Design and Detailing Considerations for Piles and Pile-to-Deck Connections: Proposed Revisions to Chapter 7 and Applicable Sections of ASCE/COPRI 61-22
Publication: Ports 2022
ABSTRACT
Seismic provisions in ASCE/COPRI 61-14 for the design and detailing of pile-supported piers and wharves are based on displacement-based principles, with target strain limits for the piles that depend on the type of pile and pile-to-deck connections. Most of the provisions have evolved from bridge design practice because of their similar “horizontal” construction nature. The seismic design and detailing of piers and wharves aims at providing adequate strength and deformation capacity of the piles while complying with capacity protection principles for the deck and the pile-to-deck connections following the so-called “strong beam-weak column” design approach. Most of the analysis and design provisions for piles in ASCE/COPRI 61-14 are based on the Port of Los Angeles (2010) and Port of Long Beach (2012) seismic design codes, and MOTEMS (2013), which focus on marine construction practice in California, namely prestressed concrete piles supporting a cast-in-place concrete flat plate (slab). Provisions for the design and detailing of pile-to-deck connections have evolved from AASHTO LRFD (2011). After almost a decade of use of ASCE 61, new experimental evidence, particularly on steel pipe piles and bridge piers, as well as the increased use of precast concrete elements for staged construction of concrete decks in piers and wharves, has raised the need to update, clarify, and even revise some of the provisions for the design of piles and pile-to-deck connections reported in Chapter 7 (“Design and Detailing Considerations”) of ASCE 61, as well as the introduction of new design procedures. This paper highlights revisions being proposed for ASCE 61-22 for the design and detailing of piles and pile-deck connections, including the use of target rotation limits (rather than strain limits) for steel pipe piles and prestressed concrete piles embedded in a concrete deck; enhancement of provisions for the design of steel pile connections involving concrete plugs, including the effect plugs have on the capacity protection design of concrete decks; a critique of the adequacy of connections involving steel pipe piles welded to steel embeds or steel pile caps in seismic regions; revisiting strain limits for steel pipe piles to address concerns against premature local buckling; and the enhancement of code provisions for the design of pile-to-deck joints and connections, with emphasis in staged deck construction using pile caps.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
ASCE. 2014. ASCE/COPRI 61-14 Seismic design of piers and wharves, ASCE Standards, Reston, VA.
AASHTO. 2018. AASHTO LRFD Guide Specifications for Accelerated Bridge Construction, 1st Ed., Wash. DC.
Fleming, B., Sritharan, S., Miller, G., and Muraleetharan, K. 2016. “Full-scale Testing of Piles in Improved and Unimproved Soft Clay,” Earthquake Spectra, February 2016.
Fulmer, S. J., Kowalsky, M. J., Nau, J. M., and Hassan, T. 2012. “Reversed Cyclic Flexural Behavior of Spiral DSAW and Single Seam ERW Steel Pipe Piles,” ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, pp. 1099–1109.
Harn, R., Ospina, C. E., and Pachakis, D. 2019. “Proposed Pipe Pile Strain Limits for ASCE 61-19,” ASCE Ports 2019 Conference, Pittsburgh.
Marcakis, K., and Mitchell, D. 1980. “Precast Concrete Connections with Embedded Steel Members, PCI Journal, Vol. 25, Issue 4, p. 88–116.
Park, R., Priestley, M. J. N., and Walpole, W. R. 1983. “Seismic Performance of Steel Encased Reinforced Concrete Bridge Piles,” Bull. of New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 16(2); 123–140.
Peters, D. J., Roubos, A. A., and Van Es, S. H. J. 2015. “Full scale local buckling and yield tests of laterally loaded steel tubular piles”.
POLB (Port of Long Beach). 2012. “Port of Long Beach Wharf Design Criteria, Version 3.0,” February.
POLA (Port of Los Angeles). 2010. Code for Seismic Design, Upgrade and Repair of Container Wharves, Los Angeles, California.
Priestley, M. J. N., Seible, F., and Calvi, G. M. 1996. Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
Roubos, A., Focks, D.-J. J., and Peters, D. J. 2018. “Innovation Flexible Dolphins by Full Scale Test Laterally Loaded Tubular Piles,” Proceedings, 19th Intl. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Seoul.
Stephens, J., and McKittrick, L. 2005. Performance of Steel Pipe Pile-to-Concrete Bent Cap Connections Subject to Seismic or High Transverse Loading: Phase II (2005),.
Silva, P., and Seible, F. 2001. “Seismic Performance Evaluation of Cast-in-steel-shell (CISS) Piles, ACI Structural Journal, 98(1); 36–49.
SCDOT (South Carolina Department of Transportation). 2006. Seismic Design Specifications for Highway Bridges, South Carolina Department of Transportation, Columbia, SC.
CALTRANS. 2010. Seismic Design Criteria. Version 1.6. Sacramento California.
WSDOT. 2012. Design Memorandum 08-2012.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Sep 15, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.