Technical Papers
Jun 28, 2024

Exploring the Factors That Influence Active BIM Use by Employees Using a Configuration Perspective: An Empirical Study in China

Publication: Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 40, Issue 5

Abstract

Despite the widespread promotion and adoption of technology, such as building information modeling (BIM), the level of employee enthusiasm for its use varies significantly. Active BIM use by employees is influenced by multiple factors that reside in different aspects and have complementary and substitutive relationships. These complex causal relationships have not been fully understood. This study, from a configuration perspective, investigates how institutional pressures (coercive, normative, and mimetic), organizational factors (management support and colleague opinion), and personal innovativeness with information technology (IT) impact active BIM use by employees. Using data from 250 employees with BIM work experience, this study employs fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to reveal four configurations that achieve active BIM use by employees. By comparing and contrasting these configurations, three theoretical propositions are offered. The findings reveal that personal innovativeness with IT is a core condition, yet it requires the supplementation of institutional pressures and organizational factors. Among institutional pressures, mimetic pressures have a more significant impact compared with coercive and normative pressures, which function complementarily in fostering active BIM use by employees. When the three types of institutional pressure are not uniformly high, management support and colleague opinion manifest more complementarity in enhancing active BIM use; however, when all institutional pressures are high, they exhibit more substitutability. The results uncover the complex relationships among these factors, advance understanding of their influences on individual active technology use, and provide practical guidance for enterprises to effectively encourage active technology use by employees.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. These include the raw data from the questionnaire survey.

Acknowledgments

This study received support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grants Nos. 72031008 and 71901161. The authors thank the NSFC for its financial support and are grateful to all the respondents and interviewees who participated in the survey.

