. 2023a. “Exploring BIM-triggered organisational and professional culture change: A systematic literature review.” Constr. Innovation 23 (1): 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-04-2021-0084.
Alankarage, S., N. Chileshe, and A. Samaraweera. 2022. “Organisational BIM maturity models and their applications: A systematic literature review.” Archit. Eng. Des. Manage. 2022 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2022.2068496.
Alankarage, S., N. Chileshe, A. Samaraweera, R. Rameezdeen, and D. J. Edwards. 2023b. “Guidelines for using a case study approach in construction culture research: Application to BIM-enabled organizations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 149 (9): 05023009. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13569.
Ayinla, K. O., and Z. Adamu. 2018. “Bridging the digital divide gap in BIM technology adoption.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 25 (10): 1398–1416. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2017-0091.
Bråthen, K. 2015. “Collaboration with BIM—Learning from the front runners in the Norwegian industry.” Procedia Econ. Finance 21 (Aug): 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00197-5.
Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2012. “Thematic analysis.” In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, 57–71. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004.
Che Ibrahim, C. K. I., N. A. Mohamad Sabri, S. Belayutham, and A. Mahamadu. 2019. “Exploring behavioural factors for information sharing in BIM projects in the Malaysian construction industry.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 9 (1): 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-02-2018-0042.
de Almeida, G., and L. C. B. M. de Brito. 2017. “Analysis of organizational culture in Brazilian building companies to evaluate changes required by BIM technology.” Bus. Manage. Dyn. 7 (4): 1–16.
Eisenhardt, K. M., and M. E. Graebner. 2007. “Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges.” Acad. Manage. J. 50 (1): 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888.
Fellows, R., and A. M. Liu. 2013. “Use and misuse of the concept of culture.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 31 (5): 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2013.794296.
Gajendran, T., G. Brewer, S. Gudergan, and S. Sankaran. 2014. “Deconstructing dynamic capabilities: The role of cognitive and organizational routines in the innovation process.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 32 (3): 246–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2013.845306.
Ghaffarianhoseini, A., J. Tookey, A. Ghaffarianhoseini, N. Naismith, S. Azhar, O. Efimova, and K. Raahemifar. 2017. “Building information modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 75 (Apr): 1046–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.083.
Hofstede, G., G. J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, G. H., and G. Hofstede. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. London: SAGE.
Homburg, C., and C. Pflesser. 2000. “A multiple-layer model of market-oriented organizational culture: Measurement issues and performance outcomes.” J. Market. Res. 37 (4): 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.4.449.18786.
Hosseini, M., S. Banihashemi, N. Chileshe, M. O. Namzadi, C. Udaeja, R. Rameezdeen, and T. McCuen. 2016. “BIM adoption within Australian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): An innovation diffusion model.” Constr. Econ. Build. 16 (3): 71–86. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v16i3.5159.
Husairi, A. H., M. N. Razali, and S. Eni. 2018. “Stakeholders’ expectations on building information modelling (BIM) concept in Malaysia.” Prop. Manage. 36 (4): 400–422. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-02-2017-0013.
Jaaron, A. A., I. H. Hijazi, and K. I. Y. Musleh. 2022. “A conceptual model for adoption of BIM in construction projects: ADKAR as an integrative model of change management.” Technol. Anal. Strategic Manage. 34 (6): 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1915975.
Kashan, A. J., A. Wiewiora, and K. Mohannak. 2021. “Unpacking organisational culture for innovation in Australian mining industry.” Resour. Policy 73 (Oct): 102149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102149.
Khosrowshahi, F., and Y. Arayici. 2012. “Roadmap for implementation of BIM in the UK construction industry.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 19 (6): 610–635. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981211277531.
Klein, H. C., A. Stelter, F. M. Oschinsky, and B. Niehaves. 2022. “A status quo bias perspective on user resistance in building information modeling adoption—Towards a taxonomy.” Comput. Ind. 143 (Dec): 103760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103760.
Kluckhohn, F. R., and F. L. Strodtbeck. 1961. Variations in value orientations. Topeka, KS: Peterson.
Knobel, M., V. Ahmed, and S. Saboor. 2021. “A socio-cultural perspective to BIM adoption: A case study in South Africa.” In Collaboration and integration in construction, engineering, management and technology, 405–412. Berlin: Springer.
Kotter, J. P. 2008. Corporate culture and performance. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Lin, M., X. Zhang, B. C. S. Ng, and L. Zhong. 2022. “The dual influences of team cooperative and competitive orientations on the relationship between empowering leadership and team innovative behaviors.” Int. J. Hospitality Manage. 102 (Jun): 103160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103160.
Mason, M. 2010. “Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews.” Forum Qual. Sozialforschung/Forum: Qual. Social Res. 11 (3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.3.1428.
Matthews, J., P. E. Love, J. Mewburn, C. Stobaus, and C. Ramanayaka. 2018. “Building information modelling in construction: Insights from collaboration and change management perspectives.” Prod. Plann. Control 29 (3): 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1407005.
Merchant, A., G. Rose, and M. Rose. 2014. “The impact of time orientation on consumer innovativeness in the United States and India.” J. Market. Theory Pract. 22 (3): 325–338. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679220307.
Merriam, S. B., and E. J. Tisdell. 2015. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. New York: Wiley.
Mignone, G., M. R. Hosseini, N. Chileshe, and M. Arashpour. 2016. “Enhancing collaboration in BIM-based construction networks through organisational discontinuity theory: A case study of the new Royal Adelaide Hospital.” Archit. Eng. Des. Manage. 12 (5): 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2016.1169987.
