Technical Papers
May 26, 2021

Gaussian Process Regression-Based Material Model for Stochastic Structural Analysis

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7, Issue 3

Abstract

Data-driven material models can capture the constitutive relationship directly from the data without involving any material-dependent mathematical expressions. But most data-driven approaches, such as artificial neural networks, only estimate the deterministic relations and do not consider the material uncertainty. In this paper, the constitutive relation is taken as a stochastic function following the Gaussian process, where a probability-based nonparametric method, called Gaussian process regression (GPR), is used to capture the constitutive relation with the uncertainty being included. Both one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) material data are used to validate the GPR-based constitutive model (GPR model). The obtained GPR model shows higher accuracy than other data-driven approaches, particularly when the data set size is small. When compared with the assumed true model, the GPR-based model has an average relative error of <2.3%. Finally, with the help of the material uncertainty identified by the GPR-based model from the material data, a data-driven stochastic structural analysis procedure is developed. The relative errors of the expected deflection and probability of failure given by the GPR model are smaller than 2% and 3%, respectively.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Australian Research Council through the Discovery Projects Scheme (Grant No. DP190102954).

References

Aldosary, M., J. Wang, and C. Li. 2018. “Structural reliability and stochastic finite element methods.” Eng. Comput. 35 (6): 2165–2214. https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-04-2018-0157.
ASTM. 2011. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Ayensa-Jiménez, J., M. H. Doweidar, J. A. Sanz-Herrera, and M. Doblaré. 2018. “A new reliability-based data-driven approach for noisy experimental data with physical constraints.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 328 (Jan): 752–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.08.027.
Børvik, T., O. S. Hopperstad, and K. O. Pedersen. 2010. “Quasi-brittle fracture during structural impact of AA7075-T651 aluminium plates.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 37 (5): 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.11.001.
Boyle, P., and M. Frean. 2005. Multiple output Gaussian process regression. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria Univ. of Wellington. https://doi.org/10.1.1.114.3898.
Chinesta, F., P. Ladeveze, R. Ibanez, J. V. Aguado, E. Abisset-Chavanne, and E. Cueto. 2017. “Data-driven computational plasticity.” Procedia Eng. 207 (Jan): 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.763.
Ebden, M. 2015. “Gaussian processes: A quick introduction.” Preprint, submitted May 12, 2015. http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.02965.
Eggersmann, R., T. Kirchdoerfer, S. Reese, L. Stainier, and M. Ortiz. 2019. “Model-free data-driven inelasticity.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 350 (Jun): 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.02.016.
Ellis, G., C. Yao, R. Zhao, and D. Penumadu. 1995. “Stress-strain modeling of sands using artificial neural networks.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (5): 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:5(429).
Faramarzi, A., A. A. Javadi, and A. Ahangar-Asr. 2013. “Numerical implementation of EPR-based material models in finite element analysis.” Comput. Struct. 118 (Mar): 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.10.002.
Fei, C.-W., H. Li, H.-T. Liu, C. Lu, B. Keshtegar, and L.-Q. An. 2020. “Multilevel nested reliability-based design optimization with hybrid intelligent regression for operating assembly relationship.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 103 (Aug): 105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.105906.
Freitag, S. 2012. “Artificial intelligence for identification of material behaviour using uncertain load and displacement data.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Scalable Uncertainty Management, 606–611. Berlin: Springer.
Freitag, S., W. Graf, and M. Kaliske. 2011. “FE analysis using recurrent neural networks for uncertain stress-strain-time dependencies.” Proc. Appl. Math. Mech. 11 (1): 211–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.201110097.
Freitag, S., W. Graf, and M. Kaliske. 2013. “A material description based on recurrent neural networks for fuzzy data and its application within the finite element method.” Comput. Struct. 124 (Aug): 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.11.011.
Ghaboussi, J., J. Garrett, and X. Wu. 1991. “Knowledge-based modeling of material behavior with neural networks.” J. Eng. Mech. 117 (1): 132–153. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:1(132).
Ghaboussi, J., D. A. Pecknold, M. Zhang, and R. M. Haj-Ali. 1998. “Autoprogressive training of neural network constitutive models.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 42 (1): 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980515)42:1%3C105::AID-NME356%3E3.0.CO;2-V.
Ghaboussi, J., and D. Sidarta. 1998. “New nested adaptive neural networks (NANN) for constitutive modeling.” Comput. Geotech. 22 (1): 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(97)00034-7.
Godil, S. S., M. S. Shamim, S. A. Enam, and U. Qidwai. 2011. “Fuzzy logic: A “simple” solution for complexities in neurosciences?” Surg. Neurol. Int. 2. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.77177.
Graf, W., S. Freitag, J. U. Sickert, and M. Kaliske. 2012. “Structural analysis with fuzzy data and neural network based material description.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 27 (9): 640–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00779.x.
Hashash, Y. M. A., S. Jung, and J. Ghaboussi. 2004. “Numerical implementation of a neural network based material model in finite element analysis.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 59 (7): 989–1005. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.905.
