Abstract
The American Society of Civil Engineer’s Body of Knowledge versions 2 and 3 (BOK2 and BOK3) explicitly describe the knowledge expected in each category (outcome) of those entering the civil engineering profession. The goal of this study was to determine the extent that the BOK2 and BOK3 outcomes align with undergraduate civil engineering program content. Data were gathered from a representative sample of civil engineering program curriculums in the 2017–2018 academic year and mapped to the BOK2 and BOK3 outcomes using three different methods. The results reveal the average civil engineering program has dedicated, required courses that cover 67% of the BOK2 and 69% of the BOK3 outcomes. When including elective and survey courses that cover multiple outcomes, coverage increased to 95% of the BOK2 outcomes and 91% of the BOK3 outcomes. About 31% of the programs met all of the BOK2 outcomes and 6% met the BOK3 outcomes. Civil engineering programs offer courses that cover the majority of the BOK2 and BOK3 outcomes, but because of the flexibility in curriculums, some programs cover as few as 75% of the outcomes. Outcomes that were most often not met include mathematics (numerical methods), sustainability, business and public administration, globalization, and engineering economics.
Practical Applications
As undergraduate programs continue to evolve, undergraduate program administrators should consider mapping their required and elective course offerings to the BOK3 outcomes. Based on the results of this study, most programs cover the majority of the outcomes, but still have gaps in coverage. A comparison of BOK3 outcomes using Method 2 and Method 3 in this study would help identify program content that may be missing and overlooked in undergraduate programs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
ABET. 2016. “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2017-2018.” Accessed April 1, 2020. https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/E001-17-18-EAC-Criteria-10-29-16-1.pdf.
ABET. 2020. “Accredited programs.” Accessed April 1, 2020. https://amspub.abet.org/aps/name-search?searchType=institution.
ASCE. 2020. “Accreditation and ABET.” Accessed April 1, 2020. https://www.asce.org/accreditation-and-abet/.
ASCE BOK Committee of the Committee on Academic Prerequisites for Professional Practice. 2008. “Civil engineering body of knowledge.” Accessed January 1, 2018. http://www.asce.org/Civil_Engineering_Body_of_Knowledge/.
ASCE Civil Engineering BOK3 Task Committee. 2019. “Body of knowledge.” Accessed April 18, 2020. https://www.asce.org/civil_engineering_body_of_knowledge/.
Beheiry, S. M., A. Ghassan, M. Maruf, and K. A. Adil. 2012. “Integrating sustainability education in a classical civil engineering program: The case of transportation and construction courses.” Adv. Mater. Res. 347–353 (Feb): 2921–2932. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.347-353.2921.
Benson, D. B. 2012. “Skill and content trajectory mapping in a mechanical engineering program of study.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. New York: American Society for Engineering Education.
Caldwell, C., J. Hanus, and A. Chalmers. 2009. “Integration of information technology software in a civil engineering program.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. New York: American Society for Engineering Education.
Chau, K. W. 2007. “Incorporation of sustainability concepts into a civil engineering curriculum.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 133 (3): 188–191. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:3(188).
Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee. 2019. “Commentary on the ABET program criteria for civil and similarly named programs.” Accessed April 1, 2020. https://www.asce.org/uploadedFiles/Education_and_Careers/University_Curriculum_Development/Content_Pieces/CEPC%20Commentary%202019-2020.pdf.
Estes, A. C., and T. A. Lenox. 2014. “New civil engineering program criteria: How the sausage is being made.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. New York: American Society for Engineering Education.
Fowler, D., N. Poling, A. Whitney, J. Morgan, and K. Brumbelow. 2015. “Data-driven curriculum redesign in civil engineering.” In Proc., Frontiers in Education Conf., FIE. New York: IEEE.
Fridley, K. J., and T. A. Lenox. 2015. “Understanding the new civil engineering program criteria: Preparing to prepare the future civil engineer.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. New York: American Society for Engineering Education.
George, K. P., J. R. Rohde, and S. L. Iyer. 1994. “National survey of materials engineering program.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 120 (3): 313–323.
