Abstract

In this study, a two-step approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) updating framework using dynamic response data is developed. In this framework, the Euclidian and Bhattacharyya distances are utilized as uncertainty quantification (UQ) metrics to define approximate likelihood functions in the first and second steps, respectively. A new Bayesian inference algorithm combining Bayesian updating with structural reliability methods (BUS) with the adaptive Kriging model is then proposed to effectively execute the ABC updating framework. The performance of the proposed procedure is demonstrated with a seismic-isolated bridge model updating application using simulated seismic response data. This application denotes that the Bhattacharyya distance is a powerful UQ metric with the capability to recreate wholly the distribution of target observations, and the proposed procedure can provide satisfactory results with much reduced computational demand compared with other well-known methods, such as transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo (TMCMC).

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Adachi, Y. 2002. “Reliability analysis and limit state design method of isolated bridges under extreme ground motions.” [In Japanese.] Doctoral thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kyoto Univ.
Angelikopoulos, P., C. Papadimitriou, and P. Koumoutsakos. 2015. “X-TMCMC: Adaptive Kriging for Bayesian inverse modeling.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 289 (Jun): 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.01.015.
Au, S. K., and J. L. Beck. 2001. “Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 16 (4): 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(01)00019-4.
Beck, J. L., and S. K. Au. 2002. “Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation.” J. Eng. Mech. 128 (4): 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:4(380).
Beck, J. L., and L. S. Katafygiotis. 1998. “Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework.” J. Eng. Mech. 124 (4): 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:4(455).
Betz, W., I. Papaioannou, J. L. Beck, and D. Straub. 2018. “Bayesian inference with subset simulation: Strategies and improvements.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 331 (Apr): 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.11.021.
Betz, W., I. Papaioannou, and D. Straub. 2016. “Transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo: Observations and improvements.” J. Eng. Mech. 142 (5): 04016016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001066.
Bhattacharyya, A. 1946. “On a measure of divergence between two multinominal populations.” Indian J. Stat. 7 (4): 401–406.
Bi, S., M. Broggi, and M. Beer. 2019. “The role of the Bhattacharyya distance in stochastic model updating.” Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 117 (Feb): 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.08.017.
Bi, S., S. Prabhu, S. Cogan, and S. Atamturktur. 2017. “Uncertainty quantification metrics with varying statistical information in model calibration and validation.” AIAA J. 55 (10): 3570–3583. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055733.
Cheung, S. H., and J. L. Beck. 2009. “Bayesian model updating using hybrid Monte Carlo simulation with application to structural dynamic models with many uncertain parameters.” J. Eng. Mech. 135 (4): 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:4(243).
Ching, J., and Y. C. Chen. 2007. “Transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo method for Bayesian updating, model class selection, and model averaging.” J. Eng. Mech. 133 (7): 816–832. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:7(816).
Crespo, L. G., S. P. Kenny, and D. P. Giesy. 2014. “The NASA Langley multidisciplinary uncertainty quantification challenge.” In Proc., 16th AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conf. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
DiazDelaO, F. A., A. Garbuno-Inigo, S. K. Au, and I. Yoshida. 2017. “Bayesian updating and model class selection with subset simulation.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 317 (Apr): 1102–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.01.006.
Echard, B., N. Gayton, and M. Lemaire. 2011. “AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation.” Struct. Saf. 33 (2): 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.01.002.
Echard, B., N. Gayton, M. Lemaire, and N. Relun. 2013. “A combined importance sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 111 (Mar): 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.008.
Giovanis, D. G., P. Iason, D. Straub, and V. Papadopoulos. 2017. “Bayesian updating with subset simulation using artificial neural networks.” Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 319 (1): 124–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.02.025.
Grimmett, G. R., and D. R. Stirzaker. 2001. Probability and random processes. New York: Oxford University Press.
Huang, X., J. Chen, and H. Zhu. 2016. “Assessing small failure probabilities by AK-SS: An active learning method combing Kriging and subset simulation.” Struct. Saf. 59 (Mar): 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.12.003.
JRA (Japan Road Association). 2004. Manual on bearings for highway bridges. [In Japanese.] Tokyo: Maruzen.
JRA (Japan Road Association). 2016. Specifications for highway bridges part V: Seismic design. Tokyo: Maruzen.
Jensen, H. A., C. Esse, V. Araya, and C. Papadimitriou. 2017. “Implementation of an adaptive meta-model for Bayesian finite element model updating in time domain.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Mech. 160 (Apr): 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.12.005.
Jensen, H. A., C. Vergara, C. Papadimitriou, and E. Millas. 2013. “The use of updated robust reliability measures in stochastic dynamical systems.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 267 (Dec): 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2013.08.015.
Katafygiotis, L. S., and J. L. Beck. 1998. “Updating models and their uncertainties. II: Model identifiability.” J. Eng. Mech. 124 (4): 463–467. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:4(463).
Kennedy, M. C., and A. O’Hagan. 2001. “Bayesian calibration of computer models.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.) 63 (3): 425–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00294.
Kitahara, M., M. Broggi, and M. Beer. 2020. “Bayesian model updating for existing seismic-isolated bridges using observed acceleration response data.” In Proc., XI Int. Conf. on Structural Dynamics. München, Germany: European Association for Structural Dynamics.
Kleinman, N. L., J. C. Spall, and D. Q. Naiman. 1999. “Simulation-based optimization with stochastic approximation using common random numbers.” Manage. Sci. 45 (11): 1570–1578. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.11.1570.
Patelli, E., Y. Govers, M. Broggi, H. M. Gomes, M. Link, and J. E. Mottershead. 2017. “Sensitivity or Bayesian model updating: A comparison of techniques using the DLR AIRMOD test data.” Arch. Appl. Mech. 87 (5): 905–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-017-1233-1.
Patra, B. K., R. Launonen, V. Ollikainen, and S. Nandi. 2015. “A new similarity measure using Bhattacharyya coefficient for collaborative filtering in sparse data.” Knowledge-Based Syst. 82 (Jul): 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.03.001.
Rocchetta, R., M. Broggi, Q. Huchet, and E. Patelli. 2018. “On-line Bayesian model updating for structural health monitoring.” Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 103 (Mar): 174–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.10.015.
Safta, C., K. Sargsyan, H. N. Najm, K. Chowdhary, B. Debusschere, L. P. Swiler, and M. S. Eldred. 2015. “Probabilistic methods for sensitivity analysis and calibration in the NASA challenge problem.” J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst. 12 (1): 170–188. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.I010256.
Straub, D., and I. Papaioannou. 2015. “Bayesian updating with structural reliability methods.” J. Eng. Mech. 141 (3): 04014134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000839.
Takeda, T., M. A. Sozen, and N. N. Nielsen. 1970. “Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes.” J. Struct. Div. 96 (12): 2557–2573. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0002765.
Turner, B. M., and T. Van Zandt. 2012. “A tutorial on approximate Bayesian computation.” J. Math. Psychol. 56 (2): 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2012.02.005.
Wei, P., C. Tang, and Y. Yang. 2019. “Structural reliability and reliability sensitivity analysis of extremely rare failure events by combining sampling and surrogate model methods.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O: J. Risk Reliab. 233 (6): 943–957. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X19844666.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7Issue 3September 2021

