Technical Papers
Aug 14, 2024

Nondeterministic Kriging for Probabilistic Systems with Mixed Continuous and Discrete Input Variables

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 10, Issue 4

Abstract

This paper presents a nondeterministic kriging (NDK) method to approximate the response of probabilistic systems with mixed continuous and discrete input variables. The proposed method approximates both epistemic (extrinsic) and aleatory (intrinsic) uncertainties in addition to the mean response of a system. Kriging is a popular metamodeling method for approximating the responses of computationally demanding systems along with prediction variances. However, conventional kriging fails to perform with nondeterministic data sets with replications. The recently developed NDK method addresses those challenges in the continuous input space. Currently, kriging is often used for approximations in probabilistic systems with mixed continuous and discrete input variables as well. Therefore, this study aims to fill the gap in the NDK method for probabilistic systems with mixed continuous and discrete input variables. Herein, the aleatory uncertainty is assessed using locally weighted regression (LWR). The proposed method uses a combination of continuous and discrete kernels to capture the effects of mixed inputs. The effectiveness of the newly proposed NDK method was demonstrated using a set of probabilistic analytical cases and engineering applications. The proposed method provides separable information about aleatory and epistemic uncertainties, which are beneficial in design optimizations and sequential explorations of probabilistic systems, especially with large-scale experiments and computer simulations with randomness.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the support of this research by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Award No. 2203116. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

Abbas, A. E. H. A., M. R. Khattab, and M. M. Abdel Azeem. 2018. “Natural radionuclides distribution and environmental impacts of ferruginous sand-siltstone (raw material) and their manufactured Ahmer oxide used as wall paints.” Environ. Forensics 19 (3): 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2018.1485791.
Aljuhani, K. H., and L. I. A. Turk. 2014. “Modification of the adaptive Nadaraya-Watson kernel regression estimator.” Sci. Res. Essays 9 (22): 966–971. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE2014.6121.
An, H., B. D. Youn, and H. S. Kim. 2021. “Reliability-based design optimization of laminated composite structures under delamination and material property uncertainties.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 205 (Jun): 106561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106561.
An, H., B. D. Youn, and H. S. Kim. 2022a. “A methodology for sensor number and placement optimization for vibration-based damage detection of composite structures under model uncertainty.” Compos. Struct. 279 (Apr): 114863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114863.
An, H., B. D. Youn, and H. S. Kim. 2022b. “Optimal placement of non-redundant sensors for structural health monitoring under model uncertainty and measurement noise.” Measurement 204 (Mar): 112102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112102.
Ankenman, B., B. L. Nelson, and J. Staum. 2008. “Stochastic Kriging for simulation metamodeling.” In Proc., Winter Simulation Conf., 362–370. New York: IEEEhttps://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2008.4736089.
Asher, M. J., B. F. W. Croke, A. J. Jakeman, and L. J. M. Peeters. 2015. “A review of surrogate models and their application to groundwater modeling.” Water Resour. Res. 51 (8): 5957–5973. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR016967.
Bae, H., D. L. Clark, and E. E. Forster. 2019. “Nondeterministic Kriging for engineering design exploration.” AIAA J. 57 (4): 1659–1670. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J057364.
Boser, B. E., I. M. Guyon, and V. N. Vapnik. 1992. “A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers.” In Proc., 5th Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, 144–152. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/130385.130401.
Broomhead, D., and D. Lowe. 1988. “Multivariable functional interpolation and adaptive networks.” Complex Syst. 2 (Apr): 321–355.
Chicco, D., M. J. Warrens, and G. Jurman. 2021. “The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation.” PeerJ Comput. Sci. 7 (Jun): e623. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.623.
Choi, S.-K., R. Grandhi, and R. A. Canfield. 2006. Reliability-based structural design. 2007th ed. London: Springer.
Clark, D. L. 2019. “Non-deterministic metamodeling for multidisciplinary design optimization of aircraft systems under uncertainty.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Engineering, Wright State Univ.
Cuesta Ramirez, J., R. Le Riche, O. Roustant, G. Perrin, C. Durantin, and A. Glière. 2022. “A comparison of mixed-variables Bayesian optimization approaches.” Adv. Model. Simul. Eng. Sci. 9 (1): 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40323-022-00218-8.
