Chapter
Mar 7, 2022

Analysis of the Resilience Management Dimensions Based on Project Complexity Level

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2022

ABSTRACT

The transportation sector has recently begun integrating resilience into its research, but there are not enough resilience measuring dimensions that are specific to the level of complexity of projects. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify the transportation infrastructure resilience-measuring dimensions and to establish the relationship of identified dimensions based on the complexity level of reconstruction project. To fulfill the aim of this study, a list of potential dimensions that can be used to measure the transportation infrastructure was developed after conducting a comprehensive literature review. Based on the list, a project-based survey was developed and distributed among highly experienced participants in complex projects. Results indicated that, according to experts working on complex transportation projects, a traditional investment process, where the focus of the capital investment is solely on reducing traffic delays, can greatly reduce the resiliency of the network. Instead, investing in adding alternate routes to the project, which is known as redundancy, increases the resiliency of the whole system. This study will help practitioners by providing dimensions for measuring the resiliency of complex projects and thus guide decision-makers to enhance the resilience of the complex transportation infrastructure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Bjorvatn, T., and Wald, A. (2018). “Project complexity and team-level absorptive capacity as drivers of project management performance.” International Journal of Project Management, 36(6), 876–888.
Chacon-Hurtado, D., Losada-Rojas, L. L., Yu, D., Gkritza, K., and Fricker, J. D. (2020). “A proposed framework for the incorporation of economic resilience into transportation decision making.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(6), 04020084.
Cutter, S. L. (2016). The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA. Natural hazards, 80(2), 741–758.
Dao, B., Kermanshachi, S., Shane, J., Anderson, S., and Damnjanovic, I. (2020). “Developing a logistic regression model to measure project complexity.” Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 1–15.
Faturechi, R., and Miller-Hooks, E. (2015). “Measuring the performance of transportation infrastructure systems in disasters: A comprehensive review.” Journal of infrastructure systems, 21(1), 04014025.
Frangopol, D. M., and Bocchini, P. (2011). “Resilience as optimization criterion for the rehabilitation of bridges belonging to a transportation network subject to earthquake.” In Structures Congress 2011 pp. 2044–2055.
Hayat, E., and Amaratunga, D. (2017). “The role of local government in post-disaster road reconstruction: Assessment of factors affecting local government road maintenance capacity.” Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia, Springer, 255–279.
Hu, Y., Chan, A. P., Le, Y., and Jin, R. Z. (2015). From construction megaproject management to complex project management: Bibliographic analysis. Journal of management in engineering, 31(4), 04014052.
Hu, H., Lei, T., Hu, J., Zhang, S., and Kavan, P. (2018). “Disaster-mitigating and general innovative responses to climate disasters: Evidence from modern and historical China.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 28, 664–673.
Kermanshachi, S. (2016). Decision Making and Uncertainty Analysis in Success of Construction Projects (Doctoral dissertation).
Luo, L., He, Q., Jaselskis, E. J., and Xie, J. (2017). “Construction project complexity: research trends and implications.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(7), 04017019.
Mojtahedi, M., Newton, S., and Von Meding, J. (2017). “Predicting the resilience of transport infrastructure to a natural disaster using Cox’s Proportional Hazards Regression Model.” Natural Hazards, 85(2), 1119–1133.
Montgomery, D. C., and Runger, G. C. (2003). Applied statistics and probability for engineers, (3rd Edition), John Wiley & Sons.
Nipa, T. J., and Kermanshachi, S. (2020, November). “Identification of the Resilience Dimensions and Determination of Their Relationships in Critical Transportation Infrastructure.” In Construction Research Congress 2020: Infrastructure Systems and Sustainability (pp. 644–653).
Nipa, T. J., and Kermanshachi, S. (2021). “Dimensions of Resilience Measurement in Critical Transportation Infrastructure.” In International Conference on Transportation and Development 2021 (pp. 302–312).
