Chapter
Nov 9, 2020
Construction Research Congress 2020

Risk Allocation in PPP Unsolicited and Solicited Proposals in Latin America: Pilot Study in Colombia

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2020: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts

ABSTRACT

Risk management between public and private sectors is crucial for the success of public-private partnership (PPP) projects. Thus, effectively allocating project risks is a key task in the development of public-private initiatives because it is a determinant characteristic for PPP success or failure. However, despite being an important topic for scholars and practitioners, today, the academic literature does not provide ample evidence of how risks are managed in solicited and unsolicited road PPP projects. Building on a systematic content analysis framework, this case study examines the allocation of risks in three unsolicited and three solicited highway PPP contracts over the last decade in Colombia. The framework was developed through line-by-line coding of contract provisions associated with risk-related issues. Results show that some risks were shared and addressed by the public sector, but the majority were transferred to the private sector. Conclusions indicate that there are two opportunistic behaviors identified, the private party who makes the unsolicited proposal seeks to transfer some endogenous risks to the public, and public agencies seek to transfer exogenous risks to the private in USPs; these changes are observed in unsolicited proposals rather than solicited proposals. Overall, this study intends to extend risk allocation studies by analyzing PPP contracts within this Latin American country.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

AKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Universidad de los Andes under Fondo de Apoyo para Profesores FAPA.

