Technical Papers
Apr 16, 2024

Nondeterministic High-Cycle Fatigue Macromodel Updating and Failure Probability Analysis of Welded Joints of Long-Span Structures

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 10, Issue 3

Abstract

Unlike previous models that do not consider uncertainties, this paper proposes a new nondeterministic method to estimate the high-cycle fatigue (HCF) resistance of welded hollow spherical joints (WHSJs) in long-span structures, including bridges, gymnasiums, and factories. This macro damage mechanics model with failure probability is introduced by accounting for the uncertainties of stress concentration and weld defects. Then artificial neural networks (ANNs) for three kinds of load type are built as a substitute for a finite-element (FE) model to obtain the concentrated stress more efficiently. Subsequently, the probability model of the defect factor is identified as a Gaussian distribution, while the stress concentration factor (SCF) has a Gaussian distribution and three-parameter t distribution. Also, a series of fatigue test on WHSJs are used to validate the proposed model, yielding a reasonable fatigue life prediction. Finally, fatigue failure probability analysis, which includes a joint probability density function (PDF), is conducted using the new nondeterministic method, which could provide a reference for fatigue design and damage quantification of WHSJs in long-span structures. Meanwhile, two Monte Carlo simulations corresponding to both possible distributions of concentrated stress were run to verify the accuracy of the HCF failure probability model of WHSJs. The results guarantee the feasibility of the proposed probability model applied in HCF fatigue design for weld joints of long-span structures.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China under Grant No. 2022YFB2602700, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52378216), the National Natural Science Fund for Excellent Young Scientists Fund Program (HW2021006), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant 2022CDJKYJH052), and the Support Plan for Returned Overseas Scholars of Chongqing (cx2020022).

