Technical Papers
May 26, 2021

Reliability-Based Design Optimization under Mixed Aleatory/Epistemic Uncertainties: Theory and Applications

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7, Issue 3

Abstract

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) is a well-known design strategy in engineering. However, RBDO usually requires uncertainties to be modeled by statistical distributions. This requires the availability of sufficient sample size so that these variables can be represented accurately by probabilistic distributions. In the design of new systems and structures, usually there is a lack of information about some uncertain variables or parameters and only a reduced set of samples might be available. This prevents their treatment as probability distributions. This type of uncertainty is called epistemic uncertainty. This paper proposes two effective multiobjective evolutionary algorithms to solve design problems under both types of uncertainty: aleatory and epistemic. Two objective functions, namely the cost of the structures and the probability of failure, are considered. The results are Pareto fronts with a trade-off between cost and reliability associated with a specified level of confidence. Pareto fronts show minimum achievable values for the probability of failure for a given cost. The effect of the epistemic uncertainty on the solution is also investigated. An analytical example and two structural examples are solved to show the applicability of the approach and how epistemic uncertainty may affect the results.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The list of available materials consists of Matlab files, OpenSees scripts, and data tables used to plot Pareto fronts.

Acknowledgments

This work has received a research grant from the Instituto de Estudios Riojanos of the Autonomous Community of La Rioja, Spain. The authors gratefully acknowledge this support.

