Abstract

Delivering project value primarily depends on understanding project stakeholders' different needs and requirements and translating these needs into a well-constructed facility. This concept is usually insufficiently revealed using different terminologies during the educational journey of architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) professionals. The goals of this research are to (1) investigate students' and practitioners' familiarity and knowledge about the concept of value, (2) explore underlying gaps in teaching value in AEC education, and (3) propose essential practices to overcome identified educational shortcomings. For this purpose, combined qualitative and quantitative approaches were used to evaluate responses by students and practitioners, including a structured survey, interviews, and statistical analysis. The paper introduced a framework for educational content that supports value delivery using lean principles, design thinking, sustainability, and digital collaborative technologies. The survey and interviews revealed a major deficiency in students' and practitioners' familiarity with the concept of delivering value and the tools needed to enhance it. Thus, a knowledge gap about delivering project value was identified in AEC curricula. Additionally, cross-disciplinary engagement and collaboration efforts were found to be insufficient. Students and practitioners revealed doubts about the relevance of academic projects. Nonetheless, participants confirmed the importance of providing a better understanding of the value concept and related practices. The proposed framework for better incorporating the value concept into AEC curricula has the potential to improve project outcomes and satisfaction in the AEC industry.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data that support the study findings are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

This study is funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant RGPIN-2020-04420 and NSERC Alliance—Alberta Innovates Advance Program 232403286.