References

Agarwal, R., and J. Prasad. 1998. “A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology.” Inf. Syst. Res. 9 (2): 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204.
Alankarage, S., N. Chileshe, A. Samaraweera, R. Rameezdeen, and D. J. Edwards. 2024. “Diagnosing organizational BIM culture: A qualitative case study using Schein’s model.” J. Manage. Eng. 40 (3): 05024005. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5672.
Bhakoo, V., and T. Choi. 2013. “The iron cage exposed: Institutional pressures and heterogeneity across the healthcare supply chain.” J. Oper. Manage. 31 (6): 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2013.07.016.
Bharati, P., C. Zhang, and A. Chaudhury. 2014. “Social media assimilation in firms: Investigating the roles of absorptive capacity and institutional pressures.” Inf. Syst. Front. 16 (2): 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-013-9433-x.
Bossink, B. A. G. 2004. “Managing drivers of innovation in construction networks.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 130 (3): 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:3(337).
Bruner, G. C., II. 2012. Marketing scales handbook. Fort Worth, TX: GCBII Productions.
Cao, D., H. Li, and G. Wang. 2014. “Impacts of isomorphic pressures on BIM adoption in construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (12): 04014056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000903.
Cao, D., H. Li, G. Wang, and T. Huang. 2017. “Identifying and contextualising the motivations for BIM implementation in construction projects: An empirical study in China.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (4): 658–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.002.
Cao, D., S. Shao, B. Huang, and G. Wang. 2022. “Multidimensional behavioral responses to the implementation of BIM in construction projects: An empirical study in China.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 29 (2): 819–841. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2020-0735.
Chatterjee, D., R. Grewal, and V. Sambamurthy. 2002. “Shaping up for e-commerce: Institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of web technologies.” MIS Q. 26 (2): 65–89. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132321.
Chaubey, A., and C. K. Sahoo. 2021. “Assimilation of business intelligence: The effect of external pressures and top leaders’ commitment during pandemic crisis.” Int. J. Inf. Manage. 59 (Aug): 102344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102344.
Chen, G., J. Chen, J. Yuan, Y. Tang, X. Xiahou, and Q. Li. 2022. “Exploring the impact of collaboration on BIM use effectiveness: A perspective through multiple collaborative behaviors.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (6): 04022065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001098.
Chen, Y., Y. Yin, G. J. Browne, and D. Li. 2019. “Adoption of building information modeling in Chinese construction industry: The technology-organization-environment framework.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26 (9): 1878–1898. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2017-0246.
Chin, W. W. 1998. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cooper, R. B., and R. W. Zmud. 1990. “Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach.” Manage. Sci. 36 (2): 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123.
Crosno, J. L., and P. Y. Tong. 2018. “Just going through the motions? An empirical investigation of control, compliance, and performance in franchisor-franchisee relationships.” J. Bus. Res. 92 (Nov): 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.003.
Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press Publishing.
Deephouse, D. L. 1996. “Does isomorphism legitimate?” Acad. Manage. J. 39 (4): 1024–1039. https://doi.org/10.2307/256722.
DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.” Am. Sociological Rev. 48 (2): 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101.
Dou, Y., and Q. Bo. 2022. “Characteristics and dynamics of BIM adoption in China: Social network analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (6): 04022025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002276.
Eastman, C. M. 2011. BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. New York: Wiley.
Faisal Shehzad, H. M., R. Binti Ibrahim, A. F. Yusof, K. A. Mohamed Khaidzir, S. Shawkat, and S. Ahmad. 2022. “Recent developments of BIM adoption based on categorization, identification and factors: A systematic literature review.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 22 (15): 3001–3013. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1837719.
Fischer, T., and C. M. Herr. 2019. “BIM adoption across the Chinese AEC industries: An extended BIM adoption model.” J. Comput. Des. Eng. 6 (2): 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2018.06.001.
Fiss, P. C. 2011. “Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research.” Acad. Manage. J. 54 (2): 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120.
Gao, Y., M. Yue, J. Zhang, Z. Jin, S. Zhang, and K. Pan. 2023. “The impact of institutional pressures on BIM identity formation in the construction industry and the mediating role of perceived usefulness.” J. Manage. Eng. 39 (6): 04023038. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5286.
Gefen, D., D. Straub, and M.-C. Boudreau. 2000. “Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice.” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 4 (1): 7. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407.
Ghaffarianhoseini, A., J. Tookey, A. Ghaffarianhoseini, N. Naismith, S. Azhar, O. Efimova, and K. Raahemifar. 2017. “Building information modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 75 (Aug): 1046–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.083.
Gholizadeh, P., B. Esmaeili, and P. Goodrum. 2018. “Diffusion of building information modeling functions in the construction industry.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (2): 04017060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000589.
Girginkaya Akdag, S., and U. Maqsood. 2020. “A roadmap for BIM adoption and implementation in developing countries: The Pakistan case.” Archnet-IJAR 14 (1): 112–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-04-2019-0081.
