Chapter
Nov 9, 2020
Construction Research Congress 2020

Owner and Contractor Choices and Dilemmas: Contemporary Project Delivery Options

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2020: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts

ABSTRACT

Governmental agencies have increasing options for project delivery and contractual arrangements when procuring and constructing public infrastructure projects. Contractors face the dilemma of selecting the right projects in which to invest their limited pre-construction financial and staff resources. This research investigates the project delivery and procurement methods selected for three large public bridges: Third Crossing Bridge in Kingston, Ontario, the Highway 53 relocation bridge located near Virginia, Minnesota, and the Warman and Martensville interchanges bridges in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Data collected through structured interviews with key stakeholders from the respective public agencies and Kiewit Corporation, the common contractor for the projects, compares tri-party/integrated form of agreement (IPD), construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC), and design-build (DB) project award processes and decision-making from the perspectives of the governmental agency and the general contractor. The research results in a comparative diagram summarizing the key advantages and challenges of these project delivery options for use by owners and contractors in their procurement and decision-making processes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

AIA California Council. (2007). “Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide.” http://info.aia.org/siteobjects/files/ipd_guide_2007.pdf.
Antoine, A. L. C., Alleman, D., and Molenaar, K. R. (2018). “Examination of Project Duration, Project Intensity, and Timing of Cost Certainty in Highway Project Delivery Methods.” https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000661.
Becker, Timothy C., Shane, Jennifer S., and Jalselskis, Edward J. (2011). “Comparative Analysis of Lean Construction with Design-Build Using a Framework of Contractual Forms of Agreement.” https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000064
Bingham, E., Gibson, J. G. E., and Asmar, M. E. (2018). “Measuring User Perceptions of Popular Transportation Project Delivery Methods Using Least Significant Difference Intervals and Multiple Range Tests.” https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001469.
Bypaneni, S. P. K., and Tran, D. Q. (2018). “Empirical Identification and Evaluation of Risk in highway Project Delivery Methods.” https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000602.
Choi, J., Yun, S., Leite, F., and Mulva, S. P. (2018). “Team Integration and Owner Satisfaction: Comparing Integrated Project Delivery with Construction Management at Risk in Health Care Projects.” https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000654.
Dang, H., and Shane, J. (2018). “Construction Manager General Contractor (CMGC) Characteristics and Effective Practices in Transportation Sector.” https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481271.072.
Dossick, C. S., Azari, R., Kim, Y., and El-Anwar, O. (2013). “IPD in Practice: Innovation in Healthcare Design and Construction.” https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412909.036.
Farnsworth, C. B., Warr, R. O., Weidman, J. E., and Hutchings, D. M. (2015). “Effects of CM/GC Project Delivery on Managing Process Risk in Transportation Construction.” https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001091.
Franz, B., and Leicht, R. M. (2012). “Initiating IPD Concepts on Campus Facilities with a “Collaboration Addendum””. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412329.007.
Fruchter, R., and Ivanov, P. V. (2012). “Agile IPD Productions Plans as an Engine of Process Change.” https://doi.org/10.1061/41182(416)96.
Garcia, A. J., Mantana, B., Mollaoglu, S., and Miller, V. (2016). “Key Information Sharing Behaviors for Improved Performance in IPD Project Teams.” https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479827.190.
Gomez, S., Naderpajouh, N., Ballard, G., Hastak, M., Weidner, T. J., and Barriga, P. (2018). “Implications of the Integrated Project Delivery Research in Practice.” https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481301.009.
Gordon, C. M. (1994). “Choosing Appropriate Construction Contracting Method.” https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:1(196).
Gransberg, D. D., and Shane, J. S. (2015). “Defining Best Value for Construction Manager/General Contractor Projects: The CMGC Learning Curve.” https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000275.
Guan, J. (2018). “Exploration on the Methods of Forming an IPD Project Team and the Responsibility of Team Members.” https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481752.032.
Kent, D. C., and Becerik-Gerber, B. (2010). “Understanding Construction Industry Experience and Attitudes towed Integrated Project Delivery.” https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000188
Montalbán-Domingo, L., García-Segura, T., Sanz, M. A., and Pelicer, E. (2018). “Social Sustainability in Delivery and Procurement of Public Construction Contracts.” https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000674.
Mossman, A., Ballard, G., and Pasquire, C. (2010). “Lean Project Delivery- Innovation in Integrated Design and Delivery.”.
Mulholland, S., and Clevenger, C. (2018). “Contracting Methods for Integrated Project Delivery: A Healthcare Case Study.” https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481295.020.
Shrestha, P. P., O’Connor, J. T., and Gibson, J. G. E. (2011). “Performance Comparison of Large Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build Highway Projects.”.
Touran, A., Gransberg, D. D., Molenaar, K. R., and Ghavamifar, K. (2011). “Selection of Project Delivery Method in Transit: Drivers and Objectives.” https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000027.
Tran, D. Q., and Molenaar, K. R. (2015). “Risk-Based Project Delivery Selection model for Highway Design and Construction.” https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001024.
West, N., Gransberg, D. D., and McMinimee, J. (2012). “Effective Tools for Projects Delivered by Construction Manager-General Contractor Method.” https://doi.org/10.3141/2268-05.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2020
Construction Research Congress 2020: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts
Pages: 1256 - 1265
Editors: David Grau, Ph.D., Arizona State University, Pingbo Tang, Ph.D., Arizona State University, and Mounir El Asmar, Ph.D., Arizona State University
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8288-9

History

Published online: Nov 9, 2020
Published in print: Nov 9, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jennifer S. Shane [email protected]
Construction Engineering, Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA. E-mail: [email protected]
Timothy Becker [email protected]
Kiewit Corporation, Omaha, NE. E-mail: [email protected]
Clay Roberts [email protected]
Construction Engineering, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State Univ. E-mail: [email protected]
Mike Kiggins [email protected]
Kiewit Corporation, Denver, CO. E-mail: [email protected]
Mark van Buren [email protected]
City of Kingston, Kingston, ON, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$294.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$294.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share