Simplified Calibration Procedure for Total Earth Pressure Cells
Publication: Geo-Congress 2023
ABSTRACT
Earth pressure cells (EPCs) are typically utilized to measure total soil and water pressures in situ. Installed EPCs exhibit an active stress arching phenomenon in which the stress sensed by the EPC is smaller than the stress in the soil surrounding the EPC. Unfortunately, the hydrostatic calibration factor provided by the manufacturer cannot account for this phenomenon, resulting in the need to independently calibrate a given EPC in the laboratory before it is installed in situ. Though other researchers have conducted their own independent laboratory calibration of EPCs in dry sand, the custom testing setups that have been developed for this calibration procedure have required special apparatus fabrication, which makes these procedures difficult to replicate. In the current study, a simplified testing apparatus and method were developed to calibrate EPCs in dry sand, which utilize standard equipment that is commonly found in most geotechnical testing laboratories. Three 1-MPa-range semiconductor EPCs were calibrated in dry sand at various sand column heights ranging from 5 cm to 30 cm by subjecting them to ten loading cycles at each column height. The goal of this study was to examine the influence of sand column height and load cycles on the EPCs’ associated sensitivity ratio. Overall, the results observed in the current study were consistent with results presented by previous researchers for EPCs calibrated at the same sand column height using larger and more sophisticated testing setups; this indicates the potential utility of the simplified calibration procedure that is described in the current paper for independent calibration of EPCs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
ASTM. ASTM D1556-07. (2007). Standard Test Method for Density and Unit Weight of Soil in Pl. by the Sand-Cone Method. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.08, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
Brown, S. F. (1977). “State-of-the-Art Report on Field Instrumentation for Pavement Experiments.” Transportation Research Record, 640, 13–28. (https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(79)90700-9).
Brown, S. F., and Brodrick, B. V. (1981). “Instrumentation for the Nottingham Pavement Test Facility.” Transportation Research Record, 810, 73–79.
Dawson, A. R., and Little, P. H. (1997). “Measurement of Stress and Strain in an Unsurfaced Haul Road at a Soft Clay Site in Scotland.” Transportation Research Record, 1596, 15–22. (https://doi.org/10.3141/1596-03).
Geokon. (2019). “Model 3500 Series Earth Pressure Cells”. Instruction Manual, Revised 04/30/2019, Geokon, Lebanon NH.
Labuz, J. F., and Theroux, B. (2005). “Laboratory Calibration of Earth Pressure Cells,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1–9.
McNulty, J. W. (1965). “An Experimental Study of Arching in Sand.”, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Miller, P. K., Rinehart, R. V., and Mooney, M. A. (2007). “Measurement of Soil Stress and Strain using In-ground Instrumentation.” Proceeding of GeoDenver 2007: New Peaks in Geotechnics, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 160, February 18-21, 2007, Denver, CO, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–10. (https://doi.org/10.1061/40904(223)13).
Patel, A. V., and Joshi, N. H. (2021). “Effect of Relative Density on Elastic Properties of Sand.” Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference 2019. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Vol 133. Springer, Singapore. (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6346-5_10).
Rinehart, R. V., and Mooney, M. A. (2009). “Measurement of Roller Compactor Induced Triaxial Soil Stresses and Strains.” Geotechnical Testing Journal, 32(4), 347–357.
Selig, E. T. (1964). “A Review of Stress and Strain Measurements in Soil.” Proceedings of the Symposium on Soil-Structure Interaction, University of Arizona, 172–186.
Talesnick, M. (2005). “Measuring Soil Contact Pressure on a Solid Boundary and Quantifying Soil Arching.” Geotechnical Testing Journal, 28(2), 171–179. (https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj12484).
Talesnick, M. L., Avraham, R., and Ringel, M. (2014). “Measurement of Contact Soil Pressure in Physical Modelling of Soil-Structure Interaction.” International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 14(1), 3–12. (https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.13.00008).
Talesnick, M., Ringel, M., and Rollins, K. (2021). Development of a Hybrid Soil Pressure Sensor and its Application to Soil Compaction.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 58(6), 811–822. (https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2020-0272).
Terzaghi, K. (1943). Theoretical Soil Mechanics, Wiley, New York.
Theroux, B., Labuz, J. F., and Dai, S. (2001). “Field Installation of an Earth Pressure Cell.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1772(1), 12–19. (https://doi.org/10.3141/1772-02).
Van Deusen, D. A., Newcomb, D. E., and Labuz, J. F. (1992). “A Review of Instrumentation Technology for the Minnesota Road Research Project.”.
Vennapusa, P. K. R., White, D. J., Siekmeier, J., and Embacher, R. A. (2012). “In situ Mechanistic Characterisations of Granular Pavement Foundation Layers.” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 13(1), 52–67. (https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2011.564281).
Weller, W. A., Jr., and Kulhawy, F. H. (1982). “Factors Affecting Stress Cell Measurements in Soil.” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering, 108(12), ASCE, 1529–1548.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Mar 23, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.