Delage, T., S. Zannane, and T. Neveux. 2022. “Metamodeling of chemical engineering unit operations using Kriging and prediction error estimation.” In Proc., Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 32 European Symp. on Computer Aided Process Engineering, edited by L. Montastruc and S. Negny, 535–540. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95879-0.50090-4.
Di Maio, F., M. Belotti, M. Volpe, J. Selva, and E. Zio. 2022. “Parallel density scanned adaptive Kriging to improve local tsunami hazard assessment for coastal infrastructures.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 222 (Mar): 108441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108441.
Dunn, P. F. 2019. Measurement, data analysis, and sensor fundamentals for engineering and science. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Fernandez, J. A., and G. J. Rix. 2012. “Seismic hazard analysis and probabilistic ground motions in the upper Mississippi embayment.” In Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics IV, 1–10. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40975(318)8.
Friedman, J. H. 1991. “Multivariate adaptive regression splines.” Ann. Stat. 19 (Jun): 1–67. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176347963.
Gajewicz-Skretna, A., S. Kar, M. Piotrowska, and J. Leszczynski. 2021. “The kernel-weighted local polynomial regression (KwLPR) approach: An efficient, novel tool for development of QSAR/QSAAR toxicity extrapolation models.” J. Cheminf. 13 (1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00484-5.
Gower, J. C. 1971. “A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties.” Biometrics 27 (4): 857–871. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528823.
Halstrup, M. 2016. “Black-box optimization of mixed discrete-continuous optimization problems.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Statistics, Technische Universität Dortmund.
Hao, W., W. Shaoping, and M. M. Tomovic. 2010. “Modified sequential Kriging optimization for multidisciplinary complex product simulation.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 23 (Sep): 616–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(09)60262-4.
Hengl, T., G. B. M. Heuvelink, and A. Stein. 2004. “A generic framework for spatial prediction of soil variables based on regression-Kriging.” Geoderma 120 (1–2): 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.08.018.
Hong, L., H. Li, and J. Fu. 2022. “Novel Kriging-based variance reduction sampling method for hybrid reliability analysis with small failure probability.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 8 (2): 04022017. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001231.
Huang, T., M. Bisram, Y. Li, H. Xu, D. Zeng, X. Su, J. Cao, and W. Chen. 2023. “Mixed-variable concurrent material, geometry, and process design in integrated computational materials engineering.” In Machine learning in modeling and simulation: Methods and applications, computational methods in engineering & the sciences, edited by T. Rabczuk and K.-J. Bathe, 395–426. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36644-4_11.
Hutter, F., H. H. Hoos, and K. Leyton-Brown. 2011. “Sequential model-based optimization for general algorithm configuration.” In Learning and intelligent optimization, lecture notes in computer science, edited by C. A. C. Coello, 507–523. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25566-3_40.
Jiang, P., Y. Zhang, Q. Zhou, X. Shao, J. Hu, and L. Shu. 2018. “An adaptive sampling strategy for Kriging metamodel based on Delaunay triangulation and TOPSIS.” Appl. Intell. 48 (6): 1644–1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1031-z.
Jones, D. R., M. Schonlau, and W. J. Welch. 1998. “Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions.” J. Global Optim. 13 (4): 455–492. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008306431147.
Kabir, A. M., J. D. Langsfeld, C. Zhuang, K. N. Kaipa, and S. K. Gupta. 2017. “A systematic approach for minimizing physical experiments to identify optimal trajectory parameters for robots.” In Proc., IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 351–357. New York: IEEE.
Kahrizi, E., T. Rajaee, and M. Sedighi. 2022. “Probabilistic and experimental investigation of the effect of mineral adsorbents on porous concrete using Kriging, PRSM, and RBF methods.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 8 (4): 04022047. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001258.
Kameshwar, S., and J. E. Padgett. 2014. “Multi-hazard risk assessment of highway bridges subjected to earthquake and hurricane hazards.” Eng. Struct. 78 (Nov): 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.016.
