Legal Notes
Nov 29, 2023

Analysis of Price Adjustment Claim during Project Time Extension

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16, Issue 1

Abstract

Uncertainties surrounding price adjustments, delays in index selection, and ambiguous escalation clauses compound the complexities of the construction environment between an owner and a contractor. This study investigated disputes and price adjustments within Nepal’s construction industry. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the qualitative analysis uncovered obstacles from index selection delays and contract management inadequacies related to price adjustments, and the quantitative analysis emphasized key project milestones and notable discrepancies between claimed and certified amounts. The research underscored the tribunal’s recommendation for an average adjustment approach, advocating for transparent communication and adherence to contract terms to facilitate fair dispute resolution. The study was motivated by the need to address the intricacies of the absence of specific price indices in construction projects, especially in the context of significant delays. It revealed the errors made by both parties in formulating and agreeing upon price adjustment clauses. The research assessed conflicts related to price adjustment, highlighting its significance in construction contracts and examining the impacts of incorporating accurate price indices on projects. The study also emphasized the implications of inadequate contract management expertise in resolving price adjustment disputes. The findings underscored the necessity for transparent methods and coherent contractual provisions. The tribunal’s endorsement of the average adjustment approach presented a balanced solution, mitigating index disparities and fostering equity. This approach underscored the importance of clear communication, consensus building, and steadfast adherence to contract terms. Ultimately, this research provided a nuanced exploration of dispute resolution dynamics, price adjustments, and the efficacy of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods within Nepal’s construction context. The findings and lessons learned presented in this paper could benefit owners, contractors, and other stakeholders by reducing the potential disputes related to price adjustment in the construction industry.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data used during the study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

List of Statutes

Arbitration Act 2055 (1999), Nepal Law Commission.
Public Procurement Rules (PPR) 2007 (2064 B.S.), Nepal Law Commission.

