Chapter
Jun 4, 2021

Development of a Model Determining the Relationships of the Factors Delaying Reconstruction Projects

Publication: International Conference on Transportation and Development 2021

ABSTRACT

Transportation infrastructure plays key role in timeliness of post-hurricane reconstruction process. Therefore, timely reconstruction after hurricanes is of high importance for the decision makers. Various factors lead to delays in the reconstruction of transportation infrastructure. To lessen the adverse impacts of these factors, not only the individual study of the effects of these factors but the interactive consequences of them need to be accurately investigated. The objective of this study was to (1) explore the causal relationships among the factors affecting timeliness of post-hurricane reconstruction of transportation infrastructure and (2) the extent to which these factors and their interactions affect the timeliness of reconstruction process. Implementing data from 44 experts in post-hurricane reconstruction of transportation infrastructure and 195 of the general public, the interrelated network of 14 factors was modeled using structural equation modeling (SEM) technique. Then, the impact of the factors on the time of the reconstruction was evaluated. The outputs demonstrated that severe damage to major transportation systems, insufficient number of available active contractors, and low revenue of local government are the top-three factors affecting the time of reconstruction of transportation infrastructure according to both groups. This research assists decision makers in understanding the critical paths that lead to delays in the post-hurricane reconstruction of transportation infrastructure and how different is the perspective in this regard. In addition, the decision makers would be able to predict the impacts of interdependent factors during the reconstruction process after hurricanes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Alipour, A., and Shafei, B. (2016). Seismic resilience of transportation networks with deteriorating components. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(8), C4015015.
Amaratunga, D., Malalgoda, C., Haigh, R., Panda, A., and Rahayu, H. (2018). Sound practices of disaster risk reduction at local level. Procedia Engineering. 212: 1163-1170.
Arouri, M., Nguyen, C., and Youssef, A. B. (2015). Natural disasters, household welfare, and resilience: evidence from rural Vietnam. World Dev., 70: 59-77.
Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual, Multivariate Software, Encino, CA.
Chang, Y., Wilkinson, S., Brunsdon, D., Seville, E., and Potangaroa, R. (2011). An integrated approach: managing resources for post-disaster reconstruction. Disasters, 35(4), 739-765.
Choi, J., Deshmukh, A., and Hastak, M. (2019). Seven-layer classification of infrastructure to improve community resilience to disasters. Journal of infrastructure systems, 25(2), 04019012.
El-Anwar, O., and Chen, L. (2015). Maximizing the computational efficiency of temporary housing decision support following disasters. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 113–123.
FEMA. (2011). A whole community approach to emergency management: Principles, themes, and pathways for action. Washington: Federal Emergency Management Agency. Retrieved from http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=4941 [accessed May 20, 2020].
Habibi, M., Kermanshachi, S., and Rouhanizadeh, B. (2019). Identifying and Measuring Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) Key Performance Indicators and Management Strategies. Infrastructures, 4(2), 14.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis, 6th Ed., Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Hayat, E., and Amaratunga, R. D. G. (2011). Road reconstruction in post-disaster recovery; the challenges and obstacles.
Ilbeigi, M., and Dilkina, B. (2017). Statistical approach to quantifying the destructive impact of natural disasters on petroleum infrastructures. J. Manag. Eng. 34 (1):04017042.
Jordan, E., and Javernick-Will, A. (2013). “Indicators of Community Recovery: Content Analysis and Delphi Approach.” Natural Hazards Review, 14(1), February 1, ©ASCE.
Jordan, E., Javernick-Will, A., and Amadei, B. (2015). Post-disaster reconstruction: lessons from Nagapattinam district, India, Dev. Pract. 25(4):518–534.
Kaliba, C., Muya, M., and Mumba, K. 2009. Cost escalation and schedule delays in road construction projects in Zambia. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 522-531.
Kermanshachi, S., Bergstrand, K., and Rouhanizadeh, B. (2019). “Identifying, Weighting and Causality Modeling of Social and Economic Barriers to Rapid Infrastructure Recovery from Natural Disasters: A Study of Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria” (.
