Differing Site Conditions: Who Is Responsible for the Risks of Additional Costs?
Publication: Forensic Engineering 2022
ABSTRACT
Claims for Differing Site Conditions (DSC), also commonly known as Changed Conditions, mainly occur when subsurface or latent physical conditions encountered at the construction site differ materially from those that are represented in the contract documents. DSC claims increase the risks to the project cost and schedule and may lead to prolonged court litigation. This study primarily focuses on who is responsible for the risks of the additional costs and delays associated with the DSC claims. To evaluate these risks, the research methodology includes a review of the literature as well as the analysis of different types of DSC claims and court requirement to prove such claims. The study finds the risk responsibility is shared between both the owner and the contractor and depends on disclosure of factual, qualified, and interpretive geotechnical information. The study further suggests strategies to both parties on claim avoidance and claim management.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
AIA (The American Institute of Architects). (2017). “American Institute of Architects General Conditions of contracts for Construction”. The American Institute of Architects (2017). https://www.aiacontracts.org/contract-documents/25131-general-conditions-of-the-contract-for-construction.
Beh, H. G. (1997). “Allocating the Risk of the Unforeseen, Subsurface and Latent Conditions in Construction Contracts: Is There Room for the Common Law?”. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/34781/1/Beh_46UKanLRev115.pdf.
Bonhomme-Delprato, D. (2008). “Pricing Cumulative Impacts of Differing Site Conditions and Design Changes in Construction”. Cost Engineering Vol. 50/No. 3 (March 2008). https://search.proquest.com/openview/d8afb1d6d96ec4b0b28c7248c3424bcb/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=49080.
FHWA. (1996). “Geotechnical Guideline No.15, TITLE Geotechnical “Differing Site Conditions”. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/policymemo/gt-15.pdf.
Hatem, D. J. (1994). “Differing site conditions: Liability precautions for design professionals”. Defense Counsel Journal (October 1994). https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/defcon61&div=93&id=&page=.
IDOT (Illinois Department of Transportation). (2016). “Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction Adopted April 1, 2016”. Illinois Department of Transportation (April 1, 2016). http://idot.illinois.gov/Assets/uploads/files/Doing-Business/Manuals-Guides-&-Handbooks/Highways/Construction/Standard-Specifications/Standard%20Specifications%20for%20Road%20and%20Bridge%20Construction%202016.pdf.
IDOT (Illinois Department of Transportation). (2020). “Supplemental Specifications and Recurring Special Provisions Adopted January 1, 2020”. Illinois Department of Transportation (January 1, 2020). http://idot.illinois.gov/Assets/uploads/files/Doing-Business/Manuals-Guides-&-Handbooks/Highways/Construction/Supplemental-Standards-Specifications/2020%20Supplemental%20Specifications%20for%20Website.pdf.
Illinois. (2020). “Illinois Construction Manual January 2020.” Illinois Department of Transportation. https://idot.illinois.gov/Assets/uploads/files/Doing-Business/Manuals-Guides-&-Handbooks/Highways/Construction/Construction-Manual/Construction%20Manual.pdf.
ISTHA (The Illinois State Toll Highway Authority). (2020). “Illinois Tollway Supplemental Specifications to the Illinois Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction Adopted April 1, 2016”. The Illinois State Toll Highway Authority (March 23, 2020). https://www.illinoistollway.com/documents/20184/111199/Illinois+Tollway+Supplemental+Specifications_Mar2020.pdf/7569429b-6152-4591-beb4-c1cf934a2e59.
LaPlaca, A. (2020). “United States: What Lies Beneath (And Who Pays For It?): Common Issues Arising Under The Differing Site Conditions Clause”. Lexis Nexis.
Litke, S. S. (1996). “Differing Site Conditions: Industry Consensus Opposes Ruling.” Journal of management in engineering 12.4 (1996): 14–. Print.
Mahfouz, T., and Kandil, A. (2012). “Litigation Outcome Prediction of Differing Site Condition Disputes through Machine Learning Models”. Journal; of Computing in Civil Engineering © ASCE/MAY/JUNE 2012. https://ascelibrary.org/journal/jccee5.
Nagle, J. F. (1998). “Differing Site Conditions Can Cause Differing Opinions”. Lexis Nexis.
O’Toole, D. (2006). “Differing Site Conditions - Who Bears the Risk?”. Troutman Sanders Attorney At Law. https://www.troutman.com/images/content/1/5/v1/150205/DifferingSiteConditions.pdf.
Rowles, D., and Cahalan, S. (2014). “Differing Site Conditions: What Are They and Are You Protected?”. Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP. https://www.sgrlaw.com/differing-site-conditions-what-are-they-and-are-you-protected/.
Thomas, H. R., Smith, G. R., and Ponderlick, R. M. (1992). “Resolving Contract Disputes Based on Differing Site Conditions Clause”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management.
Viswanathan, S. K., Panwar, A., Kar, S., Lavingiya, R., and Jha, K. N. (2020). “Causal Modeling of Disputes in Construction Projects”. Journal Legal Affair Dispute Resolution Eng. Constr., 2020. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%29LA.1943-4170.0000432.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Forensic Engineering 2022
Pages: 864 - 869
History
Published online: Nov 2, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.