Case Studies
Mar 13, 2017

Planning, Accessibility, and Distribution of New Parks: Case Study of the City of Prague

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 143, Issue 3

Abstract

This article focuses on the procedure for city planning in relation to public parks. Using the example of the City of Prague, the article first describes the methodology for the creation of the new land use plan, namely in terms of the arrangement of parks and important forested areas within the city. The hierarchy of parks, the lack of parks arising from population density, and the accessibility of parks for city residents are examined. The article also describes a newly developed comprehensive method for the assessment of areas of so-called urban jungles that are currently unused and are potentially suitable as new parks. The main objective of both parts is to find, assess, and recommend suitable areas for construction of new parks so that their location corresponds to people’s needs yet complements the composition of the city. The research predominantly showed a local rather than global lack of parks, localized in particular on the right, less rugged, bank of the Vltava in areas of the eastern periphery of the city with a lower population density.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the City of Prague and the Prague Institute of Planning and Development for providing the data they needed and to the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic; this article is part of the project (No. TD03000280) “Modern and effective planning: Density and economy.”

References

All London Green Grid SPG. (2012). “Greater London authority publications.” ⟨http://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/planning/publications/all-london-green-grid-spg⟩ (May 10, 2013).
ArcGIS [Computer software]. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.
Baycan-Levent, T., and Nijkamp, P. (2009). “Planning and management of urban green spaces in Europe: Comparative analysis.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 1–12.
Blokhuis, E., Snijders, C., Han, Q., and Schaefer, W. (2012). “Conflicts and cooperation in brownfield redevelopment projects: Application of conjoint analysis and game theory to model strategic decision making.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 195–205.
Burton, E. (2002). “Measuring urban compactness in U.K. towns and cities.” Environ. Plann. B, 29(2), 219–250.
Crompton, J. (2001). “The impact of parks on property values: A review of the empirical evidence.” J. Leisure Res., 33(1), 1–31.
Czech Act. (1992). “o ochraně přírody a krajiny.”, Sbírka zákonů České republiky, MVCR, Prague, Czech Republic.
Czech Technical Standard. (1999). “Sadovnictví a krajinářství—Terminologie—Základní odborné termíny a definice.”, Úřad pro technickou normalizaci, meterologii a státní zkušebnictví, Praha, Czech Republic.
Endlicher, W., ed. (2011). Perspectives in Urban ecology: Ecosystems and interactions between humans and nature in the metropolis of Berlin, Springer, Berlin.
Fitzgerald, R., ed. (1986). Urban planning guide, ASCE, New York.
Gaigné, C., Riou, S., and Thisse, J. F. (2012). “Are compact cities environmentally friendly?” J. Urban Econ., 72(2–3), 123–136.
Gaston, K. J., ed. (2010). Urban ecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Glaeser, E. (2011). Triumph of the city, Penguin Press, New York.
Glumac, B., Han, Q., and Schaefer, W. (2014). “Actors preferences in the redevelopment of brownfield: Latent class model.” J. Urban Plann. Dev.,.
Goličnik, B., and Thompson, C. W. (2010). “Emerging relationships between design and use of urban park spaces.” Landscape Urban Plann., 94(1), 38–53.
Hudecek, T., Churan, R., and Kufner, R. (2011). “Accessibility of Prague by roadway transport from 1920 to 2020.” Geografie, 116(3), 317–334.
Iacono, M., Krizek, K. J., and El-Geneidy, A. (2010). “Measuring non-motorized accessibility: Issues, alternatives, and execution.” J. Transp. Geog., 18(1), 133–140.
Islam, M., Rahaman, K., and Ahmed, S. (2008). “Demand of participants or supply of opportunities: Measuring accessibility of activity places based on time geographic approach.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 159–165.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities, Random House, New York.
Janák, P. (1929). “Bydlíme hustě nebo řídce?” Styl, 10(15), 33–39.