References

Ahmadi, H. 2016. “A probability distribution model for SCFs in internally ring-stiffened tubular KT-joints of offshore structures subjected to out-of-plane bending loads.” Ocean Eng. 116 (Apr): 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.02.037.
Altamura, A., and D. Straub. 2014. “Reliability assessment of high cycle fatigue under variable amplitude loading: Review and solutions.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 121 (May): 40–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.02.023.
Amirafshari, P., and A. Kolios. 2022. “Estimation of weld defects size distributions, rates and probability of detections in fabrication yards using a Bayesian theorem approach.” Int. J. Fatigue 159 (Jun): 106763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106763.
Bai, Y., M. Kurata, J. Florez-Lopez, and M. Nakashima. 2016. “Macro modelling of crack damage in steel beams subjected to non-stationary low cycle fatigue.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (10): 04016076. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001536.
Bai, Y., D. C. Nardi, X. H. Zhou, R. A. Picón, and J. Flórez-López. 2021. “A new comprehensive model of damage mechanics for flexural subassemblies prone to fatigue.” Comput. Struct. 256 (Nov): 106639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106639.
Bi, S., Y. T. Bai, and X. H. Zhou. 2022. “Bayesian updating: Reducing epistemic uncertainty in hysteretic degradation behavior of steel tubular structures.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. 8 (3): 04022039. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001255.
Chinese Standard. 2011. Code for welding of steel structures. GB50661-2011. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.
Chung, K. L. 2001. A course in probability theory. London: Academic Press.
Dassault Systems. 2022. ABAQUS 2022. Vélizy-Villacoublay, France: Dassault Systems.
Dodge, Y. 2008. The concise encyclopedia of statistics. Berlin: Springer.
Dong, P., J. Zhang, and P. J. Bouchard. 2002. “Effects of repair weld length on residual stress distribution.” J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 124 (1): 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1429230.
Dou, C., C. Xie, Y. Wang, and N. Yang. 2023. “Cyclic loading test and lateral resistant behavior of flat-corrugated steel plate shear walls.” J Build. Eng. 66 (May): 105831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.105831.
Duan, Y. H., B. Chen, F. Huang, and M. T. Chen. 2021. “Stress concentration factors of brace in-plane loaded bird-beak SHS gap K-joints.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 181 (Jun): 106592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106592.
Estes, A. C., and M. F. Dan. 1999. “Repair optimization of highway bridges using system reliability approach.” J. Eng. Mech. 125 (7): 766–775. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:7(766).
Estes, A. C., and M. F. Dan. 2001. “Bridge lifetime system reliability under multiple limit states.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (6): 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(523).
Feng, R., J. C. Xu, Z. M. Chen, K. Roy, B. Chen, and J. B. P. Lim. 2021. “Numerical investigation and design rules for stress concentration factors of stainless-steel hybrid tubular joints.” Thin-Walled Struct. 163 (Jun): 107783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.107783.
Flórez-López, J., M. E. Marante, and R. Picón. 2015. Fracture and damage mechanics for structural engineering of frames: State-of-the-art industrial applications. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Han, S., and B. Shin. 2000. “The use of hot spot stress for estimating the fatigue strength of welded components.” Steel Res. 71 (11): 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.200005716.
He, Z. P., B. Z. Chen, and X. W. Li. 2023. “Comparative study on numerical simulation methods of stress concentration calculation and fatigue life prediction for welds.” Int. J. Fatigue 166 (Jan): 107205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107205.
Hobbacher, A. F. 2016. IIW collection: Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components. Berlin: Springer.
Hultgren, G., R. Mansour, and Z. Barsoum. 2023. “Fatigue strength assessment of welded joints incorporating the variability in local weld geometry using a probabilistic framework.” Int. J. Fatigue 167 (Feb): 107364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107364.
ISO. 2014. Fusion-welded joints in steel, nickel, titanium and their alloys (beam welding excluded). Quality levels for imperfections. ISO 5817:2014. Geneva: ISO.
Karolczuk, A. 2016. “Validation of the weakest link approach and the proposed Weibull based probability distribution of failure for fatigue design of steel welded joints.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 67 (Sep): 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.05.022.
Kibria, B. G., and A. H. Joarder. 2006. “A short review of multivariate t-distribution.” J. Stat. Res. 40 (1): 59–72.
Kitahara, M., S. F. Bi, M. Broggi, and M. Beer. 2021. “Bayesian model updating in time domain with metamodel-based reliability method.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst., Part A: Civ. Eng. 7 (3): 04021030. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001149.
Kumar, V., S. K. Albert, N. Chandrasekhar, and J. Jayapandian. 2018. “Evaluation of welding skill using probability density distributions and neural network analysis.” Measurement 116 (Feb): 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.11.009.
Lemaitre, J., and R. Desmorat. 2005. Engineering damage mechanics: Ductile, creep, fatigue and brittle failures. Berlin: Springer.
Li, J. 2016. “Probability density evolution method: Background, significance and recent developments.” Prob. Eng. Mech. 44 (Apr): 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.09.013.