Works Cited

Abdul-Malak, M. A. U., M. M. El-Saadi, and M. G. Abou-Zeid. 2002. “Process model for administrating construction claims.” J. Manage. Eng. 18 (2): 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2002)18:2(84).
Agapiou, A., and B. Clark. 2011. “Scottish construction lawyers and mediation: An investigation into attitudes and experiences.” Int. J. Law Built Environ. 3 (2): 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561451111148266.
Ahmed, S., and M. H. R. Sobuz. 2020. “Challenges of implementing lean construction in the construction industry in Bangladesh.” Smart Sustainable Built Environ. 9 (2): 174–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-02-2019-0018.
Apte, B., and S. Pathak. 2016. “Review of types and causes of construction claims.” Int. J. Res. Civ. Eng. Archit. Des. 4 (2): 43–50.
Arditi, D., D. Ongkasuwan, and Committee on Management Practices in Construction (MPIC) of the ASCE Construction Institute. 2009. “Duties and responsibilities of construction managers: Perceptions of parties involved in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (12): 1370–1374. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000115.
Awwad, R., B. Barakat, and C. Menassa. 2016. “Understanding dispute resolution in the Middle East region from perspectives of different stakeholders.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (6): 05016019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000465.
Barakat, M., M. A. Abdul-Malak, and H. Khoury. 2018. “Particularized analysis of AIA’s expeditious mechanisms for administering claims and disputes.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (3): 04518015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000262.
Barrie, D. S., and B. C. Paulson. 1992. Professional construction management: Including CM, design-construct, and general contracting. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Brooker, P. 2007. “An investigation of evaluative and facilitative approaches to construction mediation.” Struct. Surv. 25 (3/4): 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800710772818.
Dancaster, C. 2008. “Construction adjudication in the United Kingdom: Past, present, and future.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 134 (2): 204–208. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:2(204).
Fawzy, S. A., I. H. El-Adaway, L. Perreau-Saussine, M. S. Abdel Wahab, and T. H. Hamed. 2018. “Claims for extension of time and additional payment under common law FIDIC: Civil law analysis.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (4): 06518002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000276.
Gebken, R. J., G. E. Gibson, and J. P. Groton. 2005. “Dispute resolution transactional cost quantification: What does resolving a construction dispute really cost?” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2005: Broadening Perspectives. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40754(183)87.
Ghimire, S., and A. K. Mishra. 2019. “Comparative study of prospective delay analysis techniques (DATs).” Saudi J. Civ. Eng. 3 (5): 84–98. https://doi.org/10.36348/SJCE.2019.v03i05.001.
Harmon, K. M. 2003. “Resolution of construction disputes: A review of current methodologies.” Leadersh. Manage. Eng. 3 (4): 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2003)3:4(187).
Haugen, T., and A. Singh. 2015. “Dispute resolution strategy selection.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 7 (3): 05014004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000160.
Jaafari, A. 2001. “Management of risks, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: Time for a fundamental shift.” Int. J. Project Manage. 19 (2): 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00047-2.
Jaffar, N., A. A. Tharim, and M. N. Shuib. 2011. “Factors of conflict in construction industry: A literature review.” Procedia Eng. 20 (Mar): 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.156.
Jagannathan, M., and V. S. K. Delhi. 2019. “Litigation proneness of dispute resolution clauses in construction contracts.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (3): 04519011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000301.
Jagannathan, M., U. Quapp, and V. S. K. Delhi. 2021. “Litigation risk transfer mechanisms in construction dispute resolution process: Cross-case analysis.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 13 (3): 04521018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000486.
Khahro, S. H., and T. H. Ali. 2014. “Causes leading to conflicts in construction projects: A viewpoint of Pakistani construction industry.” In Proc., In. Conf. on Challenges in IT, Engineering and Technology (ICCIET 2014), 17–18. Kharar, India: International Institute of Engineers.
Kisi, K., R. Kayastha, and Y. Chitrakar. 2023. “Construction claims and payment disputes analysis: Alternative dispute resolution to litigation.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 15 (1): 06522005. https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-908.
Kisi, K. P., N. Lee, R. Kayastha, and J. Kovel. 2020. “Alternative dispute resolution practices in international road construction contracts.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (2): 04520001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000373.
Kumaraswamy, M. M. 1997. “Conflicts, claims and disputes in construction.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 4 (2): 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021042.
LaBarre, P. S., and I. H. El-adaway. 2014. “Project benchmarking: Tool for mitigating conflicts, claims, and disputes through improved performance.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 6 (1): 04513003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000140.
Lieberman, J. K., and J. F. Henry. 1986. “Lessons from the alternative dispute resolution movement.” Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 53 (2): 424–439. https://doi.org/10.2307/1599646.
Marques, R. C. 2018. “Is arbitration the right way to settle conflicts in PPP arrangements?” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (1): 05017007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000564.
Marques, R. C., and S. Berg. 2010. “Revisiting the strengths and limitations of regulatory contracts in infrastructure industries.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 16 (4): 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000029.
McCartney, M. 2011. “Pakistan, growth, dependency, and crisis.” Lahore J. Econ. 16 (Sep): 71. https://doi.org/10.35536/lje.2011.v16.isp.a4.
Mishra, K., and P. S. Aithal. 2022. “Effectiveness of arbitration in construction projects.” Int. J. Manage. Tech. Soc. Sci. 7 (1): 96–111. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6246129.
Mossa, M. G. 2013. “Assessment of price escalation and adjustment problems on federal road construction projects.” Doctoral dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Addis Ababa Univ.
Ng, H., F. Peña-Mora, and T. Tamaki. 2007. “Dynamic conflict management in large-scale design and construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 2 (52): 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:2(52).
Okudan, O., and M. Çevikbaş. 2022. “Alternative dispute resolution selection framework to settle disputes in public–private partnership projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (9): 04022086. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002351.
Seifert, B. M. 2005. “International construction dispute adjudication under International Federation of Consulting Engineers conditions of contract and the dispute adjudication board.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 131 (2): 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:2(149).
Stipanowich, T. J. 1996. “Beyond arbitration: Innovation and evolution in the United States construction industry.” Wake Forest Law Rev. 31 (Mar): 65.
Subedi, D. P., and B. R. Joshi. 2020. “Identification of causes of delay in road projects: Cases in Gandaki Province, Nepal.” Saudi J. Eng. Technol. 5 (Jan): 231–243. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjet.2020.v05i05.004.
Teo, P. J. 2008. “Adjudication: Singapore perspective.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 134 (2): 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:2(224).
Vamsidhar, K., D. A. Eshwarswaroop, K. Ayyappapreamkrishna, and R. Gopinath. 2014. “Study and rate analysis of escalation in construction industry.” IOSR J. Mech. Civ. Eng. 11 (2): 14–25. https://doi.org/10.9790/1684-11251425.
Yates, J. K., and A. Epstein. 2006. “Avoiding and minimizing construction delay claim disputes in relational contracting.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 132 (2): 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2006)132:2(168).
Zegye, T. M. 2019. “Assessment of Challenges and Best Practices of Price Adjustment on Federal Road Construction Projects.” Doctoral dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Addis Ababa Science and Technology Univ.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16Issue 1February 2024

History

Received: Apr 20, 2023
Accepted: Sep 27, 2023
Published online: Nov 29, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Apr 29, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Rujan Kayastha [email protected]
Doctoral Research Assistant, Dept. of Engineering Technology, Texas State Univ., San Marcos, TX 78666. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Engineering Technology, Texas State Univ., San Marcos, TX 78666 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1850-5747. Email: [email protected]
Yogendra Chitrakar [email protected]
Senior Divisional Engineer, Ministry of Water Department, Suryabinayak, Bhaktapur, 44800, Nepal. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share