Hoang, N.-D., A.-D. Pham, Q.-L. Nguyen, and Q.-N. Pham. 2016. “Estimating compressive strength of high performance concrete with Gaussian process regression model.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2016 (Jan): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2861380.
Ibañez, R., E. Abisset-Chavanne, J. V. Aguado, D. Gonzalez, E. Cueto, and F. Chinesta. 2018. “A manifold learning approach to data-driven computational elasticity and inelasticity.” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 25 (1): 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-016-9197-9.
Javadi, A. A., and M. Rezania. 2009a. “Applications of artificial intelligence and data mining techniques in soil modeling.” Geomech. Eng. 1 (1): 53–74. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2009.1.1.053.
Javadi, A. A., and M. Rezania. 2009b. “Intelligent finite element method: An evolutionary approach to constitutive modeling.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 23 (4): 442–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2009.06.008.
Javadi, A. A., T. P. Tan, and A. Elkassas. 2009. “Intelligent finite element method and application to simulation of behavior of soils under cyclic loading.” In Foundations of computational intelligence, 317–338. Berlin: Springer.
Jung, S., and J. Ghaboussi. 2006. “Neural network constitutive model for rate-dependent materials.” Comput. Struct. 84 (15–16): 955–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.02.015.
Kessler, B. S., A. S. El-Gizawy, and D. E. Smith. 2007. “Incorporating neural network material models within finite element analysis for rheological behavior prediction.” J. Pressure Vessel Tech. 129 (1): 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2389004.
Kirchdoerfer, T., and M. Ortiz. 2016. “Data-driven computational mechanics.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 304 (Jun): 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.02.001.
Kirchdoerfer, T., and M. Ortiz. 2017. “Data driven computing with noisy material data sets.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 326 (Nov): 622–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.07.039.
Lázaro-Gredilla, M., J. Quiñonero-Candela, C. E. Rasmussen, and A. R. Figueiras-Vidal. 2010. “Sparse spectrum Gaussian process regression.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11 (Aug): 1865–1881.
Liu, H., J. Cai, and Y.-S. Ong. 2018. “Remarks on multi-output Gaussian process regression.” Knowl.-Based Syst. 144 (Mar): 102–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.12.034.
Lu, C., Y.-W. Feng, C.-W. Fei, and S.-Q. Bu. 2019. “Improved decomposed-coordinated kriging modeling strategy for dynamic probabilistic analysis of multicomponent structures.” IEEE Trans. Reliab. 69 (2): 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2019.2954379.
Nie, J., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2005. “Finite element-based structural reliability assessment using efficient directional simulation.” J. Eng. Mech. 131 (3): 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:3(259).
Papadopoulos, V., and D. G. Giovanis. 2017. Stochastic finite element methods. Berlin: Springer.
Penumadu, D., and R. Zhao. 1999. “Triaxial compression behavior of sand and gravel using artificial neural networks (ANN).” Comput. Geotech. 24 (3): 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(99)00002-6.
Ramberg, W., and W. R. Osgood. 1943. Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters. Washington, DC: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.
Ranganathan, A., M.-H. Yang, and J. Ho. 2010. “Online sparse Gaussian process regression and its applications.” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20 (2): 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2010.2066984.
Rasmussen, C. E. 2003. “Gaussian processes in machine learning.” In Proc., Summer School on Machine Learning, 63–71. Berlin: Springer.
Schuëller, G. I., and H. J. Pradlwarter. 2006. “Computational stochastic structural analysis (COSSAN)—A software tool.” Struct. Saf. 28 (1–2): 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.03.005.
Settgast, C., M. Abendroth, and M. Kuna. 2019. “Constitutive modeling of plastic deformation behavior of open-cell foam structures using neural networks.” Mech. Mater. 131 (Apr): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.01.015.
Shin, H., and G. Pande. 2002. “Enhancement of data for training neural network based constitutive models for geomaterials.” In Proc., 8th Int. Symp. on Numerical Models in Geomechanics-NUMOG VIII, 141–146. London: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439833797.
Sidarta, J. G. D. E. 1998. “New nested adaptive neural networks (NANN) for constitutive modeling.” Comput. Geotech. 22 (1): 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(97)00034-7.
Stoffel, M., F. Bamer, and B. Markert. 2018. “Artificial neural networks and intelligent finite elements in non-linear structural mechanics.” Thin-Walled Struct. 131 (Oct): 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.06.035.
Su, G., L. Peng, and L. Hu. 2017. “A Gaussian process-based dynamic surrogate model for complex engineering structural reliability analysis.” Struct. Saf. 68 (Sep): 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.06.003.
Versino, D., A. Tonda, and C. A. Bronkhorst. 2017. “Data driven modeling of plastic deformation.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 318 (May): 981–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.02.016.
Williams, C. K., and C. E. Rasmussen. 1996. “Gaussian processes for regression.” In Proc., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 514–520. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Williams, C. K., and C. E. Rasmussen. 2006. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yang, Y., B. Chen, Y. Su, Q. Chen, Z. Li, W. Guo, and H. Wang. 2020. “Concrete mix design for completely recycled fine aggregate by modified packing density method.” Materials 13 (16): 3535. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13163535.
Zhao, W., J. K. Liu, and Y. Y. Chen. 2015. “Material behavior modeling with multi-output support vector regression.” Appl. Math. Modell. 39 (17): 5216–5229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.03.036.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7Issue 3September 2021

