Chapter
Sep 25, 2023
Chapter 2

Infrastructure Resilience Framework

Publication: Infrastructure System Resilience: An Engineering Framework for Assessment, Management, and Governance

Abstract

For the infrastructure resilience framework, infrastructure systems are defined as the physical and organizational structures and facilities needed for the operation of a society or enterprise, including the physical components, data and information, and the human agency interaction (i.e., they are socio-technical systems). The infrastructure resilience framework consist of following elements: infrastructure resilience domain; building and lifeline infrastructure system performance or functionality; system service provision and operability; continuity of services; social and economic activity; community; community performance targets; and infrastructure system performance targets. These eight elements are considered the minimum groupings needed to understand how to assess, manage, and govern infrastructure resilience. They are arranged in an orderly sequence of flow necessary to understand how the elements relate and interact. The framework can be used to identify effective resilience investment strategies, through the economics of resilience outcomes, that community leaders and system owners can carry out over time.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

References

Abbou, A., R. A. Davidson, J. Kendra, V. Nuno Martins, et al. 2022. “Household adaptations to infrastructure system service interruptions.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 28 (4): 04022036.
ASCE. 2017. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE 41-17. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2021. Policy statement 518—Unified definitions for critical infrastructure resilience. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Attoh-Okine, N., A. T. Cooper, and S. A. Mensah. 2009. “Formulation of resilience index of urban infrastructure using belief functions.” IEEE Syst. J. 3 (2): 147–153.
Ayyub, B. M. 2014. “Systems resilience for multihazard environments: Definition, metrics, and valuation for decision making.” Risk Anal. 34 (2): 340–355.
Ayyub, B. M. 2015. “Practical resilience metrics for planning, design, and decision making.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 1 (3): 04015008.
Brook, D., and S. Chi Yin. 2017. “Here a city shall be wrought.” Harpers Magazine. Accessed November 5, 2019. https://pulitzercenter.org/reporting/here-city-shall-be-wrought.
Bruneau, M., S. E. Chang, R. T. Eguchi, G. C. Lee, et al. 2003. “A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities.” Earthquake Spectra 19 (4): 733–752.
Cabinet Office Japan. 2019. “Disaster management in Japan.” Accessed November 4, 2019. http://www.bousai.go.jp/kyoiku/fukko/shisai/higashinihon_en.html.
Chester, M. V., and B. Allenby. 2019. “Toward adaptive infrastructure: Flexibility and agility in a non-stationarity age.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 4 (4): 173–191.
Cimellaro, G. P., A. M. Reinhorn, and M. Bruneau. 2010. “Seismic resilience of a hospital system.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 6 (1–2): 127–144.
ConEdison. 2018. “Steam service.” Accessed September 4, 2018. https://www.coned.com/en/commercial-industrial/steam.
Cook, D. T., A. B. Liel, C. B. Haselton, and M. Koliou. 2022. “A framework for operationalizing the assessment of post-earthquake functional recovery of buildings.” Earthquake Spectra 38 (3): 1972–2007.
Croope, S., and S. McNeil. 2011. “Improving resilience of critical infrastructure systems post-disaster for recovery and mitigation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2234: 3–13.
Cutter, S. L., L. Barnes, M. Berry, C. Burton, et al. 2008. “A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters.” Global Environ. Change 18 (4): 598–606.
Davis, C. A. 2014a. “Water system service categories, post-earthquake interaction, and restoration strategies.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (4): 1487–1509.
Davis, C. A. 2014b. “Quantifying post-earthquake potable water system services.” In Proc., 6th China–Japan–US Trilateral Symp. Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, 19–26. TCLEE Monograph No. 38. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Davis, C. A. 2019a. “Infrastructure system resilience: Functionality and operability.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure. Chania, Greece: National Technical Univ. of Athens [ISSN: 2623-4513].
Davis, C. A. 2019b. “A proposed performance based seismic design process for lifeline systems.” In Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering for Protection and Development of Environment and Constructions, 1986–1993. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Davis, C. A. 2021. “Understanding functionality and operability for infrastructure system resilience.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 22 (1): 06020005-1-6.
Davis, C., B. Ayyub, S. McNeil, K. Kobayashi, et al. 2022a. “Overview of a framework to engineer infrastructure resilience through assessment, management and governance.” In Lifelines 2022, 901–913. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Davis, C., B. Ayyub, S. McNeil, K. Kobayashi, et al. 2022b. “Infrastructure resilience: A framework for assessment, governance and management.” In Proc., 4th Global Summit of Research Institutes for Disaster Risk Reduction, Increasing the Effectiveness and Relevance of Our Institutes, 127–155. Singapore: Springer. Accessed March 19, 2023. https://www.springerprofessional.de/en/proceedings-of-the-4th-global-summit-of-research-ins​titutes-for-/23775482.