Nipa, T. J., Kermanshachi, S., and Ramaji, I. (2019). “Comparative analysis of strengths and limitations of infrastructure resilience measurement methods.” In 7th CSCE International Construction Specialty Conference (ICSC), pp. 12–15.
Rentschler, J. E. (2013). “Why resilience matters-the poverty impacts of disasters.”.
Rouhanizadeh, B., and Kermanshachi, S. (2019, June). “A Systematic Approach to Analysis and Prioritization of the Socioeconomic Policies and Legal barriers to Rapid Post Disaster Reconstruction.” In 7th CSCE International Construction Specialty Conference (ICSC) (pp. 12–15).
Rouhanizadeh, B., Kermanshachi, S., and Nipa, T. J. (2019). “Identification, categorization, and weighting of barriers to timely post-disaster recovery process.” In Computing in Civil Engineering 2019: Smart Cities, Sustainability, and Resilience (pp. 41–49).
Rouhanizadeh, B., Kermanshachi, S., and Dhamangaonkar, V. S. (2020a, November). “Reconstruction of Critical and Interdependent Infrastructure Due to Catastrophic Natural Disasters: Lessons Learned.” In Construction Research Congress 2020: Infrastructure Systems and Sustainability (pp. 895–904).
Rouhanizadeh, B., Kermanshachi, S., and Nipa, T. J. (2020b). “Exploratory analysis of barriers to effective post-disaster recovery.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50, 101735.
Safapour, E., and Kermanshachi, S. (2021a). “Uncertainty analysis of rework predictors in post-hurricane reconstruction of critical transportation infrastructure.” Progress in Disaster Science, 100194.
Safapour, E., and Kermanshachi, S. (2021b). “Delay in Post-Disaster Reconstruction Projects: Analysis of Highly Damaged VS Minimally Damaged Infrastructures.” ASCE International Conference on Transportation & Development.
Safapour, E., and Kermanshachi, S. (2021c). “Reconstruction of Transportation Infrastructure with High Complexity: Mitigating Strategies for Effective Post-Disaster Reconstruction.” In International Conference on Transportation and Development 2021 (pp. 191–200).
Safapour, E., Kermanshachi, S., and Jahan Nipa, T. (2020a, July). “Analysis of Cost performance Indicators in Reconstruction Projects: A Comparative Study of Low Vs High Level Damages.” In Creative Construction e-Conference 2020 (pp. 2–10).
Safapour, E., Kermanshachi, S., and Jahan Nipa, T. (2020b, July). “Schedule Performance Analysis of Infrastructure Reconstruction Projects Due to Extreme Events.” In Creative Construction e-Conference 2020 (pp. 39–48).
Safapour, E., Kermanshachi, S., and Jahan Nipa, T. (2020c, July). “A Damage-based Analysis of Rework in Reconstruction of Infrastructure Projects Due to Natural Disasters.” In Creative Construction e-Conference 2020 (pp. 55–62).
Taghinezhad, A., Jafari, A., Kermanshachi, S., and Nipa, T. (2021). “Construction Project Management Dimensions in Transportation Agencies: Case Study of the US Department of Transportation.” Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 26(3), 06021002.
Tonn, G., Reilly, A., Czajkowski, J., Ghaedi, H., and Kunreuther, H. (2021). “US transportation infrastructure resilience: Influences of insurance, incentives, and public assistance.” Transport Policy, 100, 108–119.
Wan, C., Yang, Z., Zhang, D., Yan, X., and Fan, S. (2018). “Resilience in transportation systems: a systematic review and future directions.” Transport reviews, 38(4), 479–498.
Wood, H., and Ashton, P. (2009). “Factors of complexity in construction projects.” Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM, 857–866.
Xia, B., and Chan, A. P. (2012). “Measuring complexity for building projects: a Delphi study.” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2022
Construction Research Congress 2022
Pages: 80 - 89

History

Published online: Mar 7, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Thahomina Jahan Nipa [email protected]
1Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX. Email: [email protected]
Sharareh Kermanshachi, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
2Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX. Email: [email protected]
Ronik Ketankumar Patel [email protected]
3Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Impact of Construction Workers’ Physical Health and Respiratory Issues in Hot Weather: A Pilot Study, Tran-SET 2022, 10.1061/9780784484609.015, (135-145), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$138.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$138.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share