Technical Papers
Aug 25, 2023

Influence of Cues on the Safety Hazard Recognition of Construction Workers during Safety Training: Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Experiment

Publication: Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 150, Issue 1

Abstract

Worldwide, construction site accidents cause many casualties among construction workers every year. Although many safety guidelines that construction workers are urged to read and keep in mind have been formulated, it is still difficult for the traditional construction safety education mode to quickly and accurately improve the hazard recognition ability of construction workers. Taking appropriate intervention measures in construction safety education helps improve the learning effectiveness of construction workers. Cue design is a teaching design included in digital learning resource design. Therefore, this study combines information processing learning theory with the expertise reversal effect. Eye movements of two groups, inclusive of experienced and novice workers, were monitored during a safety education mode using two different cues (i.e., visual and question cues). Average pupil diameter, time to first fixation, and recognition accuracy were used as indicators to measure the cognitive load and adaptation level and to test the outcome of all workers receiving safety education. The study results showed that (1) compared with question cues only, visual cues are more intuitive and more accessible for construction workers to understand; (2) experienced workers performed better than novice workers in all aspects of the safety education mode using two cues, and the work experience of the learning group plays an essential role in the cognitive load, adaptation level, and test outcome of workers in safety education; and (3) compared with the two cues, novice workers’ ability improved more obviously after receiving the safety education mode with visual cues. In contrast, experienced workers’ ability improved more obviously after receiving the safety education mode that uses question cues only, and this phenomenon is associated with expertise reversal effect in the field of education. This provides a meaningful suggestion for personalized intervention measures in safety education in the construction safety field in the future.

Practical Applications

Because of the difference of tacit knowledge brought by experience, novice and experienced workers have different learning styles and applicable educational modes in hazards recognition education. Cue design is a classic educational strategy in pedagogy. This study explores the effects of education cues and work experience on the safety hazard recognition of construction workers during safety training. Through construction safety education based on eye-tracking technology for novice and experienced workers, workers can recognize hidden hazards in construction sites more quickly and accurately with the help of different types of education cues (i.e., visual and question cues) from the field of pedagogy during safety education, and eye-movement data of construction workers can be monitored by eye tracking. Visual cues are more suitable for novice workers, while question cues are more suitable for experienced workers. In the future, the content and mode of construction safety education can be reasonably set based on cue design, and personalized training methods can be carried out according to the experience level of construction workers.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72001167), the Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China (No. 2022M7712494), and the National Fund Cultivation Project of Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology (No. X20220035).