Davis, C. A., A. Mostafavi, and H. Wang. 2018. “Establishing characteristics to operationalize resilience for lifeline systems.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 19 (4): 04018014-1-21.
Duke, C. M., and D. F. Moran. 1975. “Guidelines for evolution of lifeline earthquake engineering.” In Proc., US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 367–376. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2018. Continuity guidance circular. FEMA National Continuity Programs. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2023a. National incident management system. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2023b. A framework to establish lifeline infrastructure system service recovery objectives for seismic resilience. FEMA P-2234. Prepared by Applied Technology Council. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA-NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). 2021. Recommended options for improving the built environment for post-earthquake reoccupancy and functional recovery time. FEMA P-2090/NIST SP-1254. Prepared by Applied Technology Council. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Folke, C., R. Biggs, A. V. Norström, B. Reyers, et al. 2016. “Social–ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science.” Ecol. Soc. 21 (3): 41.
Folke, C., S. R. Carpenter, B. Walker, M. Scheffer, et al. 2010. “Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability.” Ecol. Soc. 15 (4): 20.
Honda, R., M. Akiyama, S. Kataoka, Y. Murono, et al. 2017a. “Seismic design method to consider “anti-catastrophe” concept.” In Proc., 16th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago: Chile. January 9–13, Chilean Association on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering. ISBN 9781510890084.
Honda, R., M. Akiyama, A. Nozu, Y. Takahashi, et al. 2017b. “Seismic design for “anti-catastrophe” – A study on the implementation as design codes.” Journal of JSCE 5: 346–353. Originally published in the Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. A1, Vol. 72, No. 4, I_459-I_472, 2016, in Japanese.
Infrastructure Resilience Division. 2021. Hazard-resilient infrastructure analysis and design, MOP 144. Edited by B. Ayyub. Reston, VA: ASCE.
IPWEA (Institute of Public Works Engineering Australasia). 2015. International infrastructure management manual. Version 5.0. North Sydney, Australia: IPWEA.
Johnson, L. A., and R. B. Olshansky. 2014. After great disasters: How six countries managed community recovery. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Jones, L., and M. Aho. 2019. “Resilience by design.” Bridge 49 (2): 52–59.
Jones, L. M., R. Bernknopf, D. Cox, J. D. Goltz, et al. 2008. “The ShakeOut Scenario.” Open File Rep. 2008-1150. Sacramento, CA: US Geological Survey. Accessed March 19, 2023. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1150.
Kobayashi, K., K. Wakigawa, M. Onishi, H. Itoh, et al. 2007. “Financial procurement for disaster recovery and liquidity constraints.” [In Japanese.] Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu D 63 (3): 328–343.
Koike, T. 2021. “Evolution of Japan's flood control planning and policy in response to climate change risks and social changes.” Water Policy 23 (S1): 77–84.
Koliou, M., J. W. van de Lindt, T. P. McAllister, B. R. Ellingwood, et al. 2018. “State of the research in community resilience: Progress and challenges.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 5 (3): 131–151.
Kusel, J., and L. P. Fortmann. 1991. “What is community well-being?” In Vol. 1 of Well-being in forest-dependent communities, edited by J. Kusel and L. Fortman, 1–45. Berkeley, CA: Forest and Rangeland Resources Assessment Program and California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.
Kwasinski, A., J. Trainor, B. Wolshon, and F. M. Lavelle. 2016. A conceptual framework for assessing resilience at the community scale. NIST GCR 16-001. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
LADWP (Los Angeles Department of Water and Power). 2019. Performance based seismic design for LADWP water system. Rep. No. AX-747 version 1. Prepared by C. Davis. Los Angeles: LADWP.
Links, J. M., B. S. Schwartz, S. Lin, N. Kanarek, et al. 2018. “COPEWELL: A conceptual framework and system dynamics model for predicting community functioning and resilience after disasters.” Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 12 (1): 127–137.
Liu, Y., S. McNeil, and G. Herning. 2019. “Integrating resilience concepts with pavement management: A case study in Delaware.” In Pavement and asset management, edited by M. Crispino, 769–776. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Mayoral Seismic Safety Task Force. 2014. “Resilience by design.” Office of the Mayor, City of Los Angeles. Accessed December 8, 2014. http://www.lamayor.org/earthquake.
McNeil, S., Y. Liu, and A. S. Ramirez-Villamizar. 2019. “Infrastructure resilience: From concept to performance to decisions.” In Bituminous mixtures and pavements VII, edited by A. F. Nikolaides and E. Manthos, 490–498. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Mieler, M., B. Stojadinovic, R. Budnitz, M. Comerio, et al. 2015. “A framework for linking community-resilience goals to specific performance targets for the built environment.” Earthquake Spectra 31 (3): 1267–1283.
