ABSTRACT

Realistic strong-motion accelerograms of earthquakes are required for various earthquake engineering tasks, including modeling structural and site response to large and near-source events. In this work, we introduce a data-driven framework for three-component ground motion synthesis intended for engineering applications. Leveraging the increase of ground-motion data from seismic networks and recent advancements in machine learning, we train a generative adversarial neural operator (GANO) to produce realistic three-component acceleration time histories conditioned on moment magnitude (M), rupture distance (Rrup), time-average shear-wave velocity at the top 30 m (Vs30) based on a California dataset compiled from PEER NGA-West2 database, and a public DesignSafe California database. The results show that the framework can efficiently recover the magnitude, distance, and Vs30 scaling of Fourier amplitude and pseudo-spectral accelerations. Through a comprehensive residual analysis using empirical data, we have verified that our model accurately captures both the mean values and aleatory variability of the evaluated ground-motion parameters.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Abrahamson, N. A., W. J. Silva, and R. Kamai. 2014. “Summary of the ASK14 Ground Motion Relation for Active Crustal Regions.” Earthquake Spectra, 30 (3): 1025–1055. SAGE Publications Ltd STM. https://doi.org/10.1193/070913EQS198M.
Afshari, K., and J. P. Stewart. 2016. “Validation of Duration Parameters from SCEC Broadband Platform Simulated Ground Motions.” Seismological Research Letters, 87 (6): 1355–1362. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220160086.
Bayless, J., and N. A. Abrahamson. 2019. “An Empirical Model for the Interfrequency Correlation of Epsilon for Fourier Amplitude Spectra.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 109 (3): 1058–1070. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120180238.
Bhosale, A., R. Davis, and P. Sarkar. 2017. “Vertical Irregularity of Buildings: Regularity Index versus Seismic Risk.” ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 3. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000900.
Boore, D. M. 1983. “Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 73 (6A): 1865–1894. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA07306A1865.
Boore, D. M. 2003. “Simulation of Ground Motion Using the Stochastic Method.” Pure appl. geophys., 160 (3): 635–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012553.
Campbell, K. W., and Y. Bozorgnia. 2014. “NGA-West2 Ground Motion Model for the Average Horizontal Components of PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped Linear Acceleration Response Spectra.” Earthquake Spectra, 30 (3): 1087–1115. SAGE Publications Ltd STM. https://doi.org/10.1193/062913EQS175M.
Chiou, B. S.-J., and R. R. Youngs. 2014. “Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra.” Earthquake Spectra, 30 (3): 1117–1153. https://doi.org/10.1193/072813EQS219M.
Douglas, J., and H. Aochi. 2008. “A Survey of Techniques for Predicting Earthquake Ground Motions for Engineering Purposes.” Surv Geophys, 29 (3): 187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-008-9046-y.
Frankel, A. 2009. “A Constant Stress-Drop Model for Producing Broadband Synthetic Seismograms: Comparison with the Next Generation Attenuation Relations.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 99 (2A): 664–680. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080079.
Goodfellow, I., Y. Bengio, and A. Courville. 2016. Deep Learning. MIT Press.
Goulet, C. A., J. Watson-Lamprey, J. Baker, C. Haselton, and N. Luco. 2008. “Assessment of Ground Motion Selection and Modification (GMSM) Methods for Non-Linear Dynamic Analyses of Structures.” Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV, 1–10. Sacramento, California, United States: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Graves, R. W., and A. Pitarka. 2010. “Broadband Ground-Motion Simulation Using a Hybrid Approach.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100 (5A): 2095–2123. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100057.
Hanks, T. C., and R. K. McGuire. 1981. “The character of high-frequency strong ground motion.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 71 (6): 2071–2095. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0710062071.
Katsanos, E. I., A. G. Sextos, and G. D. Manolis. 2010. “Selection of earthquake ground motion records: A state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30 (4): 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.10.005.
Kempton, J. J., and J. P. Stewart. 2006. “Prediction Equations for Significant Duration of Earthquake Ground Motions considering Site and Near-Source Effects.” Earthquake Spectra, 22 (4): 985–1013. SAGE Publications Ltd STM. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2358175.
Luco, N., and P. Bazzurro. 2007. “Does amplitude scaling of ground motion records result in biased nonlinear structural drift responses?” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36 (13): 1813–1835. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.695.
Naeim, F., and M. Lew. 1995. “On the Use of Design Spectrum Compatible Time Histories.” Earthquake Spectra, 11 (1): 111–127. SAGE Publications Ltd STM. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585805.
Rahman, M. A., M. A. Florez, A. Anandkumar, Z. E. Ross, and K. Azizzadenesheli. 2022. “Generative Adversarial Neural Operators.” arXiv:2205.03017 [cs, math].
Rezaeian, S., and A. Der Kiureghian. 2012. “Simulation of orthogonal horizontal ground motion components for specified earthquake and site characteristics.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41 (2): 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1132.
Shi, Y., G. Lavrentiadis, D. Asimaki, Z. E. Ross, and K. Azizzadenesheli. 2023. “Broadband Ground Motion Synthesis via Generative Adversarial Neural Operators: Development and Validation.” arXiv.
Silva, W. 1996. Description and validation of the stochastic ground motion model. 1176.
Stafford, P. J. 2017. “Interfrequency Correlations among Fourier Spectral Ordinates and Implications for Stochastic Ground‐Motion Simulation.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 107 (6): 2774–2791. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170081.
Wu, Y., and K. He. 2018. Group Normalization. 3–19.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Geo-Congress 2024
Geo-Congress 2024
Pages: 105 - 113

History

Published online: Feb 22, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Yaozhong Shi [email protected]
1Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA. Email: [email protected]
Grigorios Lavrentiadis [email protected]
2Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA. Email: [email protected]
Domniki Asimaki [email protected]
3Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA. Email: [email protected]
Zach E. Ross [email protected]
4Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA. Email: [email protected]
Kamyar Azizzadenesheli [email protected]
5NVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, CA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$152.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$152.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share