Technical Papers
Sep 28, 2023

Comparison of Rutting Resistance of Plant Produced Asphalt Mixes Using Hamburg Wheel Tracker and Surrogate Simple Performance Tests: IDEAL-RT and HT-IDT

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 35, Issue 12

Abstract

The recent emphasis on adopting the balanced mix design (BMD) concept has encouraged highway agencies and practitioners to explore simple performance tests to capture the rutting performance of asphalt mixes. Though many researchers have adopted the Hamburg wheel tracking test (HWTT) to evaluate rutting resistance, certain limitations, such as using this test method during quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) are challenging. Therefore, researchers are exploring ways to implement surrogate simple performance tests, namely the ideal shear asphalt rutting test (IDEAL-RT) and the high-temperature indirect tensile strength test (HT-IDT) to support QC/QA of asphalt mixes. However, establishing limiting threshold values of rutting parameters based on such simple performance tests is still in the research stage. Eight mixes with different types of aggregates, binders [unmodified, polymer-modified binder (PMB), and crumb rubber–modified binder (CRMB)] and gradations having different nominal aggregate sizes (NMAS) were collected from various plants. HWTT, IDEA-RT, and HT-IDT were conducted on samples compacted at 7%±0.5% air voids using the Superpave gyratory compactor. The data analysis showed that the rutting resistance index (RRI) parameter derived from HWTT are promising and advantageous compared with final rut depth, as it incorporates the combined effect of rut depth and number of passes. The study presented correlations of different rutting parameters (shear strength, RTIndex, and HT-IDT strength) derived from IDEAL-RT and HT-IDT with the HWTT RRI parameter. Moreover, to ascertain the pass/fail criteria of asphalt mixes, critical threshold values were proposed and recommended for shear strength, RTIndex, and HT-IDT strength as 1.0 MPa and 65 and 135 kPa, respectively. IDEAL-RT followed by HT-IDT are the most suitable potential surrogate simple performance tests for HWT to screen better and worse rutting performance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge and express their gratitude to VR Techniche, Vishwa Samudra Engineering (VSE), Oriental Structural Engineers (OSE), Prakash Asphalting and Toll Highways (India) Ltd., and CDS Infra Projects Ltd. for the materials used in the current study. Also, we thank the Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay, for providing the infrastructure and platform for this study.

