Case Studies
Mar 16, 2017

Social Segregation to Exclusive Public Shoreline Access: Coastal Gated Communities on the Middle Shoreline of the Caspian Sea in Northern Iran

This article has been corrected.
VIEW CORRECTION
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 143, Issue 3

Abstract

Coastal areas are highly populated because people place considerable value on the coast for many reasons, namely aesthetic, naturalistic, and utilitarian. The physical manifestation of modernity in communities stimulates the privatization of these areas, contributing to social isolation. The term gated community is a term privileged among planners, politicians, developers, and society. It refers to the residential area where entrance is constrained by walls, fences, and gates, which causes the exclusion of public access to services such as the natural landscape of coasts, parks, and sport facilities within. Darya-Kenar and Khezer-Shahr coastal gated communities in the north of Iran were built in the 1960s by the government and are now luxury places for residential and recreational activities. This research aims to define the causes of and consequences for social well-being from gating in a coastal tourist area and explains the challenges of an exclusive public shoreline. The enclosed nature of the gated communities, which restricts public access to the shoreline inside the gates, raises the issue of social segregation in the region. The participatory and collective rationality for decision making in gated communities has increased social cohesion and caused explicit local determination for maintenance of the privatized public shoreline. But for the public sector, with its centralized manner and monopoly power, public goals are difficult to meet due to their inefficient organizational structures and the lack of public knowledge and information considering environmental values. As a result of uncontrolled increased development, limited funding, insufficient percipience of inhabitants about the concept of public access to the shoreline, and the prioritization of organizational interests over public ones, public policy cannot effectively encourage its implementation without sufficient political will, adequate regulatory enforcement, and organizational capacities.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Amin, A., and Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the urban, Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Atkinson, R., and Flint, J. (2004). “Fortress U.K.? Gated communities, the spatial revolt of the elites and time-space trajectories of segregation.” Hous. Stud., 19(6), 875–892.
Azari, N. (2012). The experience of modernity: The narration of commercial spaces of Tehran, Tisa, Tehran, Iran (in Persian).
Berger-Schmmitt, R. (2000). “Social cohesion as an aspect of the quality of societies: Concept and measurement.” Center for Survey Research and Methodology, Mannheim.
Biro, A. (1991). The culture of social science, Keyhan Publications, Tehran, Iran.
Blakely, E. J., and Gail, M. (1997). “Divided we fall: Gated and walled communities in the United States.” Architecture of fear, N. Ellin, ed., Princeton Architectural Press, New York.
Blizzard, A. F., and Mangun, W. R. (2008). “Intergovernmental influences on the implementation of coastal zone management in the United States: Public shoreline access in the southeast.” J. Ocean Coastal Manage., 51(6), 443–449.
Borsdorf, A., and Hidalgo, R. (2008). “New dimensions of social exclusion in Latin America: From gated communities to gated cities, the case of Santiago de Chile.” Land Use Policy, 25(2), 153–160.
Chan, J., To, B., and Chan, E. (2006). “Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research.” Social Indicators Res., 75(2), 273–302.
Cheong, S. M. (2008). “Controlling the coast.” J. Ocean Coastal Manage., 51(5), 391–396.
Csizmady, A. (2011). “Conflicts around gated communities.” 23rd Conf. on European Network for Housing Research (ENHR), Delft Univ. of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
European Commission. (2010). “Eurostat-statistics explained: Coastal region statistics.” ⟨http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Coastal_regions_statistics⟩ (Aug. 15, 2015).
Ferroni, M., Mercedes, M., and Mark, P. (2008). “Development under conditions of inequality and distrust: Social cohesion in Latin America.” International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Gardner, H. (2005). Multiple lenses on the mind, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, U.K.
Genis, S. (2007). “Producing elite localities: The rise of gated communities in Istanbul.” Urban Stud., 44(4), 771–798.
Grant, J., and Mittelsteadt, L. (2004). “Types of gated communities.” Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des., 31(6), 913–930.
Han, J., Hayashi, Y., Cao, X., and Imura, H. (2009). “Evaluating land-use change in rapidly urbanizing China: Case study of Shanghai.” J. Urban Plan. Dev., 166–171.
Hochschild, T., Jr. (2015). “The cul-de-sac effect: Relationship between street design and residential social cohesion.” J. Urban Plan. Dev., .
Iran Center of Statistics. (2011). “The report of census of 2011.” Tehran, Iran.
Islamic Parliament Research Center. (1974). “Defining coastal land’s act.” ⟨http://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/97348⟩ (Aug. 15, 2015) (in Persian).
Islamic Parliament Research Center. (1975). “Defining coastal land’s act.” ⟨http://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/97348⟩ (Aug. 15, 2015) (in Persian).
