Exploring Economic Impacts of Sustainable Construction Projects on Stakeholders: The Role of Integrated Project Delivery
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 3
Abstract
Climate urgency has driven sustainability and the circular economy into the agenda of the construction industry. Despite growing efforts to promote sustainability, there is still a lack of a widespread implementation of sustainability in construction projects. Cost is often viewed as a main barrier to increasing the adoption of sustainable development in construction projects. Seeking cost efficiency appears as one of the central concerns of construction stakeholders in their sustainability moves. This paper presents an assessment of economic impacts of developing sustainability in construction projects. A questionnaire survey was adopted in the study to collect views of professionals on the economic implications of sustainable construction projects. The results reveal that energy cost saving and green subsidies are the main economic benefits derived from sustainable construction projects. Economic risks such as cost overrun and risks of not meeting the expected rate of return are primary factors hindering the development of sustainable construction practice. The study, however, found that, in general, construction stakeholders perceived sustainable construction to bring more positive economic impacts than negative economic impacts for most construction stakeholders. The economic value of a sustainable construction project can benefit the construction industry value chain from clients to suppliers and end users, following an increasing demand for sustainability in the construction sector. This paper offers insights into understanding the economic implications of sustainable construction projects. Thinking around economic impacts that span the entire building life cycle is essential to reveal the true economic value of sustainable construction projects. The authors indicate how construction stakeholders, by taking an integrated project delivery (IPD) perspective, can develop a more holistic view that allows them to gauge the underlying economic value of sustainable construction projects by incorporating long-term cost efficiency in the decision-making.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Heriot-Watt University (HWU) Recovery Research Fund to the project.
References
Works Cited
ASBC (American Sustainable Business Network). 2016. “Industry brief: How green building helps the U.S. Economy.” Accessed November 3, 2018. https://www.asbcouncil.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/asbc_green_building_industry_brief_20160522a.pdf.
Atkin, B., and S. Rowlinson. 2019. “Design and construction for operability.” In Routledge handbook of integrated project delivery, 526–542. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Azapagic, A. 2003. “Systems approach to corporate sustainability.” Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 81 (5): 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1205/095758203770224342.
De Marco, A., and A. Karzouna. 2018. “Assessing the benefits of the integrated project delivery method: A survey of expert opinions.” Procedia Comput. Sci. 138 (Jan): 823–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.107.
Deng, Y., and J. Wu. 2014. “Economic returns to residential green building investment: The developers’ perspective.” Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 47 (Jul): 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.09.015.
Dodge Data and Analysis. 2018. “World green building trend 2018.” Accessed November 20, 2018. https://worldgbc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/World-Green-Building-Trends-2018-SMR-FINAL-10-11.pdf.
Dwaikat, L. N., and K. N. Ali. 2018. “The economic benefits of a green building–Evidence from Malaysia.” J. Build. Eng. 18 (Jul): 448–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.04.017.
Fan, K., E. Chan, and C. Chau. 2018. “Costs and benefits of implementing green building economic incentives: Case study of a gross floor area concession scheme in Hong Kong.” Sustainability 10 (8): 2814. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082814.
Hu, M., and M. Skibniewski. 2021. “Green building construction cost surcharge: An overview.” J. Archit. Eng. 27 (4): 04021034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000506.
Hwang, B.-G., L. Zhu, and J. T. T. Ming. 2017. “Factors affecting productivity in green building construction projects: The case of Singapore.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (3): 04016052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000499.
Kibert, C. J. 2016. Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Lash, J., and F. Wellington. 2007. “Competitive advantage on a warming planet.” Harv. Bus. Rev. 85 (3): 94.
Lu, Y., Q. Cui, and Y. Le. 2013. “Turning green to gold in the construction industry: Fable or fact?” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (8): 1026–1036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000676.
McGraw-Hill Construction. 2006. Green building smart market report: Design & construction intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Porter, M., and C. Van der Linde. 1995. “Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate.” InVol. 33 of The Dynamics of the eco-efficient economy: Environmental regulation and competitive advantage, 120–134. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Reichardt, A. 2015. “Sustainable building certification and the rent premium: A panel data approach.” In Sustainability in commercial real estate markets, 9–35. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Gabler.
Ries, R., M. M. Bilec, N. M. Gokhan, and K. L. Needy. 2006. “The economic benefits of green buildings: A comprehensive case study.” Eng. Econ. 51 (3): 259–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00137910600865469.
Robichaud, L. B., and V. S. Anantatmula. 2011. “Greening project management practices for sustainable construction.” J. Manage. Eng. 27 (1): 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000030.
Tan, Y., L. Shen, and H. Yao. 2011. “Sustainable construction practice and contractors’ competitiveness: A preliminary study.” Habitat Int. 35 (2): 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.09.008.
Torcellini, P., S. Pless, and M. Leach. 2015. “A pathway for net-zero energy buildings: Creating a case for zero cost increase.” Build. Res. Inf. 43 (1): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.960783.
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2020. “Building sector emissions hit record high, but low-carbon pandemic recovery can help transform sector—UN report.” Accessed October 18, 2022. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/building-sector-emissions-hit-record-high-low-carbon-pandemic.
Warr, B., R. Ayres, N. Eisenmenger, F. Krausmann, and H. Schandl. 2010. “Energy use and economic development: A comparative analysis of useful work supply in Austria, Japan, the United Kingdom and the US during 100years of economic growth.” Ecol. Econ. 69 (10): 1904–1917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.021.
Yilmaz, M., and A. Bakis. 2015. “Sustainability in construction sector.” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci. 195: 2253–2262.
Zhang, L., J. Wu, and H. Liu. 2018. “Turning green into gold: A review on the economics of green buildings.” J. Cleaner Prod. 172 (Jan): 2234–2245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.188.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15 • Issue 3 • August 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 18, 2022
Accepted: Feb 14, 2023
Published online: May 11, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 11, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.