Technical Papers
May 31, 2023

Rutting Resistance Evaluation of Highly Polymer-Modified Asphalt Binder and Mixes Using Different Performance Parameters

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 35, Issue 8

Abstract

This study focused on evaluating the rutting performance of three different highly polymer-modified asphalt (HiMA) binders (i.e., O, T and B) using binder-based [i.e., multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) and force ductility (FD)] and mix-based [flow number (FN) and Hamburg wheel tracking test (HWTT)] rutting performance tests. The binder-based rutting indicators were compared with mix rutting performance to determine a parameter that can help in the correct prediction of HiMA rutting resistance. In addition, the study looked into application of a simple performance test, the indirect rutting tolerance index (IDEAL-RT), for HiMA mix rutting prediction. The MSCR test revealed different rankings of recovery at 0.1- and 3.2-kPa stress levels. Moreover, the T and B binders did not satisfy the stress sensitivity criteria (Jnr_difference) of Max 75%. The force ductility tests revealed that the peak force observed for polymer network phase in HiMA was significantly higher than base binder stiffness, which is in contrast with force distribution in polymer-modified binders (PMBs). The mix rutting resistance ranking (O>T>B) was similar in all the tests (i.e., FN, HWTT, and IDEAL-RT). Although IDEAL-RT can be used to compare the rutting resistances of HiMA mixes, detailed future work is required to establish its acceptability in comparing various types of mixes and the minimum requirements of RTIndex. The comparison between binder and mix rutting indicators demonstrated that MSCR testing on binder at stress levels of 6.4 kPa and higher can be used to predict the rutting resistance of HiMA binders. Parameters like slope and cohesion energy and a newly introduced parameter—work done for polymer activation (WPA)—from FD tests can be used to determine the polymeric phase dominance in HiMA binders. Overall, this study provides pavement stakeholders with a framework for rightly predicting the rutting resistance and polymeric phase dominance of HiMA binders and mixes using MSCR, FD, and IDEAL-RT tests.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

