Research on the Development Path of Cost Consulting Enterprises under Whole-Process Engineering Consultancy
Publication: ICCREM 2022
ABSTRACT
In the context of the continuous strengthening of the reform and transformation of the construction industry, the development of the whole process of engineering construction consulting has become the focus, providing important guiding ideas for the whole process of engineering consulting for the transformation of engineering cost consulting companies. In this paper, by identifying the demand indicators of consulting service capabilities in the whole process of engineering construction, based on the maturity model, the evaluation of engineering consulting service capabilities in the whole process is carried out. The PDCA cycle theory is used to analyze the continuous improvement process of consulting service capabilities in the whole process, and the consulting service capabilities in the whole process of engineering construction are proposed. Improvement paths and measures for indicators. The results of this study can provide a theoretical framework and practical guidance for cost consulting companies to achieve a more competitive transformation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Cepeda, G., and Vera, D. (2019). “Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective.” Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 426–437.
Hwang, C. L., and Yoon, K. P. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg.
Mahoney, J. T., and Pandian, J. R. (1992). “The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management.” Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363–380.
Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., and Tracey, M. W. (2011). “The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research and practice.” Educational Technology, Research and Development, 59(5), 737–739.
Sharma, S., and Mahajan, V. (1980). “Early warning indicators of business failure.” Journal of Marketing, 44(4), 80–89.
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., and Ireland, R. D. (2017). “Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box.” Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292.
Teece, D. J. (2007). “Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance.” Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.
Volberda, H. W. (1998). Building the flexible firm: How to remain competitive. Oxford University Press, 114–157.
Xu, Z. S. (2019). “Dependent OWA operators.” Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 3885, 172–178. (in Chinese).
Yager, R. R. (1998). “Including importance in OWA aggregations using fuzzy systems modeling.” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 6, 286–294.
Zollo, M., and Winter, S. G. (2019). “Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities.” Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
ICCREM 2022
Pages: 792 - 799
History
Published online: Dec 15, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.