Legal Notes
Nov 12, 2022

Construction Claims and Payment Disputes Analysis: Alternative Dispute Resolution to Litigation

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 1

Abstract

This study highlights construction claims and payment disputes between the project owner and the contractor in one of Nepal’s physical infrastructure development projects to address and emphasize the importance of following binding alternative dispute resolution (ADR). In this project, the contractor submitted four claims, of which the adjudicator and the arbitrator favored three to the contractor, but the project owner disagreed and proceeded with the litigation. The court decided in favor of the contractor, ordering the project owner to bear all the litigation fees and interest charges accrued during litigation. The findings show that the project owner went to court (a full judicial process) believing that obeying the court order would prevent them from being questioned later by a third party during an external audit for bribery or wrongdoing. This study presents why the project owner thought appealing to litigation was necessary. The lessons learned and findings presented in this study could help contractors and owners prevent unnecessary misunderstanding and mistrust among parties and encourage contracting parties to be more cautious when adopting the ADR strategy in resolving disputes. This paper also presents how two parties are affected by additional costs incurred throughout the litigation process and presents lessons learned that could benefit owners, contractors, and project managers in resolving disputes through ADR.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data used during the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

List of Statutes

Public Procurement Act (PPA) 2007 (2063 B.S.), Public Procurement Monitoring Office, Nepal.