REFERENCES

AECOM Consult Team. (2007). User Guidebook on Implementing Public-Private Partnerships for Transportation Infrastructure Projects in the United States.
Aliza, A. H., Stephen, K., and Bambang, T. (2011). “The importance of project governance framework in project procurement planning.” Procedia Engineering, 14, 1929–1937.
Andi. (2006). “The importance and allocation of risks in Indonesian construction projects.” Construction Management and Economics, 24(1), 69–80.
Barnes, M. (1983). “How to allocate risks in construction contracts.” International Journal of Project Management, 1(1), 24–28.
Bing, L., Akintoye, A., Edwards, P. J., and Hardcastle, C. (2005). “The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK.” International Journal of Project Management, 23(1), 25–35.
Bryde, D. J., and Volm, J. M. (2009). “Perceptions of owners in German construction projects: Congruence with project risk theory.” Construction Management and Economics, 27(11), 1059–1071.
Cabello, R. (2012). Esquema contractual para APPs en carreteras Agencia Nacional de Infraestructura.
Carpintero, S., Vassallo, J. M., and Sánchez, A. (2014). “Dealing with Traffic Risk in Latin American Toll Roads.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 1–11.
Chan, A. P. C., Yeung, J. F. Y., Yu, C. C. P., Wang, S. Q., and Ke, Y. (2010). “Empirical Study of Risk Assessment and Allocation of Public-Private Partnership Projects in China.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 27(3), 136–148.
Chang, C.-Y. (2015). “A Principal-Agent Model of Risk Allocation in Construction Contracts and Its Critique.” Academy of Management Proceedings, 2013(1), 12523–12523.
Collyer, S., and Warren, C. M. J. (2009). “Project management approaches for dynamic environments.” International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier Ltd and IPMA, 27(4), 355–364.
Cuadros, A., and Zambrano, S. (2012). “Metodología para la cuantificación de pérdidas económicas en corredores viales por deslizamientos y avalanchas.”
Guevara, J., Garvin, M. J., and Ghaffarzadegan, N. (2019). “The Forest and the Trees : a Systems Map of Governance Interdependencies in the Shaping Phase of Road Public-Private Partnerships.” Journal of Management in Engineering.
Guo, F., Chang-Richards, Y., Wilkinson, S., and Li, T. C. (2014). “Effects of project governance structures on the management of risks in major infrastructure projects: A comparative analysis.” International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier Ltd, 32(5), 815–826.
Guo, H. L., Li, H., and Li, V. (2013). “VP-based safety management in large-scale construction projects: A conceptual framework.” Automation in Construction, Elsevier B.V., 34, 16–24.
Harty, C. (2006). “Innovation in construction : a sociology of technology approach.” (October 2014), 37–41.
Harty, C. (2008). “Implementing innovation in construction: Contexts, relative boundedness and actor-network theory.” Construction Management and Economics, 26(10), 1029–1041.
Ke, Y., Wang, S., and Chan, A. P. C. (2010). “Risk Allocation in Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects: Comparative Study.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 16(4), 343–351.
Kean, J. R. (2011). “Improving project predictability with the application of critical project governance structures.” AACE International Transactions, 2, 1023–1035.
Kwak, Y. H., Chih, Y., and Ibbs, C. W. (2009). “Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of Public Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development.” California Management Review, 51(2), 51–78.
Lam, K. C., Wang, D., Lee, P. T. K., and Tsang, Y. T. (2007). “Modelling risk allocation decision in construction contracts.” International Journal of Project Management, 25(5), 485–493.
Loosemore, M., and McCarthy, C. S. (2008). “Perceptions of Contractual Risk Allocation in Construction Supply Chains.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 134(1), 95–105.
Loosemore, M., Raftery, J., Reilly, C., and Higgon, D. (2006). Risk Management in Projects. International Contracting.
Marques, R. C. (2018). “Empirical Evidence of Unsolicited Proposals in PPP Arrangements: A Comparison of Brazil, Korea and the USA.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, Routledge, 20(5), 435–450.
Martin, J. C., and Point, P. (2012). “Road project opportunity costs subject to a regional constraint on greenhouse gas emissions.” Journal of Environmental Management, Elsevier Ltd, 112, 292–303.
Meng, X. (2012). “The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction.” International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier Ltd, 30(2), 188–198.
Murphy, M., Heaney, G., and Perera, S. (2011). “A methodology for evaluating construction innovation constraints through project stakeholder competencies and FMEA.” Construction Innovation, 11(4), 416–440.
Nasirzadeh, F., Khanzadi, M., and Rezaie, M. (2014). “Dynamic modeling of the quantitative risk allocation in construction projects.” International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA, 32(3), 442–451.
Nguyen, D. A., Garvin, M. J., and Gonzalez, E. E. (2018). “Risk Allocation in U.S. Public-Private Partnership Highway Project Contracts.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(5), 4018017.
Osei-Kyei, R., Chan, A. P. C., Dansoh, A., Ofori-Kuragu, J. K., and Oppong, G. D. (2018). “Strategies for Effective Management of Unsolicited Public–Private Partnership Proposals.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(3), 4018006.
Osipova, E., and Eriksson, P. E. (2011). “How procurement options influence risk management in construction projects.” Construction Management and Economics, 29(11), 1149–1158.
Sha, K. (2011). “Vertical governance of construction projects: An information cost perspective.” Construction Management and Economics, 29(11), 1137–1147.
Shiferaw, A. T., Klakegg, O. J., and Haavaldsen, T. (2012). “Governance of public investment projects in Ethiopia.” Project Management Journal, 7(3), 47–67.
Tombesi, P. (2006). “Good thinking and poor value: On the socialization of knowledge in construction.” Building Research and Information, 34(3), 272–286.
Toor, S. u R., and Ogunlana, S. O. (2010). “Beyond the ‘iron triangle’: Stakeholder perception of key performance indicators (KPIs) for large-scale public sector development projects.” International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier Ltd and IPMA, 28(3), 228–236.
Tsamboulas, D., Verma, A., and Moraiti, P. (2013). “Transport infrastructure provision and operations: Why should governments choose private-public partnership?” Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier Ltd, 38(1), 122–127.
Turner, J. R., and Müller, R. (2004). “Communication and co-operation on projects between the project owner as principal and the project manager as agent.” European Management Journal, 22(3), 327–336.
Vazquez, E., Rola, S., Martins, D., Alves, L., Freitas, M., and Rosa, L. P. (2013). “Sustainability in civil construction: Application of an environmental certification process (leed) during the construction phase of a hospital enterprise-rio de janeiro/Brazil.” International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 8(1), 1–19.
World Bank. (2017a). “Guidelines for the Development of a Policy for Managing Unsolicited Proposals in Infrastructure Projects.” (March).
World Bank. (2017b). “Review of Experiences with Unsolicited Proposals in Infrastructure Projects.” (March).
Yescombe, E. R., and Farquharson, E. (2018). Public-Private Partnerships for infrastructure: Principles of policy and finance. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Yun, S., Jung, W., Heon Han, S., and Park, H. (2015). “Critical Organizational Success Factors for Public Private Partnership Projects – a Comparison of Solicited and Unsolicited Proposals.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(2), 131–143.
Zhang, S., Zhang, S., Gao, Y., and Ding, X. (2016). “Contractual Governance: Effects of Risk Allocation on Contractors’ Cooperative Behavior in Construction Projects.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(6), 4016005.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2020
Construction Research Congress 2020: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts
Pages: 1321 - 1329
Editors: David Grau, Ph.D., Arizona State University, Pingbo Tang, Ph.D., Arizona State University, and Mounir El Asmar, Ph.D., Arizona State University
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8288-9

History

Published online: Nov 9, 2020
Published in print: Nov 9, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gabriel Castelblanco [email protected]
Doctoral Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia. E-mail: [email protected]
Jose Guevara [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$294.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$294.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share