Halpin, G., G. Halpin, L. D. Benefield, W. F. Walker, and S. MacGuire. 1999. “An evaluation of an integrated pre-engineering program: Results from the freshman year and beyond.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. New York: American Society for Engineering Education.
Koehn, E. 2000. “Professional program criteria for civil engineering curriculums.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 126 (4): 174–179. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2000)126:4(174).
Kukreti, A. R., T. C. Keener, P. L. Bishop, and S. T. Kowel. 2003. “The accelerated engineering degrees (ACCEND) program in civil and environmental engineering at the university of Cincinnati.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. New York: American Society for Engineering Education.
Lowman, J. 1995. Mastering the techniques of teaching. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Wiley.
Mann, C. R. 1918. A study of engineering education. New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Newhouse, C., T. Afrin, A. Ramniceanu, and M. Swenty. 2020. “IF programming concepts are eliminated from the curriculum then civil engineers will.” In Proc., ASEE-SE Annual Conf. New York: American Society for Engineering Education.
Perkins, S. A. 2009. “A comparative analysis of civil engineering program standards in Canada, the United States and Europe.” Inst. Transp. Eng. J. 79 (5): 44–45.
Raebel, C. H., B. Wentz, and F. Mahuta. 2017. “A statistical evaluation of the value of pre-engineering curricula on first-year civil engineering student performance.” In Proc., Architectural Engineering National Conf. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Riley, C. E., V. L. Roger, S. St. Clair, D. Thaemert, and M. Sleep. 2014. “Creation of a co-terminal BS/MS civil engineering degree program.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. New York: American Society for Engineering Education.
Robinson, M., and K. Sutterer. 2005. “The design of a four-year ASCE BOK compliant program tract.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. New York: American Society for Engineering Education.
Russell, J. S., and W. B. Stouffer. 2005. “Survey of the national civil engineering curriculum.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 131 (2): 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:2(118).
Russell, J. S., W. B. Stouffer, and S. G. Walesh. 2000. “The first professional degree: A historic opportunity.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 126 (2): 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2000)126:2(54).
SACS COC Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges. 2020. “Resource manual for the principles of accreditation: For quality enhancement.” Accessed December 3, 2021. https://sacscoc.org/app/uploads/2019/08/2018-POA-Resource-Manual.pdf.
Safai, N. M., and L. Reaveley. 2005. “Universal model—A partnership for an accelerated civil engineering program bridging the civil engineering education from the community college to a university.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. New York: American Society for Engineering Education.
Schneider, R., and M. Pickett. 2006. “Bridging engineering and science teaching: A collaborative effort to design instruction for college students.” Sch. Sci. Math. 106 (6): 259–266.
Siller, T. J. 2001. “Sustainability and critical thinking in civil engineering curriculum.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 127 (3): 104–108.
Sullivan, S., R. Williams, W. Howard, J. Yao, and P. Kauffmann. 2007. “Identifying the content of a general engineering program using benchmarking and the fundamentals of engineering examination.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. New York: American Society for Engineering Education.
Swenty, B. J., and M. Swenty. 2018. “The impact of EAC-ABET program criteria on civil engineering curricula.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. & Exposition. New York: American Society for Engineering Education.
Swenty, B. J., and M. Swenty. 2019. “Is it time for a three-year accredited civil engineering degree in the United States?” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. New York: American Society for Engineering Education.
Walesh, S. G. 2021. Engineering’s public-protection predicament: Reform education and licensure for a safer society. Valparaiso, IN: Hannah Publishing.
Wolfe, D., and P. Alexander. 2008. “The state of engineering program accreditation and quality assurance in Canada.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. New York: American Society for Engineering Education.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 149 • Issue 4 • October 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 22, 2022
Accepted: Apr 27, 2023
Published online: Jul 3, 2023
Published in print: Oct 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Dec 3, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Alignment
- Business management
- Colleges and universities
- Computing in civil engineering
- Curricula and extra curricula
- Design (by type)
- Education
- Engineering education
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering profession
- Geometrics
- Highway and road design
- Methodology (by type)
- Numerical methods
- Organizations
- Practice and Profession
- Professional societies
- Undergraduate study
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.