Works Cited

Arditi, D., and D. Ongkasuwan. 2009. “Duties and responsibilities of construction managers: Perceptions of parties involved in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (12): 1370–1374. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000115.
Awwad, R., B. Barakat, and C. Menassa. 2016. “Understanding dispute resolution in the Middle East region from perspectives of different stakeholders.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (6): 05016019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000465.
Barrie, D. S., and B. C. Paulson. 1992. Professional construction management: Including CM, design-construct, and general contracting. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Brown, H. J., and A. L. Marriott. 1999. ADR principles and practice. 2nd ed. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
Chau, K. W. 2007. “Insight into resolving construction disputes by mediation/adjudication in Hong Kong.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 133 (2): 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:2(143).
Cheung, S. O. 1999. “Critical factors affecting the use of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction.” Int. J. Project Manage. 17 (3): 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00027-1.
Cheung, S. O. 2006. “Mandatory use of ADR in construction—A fundamental change from voluntary participation.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 132 (3): 224. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2006)132:3(224).
Cheung, S. O., P. S. P. Wong, and P. Kennedy. 2010. “Use of alternative dispute resolution in construction: A comparative study.” In Proc., 5th Int. Structural Engineering and Construction Conf., edited by N. Ghafoori. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Cheung, S.-O., H. C. H. Suen, and T.-I. Lam. 2002. “Fundamentals of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 128 (5): 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:5(409).
Gupta, P. C., and K. Venkataraman. 2010. “An overview of dispute resolution procedures in road projects with reference to the FIDIC form of contract and suggestions for improvements.” J. Indian Roads Congr. 71 (1): 101–110.
Harmon, K. M. J. 2003. “Resolution of construction disputes: A review of current methodologies.” Leadersh. Manage. Eng. 3 (4): 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2003)3:4(187).
Haugen, T., and A. Singh. 2015. “Dispute resolution strategy selection.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 7 (3): 05014004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000160.
Hill, T., and C. J. Wall. 2008. “Adjudication: Temporary binding and tiered dispute resolution in construction and engineering: Hong Kong experience.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 134 (3): 306–308. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:3(306).
Jagannathan, M., and V. S. K. Delhi. 2019. “Litigation proneness of dispute resolution clauses in construction contracts.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (3): 04519011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000301.
Jagannathan, M., and V. S. K. Delhi. 2020. “Litigation in construction contracts: Literature review.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (1): 03119001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000342.
Jagannathan, M., U. Quapp, and V. S. K. Delhi. 2021. “Litigation risk transfer mechanisms in construction dispute resolution process: Cross-case analysis.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 13 (3): 04521018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000486.
Jones, D. 2006. “Construction project dispute resolution: Options for effective dispute avoidance and management.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 132 (3): 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2006)132:3(225).
Kaplan, N., J. Spruce, and T. Y. Cheng. 1991. Hong Kong arbitration cases and materials. Hong Kong: Butterworths.
Kisi, K. P., N. Lee, R. Kayastha, and J. Kovel. 2020. “Alternative dispute resolution practices in international road construction contracts.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (2): 04520001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000373.
Kumaraswamy, M. M. 1997. “Conflicts, claims and disputes in construction.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 4 (2): 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021042.
Lieberman, J. K., and J. F. Henry. 1986. “Lessons from the alternative dispute resolution movement.” Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 53 (2): 424–439. https://doi.org/10.2307/1599646.
Marques, R. C. 2018. “Is arbitration the right way to settle conflicts in PPP arrangements?” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (1): 05017007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000564.
McGeorge, D., P. Love, P. Davis, M. Jefferies, P. Ward, and B. Chesworth. 2007. Dispute avoidance and resolution a literature review. Brisbane, Australia: Cooperative Research Centre for Construction Innovation.
Mikhail, C. A., and E. Serag. 2019. “Quantifying the delay from lost productivity.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (4): 05019005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000322.
Ng, H. S., F. Peña-Mora, and T. Tamaki. 2007. “Dynamic conflict management in large-scale design and construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 2 (52): 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:2(52).
Okudan, O., and M. Çevikbaş. 2022. “Alternative dispute resolution selection framework to settle disputes in public–private partnership projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (9): 04022086. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002351.
Rao, P. C. 1997. Alternatives to litigation in India. Alternative dispute resolution: What it is and how it works. New Delhi, India: Universal Law Publishing Company.
Rosenberg, J. D., and H. J. Folberg. 1994. “Alternative dispute resolution: An empirical analysis.” Stanford Law Rev. 46 (6): 1487–1551. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229164.
Rubin, R. A., and B. V. Quintas. 2003. “Alternative dispute resolution in US public works: Proposed model.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 129 (2): 80–83. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2003)129:2(80).
Semple, C., F. T. Hartman, and G. Jergeas. 1994. “Construction claims and disputes: Causes and cost/time overruns.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 120 (4): 785–795. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:4(785).
Shavell, S. 1995. “Alternative dispute resolution: An economic analysis.” J. Legal Stud. 24 (1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1086/467950.
Spillane, J. P., D. Treacy, A. Konanahalli, and L. O. Oyedele. 2016. “Construction dispute resolution in Ireland during recession: Best practice for small-to-medium enterprises.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 8 (2): 04515004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000180.
Stipanowich, T. J. 2004. “ADR and the ‘vanishing trial’: The growth and impact of ‘alternative dispute resolution.’” J. Empirical Leg. Stud. 1 (3): 843–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2004.00025.x.
Suvedi, O. 2007. “Nepali experience and experiment with arbitration on commercial disputes.” Nepal Law J. 1 (1): 91–108.
Tanielian, A. 2013. “Arbitration still best road to binding dispute resolution.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 5 (2): 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000111.
Torchia, M., and A. Calabrò. 2018. “Increasing the governance standards of public-private partnerships in healthcare. Evidence from Italy.” Public Organ. Rev. 18 (1): 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-016-0363-1.
Treacy, T. B. 1995. “Use of alternative dispute resolution in the construction industry.” J. Manage. Eng. 11 (1): 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1995)11:1(58).
Wideman, R. M. 1990. “Construction claims identification, communication and record keeping.” In Proc., TUNS/Revay Seminar, Expert Project Management—Construction Claims. Vancouver, BC, Canada: AEW Services.
Younis, G., G. Wood, and M. A. A. Malak. 2008. “Minimizing construction disputes: The relationship between risk allocation and behavioral attitudes.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Building Education Research, 728–740. Salford, UK: Univ. of Salford.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15Issue 1February 2023

History

Received: Jun 12, 2022
Accepted: Sep 6, 2022
Published online: Nov 12, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Apr 12, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Engineering Technology, Texas State Univ., San Marcos, TX 78666 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1850-5747. Email: [email protected]
Rujan Kayastha [email protected]
Graduate Assistant, Dept. of Engineering Technology, Texas State Univ., San Marcos, TX 78666. Email: [email protected]
Yogendra Chitrakar [email protected]
Senior Divisional Engineer, Dept. of Water Supply and Sewerage Management, Maharajgunj Rd., Kathmandu 44600, Nepal. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Analysis of Price Adjustment Claim during Project Time Extension, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1063, 16, 1, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share