References

Ahmed, A., D. Hurwitz, S. Gestson, and S. Brown. 2021. “Differences between professionals and students in their visual attention on multiple representation types while solving an open-ended engineering design problem.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 147 (3): 04021005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000044.
Albert, A., M. R. Hallowell, and B. M. Kleiner. 2014. “Enhancing construction hazard recognition and communication with energy-based cognitive mnemonics and safety meeting maturity model: Multiple baseline study.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (2): 04013042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000790.
Armougum, A., A. Gaston-Bellegarde, C. Joie-La Marle, and P. Piolino. 2020. “Expertise reversal effect: Cost of generating new schemas.” Comput. Hum. Behav. 111 (Oct): 106406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106406.
Babadogan, C., and F. Unal. 2011. “Examples of instructional design for social studies according to meaningful learning and information processing theories.” In Proc., 3rd World Conf. on Educational Sciences (WCES), 2155–2158. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Bhoir, S. A., S. Hasanzadeh, B. Esmaeili, M. D. Dodd, and M. S. Fardhosseini. 2015. “Measuring construction workers’ attention using eye-tracking technology.” In Proc., ICSC15: The Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 5th Int./11th Construction Specialty Conf. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Univ. of British Columbia.
Castelhano, M. S., and C. Heaven. 2010. “The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes.” Attention Percept. Psychophysics 72 (5): 1283–1297. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.5.1283.
Chen, O., S. Kalyuga, and J. Sweller. 2017. “The expertise reversal effect is a variant of the more general element interactivity effect.” Educ. Psychol. Rev. 29 (Jun): 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9359-1.
Cheng, B., C. Fan, H. Fu, J. Huang, H. Chen, and X. Luo. 2022. “Measuring and computing cognitive statuses of construction workers based on electroencephalogram: A critical review.” IEEE Trans. Comput. Social Syst. 9 (6): 1644–1659. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2022.3158585.
Cheng, C.-W., and T.-C. Wu. 2013. “An investigation and analysis of major accidents involving foreign workers in Taiwan’s manufacture and construction industries.” Saf. Sci. 57 (Aug): 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.02.008.
Chong, H.-Y., M. Liang, and P.-C. Liao. 2021. “Normative visual patterns for hazard recognition: A crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis approach.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 25 (5): 1545–1554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-1362-5.
Comu, S., G. Kazar, and Z. Marwa. 2021. “Evaluating the attitudes of different trainee groups towards eye tracking enhanced safety training methods.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 49 (Aug): 101353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101353.
Cong, R., K. Tago, and Q. Jin. 2022. “Measurement and verification of cognitive load in multimedia presentation using an eye tracker.” Multimedia Tools Appl. 81 (19): 26821–26835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13294-0.
Dawood, N., G. Miller, J. Patacas, and M. Kassem. 2014. “Combining serious games and 4D modelling for construction health and safety training.” In Proc., Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (2014), 2087–2094. Reston, VA: ASCE.
De Koning, B. B., H. K. Tabbers, R. M. J. P. Rikers, and F. Paas. 2009. “Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design.” Educ. Psychol. Rev. 21 (Jun): 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9098-7.
De Koning, B. B., H. K. Tabbers, R. M. J. P. Rikers, and F. Paas. 2010. “Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding?” Learn. Instr. 20 (2): 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.010.
Dzeng, R.-J., C.-T. Lin, and Y.-C. Fang. 2016. “Using eye-tracker to compare search patterns between experienced and novice workers for site hazard identification.” Saf. Sci. 82 (Feb): 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.08.008.
Fang, D., C. Zhao, and M. Zhang. 2016. “A cognitive model of construction workers’ unsafe behaviors.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (9): 04016039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001118.
Forst, L., E. Ahonen, J. Zanoni, A. Holloway-Beth, M. Oschner, L. Kimmel, C. Martino, E. Rodriguez, A. Kader, and E. Ringholm. 2013. “More than training: Community-based participatory research to reduce injuries among hispanic construction workers.” Am. J. Ind. Med. 56 (8): 827–837. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22187.
Froehle, K., L. Dickman, A. R. Phillips, H. Murzi, and M. Paretti. 2022. “Understanding lifelong learning and skills development: Lessons learned from practicing civil engineers.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 148 (4): 04022007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000068.
Ge, X., C.-H. Chen, and K. A. Davis. 2005. “Scaffolding novice instructional designers’ problem-solving processes using question prompts in a web-based learning environment.” J. Educ. Comput. Res. 33 (2): 219–248. https://doi.org/10.2190/5F6J-HHVF-2U2B-8T3G.
Gegenfurtner, A., E. Lehtinen, and R. Säljö. 2011. “Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: A meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains.” Educ. Psychol. Rev. 23 (Dec): 523–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9174-7.
Han, Y., Z. Feng, J. Zhang, R. Jin, and E. Aboagye-Nimo. 2019. “Employees’ safety perceptions of site hazard and accident scenes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (1): 04018117. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001590.
Han, Y., J. R. Yang, Y. S. Diao, R. Y. Jin, B. Guo, and Z. Adamu. 2022. “Process and outcome-based evaluation between virtual really-driven and traditional construction safety training.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 52 (Apr): 101634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101634.
Han, Y., Z. Yin, J. Zhang, R. Jin, and T. Yang. 2020. “Eye-tracking experimental study investigating the influence factors of construction safety hazard recognition.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (8): 04020091. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001884.
Hasanzadeh, S., B. Dao, B. Esmaeili, and M. D. Dodd. 2019. “Role of personality in construction safety: Investigating the relationships between personality, attentional failure, and hazard identification under fall-hazard conditions.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (9): 04019052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001673.
Hasanzadeh, S., B. Esmaeili, and M. D. Dodd. 2016. “Measuring construction workers’ real-time situation awareness using mobile eye-tracking.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan, CRC 2016, 2894–2904. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Hasanzadeh, S., B. Esmaeili, and M. D. Dodd. 2017a. “Impact of construction workers’ hazard identification skills on their visual attention.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (10): 04017070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001373.
Hasanzadeh, S., B. Esmaeili, and M. D. Dodd. 2017b. “Measuring the impacts of safety knowledge on construction workers’ attentional allocation and hazard detection using remote eye-tracking technology.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (5): 04017024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000526.
Jazayeri, E., and G. B. Dadi. 2020. “Hazard recognition and risk perception skills among union electricians.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (9): 04020108. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001874.
Jeelani, I., A. Albert, R. Azevedo, and E. J. Jaselskis. 2017. “Development and testing of a personalized hazard-recognition training intervention.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (5): 04016120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001256.
Jeelani, I., A. Albert, K. Han, and R. Azevedo. 2019. “Are visual search patterns predictive of hazard recognition performance? Empirical investigation using eye-tracking technology.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (1): 04018115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001589.
Jeelani, I., K. Han, and A. Albert. 2018. “Automating and scaling personalized safety training using eye-tracking data.” Autom. Constr. 93 (Sep): 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.006.
Jerčić, P., C. Sennersten, and C. Lindley. 2020. “Modeling cognitive load and physiological arousal through pupil diameter and heart rate.” Multimedia Tools Appl. 79 (5–6): 3145–3159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6518-z.
Jiang, D., S. Kalyuga, and J. Sweller. 2018. “The curious case of improving foreign language listening skills by reading rather than listening: An expertise reversal effect.” Educ. Psychol. Rev. 30 (Sep): 1139–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9427-1.
Jin, S.-H. 2013. “Visual design guidelines for improving learning from dynamic and interactive digital text.” Comput. Educ. 63 (Apr): 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.010.
