Investigating Student Perceptions of Engineering Judgment through Experiential Learning
Publication: Geo-Congress 2024
ABSTRACT
As a result of the increasingly complex and interconnected problems facing the world, civil (and all) engineers entering the workforce require a more mature sense of engineering judgment at an early stage in their career. The world can no longer afford to wait 15 years for engineers, civil especially, to reach their prime decision-making ability. At the same time, and likely for the same reasons, ABET-aware faculty are grappling with how to develop and assess engineering judgment at the undergraduate level. The goal of our project is to develop and implement various learning strategies and instructional tools to improve student outcomes related to engineering judgment. To begin to address this, a second-year cohort of civil engineering students at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, a medium-sized R1 institution which has been producing prominent engineers such as Ralph Peck since the early 19th century, participated in several activities in a required geotechnical engineering course aimed at assessing student understanding of engineering judgment. Open coding qualitative analysis was performed on gathered student definitions of engineering judgment to identify themes within student responses prior to undergoing a design project. Subsequent student submissions to the design project were qualitatively analyzed for employment of these themes within their prepared solutions. Findings suggest that while students included certain subskills in their definitions of engineering judgment, they struggled to demonstrate them within their design submissions. Additionally, analysis of reflection prompts after completion of the design project indicated that students prefer application-based problems to traditional theoretical problem solving. This creates tension with another emerging theme from the reflection prompts: students wished they had more guidance for the open-ended design project. The general nature of application-based design problems, and ultimately experiential learning, is that the learner has limited guidance to fully allow for the individual exploration of the solution space. This work-in-progress paper briefly addresses this tension in student responses, while focusing on the evolution of engineering judgment development in second-year civil engineering students over the course of eight weeks during a required introductory civil engineering course.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
ASTM. (2021). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)). ASTM Standard D698-12. Book of Standards Volume 04.08.
Bennett, V., Carkin, R., Richtarek, A., Zastavker, Y. V., Harteveld, C., and Abdoun, T. (2022). Preliminary Development and Assessment of Engineering Judgment through Mixed-Reality Game-Based Learning. 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Uppsala, Sweden, 2022, pp. 1–5, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962436.
Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Carkin, R. (2023). Investigating undergraduate student perceptions of engineering judgment. [Master’s Thesis] Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Rensselaer Libraries’ Catalog (submitted).
Carkin, R., Bennett, V., Zastavker, Y., Richtarek, A., Harteveld, C., and Abdoun, T. (2023). Beginning to Develop and Assess Engineering Judgment in an Introductory Geotechnical Engineering Course. Proceedings of GeoCongress 2023. Los Angeles, CA.
Crabtree, B. F., and Miller, W. L. (1999). Doing Qualitative Research. United Kingdom. SAGE Publications.
DiBiagio, E., and Flaate, K. (2000). Ralph B. Peck, engineer, educator, a man of judgement. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute.
Esche, S. K. (2002). Project-Based Learning (PBL) in a course on mechanisms and machine dynamics. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 1(2), 201–204.
Ferreira, A., and Santoso, A. (2008). Do students’ perceptions matter? A study of the effect of students’ perceptions on academic performance. Accounting and Finance, 48(2), 209–231.
Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445.
Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction.
Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., and Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-Based Learning in Post-Secondary Education – Theory, Practice and Rubber Sling Shots. High Education 51(2), 287–314.
Koehn, E. (2000). Collaborative Learning In Civil/Construction Classrooms. 2000 Annual Conference (5.147.1–5.147.7). ASEE Conferences.
Kolmos, A., Fink, F. K., and Krogh, L. (2004). The Aalborg PBL model—Progress, diversity and challenges. Amsterdam University Press.
Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., and Simons, R. (2002). University Students’ Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52.
Manning, J. (2017). In Vivo Coding. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, 1–2.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., and Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1).
Pérez, R. F., Chung, S., Zastavker, Y. V., Bennett, V., Abdoun, T., and Harteveld, C. (2022). “How Can Game-Based Learning Affect Engineering Students’ Confidence?,” 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 1–5, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962463.
Richtarek, A. (2021). Beginning to develop and assess engineering judgment through mixed reality game-based learning [Master’s Thesis] Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Rensselaer Libraries’ Catalog.
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
Saldana, J. (2012). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. United Kingdom: SAGE Publications.
Servant-Miklos, V. F. C., and Kolmos, A. (2022). Student conceptions of problem and project based learning in engineering education: A phenomenographic investigation. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(4), 792–812.
Stolk, J., and Martello, R. (2018). Reimagining and Empowering the Design of Projects: A Project-Based Learning Goals Framework. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–9.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Feb 22, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Business management
- Construction engineering
- Construction management
- Education
- Employees
- Employment
- Engineering education
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering profession
- Geotechnical engineering
- Information management
- Material mechanics
- Material properties
- Materials engineering
- Mechanical properties
- Personnel management
- Practice and Profession
- Project management
- Students
- Tension
- Terminology and definition
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.