Identifying the Level of Awareness and Challenges to Adopt Mass Timber by the Construction Practitioners in the United States
Publication: Construction Research Congress 2022
ABSTRACT
Mass timber is a promising building material that provides excellent structural rigidity, a low-environmental pollution footprint, and better use of natural resources. However, the adoption of mass timber is not free from challenges. Especially in the US construction industry, the material has not been accepted widely by practitioners due to inexperience and a lack of mass timber building construction projects. This study aims to determine the current awareness level among US construction practitioners regarding mass timber building material. It further identifies the existing challenges associated with the design, construction, and manufacturing process of this material. The results from 100 construction companies, 32 architectural firms, and 15 timber manufacturers show that US construction practitioners have a relatively low level of awareness and work experience in mass timber material. Among the respondents, 55% of building contractors and 30% of architects indicated that they have never been involved in a mass timber building construction project. Furthermore, a significant number of participants who were involved in the mass timber project stated that their experience level is between 1 and 5 years, indicating that the concept of mass timber is still in a very rudimentary level. Lack of timber manufacturing plants, inexperience, high cost of engineered wood, and code limitation are some of the perceived drawbacks identified by the participants. The outcomes of the study will be helpful to determine the actual feasibility of mass timber in the US construction industry.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Ahmed, S., and Arocho, I. (2021). “Analysis of cost comparison and effects of change orders during construction: Study of mass timber and a concrete building project”. Journal of Building Engineering, 33, 101856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101856.
Ahmed, S., and Arocho, I. (2019). “Emission of particulate matters (PM) during construction: A comparative study on a cross-laminated timber (CLT) and a steel building project”. Journal of Building Engineering, 22: 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.12.015.
Ahmed, S., and Arocho, I. (2021). “Feasibility Assessment of Mass Timber as a Mainstream Building Material in the US Construction Industry: Level of Involvement, Existing Challenges, and Recommendations”. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 26(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000574.
Ahmed, S., and Arocho, I. (2020). “Mass timber building materials in the U.S. construction industry: Determining the existing awareness level, construction-related challenges, and recommendations to increase its current acceptance level”. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2020.100007.
APA (American Plywood Association—The Engineered Wood Association). 2021.“Manufacturers directory: Guide to manufacturers of APA trademarked products.” Accessed February 17, 2021. https://www.apawood.org/manufacturer-directory.
Borjen, Y., Gagnon, S., Williamson, T., and Pirvu, C. (2012). “The cross-laminated timber standard on North America”. World, 15:19.
Burback, B., and Pei, S. (2017). “Cross-Laminated Timber for Single-Family Residential Construction: Comparative Cost Study”. Journal of Architectural Engineering, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000267.
Crampton, A. (2017). “Cross-laminated timber: An innovative building material takes hold in Oregon.” Metroscape, 6–12.
CSULB (California State University Long Beach). 2020.“Qualtrics: What is Qualtrics?” Accessed February17,2021. https://www.researchgate.net/deref/https%3A%2F%2Fcsulb.libguides.com%2Fqualtrics%23%3A~%3Atext%3DQualtrics%2520is%2520a%2520powerful%2520online%2Cstaf f%2520and%2520students%2520at%2520CSULB.
FPInnovations. (2013). CLT Handbook. FPInnovations. Montreal, Canada.
Juntunen, L., Craigie, M., and Anderson, M. 2018.“Economic considerations for mass timber development in Oregon.” ECONorthwest. Accessed February 17, 2021.https://econw.com/.
Karacabeyli, C., and Lum, C. (2014). “Technical guide for the design and construction of tall wood buildings in Canada”.
Kordziel, S. (2018). Study of Moisture Conditions in a Multi-Story Timber Building Through the Use of Sensors and Wufi Hygrothermal Modeling. Master’s Thesis. Retrieved 2020 from: https://hdl.handle.net/11124/172342.
Mallo, M., and Espinoza, O. (2015). “Awareness, perceptions and willingness to adopt cross- laminated timber by the architect community in the United States”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 94:198–210.
Mohammadi, J., and Ling, L. (2017). “Can wood become an alternative material for tall building construction?”. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 22(4):04017014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000334.
Pei, S., Rammer, D., Popovski, M., Williamson, T., Line, P., and Vande Lindt, J. (2016). “An overview of CLT research and implementation in North America.” In Proc., 2016 World Conf. on Timber Engineering. Vienna, Austria: World Conference on Timber Engineering.https://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/pdf2016/fpl_2016_pei001.pdf.
Sun, S., Zhao, Z., and Shen, J. (2020). “Effects of manufacturing conditions on the VOCs emissions of particleboard”. Bioresources, 15(1): 1074–1084.
Walsh, N. I. 2019. “Top 300 architecture firms in the USA for 2019.” Accessed February 17, 2021.https://www.archdaily.com/920391/top-300-architecture-firms-in-the-usa-for-2019.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Mar 7, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.