Case Studies
Dec 29, 2022

Contractors’ Claims in an EPC and Turnkey Contract: Lessons Learned from a Hydropower Project

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 2

Abstract

This study focuses on the contractor’s claims on a hydropower project contracted under an international engineering procurement and construction (EPC) and turnkey contract in Nepal. The contractor faced challenges from the mobilization phase and submitted multiple claims to the employer for time extensions and additional overhead costs. This study identified 80 claims for a time extension and additional overhead costs. Through content analysis, this study grouped these claims under six categories: natural disaster, strike, unforeseen risk, material shortage, payment, and the COVID-19 pandemic. First, the study analyzed the claim type, outcome, and decision criteria of the claims. Next, the analysis presented decisions based on general conditions of contract (GCC) and the particular conditions of contract (PCC) clauses. The study found that the employer granted a time extension to most of the claims under natural disaster under force majeure and rejected most of the claims under the other five groups. Finally, the study presents findings and lessons learned from the case study, including the relevant GCC and PCC clauses used in claims resolution. The findings and lessons learned from this case study could help employers and international EPC contractors who want to build hydropower projects in Nepal.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the assistance of the project’s employees and express special thanks to the contract manager for providing valuable input to this research.

References

Works Cited

Adhikari, P. 2014. “Risk and responsibilities of EPC contract.” Accessed July 25, 2022. https://www.nea.org.np/admin/assets/uploads/supportive_docs/Vidyut-2070-Falgun-24.pdf.
Bakr, A. F., K. E. Hagla, and A. N. Rawash. 2008. “Heuristic approach for risk assessment modeling: EPCCM application (engineer procure construct contract management).” Alexandria Eng. J. 51 (4): 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2012.09.001.
Berelson, B. R. 1971. Content analysis in communication research. New York: Hafner.
Charoenngam, C., and C. Y. Yeh. 1999. “Contractual risk and liability sharing in hydropower construction.” Int. J. Project. Manage. 17 (1): 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00064-1.
Chu, S. L. 1979. Tunnel engineering. 3rd ed. Taiwan: Technical Press.
Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Dhungel, S. K. 2013. “Relevance of EPC contracts in hydropower project.” Accessed July 25, 2022. https://www.nea.org.np/admin/assets/uploads/supportive_docs/Vidyut%20Halfyearly%20Year%2024%20Issue1%20new%20.pdf.
DLA Piper. 2011. “EPC contracts in the power sector, Asia Pacific projects update.” Accessed July 13, 2022. https://www.slideshare.net/raghunathanjanarthanan/epc-contractsinthepowersector.
Dulal, T. P., and H. R. Shrestha. 2021. Applying FIDIC contracts in Nepal in FIDIC contracts in Asia Pacific: A practical guide to application. Edited by D. Charrett, 379–410. London: Informa Law from Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003200901.
FIDIC (International Federation of Consulting Engineers). 1999. Conditions of contract for EPC/turnkey projects. 1st ed. Geneva: FIDIC.
Guo, Q., Z. P. Xu, G. F. Zhang, and T. T. Tu. 2010. “Comparative analysis between the EPC contract mode and the traditional mode based on the transaction cost theory.” In Proc., IEEE 17th Int. Conf. on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 191–195. New York: IEEE.
Hale, D. R., P. P. Shrestha, G. E. Gibson Jr., and G. C. Migliaccio. 2009. “Empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (Jul): 579–587. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000017.
Hosie, J. 2007. Turnkey contracting under the FIDIC Silver Book: What do employers want? What do they get? London: International Federation of Consulting Engineers.
Iyer, K. C., N. B. Chaphalkar, and G. A. Joshi. 2008. “Understanding time delay disputes in construction contracts.” Int. J. Project Manage. 26 (2): 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.05.002.
Jamwal, S. S., and K. Hariharan. 2004. “Effective management of turnkey execution of Chamera Hydroelectric Project, stage-III—Contractual aspects.” Water Energy Int. 61 (1): 48–54.
Kayastha, G. 2014. “Importance of contract administration for timely construction of hydropower projects without disputes.” Hydro Nepal: J. Water Energy Environ. 14 (Oct): 49–51. https://doi.org/10.3126/hn.v14i0.11265.
Kisi, K. P., K. J. Shrestha, and R. Kayastha. 2020. “Labor shortage and safety issues in postearthquake building construction: Case study.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (3): 05020011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000386.