AASHTO. 2013. Standard method of test for determining the dynamic modulus and flow number for hot mix asphalt using the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT). Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2014. Standard specification for performance graded asphalt binder using multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2019a. Standard method of test for Hamburg wheel-track testing of compacted asphalt mixtures. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2019b. Standard method of test for multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2020. Standard method of test for force ductility test of asphalt materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Al-Qadi, I. L., A. Loulizi, I. Janajreh, and T. E. Freeman. 2002. “Pavement response to dual tires and new wide-base tires at same tire pressure.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1806 (1): 38–47. https://doi.org/10.3141/1806-05.
Asphalt Institute. 2014. Mix design methods for asphalt concrete, manual series no. 2, (MS-2). 7th ed. Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute.
ASTM. 2000. Standard test method for theoretical maximum specific gravity and density of bituminous paving mixtures. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2005. Standard practice for determining the separation tendency of polymer from polymer modified asphalt. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015. Standard test method for viscosity determination of asphalt at elevated temperatures using a rotational viscometer. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016. Standard specification for performance graded asphalt binder. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bahia, H. U., D. I. Hanson, M. Zeng, H. Zhai, M. A. Khatri, and R. M. Anderson. 2001. Characterization of modified asphalt binders in superpave mix design (No. Project 9-10 FY‘96). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Bańkowski, W., M. Gajewski, R. Horodecka, K. Mirski, E. Targowska-Lech, and D. Jasiński. 2021. “Assessment of the effect of the use of highly-modified binder on the viscoelastic and functional properties of bituminous mixtures illustrated with the example of asphalt concrete for the binder course.” Constr. Build. Mater. 296 (Aug): 123412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123412.
Błażejowski, K., M. Wójcik-Wiśniewska, H. Peciakowski, and J. Olszacki. 2016. “The performance of a highly modified binders for heavy duty asphalt pavements.” Transp. Res. Procedia 14 (Jan): 679–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.331.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 1989. Testing aggregates—Method for determination of polished-stone value. London: BSI.
Chen, J. S., T. J. Wang, and C. T. Lee. 2018. “Evaluation of a highly-modified asphalt binder for field performance.” Constr. Build. Mater. 171 (May): 539–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.188.
D’Angelo, J. 2010. “New high-temperature binder specification using multistress creep and recovery.” Transp. Res. Circ (E-C147): 1–13.
Delgadillo, R., K. Nam, and H. Bahia. 2006. “Why do we need to change G*/sinδ and how?” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 7 (1): 7–27.
Federal Aviation Administration. 2018. “Airport Construction Standards (AC 150/5370-10H) Airports.” Accessed January 5, 2022. https://www.faa.gov/airports/engineering/construction_standards/.
Gaspar, M. D. S., B. G. Nogueira, K. Vasconcelos, L. F. M. Leite, and L. L. B. Bernucci. 2019. “Effect of different creep and recovery times on the MSCR test for highly modified asphalt binder.” J. Test. Eval. 49 (1). https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20180584.
Habbouche, J., E. Y. Hajj, and P. E. Sebaaly. 2019. Structural coefficient for high polymer modified asphalt mixes. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Dept. of Transportation.
IRC (Indian Roads Congress). 2019. Tentative specification for bituminous concrete (asphaltic concrete) for airfield pavements. IRC: 105. New Delhi, India: IRC.
IS (Indian Standards). 1963a. Method of test for aggregates for concrete—Part 1: Particle size and shape. New Delhi, India: IS.
IS (Indian Standards). 1963b. Method of test for aggregates for concrete—Part 4: Mechanical properties. New Delhi, India: IS.
IS (Indian Standards). 1963c. Method of test for aggregates for concrete—Part 5: Soundness test. New Delhi, India: IS.
IS (Indian Standards). 1963d. Methods of test for aggregates for concrete—Part 3: Specific gravity, density, voids, absorption and bulking. IS: 2386. New Delhi, India: IS.
IS (Indian Standards). 1976. Method of test for soils—Part 37: Determination of sand equivalent value of soils and fine aggregates. New Delhi, India: IS.
IS (Indian Standards). 1978a. Methods for testing tar and bituminous materials: Determination of ductility. New Delhi, India: IS.
IS (Indian Standards). 1978b. Methods for testing tar and bituminous materials: Determination of softening point. New Delhi, India: IS.
IS (Indian Standards). 1979. Methods for testing tar and bituminous materials: Determination of Fraass breaking point of bitumen. New Delhi, India: IS.
IS (Indian Standards). 1995. Method of test for soils—Part 5: Determination of liquid and plastic limit. New Delhi, India: IS.
IS (Indian Standards). 2019. Polymer modified bitumen (PMB) specification. New Delhi, India: IS.
Kwon, O., B. Choubane, J. Green, and G. Sholar. 2021. “Evaluation of the performance of highly modified asphalt binder using accelerated pavement testing.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 22 (13): 1688–1696. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2020.1714617.
Mieczkowski, P., B. Budziński, M. Słowik, J. Kempa, and W. Sorociak. 2021. “Experimental study of tensile properties of styrene–butadiene–styrene modified asphalt binders.” Materials (Basel) 14 (7): 1734. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14071734.
NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program). 2011. Manual for design of hot mix asphalt with commentary: Technician’s manual, NCHRP report 673 national cooperative highway research program (NCHRP). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Rivera, C., S. Caro, E. Arámbula-Mercado, D. B. Sánchez, and P. Karki. 2021. “Comparative evaluation of ageing effects on the properties of regular and highly polymer-modified asphalt binders.” Constr. Build. Mater. 302 (Oct): 124163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124163.
Roginski, M. J. 2007. “Effects of aircraft tire pressures on flexible pavements.” In Proc., 23rd Piarc World Road Congress Paris, 17–21 September 2007. Paris: World Road Association.
Rushing, J. F., D. N. Little, and N. Garg. 2012. “Asphalt pavement analyzer used to assess rutting susceptibility of hot-mix asphalt designed for high tire pressure aircraft.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2296 (1): 97–105. https://doi.org/10.3141/2296-10.
Saqer, H., M. D. Nazzal, and A. Abbas. 2021. “Evaluation of the performance of asphalt mixes for airport pavements.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 33 (4): 04021029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003629.
TSI (Turkish Standards Institution). 2018. Bitumen and bituminous binders-Determination of the tensile properties of modified bitumen by the force ductility method. Ankara, Turkey: TSI.
Walubita, L. F., M. Ling, L. M. R. Pianeta, L. Fuentes, J. J. Komba, and G. M. Mabrouk. 2022. “Correlating the asphalt-binder MSCR test results to the HMA HWTT and field rutting performance.” J. Transp. Eng., Part B: Pavements 148 (3): 04022047. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000386.
White, G. 2015a. “Grading of Australian bitumen by multiple stress creep recovery.” Road Transp. Res.: J. Aust. N. Z. Res. Pract. 24 (4): 30–44.
White, G. 2015b. “The multiple stress creep recovery test for airport asphalt binders.” Road Transp. Res.: J. Aust. N. Z. Res. Pract. 24 (3): 24–34.
White, G. 2017. “Grading highly modified binders by multiple stress creep recovery.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 18 (6): 1322–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1212730.
Zhou, F., R. Steger, and W. Mogawer. 2021. “Development of a coherent framework for balanced mix design and production quality control and quality acceptance.” Constr. Build. Mater. 287 (Jun): 123020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123020.
Zhu, C. 2015. Evaluation of thermal oxidative aging effect on the rheological performance of modified asphalt binders. Reno, NV: Univ. of Nevada.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 35Issue 8August 2023

History

Received: Jul 9, 2022
Accepted: Jan 23, 2023
Published online: May 31, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 31, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Former Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4293-391X. Email: [email protected]
Arpita Suchismita [email protected]
Doctoral Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India. Email: [email protected]
Dharamveer Singh, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Comparison of Rutting Resistance of Plant Produced Asphalt Mixes Using Hamburg Wheel Tracker and Surrogate Simple Performance Tests: IDEAL-RT and HT-IDT, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-16205, 35, 12, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share