Technical Notes
Dec 21, 2022

Physics-Informed Optimization for Dynamic Soil–Structure Interaction Analysis of a Pile Partially Embedded in Nonlayered Soils

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23, Issue 3

Abstract

This study proposes a novel physics-informed optimization approach to account for nonlayered soil conditions for the dynamic soil–structure interaction analysis that is critical for structural health monitoring involving soil–structure interaction. This approach can estimate soil properties based on a few measurements and then predict the natural frequency of structures, a key element that has been very often utilized for structural health monitoring and evaluation. A case study for frequency-based bridge scour detection has been presented for the demonstration of this approach, where a bridge pile is partially embedded in complex nonlayered soils. With this case study, we show that the nonlinear frequency–scour depth relationship can be accurately estimated using 2–4 measured data points, which is in favor of situations where conducting a field test is difficult or the demand for conducting field measurements needs to be reduced. The impact of errors resulting from measurement uncertainty on the performance of this approach is found to be insignificant. This physics-informed optimization approach thus can help analyze dynamic responses of engineering structures in complex nonlayered soil conditions involving soil–structure interaction.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Ashford, S. A., and T. Juirnarongrit. 2003. “Evaluation of pile diameter effect on initial modulus of subgrade reaction.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (3): 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:3(234).
Bao, T., and Z. Liu. 2016. “Vibration-based bridge scour detection: A review.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 24 (7): 1–19.
Bao, T., and Z. Liu. 2021. “Bridge scour characteristic curve for natural frequency-based bridge scour monitoring using simulation-based optimization.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 28: e2773.
Bao, T., Z. Liu, and K. Bird. 2019. “Influence of soil characteristics on natural frequency-based bridge scour detection.” J. Sound Vib. 446: 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.01.040.
Bao, T., and Z. L. Liu. 2019. “Evaluation of winkler model and pasternak model for dynamic soil–structure interaction analysis of structures partially embedded in soils.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (2): 04019167. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001519.
Bao, T., R. A. Swartz, S. Vitton, Y. Sun, C. Zhang, and Z. Liu. 2017. “Critical insights for advanced bridge scour detection using the natural frequency.” J. Sound Vib. 386: 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.06.039.
Briaud, J. L., C. Yao, C. Darby, H. Sharma, S. Hurlebaus, G. Price, K. Chang, B. Hunt, and O. Y. Yu. 2010. “Motion sensors for scour monitoring: Laboratory experiments and numerical simulations.” In Proc., 89th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, 1–22. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Far, H., B. Fatahi, and B. Samali. 2013. “Seismic behavior of building frames considering dynamic soil-structure interaction.” Int. J. Geomech. 13 (4): 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000231.
Feng, C. W., S. H. Ju, H. Y. Huang, and P. S. Chang. 2011. “Using genetic algorithms to estimate the scour depth around the bridge pier.” In Proc., 28th Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction, 514–519. Seoul, Korea: The International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction.
Gee, K. 2008. National bridge inspection standards scour evaluations and plans of action for scour critical bridges. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Grabe, J., S. Henke, S. Kinzler, and T. Pucker. 2010. “Inverse determination of soil density and stress state using dispersion wave measurements and cone penetration tests in a nonlayered soil.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 30 (6): 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.01.004.
Hunt, B. 2009. Monitoring scour critical bridges. NCHRP synthesis 396. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Ju, S. 2013. “Determination of scoured bridge natural frequencies with soil-structure interaction.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 55: 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.09.015.
Lombardi, D., S. Bhattacharya, and D. M. Wood. 2013. “Dynamic soil–structure interaction of monopile supported wind turbines in cohesive soil.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 49: 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.015.
Martí, R. 2003. “Multi-start methods.” In Handbook of metaheuristics, edited by F. Glover and G. A. Kochenberger, 355–368. Boston: Springer.
Masui, Y., and O. Suzuki. 2009. “Development of a soundness evaluation system for bridge substructured.” JR East Tech. Rev. 14 (14): 65–68.
Mueller, D. S., and C. R. Wagner. 2005. Field observations and evaluations of streambed scour at bridges, 1–137. McLean, VA: Research, Development, and Technology Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, US Dept. Of Transportation.
Paul C. Rizzo Associates. 2009. “Elastic modulus of soil layers.” Accessed July 15, 2015. http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1015/ML101580051.pdf.
Peeters, B., and G. De Roeck. 2001. “One-year monitoring of the z 24-bridge: Environmental effects versus damage events.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30 (2): 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9845(200102)30:2%3C149::AID-EQE1%3E3.0.CO;2-Z.
Prendergast, L. J., K. Gavin, and D. Hester. 2017. “Isolating the location of scour-induced stiffness loss in bridges using local modal behaviour.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 7 (4): 483–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0238-3.
Prendergast, L. J., D. Hester, and K. Gavin. 2016. “Determining the presence of scour around bridge foundations using vehicle-induced vibrations.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (10): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000931.
Prendergast, L. J., D. Hester, K. Gavin, and J. J. O’Sullivan. 2013. “An investigation of the changes in the natural frequency of a pile affected by scour.” J. Sound Vib. 332 (25): 6685–6702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.08.020.
Shirole, A., and R. Holt. 1991. “Planning for a comprehensive bridge safety assurance program.” In Proc., 60th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, 39–50. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Terzaghi, K. 1955. “Evalution of conefficients of subgrade reaction.” Geotechnique 5 (4): 297–326. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1955.5.4.297.
Ugray, Z., L. Lasdon, J. Plummer, F. Glover, J. Kelly, and R. Martí. 2007. “Scatter search and local nlp solvers: A multistart framework for global optimization.” INFORMS J. Comput. 19 (3): 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1060.0175.
Wang, L., J. Ma, Y. Zhao, and Q. Liu. 2013. “Refined modeling and free vibration of inextensional beams on the elastic foundation.” J. Appl. Mech. 80 (4): 1–11.
Wardhana, K., and F. C. Hadipriono. 2003. “Analysis of recent bridge failures in the United States.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 17 (3): 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2003)17:3(144).
Xu, X., Z. Zhang, W. Yao, and Z. Zhao. 2021. “Dynamic stability analysis of pile foundation under wave load.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (4): 04021021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001968.
Yu, X., and X. Yu. 2010. “Laboratory evaluation of time-domain reflectometry for bridge scour measurement: Comparison with the ultrasonic method.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2010: 1–12.
Zhang, X., Y. Chen, and W. Yao. 2013. “Relationship between bridge natural frequencies and foundation scour depth based on iitd method.” J. Appl. Sci. 6 (1): 102–106.
Zhang, Y., D. Gallipoli, and C. Augarde. 2009. “Simulation-based calibration of geotechnical parameters using parallel hybrid moving boundary particle swarm optimization.” Comput. Geotech. 36 (4): 604–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.09.005.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23Issue 3March 2023

History

Received: Aug 16, 2021
Accepted: Sep 12, 2022
Published online: Dec 21, 2022
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 21, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing, China; Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing, China; Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Geospatial Engineering, Michigan Technological Univ., 1400 Townsend Dr., Houghton, MI 49931. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2065-7750
Xuanming Ding, Ph.D.
School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing, China; Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing, China.
Zhen Liu, Ph.D., M.ASCE
Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Geospatial Engineering, Michigan Technological Univ., 1400 Townsend Dr., Houghton, MI 49931.
Han Cao, Ph.D. [email protected]
School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South Univ., Changsha 410083, China; Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring Ministry of Education, Central South Univ., Changsha 410083, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share