Pipelines 2020
Ugh, Not Another Forcemain High Point
Publication: Pipelines 2020
ABSTRACT
Owners, engineers, and operators that are involved with wastewater forcemain systems often neglect the importance and associated risks of intermediate high points. This paper outlines the hydraulic-related challenges with intermediate forcemain high points and provides examples of the full suite/range of typical design solutions that are often considered and/or employed during design. The potential solutions are discussed from the point of view of challenges and risks, with the ultimate conclusion being that intermediate forcemain high points are a significant design challenge that is often not solved in a clear or proven manner. Given that many wastewater forcemain systems with an intermediate high point experience operational challenges, the paper also presents an additional and seldom considered design alternative of inline booster pumping for wastewater. The paper outlines the benefits and risks of inline booster pumping and proceeds to present a case study for a conceptual wastewater forcemain system with four inline booster stations to address the associated high static head, long length, and challenging intermediate high points. The case study initially provides an example of the hydraulic-related differences between inline booster pumping and traditional design with wet wells, including pump selection and surge protection requirements. The paper then proceeds to demonstrate how proportional integral derivative (PID) control logic for inline booster systems can be optimized with hydraulic transient modelling of pump operation and flow control stability. Overall, the objectives of the paper are to re-emphasize the challenges with intermediate forcemain high points and to discuss the potential benefits and risks of inline booster pumping as to promote discussion.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Chaudhry, M.H. (2014). Applied Hydraulic Transients (Third Edition). Springer, New York, USA.
Edmunds, R.C. (1979). Air Binding in Pipes. Journal of AWWA, 71:5:272.
Falvey, H. T. (1980). Air-Water Flow in Hydraulic Structures. United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), Denver, Colorado, USA.
Pothof, I. (Undated). Feasibility of Booster Pumps in a Wastewater Transportation System: A Case Study.
Pozos Estrada, O. (2007). Investigation on the Effects of Entrained Air in Pipelines. Doctorate of Engineering Thesis, University of Stuttgart, Germany.
Richards, R.T. (1962). Air Binding in Water Pipelines. Journal of AWWA, 54:6:719.
Thorley, A.R.D. (2004). Fluid Transients in Pipeline Systems. Professional Engineering Publishing Limited, UK.
United States Department of the Interior (1980). Engineering Monograph No. 41: Air-Water Flow in Hydraulic Structures. Water Resources and Power Service, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Whitsett, A.M, and Christiansen, L.E. (1969). Air in Transmission Mains. Journal of AWWA, 61:11:592.
Wylie, E.B., and Streeter, V.L. (1978). Fluid Transients. McGraw-Hill Inc>, USA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Pipelines 2020
Pages: 83 - 94
Editors: J. Felipe Pulido, OBG, Part of Ramboll and Mark Poppe, Brown and Caldwell
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8321-3
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Aug 6, 2020
Published in print: Aug 6, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.