Chapter
Mar 7, 2022

The Envision Rating System Helps Shape Public Preferences for Sustainable Stormwater Design

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2022

ABSTRACT

An impediment to the transition from more conventional concrete stormwater systems to more green stormwater systems is the public’s hesitation to adopt green infrastructure. Aiding how the public constructs preferences about stormwater options may help alleviate this barrier. When facing complex and less familiar choices, people tend to construct preferences rather than hold pre-existing preferences. In this research, a national survey with 946 people explored how the public constructs preferences about stormwater infrastructure options. Participants evaluated the perceived risk and perceived benefits of a conventional concrete infrastructure system and a green stormwater infrastructure system. Half of the participants were randomly primed to think about the value of sustainable design by reviewing a green infrastructure case that received the Envision Rating System’s Bronze Award. This intervention group (i.e., the Envision Group) was also asked to rate the potential sustainability achievement for both of the options presented to them. Both groups believed the green infrastructure option presented more risks. They also recognized the higher benefits of the green stormwater option compared to the conventional concrete option. The Envision Group perceived the benefits of the green stormwater option as significantly more and were more likely to choose the green infrastructure option as their recommendation. These results help to demonstrate how the public constructs preferences for infrastructure options and how the use of rating systems like Envision can help prime the public to think about the value of sustainable design.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Boas, T. C., Christenson, D. P., and Glick, D. M. (2020). “Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, Mechanical Turk, and Qualtrics.” Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, 8(2), 232–250.
Carlet, F. (2015). “Understanding attitudes toward adoption of green infrastructure: A case study of US municipal officials.” Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 65–76.
Copeland, C. (2016). Green Infrastructure and Issues in Managing Urban Stormwater. Congressional Research Service, 23.
Derickson, R., and Cochran, L. (2013). Making the Wind Engineer’s Role More Effective in Urban Projects: A Proposed Three-Facet Framework for Enhanced Success. 1250.
Dhakal, K. P., and Chevalier, L. R. (2017). “Managing urban stormwater for urban sustainability: Barriers and policy solutions for green infrastructure application.” Journal of Environmental Management, 203, 171–181.
Dhar, R., and Gorlin, M. (2013). “A dual-system framework to understand preference construction processes in choice.” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 528–542.
Dhar, R., and Novemsky, N. (2008). “Beyond rationality: The content of preferences.” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(3), 175–178.
Duan, H. (2010). “The public perspective of carbon capture and storage for CO2 emission reductions in China.” Energy Policy, Special Section on Carbon Emissions and Carbon Management in Cities with Regular Papers, 38(9), 5281–5289.
Fleischman, D. A., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Rinaldi, J. A., Reminger, S. L., Grinnell, E. R., Lange, K. L., and Shapiro, R. (1997). “Word-stem completion priming for perceptually and conceptually encoded words in patients with Alzheimer’s disease.” Neuropsychologia, 35(1), 25–35.
Gaffield, S. J., Goo, R. L., Richards, L. A., and Jackson, R. J. (2003). “Public Health Effects of Inadequately Managed Stormwater Runoff.” American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1527–1533.
Hammitt, S. A. (2010). Toward sustainable stormwater management : overcoming barriers to green infrastructure. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Henson, R. N. A. (2003). “Neuroimaging studies of priming.” Progress in Neurobiology, 70(1), 53–81.
Holt, T. P., and Loraas, T. M. (2019). “Using Qualtrics Panels to Source External Auditors: A Replication Study.” Journal of Information Systems, Allen Press, 33(1), 29–41.
Hu, M., and Shealy, T. (2019). “Overcoming status quo bias for resilient stormwater infrastructure: empirical evidence in neurocognition and decision-making.” Journal of Management in Engineering.
Huijts, N. M. A., Molin, E. J. E., and Steg, L. (2012). “Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 525–531.
Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure. (2020). Buffalo’s Willert Park Green Infrastructure Project Earns Envision Bronze Award | Institute For Sustainable Infrastructure.”
Kahneman, D. (2013). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
Keeler, B. L., Hamel, P., McPhearson, T., Hamann, M. H., Donahue, M. L., Meza Prado, K. A., Arkema, K. K., Bratman, G. N., Brauman, K. A., Finlay, J. C., Guerry, A. D., Hobbie, S. E., Johnson, J. A., MacDonald, G. K., McDonald, R. I., Neverisky, N., and Wood, S. A. (2019). “Social-ecological and technological factors moderate the value of urban nature.” Nature Sustainability, 2(1), 29–38.
Kung, F. Y. H., Kwok, N., and Brown, D. J. (2018). “Are Attention Check Questions a Threat to Scale Validity?” Applied Psychology, 67(2), 264–283.
MacDonald, E. F., Gonzalez, R., and Papalambros, P. Y. (2009). “Preference inconsistency in multidisciplinary design decision making.” Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, 131(3), 310091–3100913.
Mankad, A., and Tapsuwan, S. (2011). “Review of socio-economic drivers of community acceptance and adoption of decentralised water systems.” Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3), 380–391.
Mathur, V. N., Price, A. D. F., and Austin, S. (2008). “Conceptualizing stakeholder engagement in the context of sustainability and its assessment.” Construction Management and Economics, Routledge, 26(6), 601–609.
Montalto, F. A., Behr, C. T., and Yu, Z. (2011). “Accounting for Uncertainty in Determining Green Infrastructure Cost-Effectiveness.” Economic Incentives for Stormwater Control, <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/>(Aug. 9, 2018).
National Research Council. (2009). Urban Stormwater Management in the United States.
Papies, E. (2016). “Goal priming as a situated intervention tool.” Current Opinion in Psychology, Elsevier, 12, 12–16.
Parish, R. (2017). Venema GSI: using underground injection control (UIC) wells in the right-of-way.
Schacter, D. L., Dobbins, I. G., and Schnyer, D. M. (2004). “Specificity of priming: a cognitive neuroscience perspective.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 853–862.
Seto, K. C., and Shepherd, J. M. (2009). “Global urban land-use trends and climate impacts.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 89–95.
She, J., and MacDonald, E. (2013). Trigger Features on Prototypes Increase Preference for Sustainability. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference.
She, J., and MacDonald, E. (2014). “Priming Designers to Communicate Sustainability.” Journal of Mechanical Design, 136(1), 011001.
Shealy, T., Klotz, L., Weber, E., Johnson, E., and Ruth Greenspan, B. (2019). “Bringing Choice Architecture to Architecture and Engineering Decisions: How the Redesign of Rating Systems Can Improve Sustainability.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(4), 04019014.
Tang, K. H. D. (2018). “Correlation between sustainability education and engineering students’ attitudes towards sustainability.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Emerald Publishing Limited, 19(3), 459–472.
Thorne, C. R., Lawson, E. C., Ozawa, C., Hamlin, S. L., and Smith, L. A. (2018). “Overcoming uncertainty and barriers to adoption of Blue-Green Infrastructure for urban flood risk management.” Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11(S2), S960–S972.
Tomczak, M., and Tomczak, E. (2014). “The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size.” 1, 7.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1981). “The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.” Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2019). “U.S. Census Bureau Quick Facts: United States.” <https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219>(Jun. 3, 2021).
Wolsink, M. (2007). “Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives.’” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11, 1188–1207.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2022
Construction Research Congress 2022
Pages: 151 - 160

History

Published online: Mar 7, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

1Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. Email: [email protected]
Tripp Shealy, Ph.D. [email protected]
2Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$138.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$138.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share