ABSTRACT

The evaluation of sinkholes continues to present challenges when managing highway infrastructure given current geotechnical subsurface investigation techniques. Typical drilling efforts combined with standard penetration testing (SPT) and cone penetration testing (CPT) provide useful information, but only at a limited number of points throughout the site. Such efforts are also not routinely utilized after the implementation of sinkhole treatment efforts as a means of quality control due to logistical challenges and costs. The horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) method, which records ambient seismic noise using a single, broad-band three-component seismometer, can be rapidly deployed throughout a site and provides information regarding the stiffness of the subsurface materials. Repeated HVSR measurements at the same locations can potentially identify problematic areas present after the implementation of sinkhole treatment efforts. In this paper, HVSR measurements were collected along a roadway where known sinkholes were present. The HVSR testing locations were collocated with boreholes to allow for a comparison with the inferred subsurface profile from geotechnical investigations. The roadway was then subjected to an extensive grouting program to treat the active sinkholes. HVSR measurements were subsequently repeated at the same pre-grouting locations to investigate changes in the subsurface stiffness. The results exhibited an increase in HVSR amplitude toward lower frequencies when comparing the pre- and post-grouting ambient noise measurements, possibly indicating a stiffening of the soil post-grouting. Despite rejection of time windows that exhibited evidence of near-field anthropogenic waveforms, there was still significant variance in the results attributed to poor coupling of the seismometer (i.e., pavement surface and gravelly fill on the roadway shoulder), adverse weather conditions (i.e., wind and rain), and the complexity of the site conditions (i.e., the extent and spatial variability with which grout flowed into voids and interaction of grout with nearby buried utilities). Use of HVSR as a quality control tool for sinkhole treatment efforts should be further investigated with consideration of the complexities that can affect such variance in the results.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Barnes, J. (2008). Rocks and Minerals of Pennsylvania. 4th ed. Pennsylvania Geological Survey, 4th ser., Educational Series 1.
Bignardi, S., Mantovani, A., and Zeid, N. (2016). “OpenHVSR: imaging the subsurface 2D/3D elastic properties through multiple HVSR modeling and inversion.” Comp. & Geosci., 93, 103–113.
Bonnefoy-Claudet, S., Cotton, F., and Bard, P. (2006). “The nature of noise wavefield and its applications for site effects studies: A literature review.” Earth-Science Reviews, 79(3–4), 205–227.
Buchignani, V., Avanzi, G. D. A., Giannecchini, R., and Puccinelli, A. (2008). “Evaporite karst and sinkholes: A synthesis on the case of Camaiore (Italy).” Environ. Geology, 53 (5), 1037–1044.
Castellaro, S. (2016). “The complementarity of H/V and dispersion curves.” Geophysics, 81 (6), T323–T338.
Castellaro, S., and Mulargia, F. (2009). “The effect of velocity inversions on H/V.” Pure & App. Geophys., 166 (4), 567–592.
Chatelain, J.-L., et al. (2008). “Evaluation of the influence of experimental conditions on H/V results from ambient noise recordings.” Bull. of Earthquake Eng., 6 (1), 33–74.
Cox, B., Cheng, T., and Vantassel, J. (2020). “A statistical representation and frequency-domain window-rejection algorithm for single-station HVSR measurements.” Geophys. J. Int., 221 (3), 2170–2183.
Dal Moro, G. (2015). “Joint analysis of Rayleigh-wave dispersion and HVSR of lunar seismic data from the Apollo 14 and 16 sites.” Icarus, 254, 338–349.
Galloway, D., Jones, D., and Ingebritsen, S. (1999). Land subsidence in the United States., U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, 15 pp.
Di Giacomo, D., and Gallipoli, M. (2005). “Analysis and Modeling of HVSR in the Presence of a Velocity Inversion: The Case of Venosa, Italy.” Bull. Seis. Soc. America, 95 (6), 2364–2372.
Gosar, A. (2007). “Microtremor HVSR study for assessing site effects in the Bovec basin (NW Slovenia) related to 1998 Mw5. 6 and 2004 Mw5. 2 earthquakes.” Eng. Geology, 178–193.
Guerrero, J., Gutiérrez, F., Bonachea, J., and Lucha, P. (2008). “A sinkhole susceptibility zonation based on paleokarst analysis along a stretch of the Madrid–Barcelona high-speed railway built over gypsum-and salt.” Eng. Geology, 102 (1), 62–73.
Gutiérrez, F., Benito-Calvo, A., Carbonel, D., and Desir, G. (2019). “Review on sinkhole monitoring and performance of remediation measures by high-precision leveling and terrestrial laser scanner in the salt karst of the Ebro.” Eng. Geology, 248, 283–308.
Jones, C. and Blom, R. (2014). “Bayou Corne, Louisiana, sinkhole: Precursory deformation measured by radar interferometry.” Geology, 42 (2), 111–124.
Kochanov, W. E. (1999). Sinkholes in Pennsylvania., 33 p.
Konno, K., and Ohmachi, T. (1998). “Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor.” Bull. Seis. Soc. of America, 88 (1), 228–241.
Molnar, S., et al. (2022). “A review of the microtremor horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (MHVSR) method.” J. of Seismology, pp.1–33.
Mucciarelli, M. (1998). “Reliability and applicability of nakamura’s technique using microtremors: An experimental approach.” J. of Earthquake Eng., 2 (4), 625–638.
Nakamura, Y. (1989). “A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface.” Railway Technical Research Institute, Quarterly Reports, 30(1), 25–33.
Nogoshi, M. (1971). “On the amplitude characteristics of microtremor, Part II.” J. Seis. Soc. of Japan, 24, 26–40.
SESAME Project. (2004). Guidelines for the implementation of theH/V spectral ratio technique on ambient vibrations measurements, processing and interpretation. http://sesame-fp5.obs.ujf-grenoble.fr/Papers/HV_User_Guidelines.pdf.
Vantassel, J. (2021). jpvantassel/hvsrpy: v0. 2.1 (Version v0. 2.1) [online]. Zenodo. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3668353 [Accessed 25 May 2022].
Weary, D. J. (2015). “The cost of karst subsidence and sinkhole collapse in the United States compared with other natural hazards.” Proc. The 14th Sinkhole Conference, Rochester, MN.
Zeng, Y., and Zhou, W. (2019). “Sinkhole remedial alternative analysis on karst lands.” Carbonates and Evaporites, 34 (1), 159–173.
Zhou, W., and Beck, B. F. (2008). “Management and mitigation of sinkholes on karst lands: An overview of practical applications.” Environ. Geology, 55 (4), 837–851.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Geo-Congress 2023
Geo-Congress 2023
Pages: 94 - 103

History

Published online: Mar 23, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Pourya Alidoust [email protected]
1Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Temple Univ., Philadelphia, PA. Email: [email protected]
Siavash Mahvelati, Ph.D. [email protected]
2Vibra-Tech Engineers, Inc., Hazleton, PA. Email: [email protected]
Joseph T. Coe, Ph.D. [email protected]
3Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Temple Univ., Philadelphia, PA. Email: [email protected]
Atsuhiro Muto, Ph.D. [email protected]
4Dept. of Earth and Environmental Science, Temple Univ., Philadelphia, PA. Email: [email protected]
Sarah McInnes [email protected]
P.E.
5Pennsylvania Dept. of Transportation, King of Prussia, PA. Email: [email protected]
Mia Painter [email protected]
P.G.
6Schnabel Engineering, Chadds Ford, PA. Email: [email protected]
Katherine Kubiak [email protected]
7Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Temple Univ., Philadelphia, PA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$120.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$120.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share