Johnson, A. M., G. Ozogul, and M. Reisslein. 2015. “Supporting multimedia learning with visual signalling and animated pedagogical agent: Moderating effects of prior knowledge.” J. Comput. Assisted Learn. 31 (2): 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12078.
Kalyuga, S. 2007. “Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction.” Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19 (4): 509–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3.
Kazar, G., and S. Comu. 2021. “Effectiveness of serious games for safety training: A mixed method study.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (8): 04021091. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002119.
Khacharem, A. 2017. “Top-down and bottom-up guidance in comprehension of schematic football diagrams.” J. Sports Sci. 35 (12): 1204–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1218034.
Kim, N., B. A. Anderson, and C. R. Ahn. 2021a. “Reducing risk habituation to struck-by hazards in a road construction environment using virtual reality behavioral intervention.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (11): 04021157. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002187.
Kim, N., J. Kim, and C. R. Ahn. 2021b. “Predicting workers’ inattentiveness to struck-by hazards by monitoring biosignals during a construction task: A virtual reality experiment.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 49 (Aug): 101359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101359.
Kopacz, A., G. Banerski, and C. Biele. 2022. “Cognitive and visual processing of 3D enhanced disaster risk communication video.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 75 (Jun): 102971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102971.
Kutbay, E., and Y. Akpinar. 2020. “Investigating modality, redundancy and signaling principles with abstract and concrete representation.” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol. 8 (2): 131–145. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.v8i2.710.
Li, J., H. Li, H. Wang, W. Umer, H. Fu, and X. Xing. 2019. “Evaluating the impact of mental fatigue on construction equipment operators’ ability to detect hazards using wearable eye-tracking technology.” Autom. Constr. 105 (Sep): 102835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102835.
Little, J. L., and E. L. Bjork. 2016. “Multiple-choice pretesting potentiates learning of related information.” Mem. Cognit. 44 (7): 1085–1101. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0621-z.
Liu, M., P.-C. Liao, X.-Y. Wang, S. Li, and P.-L. P. Rau. 2021. “Influence of semantic cues on hazard-inspection performance: A case in construction safety.” Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 27 (1): 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1541648.
Liu, R., X. Xu, H. Yang, Z. Li, and G. Huang. 2022. “Impacts of cues on learning and attention in immersive 360-degree video: An eye-tracking study.” Front. Psychol. 12 (Jan): 792069. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.792069.
Mayer, R. E. 2005. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Namian, M., A. Albert, C. M. Zuluaga, and E. J. Jaselskis. 2016. “Improving hazard-recognition performance and safety training outcomes: Integrating strategies for training transfer.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (10): 04016048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001160.
Naser, M. 2022. “A faculty’s perspective on infusing artificial intelligence into civil engineering education.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 148 (4): 02522001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000065.
Nievelstein, F., T. Van Gog, G. Van Dijck, and H. P. Boshuizen. 2013. “The worked example and expertise reversal effect in less structured tasks: Learning to reason about legal cases.” Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 38 (2): 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.12.004.
Noghabaei, M., K. Han, and A. Albert. 2021. “Feasibility study to identify brain activity and eye-tracking features for assessing hazard recognition using consumer-grade wearables in an immersive virtual environment.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (9): 04021104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002130.
OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration). 2011. Outreach training program, construction focus four training. Washington, DC: OSHA.
Ouyang, Y., and X. Luo. 2022. “Differences between inexperienced and experienced safety supervisors in identifying construction hazards: Seeking insights for training the inexperienced.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 52 (Apr): 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101602.
Pedro, A., Q. T. Le, and C. S. Park. 2016. “Framework for integrating safety into construction methods education through interactive virtual reality.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 142 (2): 04015011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000261.
Podgórski, D. 2010. “The use of tacit knowledge in occupational safety and health management systems.” Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 16 (3): 283–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2010.11076845.
Poleacovschi, C., K. Faust, A. Roy, and S. Feinstein. 2021. “Identity of engineering expertise: Implicitly biased and sustaining the gender gap.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 147 (1): 04020011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000027.
Rey, G. D., and A. Fischer. 2013. “The expertise reversal effect concerning instructional explanations.” Instr. Sci. 41 (Mar): 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9237-2.
Richter, J., K. Scheiter, and A. Eitel. 2016. “Signaling text-picture relations in multimedia learning: A comprehensive meta-analysis.” Educ. Res. Rev. 17 (Feb): 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.003.
Salden, R. J., V. Aleven, R. Schwonke, and A. Renkl. 2010. “The expertise reversal effect and worked examples in tutored problem solving.” Inst. Sci. 38 (3): 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9107-8.
Sanchez, D., M. Barner, and S. Brown. 2022. “Comparing engineering student and practitioner performance on the strength of materials concept inventory: Results and implications.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 148 (3): 04022002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000061.
Scheiter, K., and A. Eitel. 2015. “Signals foster multimedia learning by supporting integration of highlighted text and diagram elements.” Learn. Instr. 36 (Apr): 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.002.
Szpunar, K. K., N. Y. Khan, and D. L. Schacter. 2013. “Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110 (16): 6313–6317. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221764110.
Uddin, S. J., A. Albert, A. Alsharef, B. Pandit, Y. Patil, and C. Nnaji. 2020. “Hazard recognition patterns demonstrated by construction workers.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17 (21): 7788. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217788.
Wang, F., W. Li, R. E. Mayer, and H. Liu. 2018. “Animated pedagogical agents as aids in multimedia learning: Effects on eye-fixations during learning and learning outcomes.” J. Educ. Psychol. 110 (2): 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000221.
Wang, H.-H., and F. Boukamp. 2011. “Ontology-based representation and reasoning framework for supporting job hazard analysis.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 25 (6): 442–456. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000125.
Wang, M., X. Liu, Y. Lai, W. Cao, Z. Wu, and X. Guo. 2022. “Application of neuroscience tools in building construction—An interdisciplinary analysis.” Front. Neurosci. 16 (Jun): 895666. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.895666.
Wang, X., L. Lin, M. Han, and J. M. Spector. 2020. “Impacts of cues on learning: Using eye-tracking technologies to examine the functions and designs of added cues in short instructional videos.” Comput. Hum. Behav. 107 (Jun): 106279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106279.
Weimer, A. A., S. J. P. Dowds, W. V. Fabricius, P. J. Sthwanenflugel, and G. W. Suh. 2017. “Development of constructivist theory of mind from middle childhood to early adulthood and its relation to social cognition and behavior.” J. Exp. Child Psychol. 154 (Feb): 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.10.002.
Zhang, L., and J. He. 2016. “Critical factors affecting tacit-knowledge sharing within the integrated project team.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (2): 04015045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000402.
Zhang, Q., D. Zhang, P.-C. Liao, and Y. Hu. 2021. “Investigation of interaction among factors underlying construction hazard identification.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 48 (7): 838–847. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2020-0170.
Zoudji, B., A. Khacharem, and R. Porter. 2015. “Effects of time on memorization of soccer scenes. Presentation formats and expertise reversal effect.” Int. J. Sport Psychol. 46 (5): 456–479.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 150Issue 1January 2024

