Chapter
Jul 29, 2021

Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Water Pipe Networks under Network Uncertainties

Publication: Pipelines 2021

ABSTRACT

Earthquakes disrupt the operation of critical lifelines in a community, such as underground water and gas infrastructure systems. The importance of the seismic vulnerability assessment of water pipe networks cannot be exaggerated as it has a critical role in preventive seismic rehabilitation decision-making performed to avoid costly repairs. Existing seismic vulnerability assessment methods do not consider water pipe network uncertainties (e.g., uncertainties in nodal demand, reservoir head, and pipe roughness coefficient) despite the considerable susceptibility of these assessment methods to these uncertainties. Examining the effect of network uncertainties on post-earthquake serviceability of water pipe networks is the first step towards assessing the vulnerability of water pipe networks under uncertainties. The objective of this research is to investigate the effect of network uncertainties on the post-earthquake serviceability of water networks. Demand and pipe roughness coefficient were the network parameters selected for this study. Design of the experiment, Monte Carlo simulation, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were used to examine the individual and combined effects of two water pipe network uncertainties (nodal demand and pipe roughness coefficient). The approach was tested on the Modena network, which is a city-scale benchmark network that is commonly used in the literature for seismic vulnerability assessment of water pipe networks. The results show that the uncertainty of these two selected network parameters has a statistically significant impact on the post-earthquake serviceability of water pipe networks. Hence, it is recommended to integrate the network uncertainties with the seismic vulnerability assessment of water pipe networks.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Abrahamson, N. A., and Silva, W. J. (2007). Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA ground motion relations for the geometric mean horizontal component of peak and spectral ground motion parameters. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Adachi, T. (2007). Impact of cascading failures on performance assessment of civil infrastructure systems (Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology).
ALA (American Lifelines Alliance). (2001). Seismic fragility formulations for water systems. Washington, DC: ALA.
Bargiela, A., and Hainsworth, G. D. (1989). “Pressure and flow uncertainty in water systems.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 115(2), 212-229.
Center of Water Systems. 2018. Large problems. Accessed September 1, 2019.
Field, E. H., Seligson, H. A., Gupta, N., Gupta, V., Jordan, T. H., and Campbell, K. W. (2005). “Loss estimates for a Puente Hills blind-thrust earthquake in Los Angeles, California.” Earthquake Spectra, 21(2), 329–338.
Janbaz, S., Shahandashti, M., and Najafi, M. (2017). Life cycle cost analysis of an underground freight transportation (UFT) system in Texas. In Pipelines 2017 (pp. 134-143).
Kang, D., and Lansey, K. (2009). “Real-time demand estimation and confidence limit analysis for water distribution systems.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 135(10), 825-837.
Kashani, H., Ashuri, B., Shahandashti, S. M., and Lu, J. (2015). “Investment valuation model for renewable energy systems in buildings.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(2), 04014074.
Knight, B. (2017). Mexico City earthquake reconnaissance – day 3. What’s Happening. Retrieved from http://www.wrkengrs.com/mexico-city-earthquake-reconnaissance-day-4/.
Lansey, K. E., Duan, N., Mays, L. W., & Tung, Y. K. (1989). “Water distribution system design under uncertainties.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 115(5), 630-645.
O’Rourke, T. D. (1996). “Lessons learned for lifeline engineering from major urban earthquakes.” In Proc., 11th World Conf. of Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
O’Rourke, T. D., Jeon, S. S., Toprak, S., Cubrinovski, M., Hughes, M., Van Ballegooy, S., and Bouziou, D. (2014). “Earthquake response of underground pipeline networks in Christchurch, NZ.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (1): 183–204.