Jenks, M., Burton, E., and Williams, K., eds. (1996). The compact city: A sustainable urban form, E&FN Spon, London.
Kazmierczak, A. (2013). “The contribution of local parks to neighbourhood social ties.” Landscape Urban Plann., 109(1), 31–44.
Koucký, R. (2006). Elementární urbanismus, Zlatý řez, Prague, Czech Republic.
Koucký, R., et al. (2014). Metropolitan plan of the city of Prague/concept, Institute of Planning and Development, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lange, D., and McNeil, S. (2004). “Brownfield development: Tools for stewardship.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 109–116.
Lange, D., Wang, D., Zhuang, Z., and Fontana, W. (2013). “Brownfield development selection using multi attribute decision making.” J. Urban Plann. Dev.,.
Liu, X., and Zhou, J. (2014). “Spatial pattern of land use and its implications for mode-based accessibility: Case study of Nanjing, China.” J. Urban Plann. Dev.,.
Margaritis, E., and Kang, J. (2016). “Relationship between urban green spaces and other features of urban morphology with traffic noise distribution.” Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 15, 174–185.
Mathey, J., Rössler, S., Banse, J., Lehmann, I., and Bräuer, A. (2015). “Brownfields as an element of green infrastructure for implementing ecosystem services into Urban areas.” J. Urban Plann. Dev.,.
Nicholls, S. (2001). “Measuring the accessibility and equity of public parks: A case study using GIS.” Managing Leisure, 6(4), 201–219.
Nogués, S., and Arroyo, N. (2015). “Alternative approach to prioritization of brownfield reclamation attending to Urban development potentialities: Case study in a depressed industrial district in northern Spain.” J. Urban Plann. Dev.,.
Orr, S., Paskins, J., and Chaytor, S. (2014). Valuing urban green space: Challenges and opportunities, UCL Policy Briefing, London.
Ouředníček, M. (2007). “Differential suburban development in the Prague urban region.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geog., 89(2), 111–126.
Prague Transportation Yearbook. (2015). “Technical administration of roads of the city of Prague.” TSK, Prague, Czech Republic.
Reyes, M., Paéz, A., and Morency, C. (2014). “Walking accessibility to urban parks by children: A case study of Montreal.” Landscape Urban Plann., 125, 38–47.
Richter, M., and Weiland, U., eds. (2011). Applied urban ecology: A global framework, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ.
Scott, D., and Munson, W. (1994). “Perceived constraints to park usage among individuals with low incomes.” J. Park Recreation Administration, 12(4), 79–96.
Speck, J. (2012). Walkable city, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
Whyte, W. H. (2009). City: Rediscovering the center, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
Wu, C., and Murray, A. T. (2005). “A cokriging method for estimating population density in urban areas.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 29(5), 558–579.
Zhou, Y., et al. (2011). “Urban green space planning based on computational fluid dynamics model and landscape ecology principle: A case study of Liaoyang City, northeast China.” Chin. Geog. Sci., 21(4), 465–475.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 143Issue 3September 2017

History

Received: Jan 29, 2016
Accepted: Dec 7, 2016
Published ahead of print: Mar 13, 2017
Published online: Mar 14, 2017
Discussion open until: Aug 14, 2017
Published in print: Sep 1, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tomáš Hudeček, Ph.D. [email protected]
Masaryk Institute of Advanced Studies, Czech Technical Univ. in Prague, Kolejni 2a, 16000 Prague 6, Czech Republic (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Roman Koucký [email protected]
P.E.
Associate Professor, Faculty of Architecture, Czech Technical Univ. in Prague, Thákurova 9, 16634 Prague 6, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected]
Marie Janíčková [email protected]
P.E.
Institute of Planning and Development of Prague, Vyšehradská 57, 12800 Prague 2, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected]
Michal Leňo [email protected]
P.E.
Institute of Planning and Development of Prague, Vyšehradská 57, 12800 Prague 2, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected]
Matěj Soukup [email protected]
P.E.
Institute of Planning and Development of Prague, Vyšehradská 57, 12800 Prague 2, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share