Project Chief Engineer: An Industry Review of a New Position on Design–Build Teams for Major Transportation Projects
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 3
Abstract
One of the main challenges faced by state DOTs in large and complex design–build (DB) projects is to ensure that the DB team upholds the highest standard of care in making complex engineering decisions involving multidisciplinary design works systems integration. It highlights a need for a position capable of managing engineering design integration throughout both design and construction services in DB projects. The main objective of this exploratory study is to identify the engineering decision-making practices in the DB environment by exploring opportunities offered by a new engineering leadership position, titled project chief engineer, in the DB team. This study conducts in-depth interviews with 40 subject-matter experts from a range of the DB transportation infrastructure industry, including highway contractors, design consultants, public owners, owner’s representatives, developers, legal experts, and insurance experts. Thematic analysis methods examine the interview data and identify seven major themes related to the new position: (1) benefits; (2) challenges; (3) types of projects that gain value from the new position; (4) areas that need the attention; (5) recommendations for the job descriptions; (6) best practices for implementing the new position; and (7) interface with other DB team members. The results show that this new engineering integration leadership position requested in the DB team is expected to add value to large and complex DB projects. This position requires a unique set of skills both in design and construction that may limit the pool of qualified candidates for the engineering leadership position. This study contributes to articulating the value of the new engineering leadership position on the DB team as a systems integrator to advocate for good design and to ensure an appropriate standard of care exists for all aspects of the multidisciplinary engineering decision-making process in the DB transportation infrastructure projects. It is anticipated that this study will offer constructive guidance on streamlining project delivery in the DB transportation infrastructure market.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.
Acknowledgments
This study was sponsored by the Georgia DOT through Research Project No. 19-09: Entrusted Engineer-in-Charge: A New Critical Position in the Design–Build Team. The authors remain exclusively responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the material presented in this paper. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Georgia DOT or the Federal Highway Administration. The paper does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
References
Works Cited
Alleman, D., and D. Tran. 2021. “Exploring a progressive design-build best-value delivery method in highway construction.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 13 (1): 05020018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000443.
Allensworth, W., R. Altman, A. Overcash, and O. Carol. 2009. “Construction law.” In Proc., Forum on the Construction Industry. New York: American Bar Association.
Ashuri, B., and J. H. Lee. 2021. Entrusted engineer-in-charge: A new critical position in the design-build team. Atlanta, GA: Georgia DOT.
Ashuri, B., J. H. Lee, and Y. Zhou. 2019. Emerging trends in design professional liability policies in innovative project delivery. Atlanta, GA: Georgia DOT.
Bogner, A., B. Littig, and W. Menz. 2009. Interviewing experts. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brady, T., and A. Davies. 2014. “Managing structural and dynamic complexity: A tale of two projects.” Project Manage. J. 45 (4): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21434.
Chan, E. H. W., and A. T. W. Yu. 2005. “Contract strategy for design management in the design and build system.” Int. J. Project Manage. 23 (8): 630–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.004.
Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. New York: SAGE.
Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. New York: SAGE.
Davies, A., D. Gann, and T. Douglas. 2009. “Innovation in megaprojects: Systems integration at London Heathrow Terminal 5.” Calif. Manag. Rev. 51 (2): 101–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166482.
DBIA (Design-Build Institute of America). 2022. “DBIA state maps.” Accessed July 7, 2022. https://dbia.org/advocacy/state/.
Dozzi, S. P., S. M. AbouRizk, and H. N. Ahuja. 1994. Project management: Techniques in planning and controlling construction projects. New York: Wiley.
Faniran, O. O., P. E. D. Love, G. Treloar, and C. J. Anumba. 2001. “Methodological issues in design-construction integration.” Logist. Inf. Manag. 14 (5/6): 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006254.
Fischer, M., and H. Adams. 2011. “Engineering—Based decisions in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 137 (10): 751–754. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000304.
FMI Corporation. 2021. Design-build utilization update. Raleigh, NC: FMI Corporation.
Galletta, A. 2013. Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond. New York: NYU Press.
Georgia DOT. 2020. Request for qualifications to provide design, construct, finance and maintain services through a design-build-finance-maintain agreement for the State Route (SR) 400 Express Lanes MMIP project. Atlanta, GA: Georgia DOT.
Gharaibeh, H. M. 2014. “Cost control in mega projects using the Delphi method.” J. Manage. Eng. 30 (5): 04014024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000218.
Gransberg, D., and K. Molenaar. 2008. Does design-build project delivery affect the future of the public engineer? Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Gransberg, D. D., and R. F. Barton. 2007. “Analysis of federal design-build request for proposal evaluation criteria.” J. Manage. Eng. 23 (2): 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCE0742-597X200723:2105.
Hollenbeck, J. R., and T. C. Trott. 2008. “How a small agency manages a mega pipeline project–A success story.” In Proc., Pipelines 2008: Pipeline Asset Management: Maximizing Performance of our Pipeline Infrastructure, 1–10. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Jackson, K., and P. Bazeley. 2019. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. New York: SAGE.
Levin, P. 1998. Construction contract claims, changes, & dispute resolution. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Liu, J., Q. Xie, B. Xia, and A. J. Bridge. 2017. “Impact of design risk on the performance of design-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (6): 04017010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001299.
Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. London: SAGE.
Moran, R. M., I. Odeh, and B. Ashuri. 2022. “Key challenges in megabridge design-build project procurement.” Leg. Aff. Disput. Resolut. Eng. Constr. 14 (1): 04521039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000516.
Okere, G., and C. Souder. 2018. “Making the case for temporary structures as a required course and recommending an instructional design.” In Proc., 2018 ASEE Annual Conf. & Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Oppenheim, A. N. 2000. Questionnaire design, interviewing, and attitude measurement continuum. London: Continuum.
Ratay, R. T. 2004. “Temporary structures in construction–USA practices.” Struct. Eng. Int. 14 (4): 292–295. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686604777963649.
Seidman, I. 2006. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
TxDOT (Texas DOT). 2019. Request for qualifications for the I-35 NEX project through a design-build contract and capital maintenance contract. Austin, TX: TxDOT.
Virginia DOT. 2019. I-95 Northbound Rappahannock River crossing. Fredericksburg, VA: Virginia DOT.
Whiting, L. S. 2008. “Semi-structured interviews: Guidance for novice researchers.” Nursing Stand. 22 (23): 35–40.
Wichern, S. 2004. “Protecting design-build owners through design liability coverage, independent construction managers, and quality control procedures.” Transp. Law J. 32 (1): 35–56.
Yang, D., Q. He, Q. Cui, and S.-C. Hsu. 2018. “Organizational citizenship behavior in construction megaprojects.” J. Manag. Eng. 34 (4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000614.
Yin, R. K. 2016. Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford Press.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15 • Issue 3 • August 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 7, 2022
Accepted: Feb 24, 2023
Published online: May 10, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 10, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Business management
- Construction engineering
- Construction industry
- Construction management
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering profession
- Infrastructure
- Leadership
- Personnel management
- Practice and Profession
- Professional development
- Project management
- Systems engineering
- Team building
- Transportation engineering
- Transportation management
- Transportation studies
- Value engineering
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Heung Jin Oh, Evan Mistur, Baabak Ashuri, Critical Review of Public–Private Partnership Business Models for Enhancing Broadband Initiatives in the United States, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1098, 16, 1, (2024).