References

Alves, T., C. Milberg, and K. D. Walsh. 2012. “Exploring lean construction practice, research, and education.” Eng. Construct. Archit. Manage. 19 (5): 512–525. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981211259595.
APA (American Psychological Association). 2023. APA dictionary of psychology. Washington, DC: APA. https://dictionary.apa.org/network-sampling
Aranda-Mena, G. 2016. “Four value propositions for architecture education.” In Proc., 50th Int. Conf. Architectural Science Association, 369–378. Adelaide, Australia: University of Adelaide.
Bae, J.-W., and Y.-W. Kim. 2008. “Sustainable value on construction projects and lean construction.” J. Green Build. 3 (1): 156–167. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.3.1.156.
Ballard, G., and G. Howell. 1998. “What kind of production is construction.” In Proc., 6th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, 13–15. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Ballard, G., and G. Howell. 2003. “Lean project management.” Build. Res. Inf. 31 (2): 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210301997.
Barima, O. K. B. 2010. “Examination of the best, analogous, competing terms to describe value in construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 28 (3): 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.05.009.
Bertoni, A. 2020. “Introducing value driven design in engineering education: Teaching the use of value models in preliminary design.” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 30 (3): 531–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09511-x.
Bjørberg, S., A. K. Larssen, A. Temeljotov Salaj, and A. Haddadi. 2015. “Optimizing building design to contribute to value creation.” In Proc., IPMA World Congress, 1–8. Panama City, Panama: International Project Management Association (IPMA).
Borrego, M., and L. K. Newswander. 2008. “Characteristics of successful cross-disciplinary engineering education collaborations.” J. Eng. Educ. 97 (2): 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00962.x.
Devine-Wright, H., D. S. Thomson, and S. A. Austin. 2003. “Matching values and value in construction and design.” In Proc., 3rd Conf. EPUK (Environmental Psychology in the UK). Crossing the Value of Interdisciplinary Research Boundaries, 42–51. Aberdeen: Robert Gordon Univ.
Dym, C. L., A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer. 2005. “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning.” J. Eng. Educ. 94 (1): 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x.
Found, P., and R. Harrison. 2012. “Understanding the lean voice of the customer.” Int. J. Lean. Six Sigma 3 (3): 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/20401461211282736.
Green, S. D. 1994. “Beyond value engineering: SMART value management for building projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 12 (1): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(94)90009-4.
Han, S., S. H. Lee, and F. Peña-Mora. 2012. “Identification and quantification of non-value-adding effort from errors and changes in design and construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (1): 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000406.
Hevner, A. R. 2007. “A three cycle view of design science research.” Scand. J. Inf. Sys. 19 (2): 87–92.
Holley, P. W., and C. Ben Farrow. 2013. “Expanding collaboration in academia: Case study of the development of construction products.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 139 (2): 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000130.
Horman, M. J., D. R. Riley, M. H. Pulaski, and C. Leyenberger. 2004. “Lean and green: Integrating sustainability and lean construction.” In Proc., CIB World Building Congress, Int. Council for Research and Innovation in Building, 2–7. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB).
Hu, M. 2019. “BIM-enabled pedagogy approach: Using BIM as an instructional tool in technology courses.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 145 (1): 05018017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000398.
Kamara, J. M., C. J. Anumba, and N. F. O. Evbuomwan. 2002. Capturing client requirements in construction projects. London, UK: Thomas Telford.
Kelly, J. 2003. Value management of construction projects. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Online Library.
Kliniotou, M. 2004. “Identifying, measuring and monitoring value during project development.” Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 29 (3): 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790310001658613.
Koskela, L. 2000. An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction. Espoo, Finland: Helsinki Univ. of Technology.
Laursen, M., and P. Svejvig. 2016. “Taking stock of project value creation: A structured literature review with future directions for research and practice.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (4): 736–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.06.007.
Levitt, E. R. 2007. “CEM research for the next 50 years: Maximizing economic, environmental, and societal value of the built environment.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 133 (9): 619–628. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:9(619).
Liker, J. K. 2004. Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Mallon, J. C., and D. E. Mulligan. 1993. “Quality function deployment—A system for meeting customers’ needs.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 119 (3): 516–531. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1993)119:3(516).
Martinsuo, M., O. J. Klakegg, and A. van Marrewijk. 2019. “Delivering value in projects and project-based business.” Int. J. Project Manage. 37 (5): 631–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.011.
Marzano, R. J., D. Pickering, and J. E. Pollock. 2001. Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Matthews, O., and G. A. Howell. 2005. “Integrated project delivery an example of relational contracting.” Lean Construct. J. 2 (1): 46–61.
National Research Council. 1995. Education of architects and engineers for careers in facility design and construction. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Pena, W. M., and S. A. Parshall. 2012. Problem seeking: An architectural programming primer. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Pirozzi, M. 2019. The stakeholder perspective: Relationship management to increase value and success rates of projects. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis.
Plattner, H. 2010. An introduction to design thinking: Process guide. Palo Alto, CA: Institute of Design at Stanford, Institute of Design at Stanford Univ.
Pregenzer, L. J., P. J. Seppanen, J. C. Kunz, and B. C. Paulson. 1999. “Value-added assessment of construction plans.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 125 (4): 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:4(242).
Ravesteijn, W., E. De Graaff, and O. Kroesen. 2006. “Engineering the future: The social necessity of communicative engineers.” Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 31 (1): 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790500429005.
Rischmoller, L., L. F. Alarcón, and L. Koskela. 2006. “Improving value generation in the design process of industrial projects using CAVT.” J. Manage. Eng. 22 (2): 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2006)22:2(52).
Rybkowski, Z. K., L. H. Forbes, and C. C. Y. Tsao. 2020. “Chapter 19: The evolution of lean construction education at US-based universities.” In Lean construction: Core concepts and New frontiers, edited by P. Tzortzopoulos, M. Kagioglou, and L. Koskela, 387–407. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Sahadevan, V., and K. Varghese. 2022. “A framework to identify stakeholder values for building layout design.” J. Archit. Eng. 28 (3): 4022019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000549.
Shekar, A. 2014. “Project-based learning in engineering design education: Sharing best practices.” In Proc., 2014 ASEE Annual Conf. Exposition, 24–1016. Indianapolis, IN: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).
Shen, W., and Q. Hao. 2007. “Computer supported collaborative design: Review and perspective.” SAE Transactions, JSTOR, 950–958. Ottawa, ON: SAE International/JSTORNational Research Council of Canada.
Smith, J., and P. E. D. Love. 2004. “Stakeholder management during project inception: Strategic needs analysis.” J. Archit. Eng. 10 (1): 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2004)10:1(22).
Solhjou Khah, F., Z. K. Rybkowski, A. R. Pentecost, J. P. Smith, and R. Muir. 2019. “Development and testing of an innovative architectural programming simulation as a precursor to target value design.” In 27th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), edited by V. A. González, 515–525. Dublin, Ireland.
Tener, R., M. Winstead, and E. Smaglik. 2001. “Experiential learning from internships in construction engineering.” In Proc., 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf., 6–486. Albuquerque, NM: American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE).
Thyssen, M. H., S. Emmitt, S. Bonke, and A. Kirk-Christoffersen. 2010. “Facilitating client value creation in the conceptual design phase of construction projects: A workshop approach.” Archit. Eng. Des. Manage. 6 (1): 18–30. https://doi.org/10.3763/aedm.2008.0095.
Trevelyan, J., and B. Williams. 2019. “Value creation in the engineering enterprise: An educational perspective.” Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 44 (4): 461–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1421905.
Whelton, M. G. 2004. The development of purpose in the project definition phase of construction projects, 313. Berkeley, CA: Engineering-Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California.
Womack, J. P., and D. T. Jones. 1997. “Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 84 (1): 1144–1150. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jors.2600967.
Xian, H., and K. Madhavan. 2014. “Anatomy of scholarly collaboration in engineering education: A big-data bibliometric analysis.” J. Eng. Educ. 103 (3): 486–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20052.
Zhang, L., and N. M. El-Gohary. 2016. “Discovering stakeholder values for axiology-based value analysis of building projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (4): 4015095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001004.
Zhang, X., G. Auriol, H. Eres, and C. Baron. 2013. “A prescriptive approach to qualify and quantify customer value for value-based requirements engineering.” Int. J. Computer Integr. Manuf. 26 (4): 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2012.717718.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 30Issue 4December 2024

History

Received: Dec 20, 2023
Accepted: Jun 5, 2024
Published online: Aug 20, 2024
Published in print: Dec 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jan 20, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Research Scholar, Construction Management, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, 116 St and 85 Ave., Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1907-4547. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Construction Science, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77840. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0683-5004. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, 116 St and 85 Ave., Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3986-9534. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share