Jeannotte, M. S. (2003). “Social cohesion: Insights from Canadian research.” Conf. on Strategic Research and Analysis, Dept. of Canadian Heritage, Gatineau, Canada.
Karimi, Z., Abunvari, Z., and Zobeiri, H. (2012). “Analysis of the role of social cohesion in economic development.” J. Plan. Budgeting, 16(4), 183–214 (in Persian).
Kheyroddin, R., and Hedayatifard, M. (2015). “Actors and processes behind exclusiveness of coastal lands: From institutional aspects to spatial outputs: Middle shoreline of Caspian sea of Iran.” Spaces and islands and coastal environments: Accessibility-vulnerability-resilience, Karthala, Paris.
Kheyroddin, R., Taghvai, A., and Imani, J. (2013). “Analysis of metropolitan spatial evolution related to the price of oil in Iran, case study Tabriz City.” J. Sci. Inst. Archit. Urban Plan., 6, 17–36 (in Persian).
Kline, J., and Swallow, S. (2008). “The demand for local access to coastal recreation in southern New England.” Coastal Manage., 26(3), 177–190.
Lang, K. (2008). “Lifestyle neighborhoods: The semi-exclusive world of rental gated communities.” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, VA.
Lemanski, C. H. (2006). “Spaces of exclusivity or connection? Linkages between a gated community and its poorer neighbor in a cape town master plan development.” Urban Stud., 43(2), 397–420.
Levent, T., and Gulumser, A. (2007). “Gated communities in Istanbul: The new walls of the city.” EURODIVhttp://www.feem.it/Feem/Pub/Publications/EURODIVPapers/default.htm⟩ (Feb., 15, 2015).
Matland, R. (1995). “Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation.” J. Publ. Adm. Res. Theor., 5(2), 145–174.
Mazand-Tarh Consulting Engineering Company. (2006). “The project of public access to the shoreline of Caspian Sea in Mazandaran Province.” Ministry of Housing and Urban Development of Iran, Sari, Iran.
Moobela, C. (2003). “Gated communities: Violating the evolutionary pattern of social networks in urban regeneration?” Conf. on Gated Communities: Building social divisions or safer communities?, Univ. of Glasgow, Glasgow, U.K.
Norgaard, A., and Pallesen, T. (2003). “Governing structures and structured governing: Local political control of public services in Denmark.” J. Publ. Adm. Res. Theory, 13(4), 543–561.
O’Connor, P. (1998). Mapping social cohesion, Canadian Policy Research Networks, Ottawa.
Oh, C. H., Dixon, A., Mjelde, J., and Draper, J. (2008). “Valuing visitors’ economic benefits of public beach access points.” J. Ocean Coastal Manage., 51(12), 847–853.
Oh, C. H., Draper, J., and Dixon, A. (2009). “Assessing tourist’s multi-attribute preferences for public beach access.” Coastal Manage., 37(2), 119–135.
Oh, C. H., Draper, J., and Dixon, A. (2010). “Comparing resident and tourist preferences for public beach access and related amenities.” J. Ocean Coastal Manage., 53(5–6), 245–251.
Pogue, P., and Lee, V. (1999). “Providing public access to the shore: The role of coastal zone management programs.” Coastal Manage., 27(2-3), 219–237.
Reimer, B., and Wilkinson, D. (2003). “Understanding social cohesion: Its nature and manifestation in rural Canada.” Presentation to 66th Annual Meeting of the Rural Sociological Society, Concordia Univ., Montréal, QC, Canada.
Rivadulla, M. (2007). “Golden ghettos: Gated communities and class residential segregation in Montevideo.” Uruguay, Environ. Plan., 39(1), 47–63.
Rowland, A., and Flint, J. (2007). “Fortress UK gated communities, the spatial revolt of the elites and time-space trajectories of segregation.” Housing Stud., 19(6), 875–892.
Schnell, I., Abu Baker Diab, A., and Benenson, I. (2015). “A global index for measuring socio-spatial segregation versus integration.” Appl. Geogr. 58, 179–188.
Stepanova, O. (2013). “Knowledge integration in the management of coastal conflicts in urban areas: Two cases from Sweden.” J. Environ. Plan. Manage., 57(11), 1658–1682.
Tedong, P., Grant, W. J., and Abd Aziz, W. (2014). “The social and spatial implications of community action to enclose space: Guarded neighborhoods in Selangor Malaysia.” Cities, 41, 30–37.
Vistad, O., Skar, M., Wold, L., and Mehmetoglu, M. (2013). “Balancing public access and privacy in developed coastal zones: Factors influencing attitude towards potential management options.” J. Outdoor Recreation Tourism, 3(4), 7–18.
Whitelaw, D. M., and Visgilio, G. R. (2005). America’s changing coasts—Private rights and public trust, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA.
Wissink, B. (2013). “Enclave urbanism in Mumbai: An actor-network-theory analysis of urban (dis)connection.” Geoforum, 47, 1–11.
Woolcock, M. (2011). “What distinctive contribution can social cohesion make to development theory, research and policy.” Int. Conf. on Social Cohesion an Development, International and Latin American Public Administration and Political Foundation, Madrid, Spain.
Xu, Y., Chan, E., and Yung, E. (2012). “Neighborhood change in semi urbanized villages: Case study of Shanghai.” J. Urban Plan. Dev., 235–243.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 143Issue 3September 2017

History

Received: Sep 9, 2015
Accepted: Jan 27, 2017
Published online: Mar 16, 2017
Discussion open until: Aug 16, 2017
Published in print: Sep 1, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Reza Kheyroddin [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Urban Planning and Architecture, Iran Univ. of Science and Technology, 16846-13114 Tehran, Iran (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Maede Hedayatifard [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Iran Univ. of Science and Technology, 16846-13114 Tehran, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share