Chapter
Mar 7, 2022

Investigation of Causal Relationships among Factors Affecting Post-Disaster Reconstruction Process: Adoption of Social Network Analysis (SNA) Method

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2022

ABSTRACT

The increasing number of natural disasters that have occurred globally within the last decade has made it vital for decision-makers to understand the factors that affect the process of recovery. Damage sustained by the infrastructure is a fundamental post-disaster issue that has to be addressed as quickly as possible and reconstructing the damaged or destroyed residential housing in a timely manner is essential to the affected community’s ability to return to its normal level of functioning. This study investigated the causal relationships among the factors that delay the recovery process after hurricanes. The factors were identified by a literature review, and the relationships were determined by implementing a social network analysis (SNA). The results of this study show that misalignment among the policies, insufficient local government revenue, and lack of experience cause the most significant delays in the recovery process. Historically, many other factors, such as rate of employment, diversity of culture and languages, and damage to commercial buildings have not been adequately implemented in frameworks and models and deserve more consideration. The findings of this study will assist decision-makers of post-disaster recovery in achieving a more resilient community by identifying the relationships among the factors that prevent or delay recovery and planning how to avoid them.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Arouri, M., Nguyen, C., and Youssef, A. B. (2015). Natural disasters, household welfare, and resilience: evidence from rural Vietnam. World Dev., 70:59–77.
Assaf, H. (2011). Framework for modeling mass disasters. Natural Hazards Review, 12(2), 47–61.
Audefroy, J. F. (2010). Post-disaster emergency and reconstruction experiences in Asia and Latin America: An assessment. Dev. Pract., 20 (6):664–677.
Carrasco, S., Ochiai, C., and Okazaki, K. (2016). Disaster induced resettlement: multi-stakeholder interactions and decision making following tropical storm Washi in Cagayan de Oro, Philippines. Procedia - Social. Behav. Sci., 218:35–49.
Chen, L., and Miller-Hooks, E. (2012). Resilience: An indicator of recovery capability in intermodal freight transport. Transp. Sci., 46(1):109–123.
Choi, J., Deshmukh, A., and Hastak, M. (2019). Seven-layer classification of infrastructure to improve community resilience to disasters. J. of Infrastructure Systems, 25(2), 04019012.
Duhamel, C., Santos, A. C., Brasil, D., Châtelet, E., and Birregah, B. (2016). Connecting a population dynamic model with a multi-period location-allocation problem for post-disaster relief operations. Annals of Operations Research, 247(2), 693–713.
El-Anwar, O., El-Rayes, K., and Elnashai, A. (2010). Maximizing temporary housing safety after natural disasters. J. Infrastruct. Syst., 138–148.
El-Anwar, O., and Chen, L. (2014). Maximizing the computational efficiency of temporary housing decision support following disasters. J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 113–123.
FEMA. (2011). A whole community approach to emergency management: Principles, themes, and pathways for action. Washington: Federal Emergency Management Agency. Retrieved from http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=4941 [accessed May 20, 2020].
Kassem, M. A., Khoiry, M. A., and Hamzah, N. (2020). Structural modelling of internal risk factors for oil and gas construction projects. International Journal of Energy Sector Management.
Kermanshachi, S., Bergstrand, K., and Rouhanizadeh, B. (2019). Identifying, Weighting and Causality Modeling of Social and Economic Barriers to Rapid Infrastructure Recovery from Natural Disasters: A Study of Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria, U.S. Department of Transportation, C-TEDD, January 2019.
Ku, H. B., and Ma, Y. N. (2015). Rural-Urban Alliance as a new model for post-disaster social work intervention in community reconstruction: The case in Sichuan, China. International Social Work, 58(5):743–758.
Mostafizi, A., Wang, H., Cox, D., and Dong, S. (2019). An agent-based vertical evacuation model for a near-field tsunami: Choice behavior, logical shelter locations, and life safety. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 34, 467–479.
Nejat, A., and Ghosh, S. (2016). LASSO model of post-disaster housing recovery: Case study of Hurricane Sandy. Natural Hazards Review, 17 (3), 04016007.
Orabi, W., Senouci, A. B., El-Rayes, K., and Al-Derham, H. (2010). Optimizing resource utilization during the recovery of civil infrastructure systems. J. Manage. Eng., 26(4):237–246.
Otte, E., and Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis-A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6): 441–453.
Padgett, J. E., and Tapia C. (2013). Sustainability of natural hazard risk mitigation: Life cycle analysis of environmental indicators for bridge infrastructure. J. Infr. Syst., 19:395–408.
Pamidimukkala, A., Kermanshachi, S., and Karthick, S. (2020a). Impacts of natural disasters on construction projects: Strategies to prevent cost and schedule overruns in reconstruction projects. Proc., Creative Construction e-Conference 2020, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 49–57.
Pamidimukkala, A., Kermanshachi, S., and Safapour, E. (2020b). Challenges in Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction: Analysis of Urban vs. Rural Communities. Proc., Creative Construction e-Conference 2020, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 103–110.
Pramudita, A., and Taniguchi, E. (2014). Model of debris collection operation after disasters and its application in urban area. Int. J. Urban Sci., 18(2):218–243.