Mikušová, M., N. Klabusayová, and V. Meier. 2023. “Evaluation of organisational culture dimensions and their change due to the pandemic.” Eval. Program Plann. 97 (Apr): 102246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102246.
Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Oraee, M., M. R. Hosseini, D. J. Edwards, H. Li, E. Papadonikolaki, and D. Cao. 2019. “Collaboration barriers in BIM-based construction networks: A conceptual model.” Int. J. Project Manage. 37 (6): 839–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.05.004.
Papadonikolaki, E. 2018. “Loosely coupled systems of innovation: Aligning BIM adoption with implementation in Dutch construction.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (6): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000644.
Rameezdeen, R., and N. Gunarathna. 2003. “Organisational culture in construction: An employee perspective.” Constr. Econ. Build. 3 (1): 19–30. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v3i1.2908.
Rippa, P., C. Ponsiglione, A. Bocanet, G. Capaldo, and G. Zollo. 2019. “Do new ventures explore, exploit or both? A case-based analysis of six innovative Italian start-ups.” Int. J. Entrepreneurial Behav. Res. 25 (7): 1515–1536. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2018-0817.
Rooke, J. A., and D. Seymour. 2002. Ethnography in the construction industry: Competing bodies of knowledge in civil engineering. Rotterdam, Netherlands: CIB.
Sackey, E., M. Tuuli, and A. Dainty. 2015. “Sociotechnical systems approach to BIM implementation in a multidisciplinary construction context.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (1): A4014005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000303.
Samaraweera, A., S. Senaratne, and Y. G. Sandanayake. 2018. “Methodology to extract underlying basic assumptions of a public sector construction project culture: An exploratory case study.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 18 (6): 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2017.1338130.
Saunders, M., P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill. 2019. Research methods for business students. 8th ed. New York: Pearson education.
Schein, E. H. 1984. “Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture.” Sloan Manage. Rev. 25 (2): 3–16.
Schein, E. H. 1994. “Innovative cultures and organizations.” In Information technology and the corporation of the 1990s: Research studies, 125–146.
Schein, E. H. 2004. Organizational culture and leadership. London: Jossey-Bass.
Schein, E. H. 2010. Organizational culture and leadership. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
Shojaei, R. S., K. Oti-Sarpong, and G. Burgess. 2022. “Enablers for the adoption and use of BIM in main contractor companies in the UK.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 30 (4): 1726–1745. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2021-0650.
Shurooq, H. A. A., and M. A. S. Saad. 2020. “A structure equation model of indicators driving BIM adoption in the Bahraini construction industry.” Constr. Innovation 20 (1): 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-06-2019-0048.
Siebelink, S., H. Voordijk, M. Endedijk, and A. Adriaanse. 2021. “Understanding barriers to BIM implementation: Their impact across organizational levels in relation to BIM maturity.” Front. Eng. Manage. 8 (2): 236–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0088-2.
Siggelkow, N. 2007. “Persuasion with case studies.” Acad. Manage. J. 50 (1): 20–24. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160882.
Smith, B. 2018. “Generalizability in qualitative research: Misunderstandings, opportunities and recommendations for the sport and exercise sciences.” Qual. Res. Sport Exercise Health 10 (1): 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2017.1393221.
Sompolgrunk, A., S. Banihashemi, and S. R. Mohandes. 2023. “Building information modelling (BIM) and the return on investment: A systematic analysis.” Constr. Innovation 23 (1): 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-06-2021-0119.
Stojanovska-Georgievska, L., I. Sandeva, A. Krleski, H. Spasevska, M. Ginovska, I. Panchevski, R. Ivanov, I. Perez Arnal, T. Cerovsek, and T. Funtik. 2022. “BIM in the center of digital transformation of the construction sector—The status of BIM adoption in north Macedonia.” Buildings 12 (2): 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020218.
Voordijk, H., and R. Sloot. 2019. “BIM mediation and users’ behavior.” Int. J. Managing Projects Bus. 13 (7): 1561–1577. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-11-2018-0255.
Xu, J., R. Jin, P. Piroozfar, Y. Wang, B. G. Kang, L. Ma, D. Wanatowski, and T. Yang. 2018, “Constructing a BIM climate-based framework: Regional case study in China.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (11): 04018105. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001568.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Zakariyyah, K. I., I. B. John, and I. A. Ijaola. 2021. “Cultural orientations and strategic capability for the adoption of building information modeling in construction firms.” Eng. Rep. 3 (11): e12417. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12417.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 40Issue 3May 2024

History

Received: May 5, 2023
Accepted: Nov 9, 2023
Published online: Feb 26, 2024
Published in print: May 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jul 26, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Univ. of South Australia Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (UniSA STEM), Sustainable Infrastructure and Resource Management, Univ. of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5095, Australia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1284-684X. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Univ. of South Australia Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (UniSA STEM), Sustainable Infrastructure and Resource Management, Univ. of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5095, Australia; Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Univ. of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1981-7518. Email: [email protected]
Aparna Samaraweera, Ph.D. [email protected]
Univ. of South Australia Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (UniSA STEM), Sustainable Infrastructure and Resource Management, Univ. of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5095, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Raufdeen Rameezdeen [email protected]
Professor, Univ. of South Australia Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (UniSA STEM), Sustainable Infrastructure and Resource Management, Univ. of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5095, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of the Built Environment, Birmingham City Univ., Birmingham B5 5JU, UK; Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Univ. of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9727-6000. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Exploring the Factors That Influence Active BIM Use by Employees Using a Configuration Perspective: An Empirical Study in China, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5924, 40, 5, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share