Chapter
Mar 23, 2023

Evaluation of Two Numerical Modeling Approaches for Liquefaction Investigation of Fines-Dominated Soils in Wildlife Liquefaction Array (WLA) Case Study

Publication: Geo-Congress 2023

ABSTRACT

Soil liquefaction evaluation is critically important in site seismic analyses. The presence of fines-dominated materials such as clayey and silty soils has been reported in many of the occurred liquefaction cases. Despite this observed fact, there are limited studies analyzing the presence of such materials in liquified sites compared to sandy sites. One of the practical methods to analyze such sites is to use Finn-Byrne formulation for pore water pressure buildup calculation along with other constitutive models such as simple Mohr-Coulomb. Recent advancements in constitutive models with more sophisticated PM4Silt and PM4Sand models allowed a more rigorous liquefaction analysis of such sites. In this study, these two modeling approaches are applied to Wildlife Liquefaction Array (WLA) monitored site. The WLA site profile consists of about 2.5 m of surface silty soil, 4.5 m of silty sand, followed by 5 m of silty clay, and a thick silty layer at the bottom. The liquefaction analyses of the WLA site under the 1987 Superstition Hills earthquake were conducted using these two approaches and compared to observed liquefaction. The results of the study showed that both approaches, despite significant differences in their theory and input parameters, have the capacity of predicting excess pore water pressure (EPWP) generation in the non-plastic silty layers. However, the PM4Silt model was able to produce a better prediction of EPWP variations in the low-plasticity, non-liquefiable deep silty layer during the earthquake.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Beaty, M. H., and Perlea, V. G. (2011). “Several observations on advanced analyses with liquefiable materials,” in Proceedings of the 31st Annual USSD Conference. 1369–1397.
Bennett, M. J., McLaughlin, P. V., Sarmiento, J., and Youd, T. L. “Geotechnical investigation of liquefaction sites, Imperial Valley, California,”, 103: 84-252.
Boulanger, R. W., and Idriss, I. M. (2006). “Liquefaction Susceptibility Criteria for Silts and Clays” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 132, No. 11: 1413–1426.
Bierschwale, J. G., and Stokoe, K. H., II. (1984). “Analytical Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential of Sands Subjected to the 1981 Westmorland Earthquake”, University of Texas, Austin.
Boulanger, R. W., and Idriss, I. M. (2014). “CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures.”, Department of Civil and Environ. Eng., UC Davis, CA, U.S.
Boulanger, R. W. (2019). Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses of Austrian Dam in the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. J.of Geotech. and Geoenviron. Eng., 145(11): 05019011.
Bray, J. D., Sancio, R. B., Riemer, M. F., and Durgunoglu, T. (2004). “Liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils.” Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Soil Dyn. and Eart. Eng. Stallion Press, Singapore, 655–662.
Byrne, P. M., and McIntyre, J. (1995). “Effective stress liquefaction analysis at the Wildlife site,” Proceedings, 3rd Inter. Conference on Recent Advances in Geotech. Eart. Eng. and Soil Dyn., Paper 3.49, Vo. 1: 303–311.
Cox, B. R. (2006). Development of a direct test method for dynamically assessing the liquefaction resistance of soils in situ. Ph.D. Dissertation, The university of Texas at Austin, U.S.A.
Holzer, T. L., and Youd, T. L. (2007). Liquefaction, Ground Oscillation, and Soil Deformation at the Wildlife Array, California. Bull. Seism. Soc. of Am., 97(3): 961–976.
Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. (2018). FLAC Ver. 8.1 User’s Guide. Minneapolis, MN.
Kramer, S. L., Sideras, S. S., Greenfield, M. W., and Hushmand, B. (2018). “Liquefaction, Ground Motions, and Pore Pressures at the WLA in the 1987 Superstition Hills Earthquake.” Consequences, and Mitigation. Geotec. Eart. Eng. & Soil Dyn. V GSP 290: 384–402.
Robertson, P. K., and Wride, C. E. (1998). “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J., 35(3), 442–459.https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-35-3-442.
Kuhlemeyer, R. L., and Lysmer, J. (1973). “Finite Element Method Accuracy for Wave Propagation Problems.” J. of the Soil Mech. and Found. Division, 99(5): 421–427.
Salam, S., Xiao, M., Khosravifar, A., and Wang, J. (2019). “Cyclic Behavior and Liquefaction Resistance of Fine Coal Refuse-Experimental and Numerical Modeling.” Proc., ASCE. Geo-Congress 2019.
Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1967). “Analysis of liquefaction: Niigata earthquake.” Proc., ASCE, 93(SM3), 83–108.1984.
Seed, R. B., et al. (2003). “Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering.” Keynote presentation., 26th Annual ASCE Los Angeles Geotech. Spring Seminar, Long Beach, Calif.
Wang, W. S. (1979). Some findings in soil liquefaction, Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power Scientific Research Institute, Beijing.
Ziotopoulou, A. (2010). Evaluating model uncertainty against strong motion records at liquefiable sites, Master’s Thesis, Dep.t of Civil and Enviro. Eng., U.C., Davis, 264 pp.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Geo-Congress 2023
Geo-Congress 2023
Pages: 121 - 130

History

Published online: Mar 23, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Pourya Kargar [email protected]
1Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL. Email: [email protected]
Abdolreza Osouli [email protected]
2Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Southern Illinois Univ., Edwardsville, IL. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$122.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$122.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share