Liu, J., B. Li, B. Lin, and V. Nguyen. 2007. “Key issues and challenges of risk management and insurance in China’s construction industry: An empirical study.” Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 107 (3): 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570710734280.
Low, S. P., J. Y. Liu, and S. Q. He. 2008. “Management of external risks: Case study of a Chinese construction firm at infancy stage in Singapore.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 8 (2): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2008.10773112.
Mayring, P. 2021. Qualitative content analysis a step-by-step guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
McLeod, R., and K. Laws. 2004. “Case study and grounded theory: Sharing some alternative qualitative research methodologies with systems professionals.” In Vol. 78 of Proc., 22nd Int. Conf. of the Systems Dynamics Society, 1–25. Oxford, UK: Keble College.
Oztas, A., and O. Okmen. 2004. “Risk analysis in fixed-price design–build construction projects.” Build. Environ. 39 (2): 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.08.018.
Picha, J., A. Tomek, and H. Löwitt. 2015. “Application of EPC contracts in international power projects.” Procedia Eng. 123 (Aug): 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.061.
Prajapati, R. N. 2015. “Delineation of run of river hydropower potential of Karnali basin-Nepal using GIS and HEC-HMS.” Eur. J. Adv. Eng. Technol. 2 (1): 50–54.
Pun, S. 2014. “The 60 versus 90 MW battle over Upper Trishuli-3A The victors and the vanquished classic case of throwing the baby out with the bathwater!” Hydro Nepal: J. Water Energy Environ. 13 (Aug): 8–15. https://doi.org/10.3126/hn.v13i0.11381.
RGHPCL (Rasuwagadhi Hydropower Company Limited). 2022. “Unaudited financial statement FY 2022/23.” Accessed December 12, 2022. https://rghpcl.com.np/images/supportive_docs/RGHPCL_UnauditedFinancialStatement_079_80_Q1.jpg.
Schramm, C., A. Meißner, and G. Weidinger. 2010. “Contracting strategies in the oil and gas industry.” Pipeline Technol. 2010: 33–36.
Shen, W., W. Tang, W. Yu, C. F. Duffield, F. K. P. Hui, Y. Wei, and J. Fang. 2017. “Causes of contractors’ claims in international engineering-procurement-construction projects.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 23 (6): 727–739. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1281839.
Shnookal, T., and D. Charrett. 2010. “Standard form contracting; the role for FIDIC contracts domestically and internationally.” In Vol. 30 of Proc., Society of Construction Law Conf. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Society of Construction Law Australia.
Simon, M. 1979. Construction contracts and claims. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Singh, S. 2000. “Dispute in EPC contracts.” Accessed July 28, 2022. https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-3638-dispute-in-epc-contracts.html.
Thweatt, W. T., and R. J. Long. 2017. EPC contract risk analysis associated with onshore projects in developing countries. Littleton, CO: Long International.
Wang, M.-T., and H.-Y. Chou. 2003. “Risk allocation and risk handling of highway projects in Taiwan.” J. Manage. Eng. 19 (2): 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2003)19:2(60).
Wang, S., and X. Liu. 2021. “Development of EPC model in Chinese public projects: Evolutionary game among stakeholders.” J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 21 (5): 2095–2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2021.1971681.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications: Design and methods. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15Issue 2May 2023

History

Received: Jun 30, 2022
Accepted: Oct 28, 2022
Published online: Dec 29, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 29, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sushmit Sharma Bhattarai [email protected]
Graduate Assistant, Dept. of Engineering Technology, Texas State Univ., San Marcos, TX 78666. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Engineering Technology, Texas State Univ., San Marcos, TX 78666 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1850-5747. Email: [email protected]
Rujan Kayastha [email protected]
Graduate Assistant, Dept. of Engineering Technology, Texas State Univ., San Marcos, TX 78666. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Forensic Investigations of Concrete Degradation: Case Study of a Hydropower Project, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 10.1061/JPCFEV.CFENG-4566, 38, 1, (2024).
  • Multifunctional Analysis of Construction Contracts Using a Machine Learning Approach, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5604, 40, 2, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share