Greckhamer, T., S. Furnari, P. C. Fiss, and R. V. Aguilera. 2018. “Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research.” Strategic Organ. 16 (4): 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018786487.
Greckhamer, T., V. F. Misangyi, and P. C. Fiss. 2013. “The two QCAs: From a small-N to a large-N set theoretic approach.” Chap. 3 in Vol. 38 of Configurational theory and methods in organizational research, 49–75. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0000038007.
Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black. 1995. Multivariate data analysis: With readings. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hartwick, J., and H. Barki. 1994. “Explaining the role of user participation in information system use.” Manage. Sci. 40 (4): 440–465. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.4.440.
Haveman, H. A. 1993. “Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets.” Adm. Sci. Q. 38 (4): 593–627. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393338.
Herzberg, F., B. Mausner, and B. B. Snyderman. 1959. The motivation to work. New York: World Publishing.
Hewett, R. 2023. “Dissonance, reflection and reframing: Unpacking the black box of motivation internalization.” J. Manage. Stud. 60 (2): 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12878.
Hosseini, M. R., E. A. Pärn, D. J. Edwards, E. Papadonikolaki, and M. Oraee. 2018. “Roadmap to mature BIM use in Australian SMEs: Competitive dynamics perspective.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (5): 05018008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000636.
Howard, R., L. Restrepo, and C.-Y. Chang. 2017. “Addressing individual perceptions: An application of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology to building information modelling.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (2): 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.012.
Hsieh, J., and W. Wang. 2007. “Explaining employees’ extended use of complex information systems.” Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 16 (3): 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000663.
Huang, T. K. 2015. “Exploring the antecedents of screenshot-based interactions in the context of advanced computer software learning.” Comput. Educ. 80 (Jan): 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.011.
Hwang, Y. 2014. “User experience and personal innovativeness: An empirical study on the enterprise resource planning systems.” Comput. Hum. Behav. 34 (May): 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.002.
Igbaria, M., N. Zinatelli, P. Cragg, and A. L. Cavaye. 1997. “Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model.” MIS Q. 21 (3): 279–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/249498.
Jasperson, J. S., P. E. Carter, and R. W. Zmud. 2005. “A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems.” MIS Q. 29 (3): 525–557. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148694.
Jia, J., M. Zhang, and G. Yang. 2022. “Factors influencing BIM integration with emerging technologies: Knowledge coupling perspective.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (2): 04022001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001018.
Jiang, H.-J., Z.-P. Cui, H. Yin, Z.-B. Yang, and L. C. Neves. 2021. “BIM performance, project complexity, and user satisfaction: A QCA study of 39 cases.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2021 (Sep): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6654851.
Jin, R., C. Hancock, L. Tang, C. Chen, D. Wanatowski, and L. Yang. 2017. “Empirical study of BIM implementation–based perceptions among Chinese practitioners.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (5): 04017025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000538.
Joo, Y. J., H. W. Lee, and Y. Ham. 2014. “Integrating user interface and personal innovativeness into the TAM for mobile learning in Cyber University.” J. Comput. Higher Educ. 26 (2): 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-014-9081-2.
Kim, H.-W., and A. Kankanhalli. 2009. “Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: A status quo bias perspective.” MIS Q. 33 (3): 567–582. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650309.
Klein, H. C., A. Stelter, F. M. Oschinsky, and B. Niehaves. 2022. “A status quo bias perspective on user resistance in building information modeling adoption—Towards a taxonomy.” Comput. Ind. 143 (Dec): 103760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103760.
Lai, H.-M., and C.-P. Chen. 2011. “Factors influencing secondary school teachers’ adoption of teaching blogs.” Comput. Educ. 56 (4): 948–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.010.
Lee, J. N., Y. Park, D. W. Straub, and Y. Koo. 2019. “Holistic archetypes of IT outsourcing strategy: A contingency fit and configurational approach.” MIS Q. 43 (4): 1201. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2019/14370.
Lee, S., and P. Meyer-Doyle. 2017. “How performance incentives shape individual exploration and exploitation: Evidence from microdata.” Organ. Sci. 28 (1): 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1104.
Leow, L. P., L. K. Phua, and S. Y. Teh. 2021. “Extending the social influence factor: Behavioural intention to increase the usage of information and communication technology-enhanced student-centered teaching methods.” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 69 (3): 1853–1879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10017-4.
Lewis, W., R. Agarwal, and V. Sambamurthy. 2003. “Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers.” MIS Q. 27 (4): 657–678. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036552.
Li, R., Z. Niu, C. Liu, and B. Wu. 2024. “The co-movement effect of managers’ psychological factors on the BIM adoption decision in SMEs: A study based on fsQCA.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 31 (4): 1454–1472. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-08-2022-0721.
Li, X., J. P.-A. Hsieh, and A. Rai. 2013. “Motivational differences across post-acceptance information system usage behaviors: An investigation in the business intelligence systems context.” Inf. Syst. Res. 24 (3): 659–682. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0456.
