Electrical Transmission and Substation Structures 2022
Transmission Structures Exposed to Water Flow: Resiliency and Risk Mitigation
Publication: Electrical Transmission and Substation Structures 2022: Innovating for Critical Global Infrastructure
ABSTRACT
The forces associated with flooded rivers can be incredibly destructive, causing significant damage to widespread areas. Urbanization, tiling of agricultural land, and an increasing trend in heavy precipitation are some of the suspected contributors to more frequent large-scale flooding of river basins across the United States. With this increasing commonality of flooding, a growing number of transmission structures are being put at risk. Fast flowing water carrying pieces of debris or ice can potentially damage or destroy structures within its path. Many existing transmission poles within new or changing flood zones are not robust enough to stand up to these forces. The damage can lead to costly repairs and lengthy outages because of the difficulties that accompany traversing and constructing in the flooded terrain. This paper is a case study of a structure failure along the Minnesota River. It includes an investigation into the factors that contributed to the structure failure and takes a detailed look at the difficulties associated with post-failure reconstruction. By comparing the flow data collected on the Minnesota River Basin over the past century to land use and precipitation trends, this paper draws some conclusions as to why such noticeable changes have occurred in the basin and explores the impacts those changes have had on transmission infrastructure.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2017. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Eight Edition. Washington: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
Doyle, M. W., E. H. Stanley, D. L. Strayer, R. B. Jacobson, and J. C. Schmidt. 2005. “Effective discharge analysis of ecological processes in streams.” Water Resources Research. 41: 1–16.
EQB (Environmental Quality Board). 2020. Minnesota State Water Plan: Water and Climate. Edited by M. Hoff. St. Paul, MN: EQB.
Freshwater Society. 2016. “The Minnesota River is growing.” http://freshwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/ChangeInMinnRiverReport_8.5x11.pdf. Edited by C. Jennings, B. Bohman, and P. Knapp.
Kelly, S.A., Takbiri, Z. P. Belmont, and E. Foufoula-Georgiou. 2017. “Human amplified changes in precipitation-runoff patterns in large river basins of the Midwestern United States.” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 21, 5065–5088.
Lauer, J.W., Echterling, C. Lenhart, C. P. Belmont, and R. Rausch. 2017. “Air-photo based change in channel width in the Minnesota River basin: Modes of adjustment and implications for sediment budget.” Geomorphology. 297, 170–184.
Lenhart, C.F., H. Peterson, and J. Nieber. 2011. “Increased streamflow in agricultural watersheds of the Midwest: Implications for management.” Watershed Science Bulletin. Spring 2011:25–31.
Lewandowski, A., Everett, L. Lenhart, C. Terry, K. M. Origer, and R. Moore. 2015. Fields to Streams: Managing Water in Rural Landscapes. Part One, Water Shaping the Landscape. Water Resources Center, University of Minnesota Extension. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/177290. Part Two, Managing Sediment and Water.Water Resources Center, University of Minnesota Extension. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/177291.
Libby, D. 2018. “Assessing Historical Planform Channel Change in an Altered Watershed with Quantification of Error and Uncertainty Present in a GIS/Aerial Photography-based Analysis; Case Study: Minnesota River, Minnesota, USA.” M.S. thesis, Mankato, MN: Minnesota State University, Mankato.
Minnesota Department of Transportation. 2017. LRFD Bridge Design Manual. Oakdale, Minnesota.
MPCA (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency). 2017. Adapting to Climate Change in Minnesota, 2017 Report of the Interagency Climate Adaptation Team. Edited by T. Gaffey. St. Paul, MN: MPCA.
National Weather Service. (2020, November 2). Retrieved from National Weather Service: https://water.weather.gov/ahps2/hydrograph.php?wfo=mpx&gage=jdnm5&hydro_type=2.
Novotny, E. V., and H. G. Stefan. 2007. “Stream flow in Minnesota: Indicator of climate change.” Journal of Hydrology. 334, 319–333.
Schilling, K. E., Jha, M. K. Zhang, Y. K. P. W. Gassman, and C. F. Wolter. 2008. “Impact of land use and land cover change on the water balance of a large agricultural watershed: Historical effects and future directions.” Water Resources Research. 44 (W00A09).
Schottler, S.P., Ulrich, J. Belmont, P. Moore, R. Lauer, J. W. D. R. Engstrom, and J. E. Almendinger. 2013. “Twentieth century agricultural drainage creates more erosive rivers.” Hydrological Processes.
Simon, A., and M. Rinaldi. 2006. “Disturbance, stream incision and channel evolution: The roles of excess transport capacity and boundary materials in controlling channel response.” Geomorphology. 79, 361–383.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2020. “Minnesota River Basin Interagency Study.” St. Paul, MN: USACE.
Wolman, M. G., and J. P. Miller. 1960. “Magnitude and frequency of forces in geomorphic processes.” The Journal of Geology. 68, 54–74.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Electrical Transmission and Substation Structures 2022: Innovating for Critical Global Infrastructure
Pages: 494 - 507
Editor: Tim Cashman
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8446-3
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Sep 20, 2022
Published in print: Sep 20, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.