Chapter
Aug 14, 2017
International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management 2016

Study on the Complexity Evaluation of a Construction Project

Publication: ICCREM 2016: BIM Application and Off-Site Construction

ABSTRACT

With rapid emerging of large-scale and complex projects, the complexity of the project has been increasing accordingly, which encourages us to focus on the measurement of the complexity of the project. Aiming to measure the complexity of the project systematically, complexity evaluation system and index system are constructed, which are verified with an empirical comparative case. Firstly, based on literatures on project complexity, some academic views are concluded: sources of the project complexity are stemmed from diversity, interdependence, dynamics, and uncertainty and the constituent of the project complexity is epitomized as organization, technical, environment, information as well as goal, respectively. Those academic views lay solid foundation for the construction of the evaluation framework and index system. Then, a comparative empirical case of Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge (HZMB), Qinghai-Tibetan Railway, and The Beijing Capital International Airport T3 is carried out with the method of expert investigation, where subjective and objective methods are employed to assign weights of each index. It is found that in respect of the overall complexity, T3 is the lowest among them, denoting a very high complexity level. HZMB and Qinghai-Tibetan Railway, However, they have almost equivalent level but they are in high level of complexity. From the perspective of constituent of project complexity, environmental complexity is regarded as the most significant factors, followed by information, technology, and organization complexity between Qinghai-Tibetan Railway and the HZMB. For T3 terminal, the organization complexity is the most significant factor, and others are ranked as information, technology, the goal complexity, and the environment complexity. Finally, the validity and reliability of the measurement method are verified by conclusion produced from an empirical case.

Get full access to this chapter

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Project No.106112012CDJSK0009 is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

REFERENCES

Bennett, J.P.A. (1991). International construction project management: General theory and practice, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford.
Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Jongkind, Y., Mooi, H., Bakker, H. and Verbraeck, A. (2011). “Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: the toe (technical, organizational and environmental) framework.” International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 728–739.
Brockmann, C. and Girmscheid, G. (2007). “Complexity of megaprojects.” proceedings from the CIB World Building Congress, Cape Town, South Africa, 219–230.
Chen, X.J., Yang, N.D. and Liu, X.G. (2014). “Weight determination of complexity indexes for R&D projects based on FANP.” Computer Engineering & Applications, 50(13), 42–46.
David, B. (1996). “The concept of project complexity: A review.” International Journal of Project Management, 14(4), 201–204.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). “Five misunderstandings about case-study research.” Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
He, Q., Luo, L., Hu, Y. and Chan, A.P.C. (2014). “Measuring the complexity of mega construction projects in china: A fuzzy analytic network process analysis.” International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 549–563.
Li, H., Yang, N.D.B. and Guo, X.B. (2009). “Research on the structure of the complexity of complex project system.” Soft Science, 23(2), 75–79. (in Chinese).
Li, S.F., Yang, N.D. and Liu, X.G. (2013). “Complexity fuzzy evaluation of NPD projects based on entropy and evidence theory.” Journal of Industrial Engineering & Engineering Management, 27(1), 121–134. (in Chinese).
Maylor, H., Vidgen, R. and Carver, S. (2008). “Managerial complexity in project-based operations: a grounded model and its implications for practice.” Project Management Journal, 39(1), 15–26.
Miller, R., Lessard, D., Michaud, P. and Floricel, S. (2001). The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects: Shaping Institutions, Risks, and Governance, The MIT Press, Boston.
Nguyen, A.T., Long, D.N., Long, L.H. and Chau, N.D. (2015). “Quantifying the complexity of transportation projects using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.” International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1364–1376.
Vidal, L.A., Marle, F. and Bocquet, J.C. (2011). “Measuring project complexity using the analytic hierarchy process.” International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 718–727.
Wang, M. (1999). “A comprehensive analysis method on determining the coefficients in multiindex evaluation.” Systems Engineering, 17(2), 56–61. (in Chinese).
Williams, T. (2005). “Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(4), 497–508.
Williams, T.M. (1999). “The Need for New Paradigms for Complex Projects. Managing and Modelling Complex Projects.” International Journal of Project Management, 17(5), 269–273.
Xia, W. and Lee, G. (2004). “Grasping the complexity of is development projects.” Communications of the Acm, 47(5), 68–74.
Zhang, X. and Wang, X.Q. (2011). “Construction system complexity measurement model based on structural equation model.” Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei, 34(3), 116–120. (in Chinese).
Zhang, Y.L. and Yang, N.D. (2013). “NPD project complexity evaluation based on 2-order additive fuzzy measures method.” Operations Research & Management Science, 22(5), 196–202.
Zhao, H.D., Guan, S.X. and Bao, Y.E. (2012). “Combination Determining Weights Method for Interval Multi-attribute Decision-making.” Statistics and Decision, 19(19), 98–101. (in Chinese).
Zhu, Y., Meng, Z.Y. and Kan, S.Y. (1999). “Determination of weight value by AHP.” Journal of Northern Jiaotong University, 23(5), 26. (in Chinese)

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ICCREM 2016
ICCREM 2016: BIM Application and Off-Site Construction
Pages: 490 - 501
Editors: Yaowu Wang, Ph.D., Professor, Harbin Institute of Technology, Mohamed Al-Hussein, Ph.D., Professor, University of Alberta, Geoffrey Q. P. Shen, Ph.D., Professor, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, and Yimin Zhu, Ph.D., Professor, Louisiana State University
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8027-4

History

Published online: Aug 14, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Faculty of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing, 400045. E-mail: [email protected]
Postgraduate, Faculty of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing, 400045. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$364.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$364.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share