Centrifuge Tests to Investigate the Effect of MICP Treatment Zone on Foundation System Performance
Publication: Geo-Congress 2023
ABSTRACT
Ground improvement is often used in engineering practice to mitigate the effects of liquefaction in the built environment. Prior centrifuge studies using bio-cementation (microbially induced calcite precipitation, MICP) have demonstrated increased liquefaction triggering resistance and reduced associated settlements by treating the entire soil model. One additional centrifuge test that treated discrete MICP zones within the soil model also showed improvement, but the complex interactions between the treated zones made it difficult to elucidate how treatment depth impacted system performance. This paper presents 1-m centrifuge experiments performed at the Center for Geotechnical Modeling at the University of California, Davis, to investigate how performance improvement relates to the dimensions and cementation level of a discrete MICP treated zone. Models were constructed with Ottawa F-65 sand at an initially loose state (DR ≤ 50%) with different treatment zone dimensions. In one model, the entire soil body was cemented (18.9 × 39.6 × 8.22 m in prototype scale), while in the second and third models an 8 × 8 m plan area was treated to a depth of 8.22 m (100% depth), and 3.05 m (37% depth). The stiffness levels for the treated zone were selected and tracked using shear wave velocity with a target of ΔVs = 300 m/s relative to an untreated model. In addition, a baseline uncemented model constructed at the same relative density was tested for comparison. All models were subjected to eight shaking events. Shear wave velocity measurements tracked changes in biocementation integrity through the progression of the shaking events. System performance during shaking was monitored using accelerometers, a linear potentiometer, and pore pressure transducers. Cone penetration soundings were used to measure the initial model state and track the model evolution. All models treated with MICP showed improved liquefaction resistance when compared to untreated models, which varied with MICP treatment zone dimensions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Brandenberg, S. J., Wilson, D. W., and Rashid, M. M. 2010. Weighted Residual Numerical Differentiation Algorithm Applied to Experimental Bending Moment Data. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 136 (6), 854–863. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000277.
Carey, T. J., Stone, N., and Kutter, B. L. 2020. Grain Size Analysis and Maximum and Minimum Dry Density Testing of Ottawa F-65 Sand for LEAP-UCD-2017 Kutter, B.L., Manzari, M.T., and Zeghal, M. (Eds.), Model Tests and Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22818-7_2.
Carey, T. J., Chiaradonna, A., Love, N. C., Wilson, D. W., Ziotopoulou, K., Martinez, A., and DeJong, J. T. 2022. Effect of soil gradation on embankment response during liquefaction: A centrifuge testing program. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 157, 107221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107221 Effect of soil gradation on embankment response during liquefaction.
Darby, K. M., Hernandez, G. L., DeJong, J. T., Boulanger, R. W., Gomez, M. G., and Wilson, D. W. 2019. Centrifuge Model Testing of Liquefaction Mitigation via Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (10), 13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002122.
Dashti, S., Bray, J. D., Pestana, J. M., Riemer, M., and Wilson, D. 2010. Centrifuge Testing to Evaluate and Mitigate Liquefaction-Induced Building Settlement Mechanisms. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 136 (7), 918–929. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000306.
Garnier, J., Gaudin, C., Springman, S., Culligan, P., Goodings, D., Konig, D., Kuttervii, B., Phillips, R., Randolph, M., and Thorel, L. 2007. Catalogue of Scaling Laws and Similitude Questions in Geotechnical Centrifuge Modelling. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics 3, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1615.3281.
Gomez, M. G., Anderson, C. M., Graddy, C. M. R., DeJong, J. T., Nelson, D. C., and Ginn, T. R. 2017. Large-Scale Comparison of Bioaugmentation and Biostimulation Approaches for Biocementation of Sands. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (5), 04016124. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001640.
Hausler, E. A. 2002. Influence of ground improvement on settlement and liquefaction: A study based on field case history evidence and dynamic geotechnical centrifuge tests. Ph.D. Thesis.
Kamai, R., and Boulanger, R. 2009. Characterizing localization processes during liquefaction using inverse analyses of instrumentation arrays 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10826-23.
Kutter, B. 1995. Recent Advances in Centrifuge Modeling of Seismic Shaking. International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics.
Kutter, B. L., Manzari, M. T., and Zeghal, M. (Eds.) 2020. Model Tests and Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading: LEAP-UCD-2017. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22818-7.
Liu, L., and Dobry, R. 1997. Seismic Response of Shallow Foundation on Liquefiable Sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 123 (6), 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:6(557).
Montoya, B. M., Dejong, J. T., and Boulanger, R. W. 2013. Dynamic response of liquefiable sand improved by microbial-induced calcite precipitation. Geotechnique; London 63 (4), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.SIP13.P.019.
Schofield, A. 1981. Dynamic and Earthquake Geotechnical Centrifuge Modelling. International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics.
Sturm, A. P. 2019. On the Liquefaction Potential of Gravelly Soils: Characterization, Triggering and Performance (Ph.D.). University of California, Davis, United States -- California.
Zamani, A., Xiao, P., Baumer, T., Carey, T. J., Sawyer, B., DeJong, J. T., and Boulanger, R. W. 2021. Mitigation of liquefaction triggering and foundation settlement by MICP treatment. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (10), 04021099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002596.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Mar 23, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Centrifuge models
- Centrifuges
- Construction equipment
- Continuum mechanics
- Dynamics (solid mechanics)
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering mechanics
- Environmental engineering
- Equipment and machinery
- Flow (fluid dynamics)
- Fluid dynamics
- Fluid mechanics
- Fluid velocity
- Geomechanics
- Geotechnical engineering
- Geotechnical models
- Hydrologic engineering
- Models (by type)
- Pollution
- Seismic waves
- Shear waves
- Soil dynamics
- Soil liquefaction
- Soil mechanics
- Soil pollution
- Soil properties
- Soil settlement
- Soil treatment
- Solid mechanics
- Water and water resources
- Wave velocity
- Waves (mechanics)
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Soo-Min Ham, Alexandra Camille San Pablo, Jose Luis Caisapanta, Jason DeJong, Centrifuge Modeling of Soil-Structure Interaction with MICP Improved Soil, Geo-Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485330.010, (87-95), (2024).