Chapter
Mar 23, 2023

Centrifuge Tests to Investigate the Effect of MICP Treatment Zone on Foundation System Performance

Publication: Geo-Congress 2023

ABSTRACT

Ground improvement is often used in engineering practice to mitigate the effects of liquefaction in the built environment. Prior centrifuge studies using bio-cementation (microbially induced calcite precipitation, MICP) have demonstrated increased liquefaction triggering resistance and reduced associated settlements by treating the entire soil model. One additional centrifuge test that treated discrete MICP zones within the soil model also showed improvement, but the complex interactions between the treated zones made it difficult to elucidate how treatment depth impacted system performance. This paper presents 1-m centrifuge experiments performed at the Center for Geotechnical Modeling at the University of California, Davis, to investigate how performance improvement relates to the dimensions and cementation level of a discrete MICP treated zone. Models were constructed with Ottawa F-65 sand at an initially loose state (DR ≤ 50%) with different treatment zone dimensions. In one model, the entire soil body was cemented (18.9 × 39.6 × 8.22 m in prototype scale), while in the second and third models an 8 × 8 m plan area was treated to a depth of 8.22 m (100% depth), and 3.05 m (37% depth). The stiffness levels for the treated zone were selected and tracked using shear wave velocity with a target of ΔVs = 300 m/s relative to an untreated model. In addition, a baseline uncemented model constructed at the same relative density was tested for comparison. All models were subjected to eight shaking events. Shear wave velocity measurements tracked changes in biocementation integrity through the progression of the shaking events. System performance during shaking was monitored using accelerometers, a linear potentiometer, and pore pressure transducers. Cone penetration soundings were used to measure the initial model state and track the model evolution. All models treated with MICP showed improved liquefaction resistance when compared to untreated models, which varied with MICP treatment zone dimensions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Brandenberg, S. J., Wilson, D. W., and Rashid, M. M. 2010. Weighted Residual Numerical Differentiation Algorithm Applied to Experimental Bending Moment Data. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 136 (6), 854–863. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000277.
Carey, T. J., Stone, N., and Kutter, B. L. 2020. Grain Size Analysis and Maximum and Minimum Dry Density Testing of Ottawa F-65 Sand for LEAP-UCD-2017 Kutter, B.L., Manzari, M.T., and Zeghal, M. (Eds.), Model Tests and Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22818-7_2.
Carey, T. J., Chiaradonna, A., Love, N. C., Wilson, D. W., Ziotopoulou, K., Martinez, A., and DeJong, J. T. 2022. Effect of soil gradation on embankment response during liquefaction: A centrifuge testing program. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 157, 107221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107221 Effect of soil gradation on embankment response during liquefaction.
Darby, K. M., Hernandez, G. L., DeJong, J. T., Boulanger, R. W., Gomez, M. G., and Wilson, D. W. 2019. Centrifuge Model Testing of Liquefaction Mitigation via Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (10), 13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002122.
Dashti, S., Bray, J. D., Pestana, J. M., Riemer, M., and Wilson, D. 2010. Centrifuge Testing to Evaluate and Mitigate Liquefaction-Induced Building Settlement Mechanisms. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 136 (7), 918–929. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000306.
Garnier, J., Gaudin, C., Springman, S., Culligan, P., Goodings, D., Konig, D., Kuttervii, B., Phillips, R., Randolph, M., and Thorel, L. 2007. Catalogue of Scaling Laws and Similitude Questions in Geotechnical Centrifuge Modelling. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics 3, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1615.3281.
Gomez, M. G., Anderson, C. M., Graddy, C. M. R., DeJong, J. T., Nelson, D. C., and Ginn, T. R. 2017. Large-Scale Comparison of Bioaugmentation and Biostimulation Approaches for Biocementation of Sands. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (5), 04016124. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001640.
Hausler, E. A. 2002. Influence of ground improvement on settlement and liquefaction: A study based on field case history evidence and dynamic geotechnical centrifuge tests. Ph.D. Thesis.
Kamai, R., and Boulanger, R. 2009. Characterizing localization processes during liquefaction using inverse analyses of instrumentation arrays 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10826-23.
Kutter, B. 1995. Recent Advances in Centrifuge Modeling of Seismic Shaking. International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics.
Kutter, B. L., Manzari, M. T., and Zeghal, M. (Eds.) 2020. Model Tests and Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading: LEAP-UCD-2017. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22818-7.
Liu, L., and Dobry, R. 1997. Seismic Response of Shallow Foundation on Liquefiable Sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 123 (6), 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:6(557).
Montoya, B. M., Dejong, J. T., and Boulanger, R. W. 2013. Dynamic response of liquefiable sand improved by microbial-induced calcite precipitation. Geotechnique; London 63 (4), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.SIP13.P.019.
Schofield, A. 1981. Dynamic and Earthquake Geotechnical Centrifuge Modelling. International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics.
Sturm, A. P. 2019. On the Liquefaction Potential of Gravelly Soils: Characterization, Triggering and Performance (Ph.D.). University of California, Davis, United States -- California.
Zamani, A., Xiao, P., Baumer, T., Carey, T. J., Sawyer, B., DeJong, J. T., and Boulanger, R. W. 2021. Mitigation of liquefaction triggering and foundation settlement by MICP treatment. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (10), 04021099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002596.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Geo-Congress 2023
Geo-Congress 2023
Pages: 110 - 120

History

Published online: Mar 23, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Alexandra Camille M. San Pablo [email protected]
1Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA. Email: [email protected]
Jason T. DeJong [email protected]
2Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA. Email: [email protected]
Trevor J. Carey [email protected]
3Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Centrifuge Modeling of Soil-Structure Interaction with MICP Improved Soil, Geo-Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485330.010, (87-95), (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$122.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$122.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share