Kameshwar, S., N. Vishnu, and J. Padgett. 2019. “Response and fragility modeling of aging bridges subjected to earthquakes and truck loads.” DesignSafe-CI. Accessed May 29, 2019. https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-5tzv-qz91.
Khan, M. A. Z. 2011. “Transient engine model for calibration using two-stage regression approach.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering, Loughborough Univ.
Kianifar, M. R., and F. Campean. 2020. “Performance evaluation of metamodelling methods for engineering problems: Towards a practitioner guide.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 61 (1): 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02352-1.
Kitahara, M., S. Bi, M. Broggi, and M. Beer. 2021. “Bayesian model updating in time domain with metamodel-based reliability method.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 7 (Sep): 04021030. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001149.
Kohonen, T. 1982. “Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps.” Biol. Cybern. 43 (1): 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337288.
Koziel, S., and A. Pietrenko-Dabrowska. 2022. “Performance-driven yield optimization of high-frequency structures by Kriging surrogates.” Appl. Sci. 12 (7): 3697. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073697.
Krige, D. 1951. “A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand.” J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 52 (2): 119–139.
Kumar, P., B. Rao, A. Burman, S. Kumar, and P. Samui. 2023. “Spatial variation of permeability and consolidation behaviors of soil using ordinary Kriging method.” Groundwater Sustainable Dev. 20 (Mar): 100856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100856.
Lanckriet, G., N. Cristianini, P. Cristianini, L. Ghaoui, and M. Jordan. 2004. “Learning the kernel matrix with semidefinite programming.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5 (Mar): 27–72.
Li, C., Z. Lu, T. Ma, and X. Zhu. 2009. “A simple Kriging method incorporating multiscale measurements in geochemical survey.” J. Geochem. Explor. 101 (2): 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2008.06.003.
Li, Q., and J. Racine. 2003. “Nonparametric estimation of distributions with categorical and continuous data.” J. Multivar. Anal. 86 (2): 266–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-259X(02)00025-8.
Li, Q., and J. Racine. 2004. “Cross-validated local linear nonparametric regression.” Stat. Sin. 14 (Apr): 485–512.
Lopez, R. H., E. Bismut, and D. Straub. 2022. “Stochastic efficient global optimization with high noise variance and mixed design variables.” J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 45 (Jun): 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03920-1.
Loquin, K., and D. Dubois. 2010. “Kriging and epistemic uncertainty: A critical discussion.” In Methods for handling imperfect spatial information, studies in fuzziness and soft computing, edited by R. Jeansoulin, O. Papini, H. Prade, and S. Schockaert, 269–305. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14755-5_11.
Matheron, G. 1962. Traité de géostatistique appliquée. Paris: Editions Technip.
Mckay, M. D., R. J. Beckman, and W. J. Conover. 2000. “A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics 42 (1): 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2000.10485979.
Melchers, R., and A. Beck. 2018. Structural reliability analysis and prediction. 1st ed. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119266105.
Mohammadi, H. 2016. “Kriging-based black-box global optimization: Analysis and new algorithms.” Ph.D. thesis, Doctoral School of Health Engineering Sciences (Saint-Etienne), Université de Lyon.
Moore, R. A., D. A. Romero, and C. J. J. Paredis. 2014. “Value-based global optimization.” J. Mech. Des. 136 (4): 041003. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4026281.
Mortazavi, M., G. Kuczera, and L. Cui. 2012. “Multiobjective optimization of urban water resources: Moving toward more practical solutions.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010866.
Moustapha, M., A. Galimshina, G. Habert, and B. Sudret. 2022. “Multi-objective robust optimization using adaptive surrogate models for problems with mixed continuous-categorical parameters.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 65 (12): 357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03457-w.
Mukhopadhyay, T., T. K. Dey, R. Chowdhury, and A. Chakrabarti. 2015. “Structural damage identification using response surface-based multi-objective optimization: A comparative study.” Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 40 (Mar): 1027–1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-015-1591-3.
Musiol, G. 1997. “An introduction to categorical data analysis.” Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 23 (4): 565. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(97)84760-3.