Pineda-Porras, O., and Najafi, M. (2010). “Seismic Damage Estimation for Buried Pipelines: Challenges after Three Decades of Progress.” Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 1(1), 19–24.
Piratla, K. R., Yerri, S. R., Yazdekhasti, S., Cho, J., Koo, D., and Matthews, J. C. (2015). Empirical analysis of water-main failure consequences. Procedia Engineering, 118, 727–734.
Pudasaini, B., and Shahandashti, S. M. (2018). “Identification of critical pipes for proactive resource-constrained seismic rehabilitation of water pipe networks.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 24(4), 04018024.
Pudasaini, B., and Shahandashti, S. M. (2020). “Seismic Resilience Enhancement of Water Pipe Networks Using Hybrid Metaheuristic Optimization.” In Pipelines 2020 (pp. 428-436). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Pudasaini, B., Shahandashti, S. M., and Razavi, M. (2017). “Identifying critical links in water supply systems subject to various earthquakes to support inspection and renewal decision making.” Computing in Civil Engineering, 2017, 231–238.
Sabzkouhi, A. M., and Haghighi, A. (2016). “Uncertainty analysis of pipe-network hydraulics using a many-objective particle swarm optimization”. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 142(9), 04016030.
Seifollahi-Aghmiuni, S., Haddad, O. B., Omid, M. H., and Mariño, M. A. (2013). “Effects of pipe roughness uncertainty on water distribution network performance during its operational period.” Water resources management, 27(5), 1581-1599.
Shahandashti, S. M., and Pudasaini, B. (2019). “Proactive seismic rehabilitation decision-making for water pipe networks using simulated annealing.” Natural Hazards Review, 20(2), 04019003.
Shi, P. (2006). Seismic response modeling of water supply systems. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Shibu, A., and Reddy, M. J. (2011). “Uncertainty analysis of water distribution networks by fuzzy-cross entropy approach.” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 59, 494-502.
USGS. 2018b. Unified hazard tool. Accessed September 10, 2019.
Wang, Y., Au, S.-K., and Fu, Q. (2010). “Seismic risk assessment and mitigation of water supply systems.” Earthquake Spectra, 26(1), 257–274.
Xu, C., and Goulter, I. C. (1998). “Probabilistic model for water distribution reliability.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 124(4), 218-228.
Yerri, S. R., Piratla, K. R., Matthews, J. C., Yazdekhasti, S., Cho, J., and Koo, D. (2017). Empirical analysis of large diameter water main break consequences. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 123, 242–248.
Zahed, S. E., Shahandashti, S. M., and Diltz, J. D. (2020). “Investment Valuation of Underground Freight Transportation Systems under Uncertainty.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 26(3), 04020029.
Zahed, S. E., Shahandashti, S. M., and Najafi, M. (2018). “Lifecycle benefit-cost analysis of underground freight transportation systems.” Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 9(2), 04018003.
Zahed, S. E., Shahooei, S., Farooghi, F., Shahandashti, M., and Ardekani, S. (2019). “Life-cycle cost analysis of a short-haul underground freight transportation system for the DFW Airport.” Built Environment Project and Asset Management.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Pipelines 2021
Pipelines 2021
Pages: 171 - 179

History

Published online: Jul 29, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Abhijit Roy [email protected]
1Graduate Student, Dept.of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX. Email: [email protected]
Binaya Pudasaini, Ph.D. [email protected]
2Bridge EIT, HDR, Portland. Email: [email protected]
Mohsen Shahandashti, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
3Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Proactive Seismic Rehabilitation Decision-Making for Water Pipe Networks Considering Earthquake-Induced Transient Strains and Geotechnical Instability, ASCE Inspire 2023, 10.1061/9780784485163.112, (979-988), (2023).
  • Optimal Proactive Seismic Rehabilitation of Gas Pipeline Networks, Pipelines 2023, 10.1061/9780784485033.026, (240-250), (2023).
  • Impact of Water Network Uncertainties on Seismic Rehabilitation Decision-Making for Water Pipelines, Pipelines 2023, 10.1061/9780784485019.039, (364-372), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$100.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$100.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share