Liu, M., D. M. Frangopol, and K. Kwon. 2010 “Fatigue reliability assessment of retrofitted steel bridges integrating monitored data.” Struct. Saf. 32 (1): 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.08.003.
Marsaglia, G. 2004. “Evaluating the normal distribution.” J. Stat. Software 11 (Jul): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v011.i04.
Oh, G. 2021. “Fatigue strength distribution and probabilistic evaluation on stainless steel welded components under mixed mode loading.” Int. J. Fatigue 148 (Jul): 106247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106247.
Ottersböck, M. J., M. Leitner, and M. Stoschka. 2021. “Characterization of actual weld geometry and stress concentration of butt welds exhibiting local undercuts.” Eng. Struct. 240 (Aug): 112266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112266.
Pan, Q., H. Zhou, Q. Lu, H. Gao, and L. Lu. 2017. “History-independent cyclic response of nanotwinned metals.” Nature 551 (7679): 214–217. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24266.
Paramonov, Y., and J. Andersons. 2007. “A family of weakest link models for fiber strength distribution.” Composites, Part A 38 (4): 1227–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.004.
Partanen, T., and E. Niemi. 1996. “Hot spot stress approach to fatigue strength analysis of welded components: Fatigue test data for steel plate thicknesses up to 10 mm.” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 19 (6): 709–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1996.tb01316.x.
Pyttel, B., A. F. Canteli, and A. A. Ripoll. 2016. “Comparison of different statistical models for description of fatigue including very high cycle fatigue.” Int. J. Fatigue 93 (Dec): 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.04.019.
Raftar, H. R., E. Dabiri, A. Ahola, and T. Björk. 2022. “Weld root fatigue assessment of load-carrying fillet welded joints: 4R method compared to other methods.” Int. J. Fatigue 156 (Mar): 106623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106623.
Sadek, S., and M. Olsson. 2014. “New models for prediction of high cycle fatigue failure based on highly loaded regions.” Int. J. Fatigue 66 (Sep): 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.014.
Sankararaman, S., Y. Ling, and S. Mahadevan. 2011. “Uncertainty quantification and model validation of fatigue crack growth prediction.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 78 (7): 1487–1504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.02.017.
Schmidt-Hieber, J. 2021. “The Kolmogorov–Arnold representation theorem revisited.” Neural Networks 137 (May): 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2021.01.020.
Straub, D., and I. Papaioannou. 2015. “Bayesian updating with structural reliability methods.” J. Eng. Mech. 141 (3): 04014134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000839.
Su, Y. H., X. W. Ye, and Y. Ding. 2022. “ESS-based probabilistic fatigue life assessment of steel bridges: Methodology, numerical simulation and application.” Eng. Struct. 253 (Feb): 113802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113802.
The MathWorks Inc. 2022. MATLAB R2022b the language of technical computing. Natick, MA: The MathWorks Inc.
Vasudeven, A. K., K. Sadananda, and N. Louat. 1994. “A review of crack closure, fatigue crack threshold and related phenomena.” Mater. Sci. Eng. 188 (1–2): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(94)90351-4.
Wang, P., X. J. Pei, P. Dong, and S. Song. 2019. “Traction structural stress analysis of fatigue behaviors of rib-to-deck joints in orthotropic bridge deck.” Int. J. Fatigue 125 (Aug): 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.03.038.
Xing, J. H., C. Qiu, M. Wang, and N. Yang. 2022. “Uniaxial failure mechanism and design strength of high-strength welded hollow spherical joint.” Eng. Struct. 256 (Apr): 113897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113897.
Yan, Y. J., H. G. Lei, and X. Yang. 2011. “Mechanical properties on the welded connection of pipe and hollow spheres joints.” Adv. Mater. Res. 189–193 (Apr): 3452–3457. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.189-193.3452.
Zhang, J. L., H. G. Lei, and S. H. Jin. 2019. “Experimental study on constant-amplitude fatigue performance of weld toe in steel tube of welded hollow spherical joints in grid structures.” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019 (Jan): 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6204302.
Zhao, Z., A. Haldar, and F. L. Breen Jr. 1994. “Fatigue-reliability evaluation of steel bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (5): 1608–1623. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:5(1608).
Zhou, X. H., Y. Bai, D. Nardi, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Liu, R. Picón, and J. Flórez-López. 2022. “Damage evolution modeling for steel structures subjected to combined high cycle fatigue and high-intensity dynamic loadings.” Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 22 (3–4): 2240012. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455422400120.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 10Issue 3September 2024

History

Received: Sep 1, 2023
Accepted: Jan 25, 2024
Published online: Apr 16, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Sep 16, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400045, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9270-4213. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Research Center of Steel Structure Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400045, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0726-9593. Email: [email protected]
Xuhong Zhou [email protected]
Professor, Director of Research Center of Steel Structure Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400045, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share