Kontou, E., Murray-Tuite, P., and Wernstedt, K. (2016). Commuter adaptation in response to Hurricane sandy’s damage Nat. Hazards Rev. 18 (2):04016010.
Li, S., Wu, J., Gao, Z., Lin, Y., and Fu, B. (2011). “The analysis of traffic congestion and dynamic propagation properties based on complex network.” Acta Phys. Sin., 60(5):050701.
Lou, Y., and Zhang, L. (2011). Defending transportation networks against random and targeted attacks. Transportation Research Record 2234, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 31–40.
Madhusudan, C., and Ganapathy, G. P. (2011). Disaster resilience of transportation infrastructure and ports–An overview. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 2(2), 443-455.
Mechler, R. (2016). Reviewing estimates of the economic efficiency of disaster risk management: opportunities and limitations of using risk-based cost–benefit analysis. Nat. Hazards. 81: 2121–2147.
Mostafizi, A., Wang, H., Cox, D., and Dong, S. (2019). An agent-based vertical evacuation model for a near-field tsunami: Choice behavior, logical shelter locations, and life safety. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 34, 467-479.
Nejat, A., and Ghosh, S. (2016). LASSO model of postdisaster housing recovery: Case study of Hurricane Sandy. Natural Hazards Review, 17(3), 04016007.
Nipa, T. J., and Kermanshachi, S. (2020). Identification of the Resilience Dimensions and Determination of Their Relationships in Critical Transportation Infrastructure. In Construction Research Congress 2020: Infrastructure Systems and Sustainability (pp. 644-653). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Nipa, T. J., Kermanshachi, S., and Ramaji, I. (2019). Comparative analysis of strengths and limitations of infrastructure resilience measurement methods. In 7th CSCE International Construction Specialty Conference (ICSC) (pp. 12-15).
Padgett, J. E., and Tapia, C. (2013). Sustainability of natural hazard risk mitigation: life cycle analysis of environmental indicators for bridge infrastructure. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19: 395-408.
Palttala, P., Boano, C., Lund, R., and Vos, M. (2012). Communication gaps in disaster management: Perceptions by experts from governmental and non-governmental organizations. Journal of contingencies and crisis management, 20(1), 2-12.
Pamidimukkala, A., Kermanshachi, S., and Safapour, E. (2020). Challenges in Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction: Analysis of Urban vs. Rural Communities. In Creative Construction e-Conference 2020 (103-110). Budapest University of Technology and Economics.
Pamidimukkala, A., Kermanshachi, S., and Karthick, S. (2020). Impact of natural disasters on construction projects: Strategies to prevent cost and schedule overruns in reconstruction projects. In Creative Construction e-Conference 2020 (49-57). Budapest University of Technology and Economics.
Qiang, Y., Huang, Q., and Xu, J. (2020). Observing Community Resilience from Space: Using Nighttime Lights to Model Economic Disturbance and Recovery Pattern in Natural Disaster. Sustainable Cities and Society, 102115.
Roosli, R., and Collins, A. E. (2016). “Key lessons and guidelines for post-disaster permanent housing provision in Kelantan, Malaysia.” Procedia Eng., 145: 1209–1217.
Rouhanizadeh, B., and Kermanshachi, S. (2019). Investigating the Relationships of Socioeconomic Factors Delaying Post-Disaster Reconstruction. In Computing in Civil Engineering 2019: Smart Cities, Sustainability, and Resilience (pp. 33-40). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Rouhanizadeh, B. (2020). Analysis of Barriers Causing Delay in Post-Hurricane Recovery: Experts’ Vs. Public’s Perspectives. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas at Arlington, September 2020.
Rouhanizadeh, B., and Kermanshachi, S. (2020). Gender-Based Evaluation of Physical, Social, and Economic Challenges in Natural Disasters Management. In Proceedings of ASCE Construction Research Congress (CRC) (pp. 8-10).
Rouhanizadeh, B., and Kermanshachi, S. (2020). “Reconstruction of Critical and Interdependent Infrastructures due to Catastrophic Natural Disasters: Lessons Learned,” Proceedings of ASCE Construction Research Congress (CRC), Arizona, US, March 8-10, 2020.
Rouhanizadeh, B., and Kermanshachi, S. (2019). “A Systematic Approach to Analysis and Prioritization of the Socioeconomic Policies and Legal barriers to Rapid Post Disaster Reconstruction.” In 7th CSCE International Construction Specialty Conference (ICSC), Laval, Canada, June 12-15, 2019.
