Chapter
Nov 9, 2020
Construction Research Congress 2020

Design-Build Project Performance: Comparison between Commercial Building and Health Care Building Projects

Publication: Construction Research Congress 2020: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts

ABSTRACT

One of the most widely used alternative delivery methods in the United States is design-build (DB). Not only state and counties are using DB method to construct highways, bridges, and water and wastewater projects, but the private sectors are also using this method to design and build commercial buildings and health care facilities. There have been studies done to compare the performance of DB highway projects with water/wastewater and building projects. However, the performance of DB building projects, based on subcategory as commercial, apartment, residential, school, campus, or health care facilities, were not investigated. Moreover, in comparing apartment or residential building and other infrastructure projects, it should be noted that the owners of these two types of projects are different; one private and another public. While comparing the performance of DB commercial buildings and DB health care facilities, the effect of owner will be neutralized as both are private investors with the main objective of return on investment. Therefore, this study collected 28 DB commercial buildings and 25 DB clinics and hospital buildings (health care facilities) cost and schedule data to determine whether these two types of projects funded by the private investors had significantly different cost- and schedule-related performance metrics, including cost growth, schedule growth, and construction intensity. In addition, the study also investigated whether these two types of projects were using similar types of contracts and procurement methods. The results showed that the cost and schedule performance of DB health care facilities and commercial buildings was not significantly different. It was also found that the dominant contract types and procurement methods used in these two types of DB projects were lump sum and best value, respectively.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Allen, L. N. (2001). “Comparison of design-build to design-bid-build as a project delivery method.” M.S. thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.
Bennett, J., Pothecary, E., and Robinson, G. (1996). The industry today: Designing and building a world-class industry, Centre for Strategic Studies in Construction, Reading, UK.
Bingham, E. (2014). “Analysis of the state of practice and best practices for alternative project delivery methods in the transportation design and construction industry.” PhD Dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe Arizona.
Bogus, S. M., Shane, J. S., and Molenaar, K. R. (2010). “Contract payment provisions and project performance: An analysis of municipal water and wastewater facilities.” Public Works Management and Policy, 15(1), 20-31.
Chen, Q, Jin, Z., Xia, B., Wu, P. and Skitmore, M. (2015). “Time and cost performance of design-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 142(2), 04015074; 1-7.
Contract Administration (2002). Technology and practice in Europe, international technology exchange programs, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Crewson, P. (2006). Applied statistics handbook. AcaStat Software, 1, 103-123.
Culp, G. (2011). “Alternative project delivery methods for water and wastewater projects: do they save time and money.” Leadership Manage. Eng., 11(3), 231-240.
DBIA (Design Build Institute of America). (2015). “2015 design build state statute report.”
Duggan, T., and Patel, D. (2014). “Design-build project delivery market share and market size report.” RCD/RSMeans Market Intelligence Confidential Rep. for DBIA, Reed Construction Data, Norwell, MA.
El Wardani, M. A., Messner, J. I., & Horman, M. J. (2006). Comparing procurement methods for design-build projects. Journal of constr. Eng. and manage., 132(3), 230-238.
Fathi, M., & Shrestha, P. P. (2018). Performance comparison of design-build projects for highways and buildings. In Construction Research Congress 2018 (pp. 139-149).
Shrestha, P. P., & Fathi, M. (2019a). Impacts of Change Orders on Cost and Schedule Performance and the Correlation with Project Size of DB Building Projects. J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr., 11(3), 04519010.
Fathi, M., Shrestha, P.P., and Binita Shakya (2019b). “Change Orders and Schedule Performance of DB Infrastructure Projects: A Comparison between Highway and Water Wastewater Projects” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. (Accepted July 2019)
Federal Highway Administration (2006). Design-build effectiveness study, Washington, DC.
Gad, G. M., B. Davis, P.P. Shrestha, and P. Harder. 2019a. “Lessons Learned from Progressive Design-Build Implementation projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (4): 04519020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000320
Gad, G. M., B. Davis, P.P. Shrestha, and M. Fathi. 2019b. “Legal and Contractual Issues in Lump Sum Design-Build Implementation on Large-Scale Airport Projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. (Accepted July 2019)
Gransberg, D. D., and Shane, J. S. (2010). “Construction manager-at-risk project delivery for highway programs—a synthesis of highway practice.” NCHRP Synthesis 402, National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), Washington, DC.
Hale, D. R., Shrestha, P. P., Gibson Jr, G. E., and Migliaccio, G. C. (2009). “Empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(7), 579-587.
Hill, T., and Lewicki, P. 2006. Statistics—Methods and applications, Stat Soft, Inc., Tulsa, Okla.
Hwang, B. G., Zhao, X., and Gay, M. J. S. (2013). “Public private partner- ship projects in Singapore: Factors, critical risks and preferred risk allocation from the perspective of contractors.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 31(3), 424–433.