References

Aoues, Y., and A. Chateauneuf. 2010. “Benchmark study of numerical methods for reliability-based design optimization.” Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 41 (2): 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0412-2.
Beer, M., R. L. Muhanna, and R. L. Mullen, eds. 2014. “Robust design—Coping with hazards risk and uncertainty.” Int. J. Reliab. Saf. 5 (3–4): 236.
Beer, M., and E. Patelli. 2015. “Engineering analysis with vague and imprecise information.” Struct. Saf. 52 (Part B): 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.11.001.
Ben-Haim, Y. 2006. Info-gap decision theory. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press.
Capiez-Lernout, E., and C. Soize. 2008. “Robust design optimization in computational mechanics.” ASME J. Appl. Mech.-Trans. ASME 75 (2): 021001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2775493.
Celorrio, L. 2010. “Metodología eficiente de optimización de diseño basada en fiabilidad aplicada a estructuras.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad de La Rioja.
Celorrio, L. 2012. “Development of a reliability-based design optimization toolbox for the FERUM software.” In Vol. 7520 of Scalable uncertainty management. SUM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by E. Hüllermeier, S. Link, T. Fober, and B. Seeger. Berlin: Springer.
Celorrio, L., and E. Patelli. 2018. “Multi-objective reliability-based design of complex engineering structures using response surface methods.” In Proc., 6th European Conf. on Computational Mechanics Solids, Structures and Coupled Problems, ECCM 2018 and 7th European Conf. on Computational Fluid Dynamics, ECFD 2018, 4052–4062. Glasgow, Scotland: International Centre for Numerical Methods in Engineering.
Coello, C. A. C., G. T. Pulido, and M. S. Lechuga. 2004. “Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization.” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 8 (3): 256–279. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2004.826067.
de Angelis, M., E. Patelli, and M. Beer. 2015. “Advanced line sampling for efficient robust reliability analysis.” Struct. Saf. 52 (Part B): 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.10.002.
Deb, K., A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. A. Meyarivan. 2002. “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II.” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6 (2): 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017.
Der Kiureghian, A., and O. Ditlevsen. 2009. “Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter?” Struct. Saf. 31 (2): 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020.
Du, L., K. K. Choi, B. D. Youn, and D. Gorsich. 2005. “Possibility-based design optimization method for design problems with both statistical and fuzzy input data.” J. Mech. Des. 128 (4): 928–935. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2204972.
Gunawan, S., and P. Y. Papalambros. 2005. “A Bayesian approach to reliability-based optimization with incomplete information.” J. Mech. Des. 128 (4): 909–918. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2204969.
Hao, P., R. Ma, Y. Wang, S. Feng, B. Wang, G. Li, H. Xing, and F. Yang. 2019. “An augmented step size adjustment method for the performance measure approach: Toward general structural reliability-based design optimization.” Struct. Saf. 80 (Sep): 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.04.001.
ICC (International Code Council). 2018. International building code. ICC IBC-2018. Washington, DC: ICC.
Kennedy, J., and R. C. Eberhart. 2001. Swarm intelligence. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Lagaros, N. D., V. Plevris, and M. Papadrakakis. 2005. “Multi-objective design optimization using cascade evolutionary computations.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 194 (30–33): 3496–3515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2004.12.029.
Lagaros, N. D., V. Plevris, and M. Papadrakakis. 2007. “Reliability based robust design optimization of steel structures.” Int. J. Simul. Multi. Des. Optim. 1 (1): 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1051/ijsmdo:2007003.
Li, M., and Z. Wang. 2020. “Heterogeneous uncertainty quantification using Bayesian inference for simulation-based design optimization.” Struct. Saf. 85 (Jul): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101954.
Martínez-Cagigal, V. 2020. “Multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO).” Accessed January 10, 2020. https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/62074-multi-objective-particle-swarm-optimization-mopso.
Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2006. “OpenSees command language manual.” Accessed May 5, 2018. https://opensees.berkeley.edu/.
Moon, M. Y., K. K. Choi, N. Gaul, and D. Lamb. 2018. “Treating epistemic uncertainty using bootstrapping selection of input distribution model for confidence-based reliability assessment.” J. Mech. Des. 141 (3): 031402. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042149.
Mourelatos, Z. P., and L. Zhou. 2005. “A design optimization method using evidence theory.” J. Mech. Des. 128 (4): 901–908. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2204970.
Okasha, N. M. 2016. “An improved weighted average simulation approach for solving reliability-based analysis and design optimization problems.” Struct. Saf. 60 (May): 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.01.005.
Patelli, E., D. A. Alvarez, M. Broggi, and M. de Angelis. 2015. “Uncertainty management in multidisciplinary design of critical safety systems.” J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst. 12 (1): 140–169. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.I010273.
Patelli, E., Y. Govers, M. Broggi, H. Gomes, M. Link, and J. E. Mottershead. 2017. “Sensitivity or Bayesian model updating: A comparison of techniques using the DLR- ARMOD test data.” Arch. Appl. Mech. 87 (5): 905–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-017-1233-1.
Patelli, E., H. J. Pradlwater, and G. I. Schuëller. 2011. “On multinormal integrals by importance sampling for parallel system reliability.” Struct. Saf. 33 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2010.04.002.
Penmetsa, R., and R. Grandhi. 2002. “Efficient estimation of structural reliability for problems with uncertain intervals.” Int. J. Comput. Struct. 80 (12): 1103–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00069-X.
Plevris, V., N. D. Lagaros, and M. Papadrakakis. 2005a. “Robust design optimization of steel structures.” In Proc., 5th GRACM Int. Congress on Computational Mechanics. Nicosia, Cyprus: Greek Association of Computational Mechanics.
Plevris, V., N. D. Lagaros, and M. Papadrakakis. 2005b. “Robust design optimization of steel structures using cascade evolutionary computations.” In Proc., 8th US National Congress on Computational Mechanics (USNCCM 8). Austin, TX: U.S. Association for Computational Mechanics.
Rao, S. S., and L. Cao. 2002. “Optimal design of mechanical systems involving interval parameters.” J. Mech. Des. 124 (3): 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1479691.
Roccheta, R., M. Broggi, and E. Patelli. 2018. “Do we have enough data? Robust reliability via uncertainty quantification.” J. Appl. Math. 54 (Feb): 710–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.10.020.
Schuëller, G. I., and H. A. Jensen. 2008. “Computational methods in optimization considering uncertainties—An overview.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 198 (1): 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2008.05.004.
Sinha, K. 2007. “Reliability-based multiobjective optimization for automotive crashworthiness and occupant safety.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 33 (3): 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0050-x.
Srivastava, R., and K. Deb. 2013. “An evolutionary based Bayesian design optimization approach under incomplete information.” Eng. Optim. 45 (2): 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2012.661730.
Su, Y., H. Tang, S. Xue, and D. Li. 2016. “Multi-objective differential evolution for truss design optimization with epistemic uncertainty.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 19 (9): 1403–1419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216643250.
Tamilselvi S., S. Baskar, and P. R. Varshini. 2020. “MATLAB code for constrained NSGA II.” Accessed January 10, 2020. https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/49806-matlab-code-for-constrained-nsga-ii-dr-s-baskar-s-tamilselvi-and-p-r-varshini.
Tan, F., and T. Lahmer. 2019. “Shape design of arch dams under load uncertainties with robust optimization.” Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 13 (4): 852–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0522-x.
Thoft-Christensen, P., and Y. Murotsu. 1996. Application of structural system reliability theory. Berlin: Springer.
Tu, J., K. K. Choi, and Y. H. Park. 1999. “A new study on reliability based design optimization.” ASME J. Mech. Des. 121 (4): 557–564. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2829499.
UNE (Normalización Española). 2006a. Productos laminados en caliente de aceros para estructuras. Parte 1: Condiciones técnicas generales de suministro. UNE-EN 10025-1. Madrid, Spain: UNE.
UNE (Normalización Española). 2006b. Productos laminados en caliente de aceros para estructuras. Parte 2: Condiciones técnicas de suministro de los aceros estructurales no aleados. UNE-EN 10025-2:2006. Madrid, Spain: UNE.
UNE (Normalización Española). 2014. Eurocódigo 3: Proyecto de estructuras de acero. Parte 1-1: Reglas generales y reglas para edificios. UNE-EN 1993-1-1:2013/A1. Madrid, Spain: UNE.
Valdebenito, M. A., H. J. Pradlwarter, and G. I. Schuëller. 2010. “The role of the design point for calculating failure probabilities in view of dimensionality and structural non linearities.” Struct. Saf. 32 (2): 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.08.004.
Valdebenito, M. A., and G. I. Schuëller. 2010. “A survey on approaches for reliability-based optimization.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 42 (5): 645–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0518-6.
Yadav, O. P., S. S. Bhamare, and A. Rathore. 2010. “Reliability-based robust design optimization: A multi-objective framework using hybrid quality loss function.” Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 26 (1): 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1027.
Yi, P., G. Cheng, and L. Jiang. 2008. “A sequential approximate programming strategy for performance-measure-based probabilistic structural design optimization.” Struct. Saf. 30 (2): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.08.003.
Youn, B., and R. Wang. 2006. “Bayesian reliability based design optimization under both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties.” In Proc., 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conf. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-6928.
Zhou, M., Z. Luo, P. Yi, and G. Cheng. 2018. “A two-phase approach based on sequential approximation for reliability-based design optimization.” Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 57 (2): 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1888-9.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7Issue 3September 2021