References

AASHTO. 2017. Standard method of test for Hamburg wheel-track testing of compacted asphalt mixtures. AASHTO T324. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Anderson, R. M., D. W. Christensen, and R. Bonaquist. 2003. “Estimating the rutting potential of asphalt mixtures using Superpave gyratory compaction properties and indirect tensile strength (with discussion).” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 72 (Feb): 1–26.
ASTM. 2015. Standard test method for preparation and determination of the relative density of asphalt mix specimens by means of the Superpave gyratory compactor. ASTM D6925. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for indirect tensile (IDT) strength of bituminous mixtures. ASTM D6931. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test method for theoretical maximum specific gravity and density of asphalt mixtures. ASTM D2041/D2041M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2022. Standard test method for determination of rutting tolerance index of asphalt mixture using the ideal rutting test. ASTM D8360. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bahia, H. U., D. I. Hanson, M. Zeng, H. Zhai, M. A. Khatri, and R. M. Anderson. 2001. Characterization of modified asphalt binders in Superpave mix design. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Bennert, T. 2021. Performance evaluation of asphalt mixtures statewide. Albany, NY: Univ. Transportation Research Center.
Bennert, T., E. Haas, and E. Wass. 2018. “Indirect tensile test (IDT) to determine asphalt mixture performance indicators during quality control testing in New Jersey.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (28): 394–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118793276.
Bennert, T., E. Haas, E. Wass, and B. Berger. 2021. “Indirect tensile testing for balanced mixture design and quality control performance testing.” In Vol. 89 of Proc., Technical Sessions—Asphalt Paving Technology: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 363–389. Lino Lakes, MN: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists.
Boz, I., G. P. Coffey, J. Habbouche, S. D. Diefenderfer, and O. E. Ozbulut. 2022. “A critical review of monotonic loading tests to evaluate rutting potential of asphalt mixtures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 335 (Jun): 127484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127484.
Boz, I., J. Habbouche, S. D. Diefenderfer, G. P. Coffey, O. E. Ozbulut, and A. Seitllari. 2023. Simple and practical tests for rutting evaluation of asphalt mixtures in the balanced mix design process. VTRC 23-R11. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia Transportation Research Council.
Christensen, D., and R. Bonaquist. 2007. “Using the indirect tension test to evaluate rut resistance in developing hot-mix asphalt mix designs.” In Practical Approaches to hot-mix asphalt mix design and production quality control testing, 62. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Christensen, D. W., R. Bonaquist, D. A. Anderson, and S. Gokhale. 2004. Indirect tension strength as a simple performance test: Transportation research Circular, number E-C068, 44–57. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Record.
Christensen, D. W., R. Bonaquist, and D. P. Jack. 2000. Evaluation of triaxial strength as a simple test for asphalt concrete rut resistance. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Univ.
D’Angelo, J. 2010. New high-temperature binder specification using multistress creep and recovery: Transportation research record E-C147, 1–13. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
D’Angelo, J., and R. Dongre. 2002. “Superpave binder specifications and their performance relationship to modified binders.” In Proc., Annual Conf. of the Canadian Technical Asphalt Association. Laval, QC, Canada: Polyscience Publications.
D’Angelo, J., R. Kluttz, R. Dongré, K. Stephens, and L. Zanzotto. 2007. “Revision of the Superpave high temperature binder specification: The multiple stress creep recovery test.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 76 (May): 123–162.
Delgadillo, R., D. W. Cho, and H. Bahia. 2006. “Nonlinearity of repeated creep and recovery binder test and relationship with mixture permanent deformation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1962 (1): 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106196200101.
Divandari, H. 2019. “Predict of asphalt rutting potential based on IDT and validation with ANN.” J. Appl. Eng. Sci. 9 (2): 131–138. https://doi.org/10.2478/jaes-2019-0018.
Dongre, R., and J. D’Angelo. 2003. Evaluation of different parameters for Superpave high temperature binder specification based on rutting performance in the accelerated loading facility at FHWA. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Record.
Dreessen, S., J. P. Planche, and V. Gardel. 2009. “A new performance related test method for rutting prediction: MSCRT.” In Vol. 1 of Advanced testing and characterization of bituminous materials, 971–980. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Elliott, A. C., and W. A. Woodward. 2007. Statistical analysis quick reference guidebook: With SPSS examples. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Jenks, C. W., C. F. Jencks, E. T. Harrigan, M. Adcock, E. P. Delaney, and H. Freer. 2011. A manual for design of hot mix asphalt with commentary. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Khosla, N. P., and K. I. Harikrishnan. 2007. Tensile strength—A design and evaluation tool for Superpave mixtures. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Department of Transportation.
Kim, S., J. Shen, and M. Myung Jeong. 2018. “Effects of aggregate size on the rutting and stripping resistance of recycled asphalt mixtures.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 30 (2): 04017280. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002139.