Roosli, R., and Collins, A. E. (2016). Key lessons and guidelines for post-disaster permanent housing provision in Kelantan, Malaysia. Procedia Eng., 145:1209–1217.
Rouhanizadeh, B., Kermanshachi, S., and Nipa, T. J. (2019). Identification, categorization, and weighting of barriers to timely post-disaster recovery process. In Computing in Civil Engineering 2019: Smart Cities, Sustainability, and Resilience (pp. 41–49). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Rouhanizadeh, B., and Kermanshachi, S. (2019a). Investigating the Relationships of Socioeconomic Factors Delaying Post-Disaster Reconstruction. In Computing in Civil Engineering 2019: Smart Cities, Sustainability, and Resilience (pp. 33–40). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Rouhanizadeh, B., and Kermanshachi, S. (2019b). A Systematic Approach to Analysis and Prioritization of the Socioeconomic Policies and Legal barriers to Rapid Post Disaster Reconstruction. In 7th CSCE International Construction Specialty Conference (ICSC) (pp. 12–15).
Rouhanizadeh, B., Kermanshachi, S., and Dhamangaonkar, V. S. (2020a). Reconstruction of Critical and Interdependent Infrastructure Due to Catastrophic Natural Disasters: Lessons Learned. In Construction Research Congress 2020: Infrastructure Systems and Sustainability (pp. 895–904). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Rouhanizadeh, B., Kermanshachi, S., and Nipa, T. J. (2020b). Exploratory analysis of factors to effective post-disaster recovery. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50, 101735.
Rouhanizadeh, B., and Kermanshachi, S. (2020a). Gender-based evaluation of physical, social, and economic challenges in natural disasters management. In Construction Research Congress 2020: Infrastructure Systems and Sustainability (pp. 865–874). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Rouhanizadeh, B., and Kermanshachi, S. (2020b). Comparative Analysis of Public’s and Decision-Makers’ Perspectives on Socioeconomic Barriers Causing Delay in Post-Disaster Recovery Processes. In Construction Research Congress 2020: Infrastructure Systems and Sustainability (pp. 856–864). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Rouhanizadeh, B., and Kermanshachi, S. (2020c). Post-disaster reconstruction of transportation infrastructures: Lessons learned. Sustainable Cities and Society, 63, p.102505.
Rouhanizadeh, B., and Kermanshachi, S. (2021a). Gender-based evaluation of economic, social, and physical challenges in timely post-hurricane recovery. Progress in Disaster Science, 9, p.100146.
Rouhanizadeh, B., and Kermanshachi, S. (2021b). Development of a Model Determining the Relationships of the Factors Delaying Reconstruction Projects. In International Conference on Transportation and Development 2021 (pp. 330–340).
Safapour, E., and Kermanshachi, S. (2020). Identification and categorization of factors affecting duration of post-disaster reconstruction of interdependent transportation systems. In Construction Research Congress 2020: Computer Applications (pp. 1290–1299). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Safapour, E., and Kermanshachi, S. (2021a). Delay in Reconstruction Projects: Analysis of Highly Damaged versus Minimally Damaged Infrastructure. In International Conference on Transportation and Development 2021 (pp. 157–166).
Safapour, E., and Kermanshachi, S. (2021b). “Reconstruction of Transportation Infrastructure with High Complexity: Mitigating Strategies for Effective Post-Disaster Reconstruction.” In International Conference on Transportation and Development 2021 (pp. 191–200).
Safapour, E., Kermanshachi, S., and Pamidimukkala, A. (2021). Post-disaster recovery in urban and rural communities: Challenges and strategies. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, p.102535.
Sajjad, M., Lin, N., and Chan, J. C. (2020). Spatial heterogeneities of current and future hurricane flood risk along the US Atlantic and gulf coasts. Science of The Total Envir., 136704.
Sanusi, F., Choi, J., Ulak, M. B., Ozguven, E. E., and Abichou, T. (2020). Metadata-based analysis of physical–social–civic systems to develop the knowledge base for hurricane shelter planning. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36 (5), 04020041.
Schwab, J., Topping, K. C., Eadie, C., Deyle, R. E., and Smith, R. A. (2014). Planning for post-disaster recovery., Washington, D.C.: American Planning Association.
Smith, G., Martin, A., and Wenger, D. E. (2018). Disaster recovery in an era of climate change: The unrealized promise of institutional resilience. Handbook of Disaster Research. Springer, 595–619.
Tyler, J., and Sadiq, A. A. (2019). Business continuity and disaster recovery in the aftermath of Hurricane Irma: Exploring whether community-level mitigation activities make a difference. Natural Hazards Review, 20(1), 04018026.
Weerakoon, R., Kumar, A., and Desha, C. (2015). Sustainability in post-disaster road infrastructure recovery projects in Queensland, Australia. In the Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference of the International Institute for Infrastructure Renewal and Reconstruction. (8-10 July 2013). Queensland University of Technology.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2022
Construction Research Congress 2022
Pages: 69 - 79

History

Published online: Mar 7, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Behzad Rouhanizadeh, Ph.D. [email protected]
1Postdoctoral Research Associate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX. Email: [email protected]
Sharareh Kermanshachi, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
2Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$138.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$138.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share