History

Received: Jul 13, 2020
Accepted: Mar 15, 2021
Published online: May 26, 2021
Published in print: Sep 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Oct 26, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Univ. of La Rioja, Edificio Departamental, C/San José de Calasanz 31, 26004 Logroño, La Rioja, Spain (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4275-3778. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Strathclyde, James Weir Building, 75 Montrose St., Glasgow G1 1XJ, Scotland, UK. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5007-7247. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • A Comparative Study on the Dynamic Behavior of PMA-Based Wind Turbines Connected to the Electric Grid, Emerging Technologies in Electrical Engineering for Reliable Green Intelligence, 10.1007/978-981-99-9235-5_37, (505-514), (2024).
  • Single-Loop Multi-Objective Reliability-Based Design Optimization Using Chaos Control Theory and Shifting Vector with Differential Evolution, Mathematical and Computational Applications, 10.3390/mca28010026, 28, 1, (26), (2023).
  • Risk management and components’ coordination assessment in the design of a composite riverine flood defence system, International Journal of River Basin Management, 10.1080/15715124.2023.2249436, (1-17), (2023).
  • Bayesian Framework for Assessing Effectiveness of Geotechnical Site Investigation Programs, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001278, 9, 1, (2023).
  • Uncertainty Theory-Based Structural Reliability Analysis and Design Optimization under Epistemic Uncertainty, Applied Sciences, 10.3390/app12062846, 12, 6, (2846), (2022).
  • Dynamic Risk Analysis of Deepwater Gas Hydrate Drilling with a Riserless Drilling System Based on Uncertain Dynamic Bayesian Network Model, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001206, 8, 1, (2022).
  • Multi-objective reliability-based seismic performance design optimization of SMRFs considering various sources of uncertainty, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114219, 261, (114219), (2022).
  • A hybrid teaching–learning slime mould algorithm for global optimization and reliability-based design optimization problems, Neural Computing and Applications, 10.1007/s00521-022-07277-3, 34, 19, (16617-16642), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share