Chapter
Oct 31, 2023
Chapter 3

A Sequential Decision Framework to Support Tradespace Exploration of Multihazard Resilient and Sustainable Designs

Publication: Resilient and Sustainable Buildings

Abstract

The design of resilient and sustainable buildings (RSB) is a challenging task owing in part to the consideration of various economic, sustainability, resilience, and other metrics while making decisions about a system comprised of subsystems, each generally consisting of numerous components. The combination of metrics and subsystems translates into numerous feasible design alternatives from which one must be selected. This chapter aims to provide an overview of the mathematical basis for the development of the sequential decision process (SDP), its various extensions and relevant applications, and examples to illustrate its use for the design of RSB. It begins with a review of the concept of viewing design as an SDP to provide the necessary background information. Key concepts pertaining to the development of low-fidelity models to bound the precise values of decision criteria, sequencing the low-fidelity models for efficient tradespace exploration, and calculating optimal modeling policies are described.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

References

Abel, D., D. E. Hershkowitz, and M. L. Littman. 2017. “Near optimal behavior via approximate state abstraction.” Preprint, submitted January 15, 2017. https://arXiv.org/abs/1701.04113.
Abramowitz, M., and I. A. Stegun. 1964. “Chapter 25.4 integration.” In Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, Applied Mathematics Series 55, edited by M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Commerce.
Adam, S., L. Busoniu, and R. Babuska. 2012. “Experience replay for real-time reinforcement learning control.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C Appl. Rev. 42 (2): 201–212.
AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction). 2010. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago: AISC.
AISC. 2016. Steel construction manual. Chicago: AISC.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 1996. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Rep. ATC 40. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Bendsoe, M. P., and O. Sigmund. 2003. Topology optimization: Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Springer.
Brantley, M. W., W. J. McFadden, and M. J. Davis. 2002. Expanding the trade space: An analysis of requirements tradeoffs affecting system design. Tech. Rep. West Point, NY: Military Academy, Dept. of System Engineering.
Cha, E. J., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2013a. “Seismic risk mitigation of building structures: The role of risk aversion.” Struct. Saf. 40 (2013): 11–19.
Cha, E. J., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2013b. “The role of risk aversion in nuclear plant safety decisions.” Struct. Saf. 44 (2013): 28–36.
Chhabra, J. P., V. Hasik, M. M. Bilec, and G. P. Warn. 2018. “Probabilistic assessment of the life-cycle environmental performance and functional life of buildings due to seismic events.” J. Archit. Eng. 24 (1): 04017035.
Chhabra, J. P., and G. P. Warn. 2019a. “A method for bounding imprecise probabilistic criteria when using a sequential decision process for the design of structural systems.” Struct. Saf. 79: 39–53.
Chhabra, J. P., and G. P. Warn. 2019b. “A method for model selection using reinforcement learning when viewing design as a sequential decision process.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 59: 1521–1542.
Cole, R. J., and P. C. Kernan. 1996. “Life-cycle energy use in office buildings.” Build. Environ. 31 (4): 307–317.
Deb, K., A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. A. Meyarivan. 2002. “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II.” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6 (2): 182–197.
Deierlein, G. G., A. M. Reinhorn, and M. R. Willford. 2010. Nonlinear structural analysis for seismic design, 1–36. NEHRP Seismic Design Technical Brief 4. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
De Wolf, C. C. 2014. “Material quantities in building structures and their environmental impact.” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.
Dong, Y., and D. M. Frangopol. 2016. “Performance-based seismic assessment of conventional and base-isolated steel buildings including environmental impact and resilience.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45 (5): 739–756.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 1997. NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 273. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2000. Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment frame buildings. FEMA 350. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2006. NEHRP recommended provisions: Design examples. FEMA 451. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2012a. 58-1 Seismic performance assessment of buildings volume 1: Methodology. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2012b. 58-2 Seismic performance assessment of buildings volume 2: Implementation guide. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Goda, K., and H. P. Hong. 2006. “Optimal seismic design considering risk attitude, societal tolerable risk level, and life quality criterion.” J. Struct. Eng. 132 (12): 2027–2035.
Goda, K., and H. P. Hong. 2008. “Application of cumulative prospect theory: Implied seismic design preference.” Struct. Saf. 30 (6): 506–516.
Gupta, A., and H. Krawinkler. 1999. Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Harden, C. W., and T. C. Hutchinson. 2009. “Beam-on-nonlinear-Winkler-foundation modeling of shallow, rocking-dominated footings.” Earthquake Spectra 25 (2): 277–300.
Hasik, V., J. P. Chhabra, G. P. Warn, and M. M. Bilec. 2018. “Review of approaches for integrating loss estimation and life cycle assessment to assess impacts of seismic building damage and repair.” Eng. Struct. 175: 123–137.