Nazeeh, K. M., D. M. Dilip, and G. L. Sivakumar Babu. 2023. “Quantile-based design and optimization of shallow foundation on cohesionless soil using adaptive Kriging surrogates.” Int. J. Geomech. 23 (Jan): 06023014. https://doi.org/10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-8226.
Palar, P. S., R. P. Liem, L. R. Zuhal, and K. Shimoyama. 2019. “On the use of surrogate models in engineering design optimization and exploration: The key issues.” In Proc., Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conf. Companion, GECCO ’19, 1592–1602. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Park, H., T. Tomiczek, D. T. Cox, J. W. van de Lindt, and P. Lomonaco. 2017. “Experimental modeling of horizontal and vertical wave forces on an elevated coastal structure.” Coastal Eng. 128 (Jan): 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.08.001.
Patel, S. S., and P. Ramachandran. 2015. “A comparison of machine learning techniques for modeling river flow time series: The case of upper Cauvery River Basin.” Water Resour. Manage. 29 (Jan): 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0705-0.
Pelamatti, J., L. Brevault, M. Balesdent, E.-G. Talbi, and Y. Guerin. 2019. “Efficient global optimization of constrained mixed variable problems.” J. Global Optim. 73 (3): 583–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-018-0715-1.
Pelamatti, J., L. Brevault, M. Balesdent, E.-G. Talbi, and Y. Guerin. 2020. “Overview and comparison of Gaussian process-based surrogate models for mixed continuous and discrete variables: Application on aerospace design problems.” In High-performance simulation-based optimization, studies in computational intelligence, edited by T. Bartz-Beielstein, B. Filipič, P. Korošec, and E.-G. Talbi, 189–224. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18764-4_9.
Pelamatti, J., L. Brevault, M. Balesdent, E.-G. Talbi, and Y. Guerin. 2021. “Mixed variable Gaussian process-based surrogate modeling techniques: Application to aerospace design.” J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst. 18 (11): 813–837. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.I010965.
Petersen, M., et al. 2008. Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps. Reston, VA: USGS. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20081128.
Picheny, V., T. Wagner, and D. Ginsbourger. 2013. “A benchmark of Kriging-based infill criteria for noisy optimization.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 48 (3): 607–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0919-4.
Qian, J., J. Yi, Y. Cheng, J. Liu, and Q. Zhou. 2020. “A sequential constraints updating approach for Kriging surrogate model-assisted engineering optimization design problem.” Eng. Comput. 36 (3): 993–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00745-w.
Rasmussen, C. E., and C. K. I. Williams. 2006. Gaussian processes for machine learning, Adaptive computation and machine learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rosness, R. 1993. “Limits to analysis and verification.” In Vol. 110 of Verification and validation of complex systems: Human factors issues, edited by J. A. Wise, V. D. Hopkin, and P. Stager. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02933-6_10.
Roustant, O., E. Padonou, Y. Deville, A. Clément, G. Perrin, J. Giorla, and H. Wynn. 2020. “Group kernels for Gaussian process metamodels with categorical inputs.” SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantif. 8 (Apr) 775–806. https://doi.org/10.1137/18M1209386.
Sam, A. G., and A. P. Ker. 2006. “Nonparametric regression under alternative data environments.” Stat. Probab. Lett. 76 (10): 1037–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2005.12.002.
Saves, P., N. Bartoli, Y. Diouane, T. Lefebvre, J. Morlier, C. David, E. N. Van, and S. Defoort. 2021. “Bayesian optimization for mixed variables using an adaptive dimension reduction process: Applications to aircraft design.” In Proc., AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Saves, P., Y. Diouane, N. Bartoli, T. Lefebvre, and J. Morlier. 2022. “A general square exponential kernel to handle mixed-categorical variables for Gaussian process.” In Proc., AIAA AVIATION Forum. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Shawe-Taylor, J., and N. Cristianini. 2004. Kernel methods for pattern analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sriver, T., and J. Chrissis. 2004. “Framework for mixed-variable optimization under uncertainty using surrogates and statistical selection.” In Proc., 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conf. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-4591.
Steinwart, I., and A. Christmann. 2008. Support vector machines. 1st ed. New York: Springer.
