Chapter
Mar 18, 2024

Simulation-Based Analysis of a Precast Factory Layout to Reduce Labor Travel Time and Production Time

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2024

ABSTRACT

Inefficient facility layout in construction manufacturing leads to process waste, thereby increasing production time. In particular, it results in unnecessary movement of workers to transport materials/tools during production. The research presented in this paper examines the impact of a precast concrete factory’s layout on three parameters in the production of precast concrete panels: labor travel time, activity cycle time, and production time. Recommendations are proposed to reduce process waste regarding each of these parameters, that is, relocating the material preparation mills and introducing a cart-based material/tool handling system. The benefits are quantified using a discrete-event simulation model of the process. It shows a 10% reduction in the production time of a single panel and a 39% reduction in the labor hours incurred in transportation activities when compared to the current state. It also shows that 6.9% of the labor hours in the current state is allocated to unnecessary non-value-added transportation activities.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Abou Rizk, S., Hague, S., and Ekyalimpa, R. (2016). Construction simulation: An introduction using Simphony. Edmonton, Canada: Univ. of Alberta.
Aghazadeh, S., Hafeznezami, S., Najjar, L., and Huq, Z. (2011). “The influence of work‐cells and facility layout on the manufacturing efficiency.” Journal of Facilities Management, 9(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961111148117.
Aleisa, E. E., and Lin, L. (2005). “For effective facilities planning: layout optimization then simulation, or vice versa?” Proc., of the Winter Simulation Conference, 2005., 5 pp.-. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2005.1574401.
Chen, C., Tran Huy, D., Tiong, L. K., Chen, I. M., and Cai, Y. (2019). “Optimal facility layout planning for AGV-based modular prefabricated manufacturing system.” Autom. Constr., 98, 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUTCON.2018.08.008.
Cisneros, D., and Escobar, L. (2022). “Plant Layout Selection Procedure Based on Discrete Event Simulation Software.” XV Multidisciplinary International Congress on Science and Technology (pp. 197–210).
Drira, A., Pierreval, H., and Hajri-Gabouj, S. (2007). “Facility layout problems: A survey.” Annu. Rev. Control, 31(2), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARCONTROL.2007.04.001.
Grajo, E. S. (1995). “Strategic Layout Planning and Simulation for Lean Manufacturing a LayOPT Tutorial”. Proc., of the 27th Conference on Winter Simulation, 510–514. https://doi.org/10.1145/224401.224670.
Juneja, P. (2023). “Facility Layout - Objectives, Design and Factors Affecting the Layout.” Management Study guide, <https://www.managementstudyguide.com/facility-layout.htm>(April 15, 2023).
Levine, R. V., and Norenzayan, A. (1999). “The pace of life in 31 countries.” Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 30(2), 178–205.
Liker, J. (2004). The Toyota Way - 14 management principles the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill (Vol. 11). New York.
Meller, R. D., Narayanan, V., and Vance, P. H. (1998). “Optimal facility layout design.” Oper. Res. Lett., 23(3–5), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6377(98)00024-8.
Nenzhelele, T., Trimble, J. A., Swanepoel, J. A., and Kanakana-Katumba, M. G. (2023). “MCDM Model for Evaluating and Selecting the Optimal Facility Layout Design: A Case Study on Railcar Manufacturing.” Processes, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030869.
Sargent, R. G. (2010). “Verification and validation of simulation models.” Proc., of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference, 166–183. IEEE.
Sherfudeen, A. P., Pillai, R. G., Raghavan, N., and Kalidindi, S. N. (2020). “Factors affecting productivity and functionality of precast concrete building construction.” Indian Concrete Journal, 94(9), 26–37.
Wang, D., Liu, G., Li, K., Wang, T., Shrestha, A., Martek, I., and Tao, X. (2018). “Layout Optimization Model for the Production Planning of Precast Concrete Building Components.” Sustainability, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061807.
PN, W., and Onyancha, D. (2018). Impact Assessment of a Facility Layout on Manufacturing Cycle Time and Throughput: A Case Study of a Tannery in Central Kenya.
Yang, Z., and Lu, W. (2023). “Facility layout design for modular construction manufacturing: A comparison based on simulation and optimization.” Autom. Constr., 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104713.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2024
Construction Research Congress 2024
Pages: 1087 - 1096

History

Published online: Mar 18, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

1Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Canada. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3256-3310. Email: [email protected]
Fatima Alsakka [email protected]
2Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Canada. Email: [email protected]
Mohammad Darwish [email protected]
3Civil Engineer, AB, Canada. Email: [email protected]
Mohamed Al-Hussein, Ph.D., P.Eng. [email protected]
4Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Canada. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$276.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$276.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share