Hasik, V., M. Ororbia, G. P. Warn, and M. M. Bilec. 2019. “Whole building life cycle environmental impacts and costs: A sensitivity study of design and service decisions.” Build. Environ. 163: 106316.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2006. Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Geneva: IPCC.
Lagaros, N. D., and M. Papadrakakis. 2007. “Robust seismic design optimization of steel structures.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 33: 457–469.
Levy, H., and M. Robinson. 2006. Vol. 34 of Stochastic dominance: Investment decision making under uncertainty. New York: Springer.
Li, G., Y. Jiang, and D. Yang. 2012. “Modified-modal-pushover-based seismic optimum design for steel structures considering life-cycle cost.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 45 (6): 861–874.
Li, L., T. J. Walsh, and M. L. Littman. 2006. “Towards a unified theory of state abstraction for MDPs.” In Proc., 9th Int. Symp. on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics, 531–539. Fort Lauderdale, FL. http://anytime.cs.umass.edu/aimath06/
Lin, L.-J. 1992. “Self-improving reactive agents based on reinforcement learning, planning and teaching.” Mach. Learn. 8: 293–321.
Markowitz, H. M. 1952. “Portfolio selection.” J. Finance 7 (1): 77–91.
Matthews, E. C., C. J. Friedland, and F. Orooji. 2016. “Integrated environmental sustainability and resilience assessment model for coastal flood hazards.” J. Build. Eng. 8: 141–151.
Miller, S. W. 2017. “Design as a sequential decision process: A method for reducing set spaces using models to bound objectives.” Ph.D. thesis, Pennsylvania State University, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering.
Miller, S. W., T. W. Simpson, and M. A. Yukish. 2015. “Design as a sequential decision process: A method for reducing design set space using models to bound objectives.” In Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. and Computers and Information in Engineering Conf. ASME. https://www.asme.org
.
Miller, S. W., T. W. Simpson, and M. A. Yukish. 2017. “Two applications of design as a sequential decision process.” In ASME 2017 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. and Computers and Information in Engineering Conf. New York: ASME.
Miller, S. W., T. W. Simpson, M. A. Yukish, L. A. Bennett, et al. 2013. “Preference construction, sequential decision making, and trade space exploration.” In ASME 2013 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. and Computers and Information in Engineering Conf. New York: ASME.
Miller, S. W., M. A. Yukish, and T. W. Simpson. 2018. “Design as a sequential decision process.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 57: 305–324.
Moehle, J., and G. G. Deierlein. 2004. “A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC. https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/thirteenth_conf_Canada/
Mosalam, K. M., U. Alibrandi, H. Lee, and J. Armengou. 2018. “Performance-based engineering and multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainable and resilient building design.” Struct. Saf. 74: 1–13.
Neumann, J. V., and O. Morgenstern. 1944. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ororbia, M. E., J. P. Chhabra, G. P. Warn, S. W. Miller, et al. 2020. “Increasing the discriminatory power of bounding models using problem-specific knowledge when viewing design as a sequential decision process.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 62: 709–728.
Pareto, V. 1971. Manual of political economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parmigiani, G., and L. Inoue. 2009. Vol. 812 of Decision theory: Principles and approaches. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Raychowdhury, P. 2008. “Nonlinear Winkler-based shallow foundation model for performance assessment of seismically loaded structures.” Ph.D. thesis, University of California San Diego, Dept. of Structural Engineering.
RSMeans. 2016. Building construction cost data. Rockland, MA: RSMeans.
Sarkisian, M., D. Shook, and J. Zhang. 2014. “Developing a basis for design—Embodied carbon in structures.” In AEI 2015, edited by C. H. Raebel, 555–566. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Simpson, T. W., D. Spencer, M. A. Yukish, and G. Stump. 2008. “Visual steering commands and test problems to support research in trade space exploration.” In Proc., 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conf. Victoria, BC. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/book/10.2514/MMAOC08
.
Unal, M., S. W. Miller, J. P. Chhabra, G. P. Warn, et al. 2017. “A sequential decision process for the system-level design of structural frames.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 56: 991–1011.
Watkins, C. J., and P. Dayan. 1992. “Q-learning.” Mach. Learn. 8: 279–292.
Welsh-Huggins, S. J., and A. B. Liel. 2016. “Is a stronger building also greener? influence of seismic design decisions on building life-cycle economic and environmental impacts.” In Life-cycle of engineering systems, edited by J. Bakker, D. M. Frangopol, and K. Breugel, 975–982. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Woodruff, M. J., P. M. Reed, and T. W. Simpson. 2013. “Many objective visual analytics: Rethinking the design of complex engineered systems.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 48: 201–219.
Yang, T. Y., J. Moehle, B. Stojadinovic, and A. Der Kiureghian. 2009. “Seismic performance evaluation of facilities: Methodology and implementation.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (10): 1146–1154.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Resilient and Sustainable Buildings
Resilient and Sustainable Buildings
Pages: 121 - 175
Editors: John W. van de Lindt, Ph.D., Mehrdad Sasani, Ph.D., Gordon Warn, Ph.D., and Mohsen Zaker Esteghamati, Ph.D.
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8505-7

History

Published online: Oct 31, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Jaskanwal P. S. Chhabra

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Chapter
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$110.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Chapter
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$110.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share