History

Received: Aug 14, 2022
Accepted: Jun 14, 2023
Published online: Aug 25, 2023
Published in print: Jan 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jan 25, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hanliang Fu [email protected]
Professor, School of Management, Xi’an Univ. of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China; Laboratory of Neuromanagement in Engineering, Xi’an Univ. of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China. Email: [email protected]
Zhongjing Xia [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, School of Management, Xi’an Univ. of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China; Laboratory of Neuromanagement in Engineering, Xi’an Univ. of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, School of Management, Xi’an Univ. of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China; Laboratory of Neuromanagement in Engineering, Xi’an Univ. of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Management, Xi’an Univ. of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China; Laboratory of Neuromanagement in Engineering, Xi’an Univ. of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4793-5044. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Construction Site Hazard Identification and Worker Adverse Reaction Monitoring Using Electroencephalograms: A Review, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings14010180, 14, 1, (180), (2024).
  • Differences between Experts and Novices in the Use of Aircraft Maintenance Documentation: Evidence from Eye Tracking, Applied Sciences, 10.3390/app14031251, 14, 3, (1251), (2024).
  • Effect of Interruptions and Cognitive Demand on Mental Workload: A Critical Review, IEEE Access, 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3383142, 12, (54405-54425), (2024).
  • Empowering architecture, engineering and construction students through building information modeling competitions: a deep dive into behavioral motivation, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10.1108/ECAM-10-2023-1076, (2024).
  • Construction hazard-recognition training for generation Z students: a comparison study based on eye-movement data, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10.1108/ECAM-09-2023-0882, (2024).
  • Identifying Critical Factors and Trends Leading to Fatal Accidents in Small-Scale Construction Sites in Korea, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings13102472, 13, 10, (2472), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share