Kruger, J., and E. Horak. 2005. “The appropriateness of accelerated pavement testing to assess the rut prediction capability of laboratory asphalt tests.” In Proc., 24th Southern African Transport Con. (SATC), 380–390. Pretoria, South Africa: Univ. of Pretoria.
McCarthy, L., R. J. Callans, R. Quigley, and S. Scott. 2016. Performance specifications for asphalt mixtures: A synthesis of highway practice. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Mohammad, L. N., M. A. Elseifi, A. Raghavendra, and M. Ye. 2016. Hamburg wheel-track test equipment requirements and improvements to AASHTO T324. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Pellinen, T. K., and S. Xiao. 2006. Stiffness of hot-mix asphalt. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Department of Transportation.
Radhakrishnan, V., G. S. Chowdari, K. S. Reddy, and R. Chattaraj. 2019. “Evaluation of wheel tracking and field rutting susceptibility of dense bituminous mixes.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 20 (1): 90–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2017.1374998.
Rajan, B., A. Suchismita, and D. Singh. 2023. “Rutting resistance evaluation of highly polymer modified asphalt (HiMA) binder and mixes using different performance parameters.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 35 (8): 04023266. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-15194.
Shalaby, A. 2000. “Strength testing of in-service asphalt pavements in Manitoba and correlation to rutting.” In Vol. 45 of Proc., Canadian Technical Asphalt Association, 203–227. West Kelowna, BC, Canada: Canada Canadian Technical Asphalt Association.
Tran, N. T., and O. Takahashi. 2018. “Evaluating the rutting resistance of wearing course mixtures with different fine aggregate sources using the indirect tensile strength test.” J. Test. Eval. 48 (4): 2865–2879. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20180152.
Wen, H., and S. Bhusal. 2013. “A laboratory study to predict the rutting and fatigue behavior of asphalt concrete using the indirect tensile test.” J. Test. Eval. 41 (2): 20120004. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20120004.
Wen, H., S. Wu, L. N. Mohammad, W. Zhang, S. Shen, and A. Faheem. 2016. “Long-term field rutting and moisture susceptibility performance of warm-mix asphalt pavement.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2575 (1): 103–112. https://doi.org/10.3141/2575-11.
West, R., C. Rodezno, F. Leiva, and F. Yin. 2018. Development of a framework for balanced mix design.. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Yin, F., C. Chen, R. West, A. E. Martin, and E. Arambula-Mercado. 2020a. “Determining the relationship among Hamburg wheel-tracking test parameters and correlation to field performance of asphalt pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (4): 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120912430.
Yin, F., A. J. Taylor, N. Tran, and P. A. Director. 2020b. Performance testing for quality control and acceptance of balanced mix design. Auburn, AL: National Center for Asphalt Technology.
Yin, F., and R. C. West. 2021. Balanced mix design resource guide. NAPA IS-143. Greenbelt, MD: National Asphalt Pavement Association.
Zaniewski, J. P., and G. Srinivasan. 2004. “Evaluation of indirect tensile strength to identify asphalt concrete rutting potential.” In Asphalt technology program. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia Univ.
Zhang, J., A. E. Alvarez, S. I. Lee, A. Torres, and L. F. Walubita. 2013. “Comparison of flow number, dynamic modulus, and repeated load tests for evaluation of HMA permanent deformation.” Constr. Build. Mater. 44 (Jun): 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.013.
Zhou, F., B. Crockford, J. Zhang, S. Hu, J. Epps, and L. Sun. 2019. Development and validation of an ideal shear rutting test for asphalt mix design and QC/QA. San Diego: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists.
Zhou, F., S. Hu, and D. Newcomb. 2020. “Development of a performance-related framework for production quality control with ideal cracking and rutting tests.” Constr. Build. Mater. 261 (Aug): 120549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120549.
Zhou, F., R. Steger, and W. Mogawer. 2021. “Development of a coherent framework for balanced mix design and production quality control and quality acceptance.” Constr. Build. Mater. 287 (May): 123020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123020.
Zhu, F. 2008. “Developing simple lab test to evaluate HMA resistance to moisture, rutting, thermal cracking distress.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Akron.
Zieliński, P. 2019. “Indirect tensile test as a simple method for rut resistance evaluation of asphalt concrete.” Arch. Civ. Eng. 65 (3): 31–44. https://doi.org/10.2478/ace-2019-0032.
Zieliński, P. 2022. “Indirect tensile test as a simple method for rut resistance evaluation of asphalt mixtures—Polish experience.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 23 (1): 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2020.1820894.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 35Issue 12December 2023

History

Received: Dec 24, 2022
Accepted: May 19, 2023
Published online: Sep 28, 2023
Published in print: Dec 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 28, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gavadakatla Vamsikrishna [email protected]
Ph.D. Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400076, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Dharamveer Singh [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400076, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share