Construction Research Congress 2020
Performance of Small Business Construction Firms in U.S. Federal Contracting
Publication: Construction Research Congress 2020: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts
ABSTRACT
Public agencies routinely design and promote procurement opportunities for small business interests, often by setting goals for a variety of certified small business categories to participate in procurement. The U.S. Federal Government alone awards over $100 billion annually in contracting opportunities to small businesses, often through structured programs. While such opportunities often promote the socioeconomic value of small business, they can also limit competition from larger and arguably more efficient firms and thus, have the potential to raise costs for the public owner. However, there have been few studies that have examined these claims or explore what differences, if any, are found in project performance of small business firms. This study examined the relationship between the use of small businesses and project performance in the context of federal construction contracting, examining both design-bid-build and design-build delivery. A statistical examination of 222 projects reveals nearly identical project performance between projects awarded to Small Business Administration (SBA) certified firms and comparable projects awarded to larger firms. The study’s findings contradict the narrative that small business contracting costs more. The results lay the groundwork for further research on small business contracting that can inform important public policy and procurement decisions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
BBC Research and Consulting. (2018). 2018 Disparity Study, City and County of Denver. Denver, CO.
Belassi, W., and Tukel, O. I. (1996). “A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects.” International journal of project management, 14(3), 141–151.
Carr, P. G. (2005). “Investigation of bid price competition measured through prebid project estimates, actual bid prices, and number of bidders.” ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(11), 1165–1172.
Chan, A. P. C., and Chan, A. P. L. (2004). “Key performance indicators for measuring construction success.” Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11(2), 203–221.
De Silva, D. G., Dunne, T., Kosmopoulou, G., and Lamarche, C. (2012). “Disadvantaged business enterprise goals in government procurement contracting: An analysis of bidding behavior and costs.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 30(4), 377–388.
Denes, T. A. (1997). “Do small business set-asides increase the cost of government contracting?” Public Administration Review, 57(5), 441–444.
GSA. (2015). “Federal Acquisition Regulation.” U.S. General Services Administration, <http://www.acquisition.gov/far/html/Subpart%2016_5.html> (Jan. 6, 2015).
Konchar, M., and Sanvido, V. (1998). “Comparison of U.S. Project Delivery Systems.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(6), 435–444.
Marion, J. (2007). “Are bid preferences benign? The effect of small business subsidies in highway procurement auctions.” Journal of Public Economics, 91(7–8), 1591–1624.
Molenaar, K. R., and Gransberg, D. D. (2001). “Design-Builder Selection for Small Highway Projects.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 17(4), 214–223.
Nakabayashi, J. (2013). “Small business set-asides in procurement auctions: An empirical analysis.” Journal of Public Economics, 100, 28–44.
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense. (2017). “Defense Budget Overview.” Defense Budget Overview FY 2018 Budget Request, <https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2018/fy2018_Budget_Request_Overview_Book.pdf> (Jul. 26, 2019).
Pocock, J., Hyun, C., Liu, L., and Kim, M. (1996). “Relationship between Project Interaction and Performance Indicators.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122(2), 165–176.
Rosner, J., Thal, A., and West, C. (2009). “Analysis of the Design-Build Delivery Method in Air Force Construction Projects.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(8), 710–717.
SBA. (2017). “Table of size standards.” U.S. Small Business Administration, <https://www.sba.gov/document/support--table-size-standards> (Jul. 26, 2019).
SBA. (2018). “The Federal Government Achieves Small Business Contracting Goal for the Fifth Consecutive Year.” U.S. Small Business Administration, <https://www.sba.gov/about-sba/sba-newsroom/press-releases-media-advisories/federal-government-achieves-small-business-contracting-goal-fifth-consecutive-year-record-breaking> (Jul. 26, 2019).
SBA. (2019). “Types of contracts.” U.S. Small Business Administration, <https://www.sba.gov/federal-contracting/contracting-guide/types-contracts> (Jul. 26, 2019).
Shrestha, P. P., Sharma, R., Karakouzian, M., and Ashok, S. (2016). “Comparing Performance and Impediments of Construction and Professional Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Transportation.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 142(2), 04015012.
Songer, A., and Molenaar, K. (1997). “Project Characteristics for Successful Public-Sector Design-Build.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(1), 34–40.
Toor, S.-R., and Ogunlana, S. O. (2010). “Beyond the ‘iron triangle’: Stakeholder perception of key performance indicators (KPIs) for large-scale public sector development projects.” International Journal of Project Management, 28(3), 228–236.
Trombitas, P. (2018). “The Growing World of Design-Build.” FMI Corporation, <https://www.fminet.com/the-growing-world-of-design-build/> (Aug. 1, 2019).
US DOT. (2017). “Definition of a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise.” US Department of Transportation, Text, <https://www.transportation.gov/civil-rights/disadvantaged-business-enterprise/definition-disadvantaged-business-enterprise> (Jul. 26, 2019).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Construction Research Congress 2020: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts
Pages: 1247 - 1255
Editors: David Grau, Ph.D., Arizona State University, Pingbo Tang, Ph.D., Arizona State University, and Mounir El Asmar, Ph.D., Arizona State University
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8288-9
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Nov 9, 2020
Published in print: Nov 9, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.