Stuckner, J., M. Piekenbrock, S. M. Arnold, and T. M. Ricks. 2021. “Optimal experimental design with fast neural network surrogate models.” Comput. Mater. Sci. 200 (Jun): 110747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110747.
Su, D.-X., J. Zhao, Y. Wang, and M.-J. Qu. 2019. “Kriging-based orthotropic closure for flow-induced fiber orientation and the part stiffness predictions with experimental investigation.” Polym. Compos. 40 (10): 3844–3856. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25243.
Tao, S., D. W. Apley, M. Plumlee, and W. Chen. 2021. “Latent variable Gaussian process models: A rank-based analysis and an alternative approach.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 122 (15): 4007–4026. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.6690.
Trochu, F., N. Vernet, Y. Sun, J. Echaabi, A. Makradi, and S. Belouettar. 2022. “Hybrid twin models of fiber compaction for composite manufacturing based on dual Kriging.” Int. J. Mater. Form. 15 (3): 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-022-01679-3.
Vapnik, V. 1999. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer.
Wang, D., X.-J. Zeng, and J. A. Keane. 2007. “Hierarchical hybrid fuzzy-neural networks for approximation with mixed input variables.” Neurocomputing 70 (16–18): 3019–3033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2006.07.015.
Wang, G., Z. Dong, and P. Aitchison. 2001. “Adaptive response surface method—A global optimization scheme for approximation-based design problems.” Eng. Optim. 33 (Jan): 707–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/03052150108940940.
Welch, W. J., R. J. Buck, J. Sacks, H. P. Wynn, T. J. Mitchell, and M. D. Morris. 1992. “Screening, predicting, and computer experiments.” Technometrics 34 (Apr): 15–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1269548.
Widrow, B., and M. E. Hoff. 1960. Adaptive switching circuits. Stanford, CA: Stanford Electronics Lab.
Xie, Y., J. Zhang, R. DesRoches, and J. E. Padgett. 2019. “Seismic fragilities of single-column highway bridges with rocking column-footing.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 48 (7): 843–864. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3164.
Xu, G., A. Kareem, and L. Shen. 2020. “Surrogate modeling with sequential updating: Applications to bridge deck–wave and bridge deck–wind interactions.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 34 (Apr): 04020023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000904.
Yi, J.-H., S.-H. Kim, and S. Kushiyama. 2007. “PDF interpolation technique for seismic fragility analysis of bridges.” Eng. Struct. 29 (7): 1312–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.08.019.
Yi, S., and A. A. Taflanidis. 2023. “Computationally efficient adaptive design of experiments for global metamodeling through integrated error approximation and multicriteria search strategies.” J. Eng. Mech. 149 (Sep): 04023050 https://doi.org/10.1061/JENMDT.EMENG-7083.
Yin, H., H. Fang, G. Wen, M. Gutowski, and Y. Xiao. 2018. “On the ensemble of metamodels with multiple regional optimized weight factors.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 58 (1): 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1891-1.
Zhang, J., S. Chowdhury, and A. Messac. 2012. “An adaptive hybrid surrogate model.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 46 (2): 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-012-0764-x.
Zhang, X., L. Wang, and J. D. Sørensen. 2020a. “AKOIS: An adaptive Kriging oriented importance sampling method for structural system reliability analysis.” Struct. Saf. 82 (Aug): 101876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.101876.
Zhang, Y., S. Tao, W. Chen, and D. W. Apley. 2020b. “A latent variable approach to Gaussian process modeling with qualitative and quantitative factors.” Technometrics 62 (3): 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2019.1638834.
Zhou, Q., Y. Wang, S.-K. Choi, P. Jiang, X. Shao, J. Hu, and L. Shu. 2018. “A robust optimization approach based on multi-fidelity metamodel.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 57 (2): 775–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1783-4.
Zhuang, X., and R. Pan. 2012. “Epistemic uncertainty in reliability-based design optimization.” In Proc., Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symp., 1–6. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2012.6175496.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 10Issue 4December 2024

History

Received: Nov 9, 2023
Accepted: May 22, 2024
Published online: Aug 14, 2024
Published in print: Dec 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jan 14, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70803. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6677-2279. Email: [email protected]
Sabarethinam Kameshwar, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70803 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share