Liu, D., W. Lu, and Y. Niu. 2018. “Extended technology-acceptance model to make smart construction systems successful.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (6): 04018035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001487.
Liu, N., L. Ruan, R. Jin, Y. Chen, X. Deng, and T. Yang. 2019. “Investigation of individual perceptions towards BIM implementation—A Chongqing case study.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26 (7): 1455–1475. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2018-0342.
Luo, Y. M., and H. Ling. 2013. “Exploration and exploitation of information systems usage and individual performance.” Procedia Comput. Sci. 22 (Jan): 863–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.169.
Ma, P., S. Zhang, Y. Hua, and J. Zhang. 2020. “Behavioral perspective on BIM postadoption in construction organizations.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (1): 04019036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000729.
Ma, X., F. Xiong, T. O. Olawumi, N. Dong, and A. P. C. Chan. 2018. “Conceptual framework and roadmap approach for integrating BIM into lifecycle project management.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (6): 05018011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000647.
Marx, A., and A. Dusa. 2011. “Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA), contradictions and consistency benchmarks for model specification.” Methodol. Innovations Online 6 (2): 103–148. https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2010.0037.
Mattke, J., C. Maier, T. Weitzel, J. E. Gerow, and J. B. Thatcher. 2022. “Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in information systems research: Status quo, guidelines, and future directions.” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 50 (1): 8. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.05008.
Mellewigt, T., G. Hoetker, and M. Lütkewitte. 2018. “Avoiding high opportunism is easy, achieving low opportunism is not: A QCA study on curbing opportunism in buyer–supplier relationships.” Organ. Sci. 29 (6): 1208–1228. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1227.
Meuer, J., and C. Rupietta. 2017. “Integrating QCA and HLM for multilevel research on organizational configurations.” Organ. Res. Methods 20 (2): 324–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116665465.
Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.” Am. J. Sociol. 83 (2): 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550.
Morgan, B. 2019. “Organizing for digitalization through mutual constitution: The case of a design firm.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 37 (7): 400–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1538560.
Murguia, D., P. Demian, and R. Soetanto. 2021. “The role of the industry’s cultural-cognitive elements on actors’ intention to adopt BIM: An empirical study in Peru.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 30 (3): 1183–1200. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2021-0743.
Murguia, D., C. Vasquez, P. Demian, and R. Soetanto. 2023. “BIM adoption among contractors: A longitudinal study in Peru.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 149 (1): 04022140. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002424.
Okakpu, A., A. GhaffarianHoseini, J. Tookey, J. Haar, A. Ghaffarianhoseini, and A. Rehman. 2018. “A proposed framework to investigate effective BIM adoption for refurbishment of building projects.” Archit. Sci. Rev. 61 (6): 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2018.1522585.
Pappas, I. O., and A. G. Woodside. 2021. “Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing.” Int. J. Inf. Manage. 58 (Jun): 102310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310.
Park, Y., P. C. Fiss, and O. A. El Sawy. 2020. “Theorizing the multiplicity of digital phenomena: The ecology of configurations, causal recipes, and guidelines for applying QCA.” MIS Q. 44 (Jul): 1493–1520. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/13879.
Parthasarathy, M., and A. Bhattacherjee. 1998. “Understanding post-adoption behavior in the context of online services.” Inf. Syst. Res. 9 (4): 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.4.362.
Patala, S., J. K. Juntunen, S. Lundan, and T. Ritvala. 2021. “Multinational energy utilities in the energy transition: A configurational study of the drivers of FDI in renewables.” J. Int. Bus. Stud. 52 (Jul): 930–950. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00387-x.
Phan, T. N., and K. Baird. 2015. “The comprehensiveness of environmental management systems: The influence of institutional pressures and the impact on environmental performance.” J. Environ. Manage. 160 (Sep): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.06.006.
Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. “Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.” J. Appl. Psychol. 88 (5): 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
Ragin, C. C. 2008. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C. C. 2014. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.
Rihoux, B., and C. C. Ragin. 2008. Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000. “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.” Am. Psychol. 55 (1): 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
Saka, A. B., D. W. Chan, and S. O. Ajayi. 2024. “Institutional isomorphism and adoption of building information modelling (BIM) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) of the Nigerian construction industry.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 31 (1): 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2022-0188.
Saka, A. B., D. W. M. Chan, and A.-M. Mahamadu. 2022. “Rethinking the digital divide of BIM adoption in the AEC industry.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (2): 04021092. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000999.
Shao, S., and D. Cao. 2024. “Contagion of BIM implementation practices in interproject networks: An empirical study in China.” J. Manage. Eng. 40 (1): 05023009. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5639.
Son, H., S. Lee, and C. Kim. 2015. “What drives the adoption of building information modeling in design organizations? An empirical investigation of the antecedents affecting architects’ behavioral intentions.” Autom. Constr. 49 (Jan): 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.10.012.
