Earthquake Ground Motions for Design of Bridges on Deep Foundations
Publication: IFCEE 2021
ABSTRACT
Major bridges in areas of high seismicity are often supported on deep pile foundations. During an earthquake, ground shaking is not uniform in the entire soil domain supporting a bridge and its foundations. Ground motions may be different at each support and at various depths along each pile. In particular, site response effects alter the seismic waves as they propagate upward, leading to depth-varying motions. This raises the question of what motions are the most appropriate for use in evaluating the seismic response of a pile-supported bridge. In this study, excitations caused by depth-varying motions are investigated by performing analysis of kinematic pile-soil interaction. Depth-varying free field motions are computed along the length of the piles and used as inputs through soil springs into foundation models. The resulting “kinematic motion” is computed at the pile cap, which gives an indication of the effective earthquake excitation imparted to the bridge. Results are presented from major bridge projects covering a range of pile types and ground conditions. In terms of their computed response spectra, the kinematic motions are often found to be lower than the free field ground motions at the mudline or ground surface. As a result, seismic design demands may be reduced by implementing kinematic or depth-varying motions in global bridge model analysis, as opposed to following the ground surface response spectrum approach used in standard practice. Significant reductions in demands are found particularly for bridges on stiff pile foundations at sites with soft upper soils underlain by denser materials.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Abrahamson, N. A., 1998. Non-stationary spectral matching program RSPMATCH, Pacific Gas & Electric Internal Report, February.
Fugro-EMI. 2001. Ground Motion Report, San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge East Span Seismic Safety Project, Prepared for Calif. Dept. of Trans., March.
EMI. 2009a. Ground Motion Study Report, Antioch Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project, Prepared for Bay Area Toll Authority and Calif. Dept. of Trans., December.
EMI. 2009b. Ground Motion Study Report, Dumbarton Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project, Prepared for Bay Area Toll Authority and Calif. Dept. of Trans., March.
EMI. 2011. Seismic Ground Motion Report for Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement Project, Long Beach, California, Prepared for Parsons/HNTB Joint Venture, June.
Hayden, C. P., Bray, J. D., and Abrahamson, N. A. 2014. Selection of near-fault pulse motions, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE.
Housner, G. W., and Thiel, C. C. 1995. The Continuing Challenge: Report on the Performance of State Bridges in the Northridge Earthquake, Earthquake Spectra: November.
Lam, I. P., and Law, H. 2000. Soil Structure Interaction of Bridges for Seismic Analysis, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER). 2014. PEER Ground Motion Database, http://peer.berkeley.edu/peer_ground_motion_database/.
Wilson, P., Jones, M., Law, H., Treyger, S., and Allen, J. 2018. Seismic Demands and Performance of the Base-Isolated Sixth Street Viaduct Replacement, Proc., 11th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Los Angeles, CA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: May 6, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.