Awarding Interest in International Arbitration: Identifying the Issues to be Considered for Coherence and Enforceability
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 3
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the legal position regarding awarding interest in international arbitration and identify the issues to be considered by arbitral tribunals. Despite the frequency of interest claims in arbitration, the area is shrouded in uncertainty. The uncertainty emanates from lack of uniformity and randomness in quantification of interest leading to undercompensation, incoherence, and inconsistency in the awards on interest. In identifying the pertinent issues to be considered in awarding interest, the paper relies on the doctrinal legal research approach to trace the legal basis for awarding interest and the interest rate to be applied. The approach justifies the use of primary legal text as sources of law, arbitral awards, and secondary sources to unveil the problem surrounding this area, analyze it, and identify the issues to be considered. The paper identifies the pertinent issues to be considered by arbitrators in awarding interest, and further unearths the legal basis of the issues from the generality of sources of law including sources of arbitral legitimacy. Indeed, the originality and value of this paper lie in the complexity and difficulty in navigating the issues of the award of interest and the little attention the current scholarship in arbitration pays to the issue, compared with other related areas such as quantification of damages. Thus, the issues identified and the need to systemically consider interest from the initial phase of arbitration will bring a new insight into the analysis of interest in international arbitration.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
No data, models, or code were generated or used during the study.
References
List of Cases
Amin Oil v. Kuwait (1982) Final Award.
CME Czech Republic BV v. The Czech Republic, (2003) Uncitral, para 643.
Compania del Desarrollo de Santa Elena S.A. v. Republic of Costa Rica, (2000) ICSID Case No. ARB/96/1.
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), (International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]) 575 UNTS 159, EIF October 14, 1966.
Desert Line Projects LLC v. The Republic of Yemen (2008) ICSID Case No. ARB/05/17.
Duke Energy Electroquil Partners & Electroquil S.A. v. Republic of Ecuador, (2008) ICSID.
Duke Energy International Peru Investments No. 1 Ltd. v. Republic of Peru, (2008) ICSID Case No. ARB/03/28.
Emilio Agustin Maffezini v. The Kingdom of Spain (2000) Case No. ARB/97/7.
ICC Case No. 5289, (1992) Award (extract), 3 (2) ICC Bull.
ICC Case No. 5789, (1992) Award (extract), 3 (1) ICC Bull.
Laminoirs, ETC v. Southwire Co., 484 F Supp. 1063 (N.D. Ga 1980).
Metalclad Corporation v. The United Mexican States, (2000) ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1.
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Iran, Partial Award in IUSCT Case No. 145-353-3 (1984).
Wena Hotels v. Egypt (1998) ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4; Case No. ARB/04/19.
List of Statutes
Agreement between the United States of America, the United Mexican States, and Canada, 7/1/20 Text, Expropriation and Compensation (2020).
Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ARSIWA), https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/9_6_2001.pdf.
Energy Charter Treaty, (1994).
English Arbitration Act 1996 c.23 (1996).
German Civil Code in the version promulgated on 2 January 2002 (Federal Law Gazette [Bundesgesetzblatt] I page 42, 2909; 2003 I page 738), last amended by Article 4 para. 5 of the Act of 1 October 2013 (Federal Law Gazette I page 3719) (2002).
International Centre for Dispute Settlement (ICSID) Convention, Regulations and Rules, ICSID/15/Rev.3 July (2022).
Italian Civil Code (Regio Decreto 16 Marzo 1942 n.262) (1942).
Mauritius International Arbitration Act, Act 37 of 2008, 1 January (2009).
UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, https://www.unidroit.org/english/principles/contracts/principles2016/principles2016-e.pdf.
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL): United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) (2010).
Works Cited
Berger, B., and E. Moltzahn. 2014. “Interest in international arbitration—An overview.” Int. Bus. Law J. 5: 361–371.
Born, G. B. 2020. International commercial arbitration. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.
Branson, D. J., and R. E. Wallace Jr. 1998. “Awarding interest in international commercial arbitration: Establishing a uniform approach.” Virginia J. Int. Law 28 (4): 919.
Chu, G. S., and J. Kelly. 2018. Awards of interest in international arbitration: Achieving coherence through purpose.” Indian J. Arb. L. 7 (1): 9.
CIArb (Chartered Institute of Arbitrators). 2016. “Practice Guideline 13: Guidelines for arbitrators on how to approach the making of on awards on interest.” Accessed January 28, 2023. https://www.ciarb.org/media/4218/2011-making-of-awards-on-interest.pdf.
Gotanda, J. Y. 1988. Supplemental damages in private international law. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
Gotanda, J. Y. 1996. “Awarding interest in international arbitration.” Am. J. Int. Law. 90 (1): 40–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/2203750.
Kantor, M. 2008. Valuation methods and expert evidence. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
LCIA (London Court of International Arbitration). 2020. “LCIA arbitration rules.” Accessed March 20, 2023. https://www.lcia.org/Dispute_Resolution_Services/lcia-arbitration-rules-2020.aspx.
Maniatis, M. A., F. Dorobantu, and F. Nunez. 2018. “A framework for interest awards in international arbitration.” Fordham Int. LJ. 41 (4): 821–840.
Marboe, I. 2017. Calculation of compensation and damages in international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ramsey, S. V. 2011. “Establishing claims for damages, costs and interest in international arbitration.” Am Univ. Int. Law Rev. 26 (5): 1211–1239.
Robin, G. 2010. “The recovery of contractual damage in international commerce: Arbitration practice.” Int. Business Law J. 5 (1): 431–466.
Sabahi, B. 2011.Compensation and restitution in investor-state arbitration: Principles and practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Secomb, M. 2019. Interest in international arbitration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Senechal, T. J., and J. Y. Gotanda. 2009. “Interest as damages.” C. J. Transnational Law 47 (3): 491–536.
SIAC (Singapore International Arbitration Centre) Rules. 2016. “SIAC Arbitration Rules.” Accessed April 14, 2023. https://siac.org.sg/siac-rules-2016.
WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). 2021. “WIPO arbitration rules.” Accessed January 12, 2023. https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/arbitration/rules/index.html.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 14, 2022
Accepted: Feb 11, 2023
Published online: May 9, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 9, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.