Miles, S. B., and S. Chang. 2006. “Modeling community recovery from earthquakes.” Earthquake Spectra 22 (2): 439–458.
NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2019. Building and measuring community resilience: Actions for communities and the Gulf Research Program. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NIST. 2015. Community resilience planning guide for buildings and infrastructure systems. NIST Special Publication 1190. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
NIST. 2016. Critical assessment of lifeline system performance: Understanding societal needs in disaster recovery. NIST GCR 16-917-39. Prepared by Applied Technology Council for the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
NIST. 2017. Implementation Guidelines for Executive Order 13717: Establishing a federal earthquake risk management standard. ICSSC Recommended Practice (RP) 9. Gaithersburg: MD: US Dept. of Commerce, NIST.
NIST. 2018. Research Needs to Support Immediate Occupancy Building Performance Objective Following Natural Hazards Events. NIST Special Publication 1224. US Dept. of Commerce, NIST.
Onishi, M., M. Yokomatsu, and K. Kobayashi. 2005. “Liquidity risks and demands for earthquake insurance.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 221–226. New York: IEEE.
Ouyang, M. 2014. “Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 121: 43–60.
Ouyang, M., L. Duenas-Osorio, and X. Min. 2012. “A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems,” Elsevier: Struct. Saf. 36-37: 23–31.
Poli, R. 2013. “A note on the difference between complicated and complex social systems.” Cadmus J. 2 (1): 142–147.
PPD (Presidential Policy Directive). 2013. “Critical infrastructure security and resilience.” PPD-21. Accessed June 25, 2013. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/12/presidential-policy-directive-critical-infrastructure-security-and-resil.
Rockefeller Foundation and ARUP. 2014. “City resilience framework.” Accessed March 10, 2019. https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/report/city-resilience-framework/.
Romero, N., T. D. O'Rourke, L. K. Nozick, and C. A. Davis. 2010. “Seismic hazards and water supply performance.” J. Earthquake Eng. 14 (7): 1022–1043.
Rose, A. 2004. “Economic principles, issues, and research priorities in hazard loss estimation.” In Modeling spatial and economic impacts of disasters. Advances in spatial science, edited by Y. Okuyama and S. E. Chang. Berlin: Springer.
Rose, A. 2007. “Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: Multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions.” Environ. Hazards 7 (4): 383–398.
Rose, A. 2009. “Economic resilience to disasters.” Community and Regional Resilience Institute, CARRI Research Rep. 8, Published Articles and Papers, Paper 75. Accessed March 19, 2023. https://text2fa.ir/wp-content/uploads/Text2fa.ir-Economic-Resilience-to-Disasters-1.pdf.
Rose, A. 2016. “Benefit–cost analysis of economic resilience actions.” In Oxford research encyclopedia of natural hazard science. New York: Oxford University Press.
RRMC (Risk and Resilience Measurement Committee). 2019. Resilience-based performance: Next generation guidelines for buildings and lifeline standards. ASCE Infrastructure Resilience Division, IRP 3. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Sinah, S., C. Davis, P. Gardoni, M. B. Sebens, et al. 2023. “Water sector infrastructure systems resilience a social-ecological-technical system-of-systems and whole-life approach.” Cambridge Prisms: Water. 1: E4.
Stock, A., R. A. Davidson, J. Kendra, V. Nuno Martins, et al. 2023. “Household impacts of interruption to electric power and water services.” Nat. Hazard. 115: 2279–2306.
Tierney, K., and M. Bruneau. 2007. “Conceptualized and measuring resilience.” TR News 250: 14–17. Accessed April 8, 2015. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/trnews/trnews250_p14-17.pdf.
Van der Merwe, S. E., R. Biggs, and R. Preiser. 2018. “A framework for conceptualizing and assessing the resilience of essential services produced by socio-technical systems.” Ecol. Soc. 23 (2): 12.
Varga, L. 2015. “Complexity and sustainable utility services.” Emergence: Complexity Organ. 17 (2).
Waage, J., C. Yap, S. Bell, C. Levy, et al. 2015. “Governing the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Interactions, infrastructures, and institutions.” Lancet Global Health 3 (5): E251–E252.
What Works Wellbeing. 2017. “What is community wellbeing? Conceptual review.” Accessed April 22, 2019. http://whatworkswellbeing.org.
Wiseman, J., and K. Brasher. 2008. “Community wellbeing in an unwell world: Trends, challenges, and possibilities.” J. Public Health Policy 29 (3): 353–366.
Woods, D. D. 2018. “The theory of graceful extensibility: Basic rules that govern adaptive systems.” Environ. Syst. Dec. 38 (4): 433–457.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Infrastructure System Resilience
Infrastructure System Resilience: An Engineering Framework for Assessment, Management, and Governance
Pages: 7 - 33
Editor: Craig Davis, Ph.D., P.E., G.E.
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8508-8

History

Published online: Sep 25, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Chapter
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$110.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Chapter
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$110.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share