History

Received: Aug 18, 2020
Accepted: Mar 22, 2021
Published online: Jun 2, 2021
Published in print: Sep 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Nov 2, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Assistant, Institute for Risk and Reliability, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167 Hannover, Germany (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9877-9574. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, 100081 Beijing, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8600-8649. Email: [email protected]
Deputy Head, Institute for Risk and Reliability, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167 Hannover, Germany. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3683-3907. Email: [email protected]
Professor and Head, Institute for Risk and Reliability, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167 Hannover, Germany; Part-Time Professor, Institute for Risk and Uncertainty, Univ. of Liverpool, L69 7ZF Liverpool, UK; Guest Professor, Shanghai Institute of Disaster Prevention and Relief, Tongji Univ., 200092 Shanghai, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0611-0345. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Nondeterministic Kriging for Probabilistic Systems with Mixed Continuous and Discrete Input Variables, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1274, 10, 4, (2024).
  • Nondeterministic High-Cycle Fatigue Macromodel Updating and Failure Probability Analysis of Welded Joints of Long-Span Structures, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1226, 10, 3, (2024).
  • Comparison between Distance Functions for Approximate Bayesian Computation to Perform Stochastic Model Updating and Model Validation under Limited Data, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1223, 10, 2, (2024).
  • Gaussian Mixture–Based Autoregressive Error Model with a Conditionally Heteroscedastic Hierarchical Framework for Bayesian Updating of Structures, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1205, 10, 3, (2024).
  • Bayesian updating of model parameters using adaptive Gaussian process regression and particle filter, Structural Safety, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2023.102328, 102, (102328), (2023).
  • Comparison between Bayesian updating and approximate Bayesian computation for model identification of masonry towers through dynamic data, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 10.1007/s10518-023-01670-6, (2023).
  • Geotechnical uncertainty, modeling, and decision making, Soils and Foundations, 10.1016/j.sandf.2022.101189, 62, 5, (101189), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share