Song, J., G. C. Migliaccio, G. Wang, and H. Lu. 2017. “Exploring the influence of system quality, information quality, and external service on BIM user satisfaction.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (6): 04017036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000549.
Tavallaei, R., A. Mashayekhi, N. Harrison, M. Talebian, and R. Moser. 2022. “BIM adoption: A case of institutional pressures and top management support.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (9): 04022084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002331.
Teo, H. H., K. K. Wei, and I. Benbasat. 2003. “Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective.” MIS Q. 27 (1): 19–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036518.
Thakur, R., A. Angriawan, and J. H. Summey. 2016. “Technological opinion leadership: The role of personal innovativeness, gadget love, and technological innovativeness.” J. Bus. Res. 69 (8): 2764–2773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.012.
Tong, P. Y., and J. Crosno. 2021. “The effects of perceived risk on control-compliance relationships.” Ind. Mark. Manage. 96 (Jul): 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.04.010.
Tsai, H. P., and D. R. Compeau. 2021. “Understanding and measuring formal communication quality for technology implementation: A test during the anticipation stage.” J. Strategic Inf. Syst. 30 (3): 101669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101669.
Tu, B., J. Zuo, R.-D. Chang, R. J. Webber, F. Xiong, and N. Dong. 2021. “A system dynamic model for assessing the level of BIM implementation in construction phase: A China case study.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 30 (4): 1321–1343. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2021-0895.
Ungan, M. 2005. “Management support for the adoption of manufacturing best practices: Key factors.” Int. J. Prod. Res. 43 (18): 3803–3820. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500140989.
Van Beek, I., T. W. Taris, and W. B. Schaufeli. 2011. “Workaholic and work engaged employees: Dead ringers or worlds apart?” J. Occup. Health Psychol. 16 (4): 468. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024392.
Waldkirch, M., N. Kammerlander, and C. Wiedeler. 2021. “Configurations for corporate venture innovation: Investigating the role of the dominant coalition.” J. Bus. Venturing 36 (5): 106137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106137.
Wang, G., Q. He, B. Xia, X. Meng, and P. Wu. 2018. “Impact of institutional pressures on organizational citizenship behaviors for the environment: Evidence from megaprojects.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (5): 04018028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000628.
Wang, G., and J. Song. 2017. “The relation of perceived benefits and organizational supports to user satisfaction with building information model (BIM).” Comput. Hum. Behav. 68 (Mar): 493–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.002.
Wang, K. Y., C. Zhang, F. Y. Guo, and S. T. Guo. 2022. “Toward an efficient construction process: What drives BIM professionals to collaborate in BIM-enabled projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (4): 04022033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001056.
Xu, H., J. Feng, and S. Li. 2014. “Users-orientated evaluation of building information model in the Chinese construction industry.” Autom. Constr. 39 (Apr): 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.12.004.
Xue, X., X. Sun, W. Xue, Y. Wang, and L. Liao. 2022. “Investigating building information modeling acceptance in the Chinese AECO industry.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 30 (9): 4253–4270. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2021-0685.
Yoon, T. E., and J. F. George. 2013. “Why aren’t organizations adopting virtual worlds?” Comput. Hum. Behav. 29 (3): 772–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.003.
Zhang, G., W. Wang, and Y. Liang. 2021. “Understanding the complex adoption behavior of cloud services by SMEs based on complexity theory: A fuzzy sets qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA).” Complexity 2021 (Apr): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5591446.
Zhang, M., and Y. Du. 2019. “Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in management and organization research: Position, tactics, and directions.” [In Chinese.] Chin. J. Manage. 16 (9): 1312–1323. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.09.005.
Zhao, Y., Y. Sun, Q. Zhou, C. Cui, and Y. Liu. 2023. “How A/E/C professionals accept BIM technologies in China: A technology acceptance model perspective.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 30 (10): 4569–4589. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2022-0308.
Zhou, S., R. Yu, M. Pan, J. Zuo, B. Tu, and N. Dong. 2024. “Understanding current demand for BIM professionals in China through recruitment data mining.” J. Manage. Eng. 40 (3): 04024011. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5439.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 40Issue 5September 2024

History

Received: Sep 19, 2023
Accepted: Apr 12, 2024
Published online: Jun 28, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 28, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, College of Management and Economics, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300072, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Postgraduate Student, College of Management and Economics, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300072, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Real Estate and Construction, Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Postgraduate Student, College of Management and Economics, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300072, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Shuibo Zhang [email protected]
Professor, College of Management and Economics, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300072, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, College of Management and Economics, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300072, PR China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share