Rouhanizadeh, B., Kermanshachi, S., and Nipa, T. J. (2019). Identification, Categorization, and Weighting of Barriers to Timely Post-Disaster Recovery Process. In Computing in Civil Engineering 2019: Smart Cities, Sustainability, and Resilience (pp. 41-49). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Rouhanizadeh, B., and Kermanshachi, S. (2020). “Post-Disaster Reconstruction of Transportation Infrastructures: Lessons Learned.” Sustainable Cities and Society, 63, 102505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102505.
Rouhanizadeh, B., and Kermanshachi, S. (2020). “Comparative Analysis of Public’s and Decision-Maker’s Perspectives on Socioeconomic Barriers Causing Delay in Post-disaster Recovery Processes.” In Proceedings of ASCE Construction Research Congress (CRC) (8-10).
Rouhanizadeh, B., Kermanshachi, S., and Dhamangaonkar, V. (2019). “Identification and Categorization of Policy and Legal Barriers to Long-Term Timely Post-Disaster Reconstruction,” Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 11(3):04519014.
Rouhanizadeh, B., Kermanshachi, S., and Nipa, T. J. (2020). “Exploratory analysis of barriers to effective post-disaster recovery.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 101735.
Safapour, E., and Kermanshachi, S. (2019). Investigation of the Challenges and Their Best Practices for Post-Disaster Reconstruction Safety: Educational Approach for Construction Hazards. In Preceedings of 99th Transportation Research Board Conference.
Safapour, E., and Kermanshachi, S. (2020). “Identification and Categorization of Factors Affecting Duration of Post-Disaster Reconstruction of Interdependent Transportation Systems.” Proceedings of ASCE Construction Research Congress (CRC), Arizona, US, March 8-10, 2020.
Safapour, E., Kermanshachi, S., and Nipa, T. J. (2020). “Schedule Performance Analysis of Infrastructure Reconstruction Projects Due to Extreme Events.” Proceedings of Creative Construction Conference (CCC), June 28-July 1, 2020.
Safapour, E., Kermanshachi, S., and Nipa, T. J. (2020). “A Damaged-Based Analysis of Rework in Reconstruction of Infrastructure Projects Due to Natural Disasters.” Proceedings of Creative Construction Conference (CCC), June 28-July 1, 2020.
Safapour, E., Kermanshachi, S., and Nipa, T. J. (2020). “Analysis of Cost performance Indicators in Reconstruction Projects: A Comparative Study of Low Vs High Level Damages.” Proceedings of Creative Construction Conference (CCC), June 28-July 1, 2020.
Schwab, J., Topping, K. C., Eadie, C., Deyle, R. E., and Smith, R. A. (2014). Planning for post-disaster recovery. Washington, D.C.: American Planning Association.
Smith, G., Martin, A., and Wenger, D. E. (2018). Disaster recovery in an era of climate change: The unrealized promise of institutional resilience. Handbook of Disaster Research. Springer. 595-619.
Tuler, S., and Webler, T. (2020). Promises and challenges of citizen engagement in risk and environmental decision making. In Handbook of US Environmental Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Vahanvati, M., and Mulligan, M. (2017). A new model for effective post-disaster housing reconstruction: Lessons from Gujarat and Bihar in India. International Journal of Project Management. 35(5): 802-817.
Yamashita, S., Watanabe, R., and Shimatani, Y. (2016). Smart adaptation activities and measures against urban flood disasters. Sustainable cities and society, 27, 175-184.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Conference on Transportation and Development 2021
International Conference on Transportation and Development 2021
Pages: 330 - 340

History

Published online: Jun 4, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Behzad Rouhanizadeh, Ph.D. [email protected]
1Postdoctoral Research Associate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX. Email: [email protected]
Sharareh Kermanshachi, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
2Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Establishment of Resilience Quantification Tool for Transportation Projects, International Conference on Transportation and Development 2022, 10.1061/9780784484340.023, (251-261), (2022).
  • Investigation of Causal Relationships among Factors Affecting Post-Disaster Reconstruction Process: Adoption of Social Network Analysis (SNA) Method, Construction Research Congress 2022, 10.1061/9780784483954.008, (69-79), (2022).
  • Post-Hurricane Recovery Process: Analysis of the Public and Subject Matter Experts’ Perspectives Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), Construction Research Congress 2022, 10.1061/9780784483954.007, (57-68), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$80.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$80.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share