History

Received: May 19, 2020
Accepted: Feb 15, 2021
Published online: May 26, 2021
Published in print: Sep 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Oct 26, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9503-2851. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6243-4304. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • An augmented physics informed neural network approach for blunt-body dynamics, Physics of Fluids, 10.1063/5.0176702, 36, 1, (2024).
  • Effect of Curing Regimes and Fiber Contents on Flexural Behaviors of Milling Steel Fiber-Reinforced Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete: Experimental and Data-Driven Studies, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17429, 36, 7, (2024).
  • Prediction of flow stress in isothermal compression of hydrogenated TC17 alloy using multiple prediction models, Materials Today Communications, 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.108011, 38, (108011), (2024).
  • Predicting fatigue life of shear connectors in steel‐concrete composite bridges using artificial intelligence techniques, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 10.1111/ffe.14207, 47, 3, (818-832), (2023).
  • Study and data-driven modeling of flexural behaviors of ultra-high-performance concrete reinforced by milling steel fiber, Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 10.1080/15376494.2023.2282106, (1-14), (2023).
  • A hybrid proper orthogonal decomposition-heteroscedastic sparse Gaussian process regression model for evaluating structural reliability with correlated stochastic material properties, Structural Safety, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2022.102289, 100, (102289), (2023).
  • Shear strength of circular concrete-filled tube (CCFT) members using human-guided artificial intelligence approach, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115820, 282, (115820), (2023).
  • Intelligent Data-Driven Models for Simulating Formwork Labour Productivity in High Rise Buildings, International Journal of Civil Infrastructure, 10.11159/ijci.2022.001, (2022).
  • Proposing an Uncertainty Management Framework to Implement the Evidence Theory for Vehicle Crash Applications, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, 10.1115/1.4053062, 8, 2, (2022).
  • Heteroscedastic sparse Gaussian process regression-based stochastic material model for plastic structural analysis, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-022-06870-9, 12, 1, (2022).
  • See more

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share