Hyun, C., Cho, K., Koo, K., Hong, T., & Moon, H. (2008). Effect of delivery methods on design performance in multifamily housing projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(7), 468-482.
Ibbs, C. W., Kwak, Y. H., Ng, T., and Odabasi, A. M. (2003). “Project delivery systems and project change: Quantitative analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(4), 382-387.
Konchar, M., and Sanvido, V. 1998. “Comparison of U.S. project delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124 6, 435–444.
Ling, Y. Y., Chan, S. L., Chong, E., and Ee, L. P. (2004). “Predicting performance design-build and design-bid-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(1), 75–83.
Ma, Z., Zhang, D., & Li, J. (2018). A dedicated collaboration platform for integrated project delivery. Automation in Construction, 86, 199-209.
Mahamid, I., A. Bruland, and N. Dmaidi. 2012. “Causes of delay in road 702 construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 28 (3): 300–310.
Minchin Jr, R. E., Li, X., Issa, R. R., and Vargas, G. G. (2013). “Comparison of cost and time performance of design-build and design-bid-build delivery systems in Florida.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 139(10), 04013007.
Moon, H., Cho, K., Hong, T., and Hyun, C. (2011). “Selection model for delivery methods for multifamily-housing construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 27(2), 106-115.
NAIOP Research Foundation, (2019), “Economic Impacts of Commercial Real Estate”.
Park, H. S., Lee, D., Kim, S., and Kim, J. L. (2015) “Comparing project performance of design-build and design-bid-build methods for large-sized public apartment housing projects in Korea.” J. Asian Arch. Build. Eng., 14(2), 323-330.
Rosner, J. W., Thal Jr, A. E., and West, C. J. (2009). “Analysis of the design-build delivery method in air force construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(8), 710-717.
RS Means (2019). “Building Cost Index” 〈https://www.rsmeans.com/products/online.aspx.
Sanvido, V. E., and Konchar, M. D. (1997). “Project delivery systems: CM at risk, design-build, design-bid-build.” Tech. Rep. No. 133, Construction Industry Institute (CII), Austin, TX.
Sawilowsky, SS. Nonparametric tests of interaction in experimental design. Rev Educ Res 1990; 60: (1)91–126.
Shane, J. S., Bogus, S. M., and Molenaar, K. R. “Municipal water/wastewater project delivery performance comparison.” J. Manage. Eng., 29(3), 251-258.
Shrestha, P. P., Migliaccio, G. C., O’Connor, J. T., and Gibson, E. G., Jr. (2007). “Benchmarking of large design-build highway projects: One to one comparison and comparison with design-bid-build projects.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1994(1), 17–25.
Shrestha, P. P., O’Connor, J. T., & Gibson, G. E. (2012).“Performance comparison of large design-build and design-bid-build highway projects” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 138(1), 1-13.
Shrestha, P. P., Maharjan, R., Shakya, B., and Batista, J. (2014). “Alternative project delivery methods for water and wastewater projects: the satisfaction level of owners.” In Construction Research Congress 2014: Construction in a Global Network (pp. 1733-1742).
Shrestha, P. P., and Fernane, J. D. (2017). “Performance of Design-Build and Design- Bid-Build Projects for Public Universities.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 143(3), 04016101.
Shrestha, P. P., & Zeleke, H. (2018). Effect of change orders on cost and schedule overruns of school building renovation projects. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10(4), 04518018.
Songer, A. D., and Molenaar, K. R. 1996. “Selective design-build: Public and private sector owner’s attitudes.” J. Manage. Eng., 12 6, 47–53.
Thomas, S. R., Macken, C. L., Chung, T. H., & Kim, I. (2002). Measuring the impacts of the delivery system on project performance—Design-build and design-bid-build. NIST GCR, Austin, TX, 2, 840.
Tran, D., Cameron Lampe, J., Bypaneni, S., and Molenaar, K. (2016). “An empirical comparison of cost growth between highway design-bid-build and design-build projects by project size.” Construction Research Congress 2016, ASCE, Reston, VA, 2029–2038.
Tymvios, N., McCullouch, B. G., and Sinha, K. C. (2002). “An Initial Evaluation of Design-Build Highway Projects Performed by the Indiana Department of Transportation”.
Water Design Build Council (2012). “2012 Municipal owners’ customer satisfaction survey of water design-build projects” Edgewater, MD.
Warne, T. R. (2005). “Design build contracting for highway projects: A performance assessment.” Tom Warne and Associates, LLC.
Weinstein, E. (2019). “Wolfram math world, the web’s most extensive mathematics resource.” http://mathworld.wolfram.com/outlier.html (July 28, 2019).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Construction Research Congress 2020
Construction Research Congress 2020: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts
Pages: 1091 - 1100
Editors: David Grau, Ph.D., Arizona State University, Pingbo Tang, Ph.D., Arizona State University, and Mounir El Asmar, Ph.D., Arizona State University
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8288-9

History

Published online: Nov 9, 2020
Published in print: Nov 9, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Medya Fathi [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction Dept., Howard R. Hughes College of Engineering, Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV. E-mail: [email protected]
Pramen P. Shrestha [email protected]
Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction Dept., Howard R. Hughes College of Engineering, Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$294.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$294.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share